[en] Background
In men presenting with metastatic seminoma and no discrete intratesticular mass, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) findings such as atrophy, heterogeneity, calcifications, and focal low-signal areas are often interpreted as a regressed (“burned-out”) testicular primary. Rare non–mass-forming patterns, however, may produce similar indirect features and complicate primary-site attribution.
Case presentation
A 37-year-old man presented with abdominal pain and a 7-8-cm retroperitoneal mass; biopsy confirmed seminoma. Scrotal ultrasound demonstrated right testicular atrophy with diffuse parenchymal heterogeneity and a punctate calcification, without a focal lesion. Testicular mpMRI showed marked heterogeneity with a poorly defined subcapsular T2-hypointense pseudonodular area, heterogeneous enhancement with focal relative hypoperfusion, and regions of increased apparent diffusion coefficient—an appearance considered compatible with a burned-out tumor. Right inguinal orchiectomy performed prior to systemic therapy revealed diffuse viable seminoma with an exclusive intertubular growth pattern, associated germ cell neoplasia
in situ
, and prominent fibro-sclerotic remodeling, without a macroscopic mass. After three cycles of chemotherapy, the patient achieved a complete metabolic response.
Conclusion
This radiologic–pathologic correlation illustrates that diffuse viable intertubular seminoma with fibro-sclerotic remodeling can mimic burned-out tumor on mpMRI. In metastatic seminoma, subtle ipsilateral testicular abnormalities on ultrasound/mpMRI should prompt orchiectomy to secure definitive primary-site pathology and avoid misclassification as regression or extragonadal disease.
Disciplines :
Oncology
Author, co-author :
Pasoglou, Vassiliki; Department of Radiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
Van Nieuwenhove, Sandy; Department of Radiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
Dano, Hélène; Department of Pathology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
Sautois, Brieuc ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service d'oncologie médicale
Rocher, Laurence; Department of Radiology, Hôpital Antoine-Béclère, Université Paris-Saclay
Van Damme, Julien; Department of Urology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
Tombal, Bertrand; Department of Urology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
Seront, Emmanuel; Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
Language :
English
Title :
A pure intertubular testicular seminoma mimicking a burned-out tumor: a case report
1 Moch H Cubilla AL Humphrey PA Reuter VE Ulbright TM. The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs—part a: renal, penile, and testicular tumours. Eur Urol. (2016) 70:93–105. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.029. PMID: 26935559
2 Chu Y-H Huang W Hu R. Exclusively intertubular seminoma arising in undescended testes: report of two cases. Hum Pathology: Case Rep. (2018) 11:15–8. doi:10.1016/j.ehpc.2017.08.004. PMID: 38826717
3 Desmousseaux T Arama E Maxwell F Ferlicot S Hani C Fizazi K et al. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of burned-out testicular tumours: the diagnostic keys based on 48 cases. Cancers (Basel). (2022) 14:4013. doi:10.3390/cancers14164013. PMID: 36011006
4 Tsili AC Sofikitis N Pappa O Bougia CK Argyropoulou MI. An overview of the role of multiparametric MRI in the investigation of testicular tumors. Cancers (Basel). (2022) 14:3912. doi:10.3390/cancers14163912. PMID: 36010905
5 Mosillo C Scagnoli S Pomati G Caponnetto S Mancini ML Bezzi M et al. Burned-out testicular cancer: really a different history. Case Rep Oncol. (2017) 10:846–50. doi:10.1159/000480493. PMID: 29071000
7 Persano G Crocoli A De Pasquale MD Cozza R Alaggio R Diomedi Camassei F et al. Burned-out testicular tumors in adolescents: clinical aspects and outcome. Front Pediatr. (2021) 9:688021. doi:10.3389/fped.2021.688021. PMID: 34513760
8 Iannantuono GM Strigari L Roselli M Torino F. A scoping review on the “burned out” or “burnt out” testicular cancer: when a rare phenomenon deserves more attention. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. (2021) 165:103452. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103452. PMID: 34384861
9 Patrikidou A Cazzaniga W Berney D Boormans J de Angst I Di Nardo D et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on testicular cancer: 2023 update. Eur Urol. (2023) 84:289–301. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.010. PMID: 37183161
10 Rocher L Ramchandani P Belfield J Bertolotto M Derchi LE Correas JM et al. Incidentally detected non-palpable testicular tumours in adults at scrotal ultrasound: impact of radiological findings on management radiologic review and recommendations of the ESUR scrotal imaging subcommittee. Eur Radiol. (2016) 26:2268–78. doi:10.1007/s00330-015-4059-7. PMID: 26497666
11 Murez T Fléchon A Branger N Savoie P-H Rocher L Camparo P et al. French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: testicular germ cell cancer. Progrès en Urologie. (2022) 32:1066–101. doi:10.1016/j.purol.2022.09.009. PMID: 36400478
12 Kaushal S Jain E Acosta AM Sangoi AR Lobo A Jha S et al. Pure intertubular seminoma (PITS) of the testis: a multi-institutional cohort of a rare growth pattern of seminoma. Hum Pathol. (2024) 153:105667. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2024.105667. PMID: 39305965