[en] BACKGROUND: A formal prognostic staging system in wild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTRwt-CM), based on echocardiographic imaging, is lacking. We evaluated the prognostic performance of global longitudinal strain (GLS) staging in a large cohort of patients with ATTRwt-CM, including under tafamidis treatment and relative to National Amyloidosis Center (NAC) biomarker staging. METHODS: A multicentric, international ATTRwt-CM patient cohort with baseline GLS (distribution quartiles), evaluated by echocardiography, was studied, related to all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The study comprised 816 patients with ATTRwt-CM, median age of 81.5 years, 83% males, and 72% tafamidis initiated. During a 2.2-year median follow-up, 29.7% of patients died. GLS worsened with increasing NAC disease stage (I: −14.3%, II: −11.6%, III: −11.4%; P<0.001). Median survival per baseline GLS quartile stage 1 (<−15.8%), 2 (−15.8 to −12.9%), 3 (−12.8 to −10.0%), and 4 (GLS >−10.0%) was not met, 6.7, 4.6, and 3.4 years, respectively (P<0.001). The median GLS −12.8% cutoff predicted 1-year mortality with 74% sensitivity, 52% specificity (area under the curve, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.66-0.80]; P<0.001). GLS was the only independent echocardiographic and strong mortality predictor, independent of other predictors, including age, New York Heart Association class symptoms, NAC stage, and tafamidis treatment (hazard ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.04-1.12]; P<0.001), also when restricted to 591 tafamidis-treated subjects (hazard ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.08-1.22]; P<0.001). Baseline GLS −12.8% cutoff value provided further prognostic discriminative ability for mortality within each NAC disease stage stratum (all P<0.050). Likelihood ratio test indicated incremental prognostic value of GLS (staging) over baseline NAC staging (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: GLS is a strong, independent mortality predictor in ATTRwt-CM, irrespective of tafamidis treatment, that may be an adjunct or complementary to biomarker staging.
2. MaurerMSBokhariSDamyTDorbalaSDrachmanBMFontanaMGroganMKristenAVLousadaINativi-NicolauJet al. Expert consensus recommendations for the suspicion and diagnosis of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis. Circ Heart Fail. 2019;12:e006075. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006075
3. DebonnairePDujardinKVerheyenNPouleurACDroogmansSClaeysMBohynABogaertsKEl HaddadMChristiaenEet al. Tafamidis in octogenarians with wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: an international cohort study. Eur Heart J. 2025;46:1057–1070. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae923
4. Garcia-PaviaPRapezziCAdlerYAradMBassoCBrucatoABurazorICaforioALPDamyTErikssonUet al. Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis: a position statement of the ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:1554–1568. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab072
5. MaurerMSSchwartzJHGundapaneniBElliottPMMerliniGWaddington-CruzMKristenAVGroganMWittelesRDamyTet al. ; ATTR-ACT Study Investigators. Tafamidis treatment for patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1007–1016. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805689
6. FengKYLounganiRSRaoVNPatelCBKhouriMGFelkerGMDeVoreAD. Best practices for prognostic evaluation of a patient with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. JACC CardioOncol. 2019;1:273–279. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2019.11.006
7. GillmoreJDDamyTFontanaMHutchinsonMLachmannHJMartinez-NaharroAQuartaCCRezkTWhelanCJGonzalez-LopezEet al. A new staging system for cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:2799–2806. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx589
8. FontanaMIoannouACuddySDorbalaSMasriAMoonJCSinghVClercOHannaMRubergFet al. The last decade in cardiac amyloidosis: advances in understanding pathophysiology, diagnosis and quantification, prognosis, treatment strategies, and monitoring response. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025;18:478–499. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.10.011
9. BoldriniMCappelliFChackoLRestrepo-CordobaMALopez-SainzAGiannoniAAimoABaggianoAMartinez-NaharroAWhelanCet al. Multiparametric echocardiography scores for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:909–920. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.10.011
10. QuartaCCSolomonSDUraizeeIKrugerJLonghiSFerlitoMGagliardiCMilandriARapezziCFalkRH. Left ventricular structure and function in transthyretin-related versus light-chain cardiac amyloidosis. Circulation. 2014;129:1840–1849. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006242
11. ChackoLMartoneRBanderaFLaneTMartinez-NaharroABoldriniMRezkTWhelanCQuartaCRowczenioDet al. Echocardiographic phenotype and prognosis in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:1439–1447. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz905
12. LangRMBadanoLPMor-AviVAfilaloJArmstrongAErnandeLFlachskampfFAFosterEGoldsteinSAKuznetsovaTet al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:233–270. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev014
13. ZoghbiWAAdamsDBonowROEnriquez-SaranoMFosterEGrayburnPAHahnRTHanYHungJLangRMet al. Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30:303–371. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.01.007
14. SmisethOARiderOCvijicMValkovicLRemmeEWVoigtJU. Myocardial strain imaging: theory, current practice, and the future. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025;18:340–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.07.011
15. CohenOCIsmaelAPawarovaBManwaniRRavichandranSLawSFoardDPetrieAWardSDouglasBet al. Longitudinal strain is an independent predictor of survival and response to therapy in patients with systemic AL amyloidosis. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:333–341. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab507
16. TernacleJBodezDGuellichAAudureauERappeneauSLimPRaduCGuendouzSCouetilJPBenhaiemNet al. Causes and consequences of longitudinal LV dysfunction assessed by 2D strain echocardiography in cardiac amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:126–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.05.014
17. Lee ChuyKDrillEYangJCLandauHHassounHNahhasOChenCLYuAFSteingartRMLiuJE. Incremental value of global longitudinal strain for predicting survival in patients with advanced AL amyloidosis. JACC CardioOncol. 2020;2:223–231. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.05.012
18. KaoTWHungYHYuALChengMFSuMYChaoCCTsaiCHLinYH. Effect of tafamidis on clinical and functional parameters in transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. JACC Adv. 2025;4:101511. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101511
19. ShahSJFineNGarcia-PaviaPKleinALFernandesFWeissmanNJMaurerMSBomanKGundapaneniBSultanMBet al. Effect of tafamidis on cardiac function in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy: a post hoc analysis of the ATTR-ACT randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2024;9:25–34. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.4147
20. MullerMLBrandAMattigISpethmannSMessroghliDHahnKViolanoMMitchellJDHareJMFrustaciAet al. Myocardial inflammation in cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis: prevalence and potential prognostic implications. Circ Heart Fail. 2025;18:e012146. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.012146
21. FalkRHCuddySAMItzhaki Ben ZadokO. Silencers versus stabilizers in amyloid cardiomyopathy. Are we asking the wrong questions? Eur J Heart Fail. 2025;27:623–627. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3614
22. PucciAAimoAMusettiVBarisonAVergaroGGenovesiDGiorgettiAMasottiSArzilliCPronteraCet al. Amyloid deposits and fibrosis on left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy correlate with extracellular volume in cardiac amyloidosis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e020358. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020358
23. ChackoLKariaNVenneriLBanderaFPassoBDBuonamiciLLazariJIoannouAPorcariAPatelRet al. Progression of echocardiographic parameters and prognosis in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2022;24:1700–1712. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2606
24. UnluSMireaOBezySDuchenneJPagoureliasEDBogaertJThomasJDBadanoLPVoigtJU; EACVI-ASE-Industry Standardization Task Force, chaired by; participating companies. Inter-vendor variability in strain measurements depends on software rather than image characteristics. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;37:1689–1697. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-02155-2