Article (Scientific journals)
Different dosing regimens for chronic knee osteoarthritis (KOA) pain management: A pooled analysis on celecoxib.
Choy, Ernest; Fuggle, Nicholas; Biesheuvel, Egbert et al.
2026In Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 38 (1), p. 55
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Different dosing regimens for chronic knee osteoarthritis ,KOA, pain management A pooled analysis on celecoxib.pdf
Author postprint (1.25 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Celecoxib; Dosage regimen; Moderate pain; Osteoarthritis (OA); Pain reduction; Randomized controlled trials; Severe pain; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Female; Aged; Double-Blind Method; Pain Measurement; Treatment Outcome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Celecoxib/administration & dosage; Celecoxib/therapeutic use; Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy; Pain Management/methods; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors/administration & dosage; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Pain Management; Aging; Geriatrics and Gerontology
Abstract :
[en] [en] BACKGROUND: Celecoxib is widely used for the management of different chronic musculoskeletal conditions including osteoarthritis (OA), but the comparative effectiveness of 200 mg once daily (OD) versus 100 mg twice daily (BID) in patients with varying baseline pain severity is not fully established. AIMS: To compare the efficacy of celecoxib 200 mg OD and 100 mg BID in reducing pain among OA patients with moderate or severe baseline pain, using pooled post hoc analyses of two similar randomized controlled trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from two 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in knee OA (n = 1,360) were pooled. Patients were stratified into moderate (VAS 40-69 mm, n = 675) or severe (VAS ≥ 70 mm, n = 685) pain subgroups. Interventions included celecoxib 100 mg BID, celecoxib 200 mg OD, or placebo. Primary endpoint was change from baseline in VAS pain at weeks 2 and 6, analyzed via mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) and ANCOVA with last observation carried forward. WOMAC pain score was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Both celecoxib regimens significantly reduced VAS pain scores versus placebo at weeks 2 and 6 in the overall and moderate pain groups (p < 0.05). In severe pain patients, both regimens were superior to placebo at week 2; however, at week 6, only the 200 mg OD regimen retained statistical significance (LS mean difference vs. placebo - 7.45, p = 0.0135), while 100 mg BID did not. WOMAC pain score results mirrored VAS findings, with 200 mg OD showing the greatest improvement in severe baseline pain. CONCLUSION: Celecoxib 100 mg BID and 200 mg OD are both effective for OA pain relief, in moderate and severe pain. Findings suggest 200 mg OD may confer an advantage in patients with severe baseline pain in the long-term treatment (week 6).
Disciplines :
General & internal medicine
Public health, health care sciences & services
Author, co-author :
Choy, Ernest;  Cardiff Regional Experimental Arthritis Treatment and Evaluation (CREATE) Centre, Section of Rheumatology, Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Wales, UK
Fuggle, Nicholas;  MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Biesheuvel, Egbert;  Biometrics, Viatris Inc, Amstelveen, Netherlands
Venugopal, Srinivasan;  Biometrics, Viatris, Hyderabad, India
Kumbhar, Sagar Suresh;  Biometrics, Viatris Inc, Bangalore, India
Chiaese, Raffaella Maria Rita;  Global Medical Affairs, Viatris, Milan, Italy
Walker, Chris ;  Global Medical Affairs, Viatris, UK. Chris.Walker@viatris.com
Reginster, Jean-Yves  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique ; Protein Research Chair, Biochemistry Dept, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Language :
English
Title :
Different dosing regimens for chronic knee osteoarthritis (KOA) pain management: A pooled analysis on celecoxib.
Publication date :
23 January 2026
Journal title :
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
ISSN :
1594-0667
eISSN :
1720-8319
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, Germany
Volume :
38
Issue :
1
Pages :
55
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funding text :
Medical writing and editorial support was provided by Pramod Mallikarjuna and Shantha Kumar V, Viatris Inc. The contribution of JYR to this manuscript has been funded by the Distinguished Scientist Fellowship Program (DSFP) of the King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Available on ORBi :
since 20 March 2026

Statistics


Number of views
55 (1 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
17 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
0
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenAlex citations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi