Article (Scientific journals)
Comparison of Three Treatment Strategies in Mild Asthma: A Carbon-Utility Analysis.
Vieira, Rafael José; Duarte, Vítor Henrique; Bognanni, Antonio et al.
2025 • In Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 13 (10), p. 2649-2656.e1
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
VIEIRA 2025_Comparison of three treatment_J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract_ppediteur.pdf
Publisher postprint (1.44 MB) Creative Commons License - Attribution
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Budesonide; QF8SVZ843E (Albuterol); Anti-Asthmatic Agents; 142M471B3J (Carbon Dioxide); Bronchodilator Agents; W34SHF8J2K (Formoterol Fumarate); Humans; Asthma/drug therapy; Budesonide/therapeutic use/administration & dosage; Dry Powder Inhalers; Metered Dose Inhalers; Albuterol/therapeutic use/administration & dosage; Female; Male; Adult; Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use/administration & dosage; Carbon Dioxide; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Middle Aged; Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use/administration & dosage; Formoterol Fumarate/therapeutic use; Carbon Footprint; Administration, Inhalation; Asthma; Carbon footprint; Hydrofluorocarbons; Inhalers; Planetary health; Quality-adjusted life years
Abstract :
[en] BACKGROUND: The main types of commercially available inhalers for the management of asthma include dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs). The environmental impact of pMDIs, due to hydrofluorocarbon propellants, is a growing concern. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a carbon-utility analysis in mild asthma, comparing the clinical efficacy of DPIs versus pMDIs alongside their associated environmental impacts. METHODS: We performed a carbon-utility analysis using data from the Novel START trial, comparing 3 treatment strategies for mild asthma: as-needed budesonide/formoterol DPI, as-needed salbutamol pMDI, and maintenance budesonide DPI plus as-needed salbutamol pMDI. We calculated carbon dioxide equivalent (kgCO(2)e) emissions per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Results were compared to predefined willingness-to-emit thresholds based on health care CO(2)e emissions in the United States, the European Union, and the United Kingdom. RESULTS: As-needed budesonide/formoterol DPI had a yearly carbon footprint of 1.1 kgCO(2)e and a utility of 0.936, compared with 26.2 kgCO(2)e and 0.935 for as-needed salbutamol pMDI, and 17.3 kgCO(2)e and 0.944 for maintenance budesonide DPI plus as-needed salbutamol pMDI. Compared with budesonide/formoterol, budesonide plus salbutamol resulted in 2192 more kgCO(2)e per QALY gained, exceeding the US per capita kgCO(2)e emissions in the health care sector and its 2030 target values. As-needed salbutamol was associated with higher CO(2)e emissions and lower utilities than budesonide/formoterol. CONCLUSION: We applied to the asthma field a novel methodological approach to consider both the environmental impact and effectiveness of interventions. These findings indicate that as-needed budesonide/formoterol DPI is the preferred option when considering both carbon emissions and treatment effectiveness.
Disciplines :
Cardiovascular & respiratory systems
Author, co-author :
Vieira, Rafael José;  MEDCIDS-Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal, CINTESIS@RISE-Health Research Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Duarte, Vítor Henrique;  MEDCIDS-Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal, CINTESIS@RISE-Health Research Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Bognanni, Antonio;  Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, Clinical Epidemiology and Research Center (CERC), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Gil-Mata, Sara;  MEDCIDS-Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal, CINTESIS@RISE-Health Research Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Marques-Cruz, Manuel;  MEDCIDS-Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal, CINTESIS@RISE-Health Research Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Pereira, Ana Margarida;  MEDCIDS-Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal, CINTESIS@RISE-Health Research Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Chen-Xu, José;  NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal, ISGlobal, Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Barcelona, Spain.
Louis, Renaud ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Pneumologie - Allergologie
Williams, Sian;  International Primary Care Respiratory Group IPCRG, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Nadeau, Kari C;  Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
Haahtela, Tari;  Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Piggott, Thomas;  Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, Department of Family Medicine, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Fonseca, João A;  MEDCIDS-Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal, CINTESIS@RISE-Health Research Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Antó, Josep M;  ISGlobal, Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Barcelona, Spain, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain, CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.
Schünemann, Holger J;  Clinical Epidemiology and Research Center (CERC), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy, Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Immunology and Allergology, Berlin, Germany.
Bousquet, Jean;  Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Immunology and Allergology, Berlin, Germany, Institute of Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany, ARIA, Montpellier, France.
Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo;  MEDCIDS-Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal, CINTESIS@RISE-Health Research Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. Electronic address: bernardo@med.up.pt.
More authors (7 more) Less
Language :
English
Title :
Comparison of Three Treatment Strategies in Mild Asthma: A Carbon-Utility Analysis.
Publication date :
October 2025
Journal title :
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
ISSN :
2213-2198
eISSN :
2213-2201
Publisher :
Elsevier, Amsterdam, Nl
Volume :
13
Issue :
10
Pages :
2649-2656.e1
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Commentary :
Copyright © 2025 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Available on ORBi :
since 24 April 2026

Statistics


Number of views
106 (0 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
127 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
2
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
1
OpenAlex citations
 
3

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi