Article (Scientific journals)
Where is the eye of the storm of eGFR formulas?
Delanaye, Pierre; Cavalier, Etienne; Pottel, Hans et al.
In pressIn Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
gfaf248.pdf
Embargo Until 01/Jul/2026 - Publisher postprint (541.49 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
creatinine; cystatin C; glomerular filtration rate
Abstract :
[en] The estimation of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is central to nephrology, yet the growing number of equations often raises concern. However, only a few creatinine-based equations have gained widespread validation: Cockcroft-Gault (CG), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-EPI), and European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC). The CG equation, introduced in 1976, was simple but imprecise. In 1999, the MDRD study equation improved GFR estimation and enabled automatic reporting by laboratories by removing weight from the formula. However, its development in patients with CKD led to GFR underestimation in healthy individuals. In 2009, the CKD-EPI equation corrected this, offering improved accuracy and less bias, except in hyperfiltration. In 2021, the CKD-EPI equation was updated to exclude race, mainly for societal reasons, though at the cost of slightly worse performance. In the same year, the EKFC equation was introduced based on European cohorts. It brought two innovations: normalization via the creatinine-to-Q ratio (Q being the median creatinine in healthy individuals), and refined age modeling. These enhancements reduced bias across both the GFR and age ranges and allowed the equation use in both adults and children. At the individual level, all equations remain estimations with similar precision, unless an additional biomarker like cystatin C is used. However, at the population level, EKFC improves bias and accuracy, especially in young adults. Switching from CKD-EPI to EKFC increases CKD prevalence moderately, as shown in European cohorts, but likely reflects better detection. Prognostic performance, particularly for cardiovascular outcomes, is maintained or improved among those reclassified to more severe CKD stages with EKFC. In summary, the EKFC equation represents a scientifically grounded progression in eGFR estimation, an evolution rather than a revolution, offering better performance and flexibility for broader clinical implementation in Europe.
Disciplines :
Laboratory medicine & medical technology
Urology & nephrology
Author, co-author :
Delanaye, Pierre  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Néphrologie ; Department of Nephrology-Dialysis-Apheresis, Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau, Université de Montpellier, Nîmes, France
Cavalier, Etienne  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de pharmacie > Chimie médicale
Pottel, Hans ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques ; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven Campus Kulak Kortrijk, Kortrijk, Belgium
Mariat, Christophe;  Service de Néphrologie, Dialyse et Transplantation Rénale, Hôpital Nord, CHU de Saint-Etienne, France
Language :
English
Title :
Where is the eye of the storm of eGFR formulas?
Publication date :
In press
Journal title :
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
ISSN :
0931-0509
eISSN :
1460-2385
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), England
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 27 February 2026

Statistics


Number of views
72 (3 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
2 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
1
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
1
OpenAlex citations
 
2

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi