tACS; working memory; accuracy-quantity trade-off; 4Hz theta; psychological inertia
Abstract :
[en] Previous studies have demonstrated that tACS can expand cognitive resources, thereby improving working memory (WM) performance, while some studies failed to observe a definitive advantage of tACS in boosting WM. Regarding this ongoing debate, this study sought to explore the effect of tACS on working memory by involving the factor of psychological inertia. Psychological inertia refers to the unconscious, automatic behavior
of an individual. The conflict between psychological inertia and rational decision-making could lead to a loss of optimal choice.
In Experiment 1, 36 participants completed a color recall reporting task. Active or sham tACS was applied before or after practice to manipulate the amount of memory resources at the initial stage. The results confirmed our hypothesis that participants who received active tACS after practice (post-practice) adopted similar memory strategies to those receiving sham stimulation due to a psychological inertia. They exhibited a trade-off between quantity and quality, i.e., post-practice tACS could boost memory accuracy with comparable quantity; while pre-practice stimulation improved memory quantity with comparable accuracy.
To investigate whether the regulatory effects of the first task would carry over to the second task, 56 participants completed both color and orientation recall reporting tasks in Experiment 2, where tACS stimulation was applied after the practice of the first task. The results revealed that memory accuracy was improved while the quantity was unchanged in the first task, which is consistent with the results from the group receiving post-ptactice tACS in Experiment 1. However, the memory quantity was enhanced and the accuracy was kept unchanged in the second task, consisting with the results of pre-practice tACS in Experiment 1. This indicates that, psychological inertia can be disrupted in new situations, leading to new strategies.
The regulatory effects of tACS on WM are modulated by the timing of stimulation. That is, pre-practice tACS influences the memory quantity, and post-practice tACS affects memory accuracy. Furthermore, the regulatory effects that were established during the first task may be disrupted when encountering a new task. These findings clarify the optimal temporal window for tACS intervention, providing a precise reference for clinical cognitive rehabilitation, such as early intervention in Alzheimer's disease.
Disciplines :
Theoretical & cognitive psychology
Author, co-author :
Guo, Ruiqiao ✱; Sichuan Normal University > Institute of Brain and Psychological Sciences
Li, Wenrui ✱; Université de Liège - ULiège > Psychologie et Neuroscience Cognitives (PsyNCog) ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Psychologie et neurosciences cognitives
Guo, Xue; University Medical Center Göttingen > Non-InvasiveBrain Stimulation Lab > Department of Neurology
Zhao, Na; Liaoning Normal University > Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience Research Center
Lei, Ming; Southwest Jiaotong University > Psychological Research and Counseling Center
Liu, Qiang; Sichuan Normal University > Institute of Brain and Psychological Sciences
✱ These authors have contributed equally to this work.
Language :
English
Title :
The impact of tACS stimulation timing on the modulation of working memory
Alternative titles :
[zh] 经颅交流电刺激的刺激时机对工作记忆调控效果的影响
Publication date :
05 March 2026
Journal title :
Acta Psychologica Sinica
ISSN :
0439-755X
Publisher :
Chinese Academy of Sciences. Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China
Alós-Ferrer, C., Hügelschäfer, S., & Li, J. (2016). Inertia and decision making. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 169. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00169
Antal, A., Boros, K., Poreisz, C., Chaieb, L., Terney, D., & Paulus, W. (2008). Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans. Brain Stimulation, 1(2), 97−105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2007.10.001
Antal, A., & Paulus, W. (2013). Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 317. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00317
Axmacher, N., Henseler, M. M., Jensen, O., Weinreich, I., Elger, C. E., & Fell, J. (2010). Cross-frequency coupling supports multi-item working memory in the human hippocampus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(7), 3228−3233. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911531107
Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 1−29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422
Barton, B., Ester, E. F., & Awh, E. (2009). Discrete resource allocation in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1359−1367. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015792
Bays, P. M., & Husain, M. (2008). Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision. Science, 321(5890), 851−854. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158023
Bender, M., Romei, V., & Sauseng, P. (2019). Slow theta tACS of the right parietal cortex enhances contralateral visual working memory capacity. Brain Topography, 32(3), 477−481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-019-00702-2
Biel, A. L., Sterner, E., Röll, L., & Sauseng, P. (2022). Modulating verbal working memory with fronto‐parietal transcranial electric stimulation at theta frequency: Does it work? European Journal of Neuroscience, 55(2), 405−425. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15563
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Danner, U. N., Aarts, H., & de Vries, N. K. (2008). Habit vs. intention in the prediction of future behaviour: The role of frequency, context stability and mental accessibility of past behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(2), 245−265. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X230876
Ding, J., Zhang, Y., Liang, P., & Li, X. (2023). Modulation of working memory capacity on predictive processing during language comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 38(8), 1133−1152.
Elyamany, O., Leicht, G., Herrmann, C. S., & Mulert, C. (2021). Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS): From basic mechanisms towards first applications in psychiatry. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 271(1), 135−156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-020-01209-9
Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102(2), 211−245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.211
Guo, X., Li, Z., Zhang, L., & Liu, Q. (2021). Modulation of visual working memory performance via different theta frequency stimulations. Brain Sciences, 11(10), 1358. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11101358
Haggar, P., Whitmarsh, L., & Skippon, S. M. (2019). Habit discontinuity and student travel mode choice. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 64, 1−13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.022
Jaušovec, N., Jaušovec, K., & Pahor, A. (2014). The influence of theta transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on working memory storage and processing functions. Acta Psychologica, 146, 1−6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.011
Jensen, O., & Lisman, J. E. (1998). An oscillatory short-term memory buffer model can account for data on the Sternberg task. The Journal of Neuroscience, 18(24), 10688−10699. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.18-24-10688.1998
Jensen, O., & Lisman, J. E. (2005). Hippocampal sequence-encoding driven by a cortical multi-item working memory buffer. Trends in Neurosciences, 28(2), 67−72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2004.12.001
Jensen, O., & Mazaheri, A. (2010). Shaping functional architecture by oscillatory alpha activity: Gating by inhibition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 186. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00186
Jones, K. T., Arciniega, H., & Berryhill, M. E. (2019). Replacing tDCS with theta tACS provides selective, but not general WM benefits. Brain Research, 1720, 146324.
Kleinert, M.-L., Szymanski, C., & Müller, V. (2017). Frequency-unspecific effects of θ-tACS related to a visuospatial working memory Task. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 367.
Lee, J., & Park, S. (2005). Working memory impairments in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114(4), 599−611. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021843X.114.4.599
Lega, B., Burke, J., Jacobs, J., & Kahana, M. J. (2016). Slow-theta-to-gamma phase-amplitude coupling in human hippocampus supports the formation of new episodic memories. Cerebral Cortex, 26(1), 268−278. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu232
Liu, C.-L., & Zhou, R.-L. (2013). Effects of working memory training on cognition and brain plasticity. Advances in Psychological Science, 20(7), 1003−1011. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1042.2012.01003
Long, F., Ye, C., Li, Z., Tian, Y., & Liu, Q. (2020). Negative emotional state modulates visual working memory in the late consolidation phase. Cognition and Emotion, 34(8), 1646−1663. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2020.1795626
Nissim, N. R., McAfee, D. C., Edwards, S., Prato, A., Lin, J. X., Lu, Z., Coslett, H. B., & Hamilton, R. H. (2023). Efficacy of transcranial alternating current stimulation in the enhancement of working memory performance in healthy adults: A systematic meta-analysis. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 26(4), 728−737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2022.12.014
Nitsche, M. A., Cohen, L. G., Wassermann, E. M., Priori, A., Lang, N., Antal, A., Paulus, W., Hummel, F., Boggio, P. S., Fregni, F., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2008). Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimulation
1(3), 206−223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004 Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 54−74.
Paßmann, S., Baselgia, S., Kasten, F. H., Herrmann, C. S., & Rasch, B. (2024). Differential online and offline effects of theta-tACS on memory encoding and retrieval. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 24(5), 894−911. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-024-01204-w
Peich, M.-C., Husain, M., & Bays, P. M. (2013). Age-related decline of precision and binding in visual working memory. Psychology and Aging, 28(3), 729−743. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033236
Pupíková, M., Maceira-Elvira, P., Harquel, S., Šimko, P., Popa, T., Gajdoš, M., … Rektorová, I. (2024). Physiology-inspired bifocal fronto-parietal tACS for working memory enhancement. Heliyon, 10(18), e37427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37427
Riecke, L., Formisano, E., Herrmann, C. S., & Sack, A. T. (2015). 4-Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation phase modulates hearing. Brain Stimulation, 8(4), 777−783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2015.04.004
Ruhnau, P., Neuling, T., Fuscá, M., Herrmann, C. S., Demarchi, G., & Weisz, N. (2016). Eyes wide shut: Transcranial alternating current stimulation drives alpha rhythm in a state dependent manner. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 27138. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27138
Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7−59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055564
Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), 597−599. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100
Schneegans, S., & Bays, P. M. (2017). Neural architecture for feature binding in visual working memory. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37(14), 3913−3925. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3493-16.2017
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84(2), 127−190. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.127
Spitzer, B., & Blankenburg, F. (2011). Stimulus-dependent EEG activity reflects internal updating of tactile working memory in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(20), 8444−8449. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1104189108
Sreeraj, V. S., Shivakumar, V., Sowmya, S., Bose, A., Nawani, H., Narayanaswamy, J. C., & Venkatasubramanian, G. (2019). Online theta frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation for cognitive remediation in schizophrenia: A case report and review of literature. The Journal of ECT, 35(2), 139−143. https://doi.org/10.1097/yct.0000000000000523
Suchow, J. W., Brady, T. F., Fougnie, D., & Alvarez, G. A. (2013). Modeling visual working memory with the MemToolbox. Journal of Vision, 13(10), 9−9. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.10.9
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251−296.
Tavakoli, A. V., & Yun, K. (2017). Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) mechanisms and protocols. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 11, 214. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2017.00214
Tseng, P., Lu, K. C., & Juan, C.-H. (2018). The critical role of phase difference in theta oscillation between bilateral parietal cortices for visuospatial working memory. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 349.
Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., & Machizawa, M. G. (2005). Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature, 438(7067), 500−503. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04171
Wang, S., Itthipuripat, S., & Ku, Y. (2019). Electrical stimulation over human posterior parietal cortex selectively enhances the capacity of visual short-term memory. The Journal of Neuroscience, 39(3), 528−536. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1959-18.2018
Wolinski, N., Cooper, N. R., Sauseng, P., & Romei, V. (2018). The speed of parietal theta frequency drives visuospatial working memory capacity. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2005348. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005348
Ye, C., Hu, Z., Li, H., Ristaniemi, T., Liu, Q., & Liu, T. (2017). A two-phase model of resource allocation in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(10), 1557−1566. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000376
Ye, C., Sun, H.-J., Xu, Q., Liang, T., Zhang, Y., & Liu, Q. (2019). Working memory capacity affects trade-off between quality and quantity only when stimulus exposure duration is sufficient: Evidence for the two-phase model. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 8727. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44998-3
Zhang, D.-W., Moraidis, A., & Klingberg, T. (2022). Individually tuned theta HD-tACS improves spatial performance. Brain Stimulation, 15(6), 1439−1447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2022.10.009
Zhang, S. Y., & Li, X., B. (2022). The application of different frequencies of transcranial alternating current stimulation in mental disorders. Advances in Psychological Science, 30(9), 2053−2066. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1042.2022.02053
Zhang, W., & Luck, S. J. (2008). Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory. Nature, 453(7192), 233−235. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06860
Zhang, X., Wang, W., Duan, H., Zhao, Y., Kan, Y., & Hu, W. (2019). Effect of working memory on insight and analytic problem solving. Journal of Psychological Science, 42(4), 777−783.
Zokaei, N., Burnett Heyes, S., Gorgoraptis, N., Budhdeo, S., & Husain, M. (2015). Working memory recall precision is a more sensitive index than span. Journal of Neuropsychology, 9(2), 319−329. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12052
