Article (Périodiques scientifiques)
Livestock Integration Into Cropping Systems Enhances Their Climate Change Resistance and Mitigation While Reducing Their Environmental Impacts.
Delandmeter, Mathieu; Basso, Bruno; Fettweis, Xavier et al.
2026In Global Change Biology, 32 (2), p. 70765
Peer reviewed vérifié par ORBi
 

Documents


Texte intégral
Global Change Biology - 2026 - Delandmeter - Livestock Integration Into Cropping Systems Enhances Their Climate Change.pdf
Postprint Éditeur (3.22 MB) Licence Creative Commons - Attribution
Télécharger

Tous les documents dans ORBi sont protégés par une licence d'utilisation.

Envoyer vers



Détails



Mots-clés :
STICS; circularity; climate change; crop model; crop‐livestock; ecosystem services; greenhouse gas; human diet; leaching; resistance; Greenhouse Gases; Animals; Belgium; Greenhouse Gases/analysis; Environment; Climate Change; Livestock; Agriculture/methods; Crops, Agricultural/growth & development; Conservation of Natural Resources
Résumé :
[en] The sustainability of cropping systems is linked to their circularity, which is their ability to close resource cycles such as carbon and nitrogen through strategies for managing crop residues, byproducts, and other inputs. Here, we investigate three crop rotations-business-as-usual (BAU), vegan, and integrated crop-livestock systems (ICLS)-varying in livestock integration, crop residue fate, and human diet sustained. Under ten climate change scenarios, we compare their impacts on multiple ecosystem services during 24 years over 541,800 ha in Belgium using a validated crop model. All three circularity scenarios are found to be net greenhouse gas (GHG) emitters, with increasing intensity under climate change. The BAU system, favoring cash crops such as sugarbeet or potato, demonstrates the highest productivity, which, however, is highly variable across years and comes with greater environmental impacts such as GHG emissions (+45% and +23% compared to ICLS and Vegan in average-i.e., across all sites and climate scenarios). The Vegan system has lower carbon sequestration than the ICLS due to the lack of pasture and livestock, which, however, is partly offset by the regular incorporation of crop residues into the soil. Finally, ICLS, which include temporary pastures and sheep, demonstrate intermediate productivity levels compared to the other systems. However, they offer the greatest stability and resistance to extreme weather (+43% and +86% for stability compared to BAU and Vegan, in average), with better environmental performance. Therefore, our study reveals the benefits of crop-livestock systems in terms of climate change adaptation, through stability and resistance to extreme climate events, and mitigation, through soil carbon sequestration and reduced greenhouse gas emissions and nitrate leaching. Moreover, our findings highlight the critical links between farm-level circularity, soil-crop feedbacks, human diet, and climate change.
Disciplines :
Agriculture & agronomie
Productions animales & zootechnie
Auteur, co-auteur :
Delandmeter, Mathieu  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Plant Sciences ; Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
Basso, Bruno ;  Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA ; W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, Michigan, USA
Fettweis, Xavier  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de géographie > Climatologie et Topoclimatologie
Lacroix, Christophe  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Plant Sciences
Aubry, Pierre  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre
Bindelle, Jérôme   ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Animal Sciences (AS)
Dumont, Benjamin   ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre > Plant Sciences
 Ces auteurs ont contribué de façon équivalente à la publication.
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Livestock Integration Into Cropping Systems Enhances Their Climate Change Resistance and Mitigation While Reducing Their Environmental Impacts.
Date de publication/diffusion :
février 2026
Titre du périodique :
Global Change Biology
ISSN :
1354-1013
eISSN :
1365-2486
Maison d'édition :
Wiley, England
Volume/Tome :
32
Fascicule/Saison :
2
Pagination :
e70765
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed vérifié par ORBi
Organisme subsidiant :
F.R.S.-FNRS - Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique
N° du Fonds :
44221
Subventionnement (détails) :
FNRS Research Fellow grant awarded to M. Delandmeter (Grant nb 44221)
Disponible sur ORBi :
depuis le 09 avril 2026

Statistiques


Nombre de vues
73 (dont 5 ULiège)
Nombre de téléchargements
42 (dont 1 ULiège)

citations Scopus®
 
0
citations Scopus®
sans auto-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
0
citations OpenAlex
 
0

Bibliographie


Publications similaires



Contacter ORBi