3D morphometrics; Digital morphology; Evolutionary biology; FAIR principles; Open access; Machine Learning; Biological Evolution; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Access to Information; Information Dissemination; Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics; Environmental Science (all)
Abstract :
[en] The recent integration of 3D imaging and digital methodologies has revolutionized evolutionary biology, offering unprecedented opportunities for analysing and sharing morphological data. However, the transition toward open access remains incomplete due to persistent technical, legal, and institutional barriers. Issues such as lack of standardization, massive file sizes, and unclear intellectual property rights continue to hinder data verification and reproducibility. These challenges have acquired new urgency with the rapid rise of machine learning and AI-based tools for automated segmentation, landmarking, and shape analysis, which require large, standardized, and openly accessible training datasets - making inaccessible 3D data not merely an inconvenience, but a source of systematic bias in the algorithms shaping the field's future. This review synthesizes technical, legal, and behavioural perspectives on open data in digital morphology, building on prior work to address the specific challenges of the current AI era. By advocating for the adoption of FAIR principles, the use of persistent digital identifiers, and the implementation of digital watermarking, we offer recommendations for establishing minimum standards in data publication. Ultimately, a shift toward responsible data stewardship is essential to ensuring that digital morphological resources remain accessible, reproducible, and scientifically valuable for both human and computational users.
Disciplines :
Life sciences: Multidisciplinary, general & others Zoology Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Author, co-author :
De Leo, Naomi; Department of Biology and Biotechnologies "Charles Darwin", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. naomi.deleo@uniroma1.it
Michaud, Margot ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de géologie > Evolution and diversity dynamics lab ; IDEALISS ULR 7519, Institut Polytechnique UniLaSalle, Université d'Artois, Mont-Saint-Aignan, France ; Département Formation et Recherche Sciences et Technologie, Université de Guyane, Cayenne, French Guiana
Maiorano, Luigi; Department of Biology and Biotechnologies "Charles Darwin", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
Meloro, Carlo; Research Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK. C.Meloro@ljmu.ac.uk
Chatar, Narimane ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de géologie > Evolution and diversity dynamics lab ; Department of Integrative Biology, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA ; Departamento de Ecología y Geología, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, 29071, Spain
Tamagnini, Davide; Department of Biology and Biotechnologies "Charles Darwin", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
Language :
English
Title :
Open access and digital morphology data in evolutionary biology: expanding frontiers of knowledge.
Lautenschlager S Multibody dynamics analysis as a computational tool to reconstruct the function and palaeobiology of extinct organisms Palaeontology 2020 63 5 703 15 10.1111/pala.12501
Douglas-Jones R Walford A Seaver N Introduction Towards an anthropology of data J Roy Anthropol Inst 2021 27 9 25 10.1111/1467-9655.13477
Sutton M, Rahman I, Garwood R. Techniques for virtual palaeontology. Wiley; 2014.
Ford KL Albert JS Summers AP Hedrick BP Schachner ER Jones AS Evans K Chakrabarty P A New Era of Morphological Investigations: Reviewing Methods for Comparative Anatomical Studies Integr Org Biol 2023 5 1 obad008 1:STN:280:DC%2BB2s%2Fotlylsg%3D%3D 10.1093/iob/obad008 37035037 10081917 PMID: 37035037; PMCID: PMC10081917
Goswami A Clavel J Morphological evolution in a time of phenomics Paleobiology 2025 51 195 213 10.1017/pab.2024.35
Carlson WD Rowe T Ketcham RA Colbert MW Applications of high-resolution X-ray computed tomography in petrology, meteoritics and palaeontology SP 2003 215 7 22 10.1144/GSL.SP.2003.215.01.02
Subburaj K Ravi B Agarwal M Automated identification of anatomical landmarks on 3D bone models reconstructed from CT scan images Comput Med Imaging Graph 2009 33 359 68 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MzkvVKqsA%3D%3D 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2009.03.001 19345065
Lösel PD Van De Kamp T Jayme A Ershov A Faragó T Pichler O et al. Introducing Biomedisa as an open-source online platform for biomedical image segmentation Nat Commun 2020 11 5577 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXit1OqtLzP 10.1038/s41467-020-19303-w 33149150 7642381
Weeks BC Zhou Z O’Brien BK Darling R Dean M Dias T et al. A deep neural network for high-throughput measurement of functional traits on museum skeletal specimens Methods Ecol Evol 2023 14 347 59 10.1111/2041-210X.13864
Didziokas M Pauws E Kölby L Khonsari RH Moazen M BounTI (boundary-preserving threshold iteration): A user‐friendly tool for automatic hard tissue segmentation J Anat 2024 245 829 41 10.1111/joa.14063 38760955 11547236
He Y, Camaiti M, Roberts LE, Mulqueeney JM, Ioannou E, Didziokas M et al. SPROUT: A User-friendly, Scalable Toolkit for Multi-class Segmentation of Volumetric Images. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.22.624847
Lebrun R Orliac MJ MORPHOMUSEUM: AN ONLINE PLATFORM FOR PUBLICATION AND STORAGE OF VIRTUAL SPECIMENS Paleontol Soc Pap 2016 22 183 95 10.1017/scs.2017.14
Boyer DM Gunnell GF Kaufman S McGeary TM Morphosource: archiving and sharing 3D digital specimen Paleontol Soc Pap 2016 22 157 81 10.1017/scs.2017.13
Blackburn DC Boyer DM Gray JA Winchester J Bates JM Baumgart SL et al. Increasing the impact of vertebrate scientific collections through 3D imaging: The openVertebrate (oVert) Thematic Collections Network Bioscience 2024 74 169 86 10.1093/biosci/biad120 38560620 10977868
Cicero C Koo MS Braker E Abbott J Bloom D Campbell M et al. Arctos: Community-driven innovations for managing natural and cultural history collections PLoS ONE 2024 19 e0296478 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB2cXht12nsrvP 10.1371/journal.pone.0296478 38820381 11142579
Clavel J Escarguel G Merceron G mv morph: an r package for fitting multivariate evolutionary models to morphometric data Methods Ecol Evol 2015 6 1311 9 10.1111/2041-210X.12420
Baken EK Collyer ML Kaliontzopoulou A Adams DC geomorph v4.0 and gmShiny: enhanced analytics and a new graphical interface for a comprehensive morphometric experience Methods Ecol Evol 2021 12 2355 63 10.1111/2041-210X.13723
Rolfe S Pieper S Porto A Diamond K Winchester J Shan S et al. SlicerMorph: An open and extensible platform to retrieve, visualize and analyse 3D morphology Methods Ecol Evol 2021 12 1816 25 10.1111/2041-210X.13669 40401087 12094517
Rostamian R Shariat Panahi M Karimpour M Kashani HG Abi A A deep learning-based multi-view approach to automatic 3D landmarking and deformity assessment of lower limb Sci Rep 2025 15 534 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB2MXptFCntA%3D%3D 10.1038/s41598-024-84387-z 39747979 11697423
Anné J. Interpreting pathologies in extant and extinct archosaurs using micro-CT. PeerJ. 2015;3. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1130.
Qing X Bert W 3D printing in zoological systematics: Integrative taxonomy of Labrys chinensis gen. nov., sp. nov. (Nematoda: Tylenchomorpha) J Zool Syst Evol Res 2018 56 35 47 10.1111/jzs.12191
Cardini A Chiapelli M How flat can a horse be? Exploring 2D approximations of 3D crania in equids Zoology 2020 139 125746 10.1016/j.zool.2020.125746 32086141
Ziegler MJ Perez VJ Pirlo J Narducci RE Moran SM Selba MC et al. Applications of 3D Paleontological Data at the Florida Museum of Natural History Front Earth Sci 2020 8 600696 10.3389/feart.2020.600696
Ford KL Albert JS Summers AP Hedrick BP Schachner ER Jones AS et al. A New Era of Morphological Investigations: Reviewing Methods for Comparative Anatomical Studies Integr Organismal Biology 2023 5 obad008 1:STN:280:DC%2BB2s%2Fotlylsg%3D%3D 10.1093/iob/obad008
Davies TG Rahman IA Lautenschlager S Cunningham JA Asher RJ Barrett PM et al. Open data and digital morphology Proc R Soc B 2017 284 20170194 10.1098/rspb.2017.0194 28404779 5394671
Polly PD. Geometric Morphometrics. In: López Varela SL, editor. The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences. 1st edition. Wiley; 2018. pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119188230.saseas0258
Maga A Digital Morphology: The Final Frontier iar 2023 0 0 0 10.26650/IAR2022-1174374
Anas I Bamgbose B Nuhu S A comparison between 2D and 3D methods of quantifying facial morphology Heliyon 2019 5 e01880 1:STN:280:DC%2BB3MvgsF2gsw%3D%3D 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01880 31338446 6579906
Chatar N Fischer V Siliceo G Antón M Morales J Salesa MJ Morphometric Analysis of the Mandible of Primitive Sabertoothed Felids from the late Miocene of Spain J Mammal Evol 2021 28 753 71 10.1007/s10914-021-09541-0
De Leo N Chimenti C Maiorano L Tamagnini D Protocol for 3D photogrammetry and morphological digitization of complex skulls STAR Protocols 2025 6 103572 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB2MXhs1yrs70%3D 10.1016/j.xpro.2024.103572 39826113 11787561
Cardini A Missing the third dimension in geometric morphometrics: how to assess if 2D images really are a good proxy for 3D structures? Hystrix Italian J Mammalogy 2014 25 2 73 81 10.4404/hystrix-25.2-10993
Andrea C, Marika C. How flat can a horse be? Exploring 2D approximations of 3D crania in equids. Zoology. Volume 139. 2020. 125746. ISSN 0944–2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2020.125746
Zhu Y Open-access policy and data-sharing practice in UK academia J Inform Sci 2020 46 41 52 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1MXhslaqtLfJ 10.1177/0165551518823174
Grzenda M Legierski J Towards Increased Understanding of Open Data Use for Software Development 2021 10.1007/s10796-019-09954-6
Johnson KG Filkorn HF Stecheson M A collaborative system for sharing paleontology collections data Geosphere 2005 1 61 10.1130/GES00011.1
Mulligan CJ Boyer DM Turner TR Delson E Leonard WR Data sharing in biological anthropology Am J Biol Anthropol 2022 178 26 53 10.1002/ajpa.24499
Gignac PM Aceves V Baker S Barnes JJ Bell J Boyer D et al. The role of networks to overcome large-scale challenges in tomography: The non-clinical tomography users research network Tomography Mater Struct 2024 5 100031 10.1016/j.tmater.2024.100031
Hipsley CA, Sherratt E. Psychology, not technology, is our biggest challenge to open digital morphology data. Sci Data. 2019;6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0047-0. 41.
Mitteroecker P Schaefer K Thirty years of geometric morphometrics: Achievements, challenges, and the ongoing quest for biological meaningfulness Am J Biol Anthropol 2022 178 181 210 10.1002/ajpa.24531 36790612 9545184
Benson DA Clark K Karsch-Mizrachi I Lipman DJ Ostell J Sayers EW GenBank Nucl Acids Res 2014 42 D32 7 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXoslem 10.1093/nar/gkt1030 24217914
Hood L Rowen L The human genome project: big science transforms biology and medicine Genome Med 2013 5 79 10.1186/gm483 24040834 4066586
Mangul S Martin LS Langmead B Sanchez-Galan JE Toma I Hormozdiari F et al. How bioinformatics and open data can boost basic science in countries and universities with limited resources Nat Biotechnol 2019 37 324 6 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1MXosV2qtb4%3D 10.1038/s41587-019-0053-y 30833765
Conroy M Sellors J Effingham M Littlejohns TJ Boultwood C Gillions L et al. The advantages of UK Biobank’s open-access strategy for health research J Intern Med 2019 286 389 97 1:STN:280:DC%2BB3MzltFWnsA%3D%3D 10.1111/joim.12955 31283063 6790705
Dowding EM Dunne EM Collins KS et al. The billion-dollar case for sustaining palaeontology’s digital databases Nat Ecol Evol 2026 10 594 605 10.1038/s41559-026-02985-8 41667741 12971485
Matsui K Kimura Y Museum Exhibitions of Fossil Specimens Into Commercial Products: Unexpected Outflow of 3D Models due to Unwritten Image Policies Front Earth Sci 2022 10 874736 10.3389/feart.2022.874736
Buser TJ Sidlauskas BL Summers AP 2D or Not 2D? Testing the Utility of 2D Vs. 3D Landmark Data in Geometric Morphometrics of the Sculpin Subfamily Oligocottinae (Pisces; Cottoidea) Anat Rec 2018 301 806 18 10.1002/ar.23752
Hublin J-J Free digital scans of human fossils Nature 2013 497 183 183 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXntlWjsLo%3D 10.1038/497183a 23657334
Lombardi M Sustainability of 3D heritage data: life cycle and impact AeC 2023 34 339 56 10.19282/ac.34.2.2023.18
Peukert C Windisch M The economics of copyright in the digital age J Economic Surveys 2025 39 877 903 10.1111/joes.12632
da Silva AG, de Oliveira RP, de Oliveira Bastos C, de Carvalho EA, Gomes BD. A mobile hybrid deep learning approach for classifying 3D-like representations of Amazonian lizards. Front Artif Intell 8:15243802025. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1524380
Loy A, Slice DE. Image data banks and geometric morphometrics. In P. L. Nimis & R. Vignes Lebbe, editors, Tools for identifying biodiversity: Progress and problems. EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste. 2010. 243–248.
Cunningham JA Rahman IA Lautenschlager S Rayfield EJ Donoghue PCJ A virtual world of paleontology Trends Ecol Evol 2014 29 347 57 10.1016/j.tree.2014.04.004 24821516
Otero A, Pérez Moreno A, Falkingham P, Cassini G, Ruella A, Militello M et al. THREE-DIMENSIONAL IMAGE SURFACE ACQUISITION IN VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY: A REVIEW OF PRINCIPAL TECHNIQUES. PEAPA. 2020. https://doi.org/10.5710/PEAPA.04.04.2020.310
Falkingham P Acquisition of high resolution three-dimensional models using free, open-source, photogrammetric software Palaeontologia Electronica 2012 10.26879/264
Mallison H Wings O Photogrammetry in Paleontology - a Practical Guide J Paleontological Techniques 2014 12 1 31
Konstantakis M Trichopoulos G Aliprantis J Michalakis K Caridakis G Thanou A et al. An Enhanced Methodology for Creating Digital Twins within a Paleontological Museum Using Photogrammetry and Laser Scanning Techniques Heritage 2023 6 5967 80 10.3390/heritage6090314
Cottrell B Kalacska M Arroyo-Mora JP Lucanus O Cottrell P Lehnhart T et al. 3D reconstructions of stranded marine mammals via easily accessible remote sensing tools for use in morphometrics and visualizations Front Mar Sci 2025 12 1485788 10.3389/fmars.2025.1485788
Polly P, MacLeod N. Locomotion in fossil Carnivora: An application of eigensurface analysis for morphometric comparison of 3D surfaces. Palaeontol Electron. 2008;11.
Slizewski A Astrid, Semal P Patrick Experiences with low and high cost 3D surface scanner Quartär 2009 56 131 8
Abel R Laurini C Richter M A palaeobiologist’s guide to virtual micro-CT preparation Palaeontologia Electronica 2012 10.26879/284
Wilkinson MD Dumontier M Aalbersberg IJ Appleton G Axton M Baak A et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship Sci Data 2016 3 160018 10.1038/sdata.2016.18 26978244 4792175
Modesto-Mata M Thiebaut A Krueger KL Maga AM Joganic JL Ryan TM et al. Easier said than done: unexpected hurdles to preparing ∼1,000 cranial CT scans for data collection from an online digital repository PeerJ 2025 13 e20172 10.7717/peerj.20172 41142304 12548635
Bernardini F Rushmeier H The 3D Model Acquisition Pipeline Comput Graphics Forum 2002 21 149 72 10.1111/1467-8659.00574
Tocheri MW Sensen CW Hallgrímsson B Laser Scanning: 3D Analysis of Biological Surfaces Advanced Imaging in Biology and Medicine 2009 Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 85 101 10.1007/978-3-540-68993-5_4
Geng J Structured-light 3D surface imaging: a tutorial Adv Opt Photon 2011 3 128 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhtVWks7%2FM 10.1364/AOP.3.000128
Fischer V Vaczi N Bennion RF Cottereau R Lawrence Wujek J MacLaren JA Accurate specimen digitization through glass achieved and validated using 3D surface scanning Palaeontol Electron 2024 10.26879/1375
Walker M Humphries S 3D Printing: Applications in evolution and ecology Ecol Evol 2019 9 4289 301 10.1002/ece3.5050 31016005 6468079
Wilson RJ De Siqueira AF Brooks SJ Price BW Simon LM Van Der Walt SJ et al. Applying computer vision to digitised natural history collections for climate change research: Temperature-size responses in British butterflies Methods Ecol Evol 2023 14 372 84 10.1111/2041-210X.13844
Watson CM Francis GR Three dimensional printing as an effective method of producing anatomically accurate models for studies in thermal ecology J Therm Biol 2015 51 42 6 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2015.03.004 25965016
Leiva FP Ellers J Berg MP Cuxart-Erruz R Barneche DR Blackburn TM et al. ShareTrait: Towards interoperable and reusable individual trait‐based data in ectotherms Funct Ecol 2025 39 3124 38 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB2MXit1Ors7jM 10.1111/1365-2435.70147
MacLean HJ Nielsen ME Kingsolver JG Buckley LB Using museum specimens to track morphological shifts through climate change Phil Trans R Soc B 2018 374 20170404 10.1098/rstb.2017.0404 30455218 6282086
Cornwell W Nakagawa S Phylogenetic comparative methods Curr Biol 2017 27 R333 6 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXnsVamsLw%3D 10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.049 28486113
Jeiter J Smets E Integrating comparative morphology and development into evolutionary research Taxon 2023 72 724 32 10.1002/tax.12983
He Y Mulqueeney JM Watt EC Salili-James A Barber NS Camaiti M et al. Opportunities and Challenges in Applying AI to Evolutionary Morphology Integr Organismal Biology 2024 6 obae036 1:STN:280:DC%2BA3cvms1eksg%3D%3D 10.1093/iob/obae036
Porto A Rolfe S Maga AM ALPACA: A fast and accurate computer vision approach for automated landmarking of three-dimensional biological structures Methods Ecol Evol 2021 12 11 2129 44 10.1111/2041-210X.13689 35874971 9291522 Epub 2021 Aug 9. PMID: 35874971; PMCID: PMC9291522
Buser TJ, Boyd OF, Cortés Á, Donatelli CM, Kolmann MA et al. The Natural Historian’s Guide to the CT Galaxy: Step-by-Step Instructions for Preparing and Analyzing Computed Tomographic (CT) Data Using Cross-Platform, Open Access Software, Integrative Organismal Biology, Volume 2, Issue 1, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/iob/obaa009
Hassoun S Jefferson F Shi X Stucky B Wang J Rosa E Artificial Intelligence for Biology Integr Comp Biol 2022 61 2267 75 10.1093/icb/icab188 34448841
Beaman R Cellinese N Mass digitization of scientific collections: New opportunities to transform the use of biological specimens and underwrite biodiversity science ZK 2012 209 7 17 10.3897/zookeys.209.3313
Nelson G Ellis S The history and impact of digitization and digital data mobilization on biodiversity research Phil Trans R Soc B 2019 374 20170391 10.1098/rstb.2017.0391
Drew JA Moreau CS Stiassny MLJ Digitization of museum collections holds the potential to enhance researcher diversity Nat Ecol Evol 2017 1 1789 90 10.1038/s41559-017-0401-6 29133899
Medina JJ Maley JM Sannapareddy S Medina NN Gilman CM McCormack JE A rapid and cost-effective pipeline for digitization of museum specimens with 3D photogrammetry PLoS ONE 2020 15 e0236417 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXhs1OnsbzJ 10.1371/journal.pone.0236417 32790700 7425849
Pirotta V Shen K Liu S Phan HTH O’Brien JK Meagher P et al. Detecting illegal wildlife trafficking via real time tomography 3D X-ray imaging and automated algorithms Front Conserv Sci 2022 3 757950 10.3389/fcosc.2022.757950
Kaiser K Heumann I Nadim T Keysar H Petersen M Korun M et al. Promises of mass digitisation and the colonial realities of natural history collections s J Nat Sci Collections 2023 11 13 25
Balanoff AM, Bever GS. The Role of Endocasts in the Study of Brain Evolution. Evolution of Nervous Systems. Elsevier; 2017. pp. 223–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804042-3.00023-3.
De Sousa AA Beaudet A Calvey T Bardo A Benoit J Charvet CJ et al. From fossils to mind Commun Biol 2023 6 636 10.1038/s42003-023-04803-4 37311857 10262152
Bertrand OC, Michaud M, Kirk EC. How the neurosensory system provides clues for the adaptive radiation of mammals. Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology. Elsevier; 2025. p. B9780443273803000191. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-27380-3.00019-1.
Balanoff AM Bever GS Colbert MW Clarke JA Field DJ Gignac PM et al. Best practices for digitally constructing endocranial casts: examples from birds and their dinosaurian relatives J Anat 2016 229 173 90 10.1111/joa.12378 26403623
Storeide MSB George S Sole A Hardeberg JY Standardization of digitized heritage: a review of implementations of 3D in cultural heritage Herit Sci 2023 11 249 10.1186/s40494-023-01079-z
Gomes DGE Pottier P Crystal-Ornelas R Hudgins EJ Foroughirad V Sánchez-Reyes LL et al. Why don’t we share data and code? Perceived barriers and benefits to public archiving practices Proc R Soc B 2022 289 20221113 10.1098/rspb.2022.1113 36416041 9682438
Herraiz JL Villena JA Vilaplana-Climent A Conejero N Cocera H Botella H et al. The palaeontological virtual collection of the University of Valencia’s Natural History Museum: a new tool for palaeontological heritage outreach Span J Palaeontol 2019 34 139 44 10.7203/sjp.34.1.15249
Delgado J, West R, Barmpoutis A, Jang SH, Stanley E, Kang H. Enhancing Museum Experience with VR by Situating 3D Collections in Contex. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference. Delft Netherlands: ACM; 2024. pp. 670–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3628516.3659372
White E Baldridge E Brym Z Locey K McGlinn D Supp S Nine simple ways to make it easier to (re)use your data IEE 2013 10.4033/iee.2013.6b.6.f
Roche DG Kruuk LEB Lanfear R Binning SA Public Data Archiving in Ecology and Evolution: How Well Are We Doing? PLoS Biol 2015 13 e1002295 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XmtFKjsrk%3D 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002295 26556502 4640582
Díez Díaz V Belvedere M Depraetere M Holwerda F Schwarz D How should I publish my digital fossil? Recommendations for the publication of comprehensive 3D datasets in palaeontological studies Palaeontology 2026 69 e70052 10.1111/pala.70052
Basson I Simard M-A Ouangré ZA Sugimoto CR Larivière V The effect of data sources on the measurement of open access: A comparison of Dimensions and the Web of Science PLoS ONE 2022 17 e0265545 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB38XhtVSlsb%2FK 10.1371/journal.pone.0265545 35358227 8970383
Narendra M Valarmathi ML Anbarasi LJ Watermarking techniques for three-dimensional (3D) mesh models: a survey Multimedia Syst 2022 28 623 41 10.1007/s00530-021-00860-z
Shaliyar M Mustafa K Watermarking approach for source authentication of web content in online social media: a systematic literature review Multimed Tools Appl 2023 83 54027 79 10.1007/s11042-023-17559-0
Mondal H Mondal S Digital object identifier: What it is and why it matters? IJSA 2023 2 77 80 10.25259/IJSA_20_2023
