3D printing; Horse; Modified transconjunctival enucleation; Ophthalmology; Orbital implant; Biocompatible Materials; Horses; Animals; Pilot Projects; Feasibility Studies; Orbit/surgery; Printing, Three-Dimensional; Orbital Implants; Orbit; Equine
Abstract :
[en] Severe ophthalmic conditions such as trauma, uveitis, corneal damage, or neoplasia can lead to eye removal surgery. Poor cosmetic appearance resulting from the sunken orbit ensues. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of manufacturing a custom-made 3D-printed orbital implant made of biocompatible material for the enucleated horse and usable in conjunction to a corneoscleral shell. Blender, a 3D-image software, was used for prototype design. Twelve cadaver heads of adult Warmbloods were collected from the slaughterhouse. On each head, one eye was removed via a modified transconjunctival enucleation while the contralateral eye was kept intact as control. Ocular measurements were collected on each enucleated eye with the help of a caliper and used for prototype sizing. Twelve custom-made biocompatible porous prototypes were 3D-printed in BioMed Clear resin using the stereolithography technique. Each implant was fixated into the corresponding orbit, within the Tenon capsule and conjunctiva. Heads were frozen and thin slices were then cut in the transverse plane. A scoring system based on four criteria (space for ocular prosthesis, soft-tissue-coverage, symmetry to the septum, and horizontal symmetry), ranging from A (proper fixation) to C (poor fixation), was developed to evaluate implantation. The prototypes reached our expectations: 75% of the heads received an A score, and 25% a B score. Each implant cost approximately 7.30€ and took 5 hours for 3D-printing. The production of an economically accessible orbital implant made of biocompatible porous material was successful. Further studies will help determine if the present prototype is usable in vivo.
Disciplines :
Veterinary medicine & animal health
Author, co-author :
Jarry, Jenny ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals and Health (FARAH) ; Integrated Veterinary Research Unit (IVRU) - Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS), Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Sciences, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium
De Raeve, Yves; Integrated Veterinary Research Unit (IVRU) - Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS), Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Sciences, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium
Dugdale, Alexandra; Paragon Veterinary Referrals, Paragon Business Village, Wakefield, UK
Simon, Vincent; Integrated Veterinary Research Unit (IVRU) - Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS), Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Sciences, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium
Vandeweerd, Jean-Michel ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département clinique des animaux de production (DCP) ; Integrated Veterinary Research Unit (IVRU) - Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS), Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Sciences, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium. Electronic address: jean-michel.vandeweerd@unamur.be
Language :
English
Title :
An Ex Vivo Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility of 3D Printing of Orbital Implants in Horses.
Baino, F, Perero, S, Ferraris, S, Miola, M, Balagna, C, Verné, E, Vitale-Brovarone, C, Coggiola, A, Dolcino, D, Ferraris, M., Biomaterials for orbital implants and ocular prostheses: Overview and future prospects. Acta Biomaterialia 10 (2014), 1064–1087.
Betbeze, CM, Dray, SM, Fontenot, RL., Subconjunctival enucleation with orbital implant placement in standing horses: 20 cases (2014-2017). J Am Vet Med Association 258 (2021), 661–667.
Brooks, DE., Complications of ophthalmic surgery in the horse. Vet Clin N Am: Equine Pract 24 (2008), 697–734.
Gilger, BC., Equine ophthalmology, Third Edition, 3, 2017, Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey, 90–91.
Gilger, BC, Pizzirani, S, Johnston, LC, Urdiales, NR., Use of a hydroxyapatite orbital implant in a cosmetic corneoscleral prosthesis after enucleation in a horse. J Am Vet Med Assoc 222 (2003), 343–345.
Hamor, RE, Roberts, SM, Severin, GA, Trawnik, WR, Johnson, WJ., Ocular cosmetic and prosthetic devices. Vet Clin N Am: Equine Pract 8 (1992), 637–654.
Jordan, DR, Klapper, SR., Controversies in enucleation technique and implant selection: whether to wrap, attach muscles, and peg?. Oculoplast orbit, 2010, 195–211.
Kaltreider, SA, Jacobs, JL, Hughes, MO., Predicting the ideal implant size before enucleation. Ophthal Plast Reconst Surg 15 (1999), 37–43.
Lavach, JD, Severin, GA., Equine ocular cosmesis. Vet Clin N Am: Large Animal Pract 6 (1984), 489–500.
Park, SY, An, JH, Kwon, H, Choi, SY, Lim, KY, Kwak, HH, Hussein, KH, Woo, HM, Park, KM., Custom-made artificial eyes using 3D printing for dogs: a preliminary study. PLoS ONE, 15(11), 2020, e0242274.
Rogers, M, Cartee, RE, Miller, W, Ibrahim, A., Evaluation of the extirpated equine eye using B-mode ultrasonography. Vet Radiol 27:1 (1986), 24–26.
Romkes, G, Eule, JC., Followup of a dog with an intraocular silicone prosthesis combined with an extraocular glass prosthesis. Case Rep Vet Med 2012 (2012), 1–6.
Toth, J, Huthmann, S, Dikker, L., Intrascleral ocular prosthesis following evisceration in thirteen horses. Pferdeheilkunde 2 (2014), 153–160.
Formlabs [online]. Safety data sheet – According to OSHA Hazard Communication Standard. 2020 [initial preparation date: 05.28.2020; revision date: 02.04.2022]. Available: https://formlabs-media.formlabs.com/datasheets/2001424-SDS-ENUS-0.pdf. [Accessed 15 May 2023].