Article (Scientific journals)
A comparative assessment of flood mapping methods for urban risk management in data-poor environments
Ramiaramanana, Fenosoa Nantenaina; Munyi, Jane-marie Muthoni; Archambeau, Pierre et al.
2025In Natural Hazards
Peer reviewed
 

Files


Full Text
A Comparative assessment for flood mapping methods for urban risk management in data.pdf
Author postprint (12.59 MB)
Download
Annexes
ESM_1_A Comparative assessment for flood mapping methods.pdf
(10.81 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Flood mapping; Remote sensing; Fast Flood Simulation; Multicriteria analysis; Data-poor environments; Antananarivo
Abstract :
[en] Flood mapping is essential to urban resilience, but it often relies on traditional hydrological models, which are poorly suited to data-scarce contexts due to their complexity and input requirements. This study, conducted in Antananarivo, Madagascar, evaluates alternative approaches combining remote sensing (Pleiades and Sentinel-1), simplified hydrological modeling (Fast Flood Simulation—FFS), and multicriteria analysis (MCA), with validation from field observations. The results show contrasting performances: FFS (10 cm threshold) detected 45% of flooded zones in the urban center, while Sentinel-1 identified only 3% due to poor performance in dense built-up areas. Pleiades was also affected by structural artifacts, despite its high resolution. MCA identified 40% of the city as being highly vulnerable. In agricultural zones, FFS captured over 80% of flooded areas, compared to 56% for MCA and less than 10% for Sentinel-1. In residential neighborhoods, flooded building detection ranged from under 1% (Sentinel-1) to 27% (FFS) and 37% (MCA). Overall, FFS emerged as the most suitable tool, providing flood depth estimates for operational decision-making, but its reliability depends heavily on input data quality and calibration processes. Satellite imagery offers complementary post-crisis validation but remains limited in dense urban environments. MCA supports strategic planning but cannot model event-specific dynamics. Combined within a GIS platform or interactive dashboard, these tools provide complementary capabilities across risk management phases—prevention (FFS, remote sensing, MCA), crisis response (FFS), and reconstruction (FFS, remote sensing)—offering decision-support solutions adapted to data-poor environments.
Research Center/Unit :
LEMA - Local Environment Management and Analysis
Disciplines :
Engineering, computing & technology: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Author, co-author :
Ramiaramanana, Fenosoa Nantenaina  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département ArGEnCo > Urbanisme et aménagement du territoire
Munyi, Jane-marie Muthoni
Archambeau, Pierre  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département ArGEnCo > HECE (Hydraulics in Environnemental and Civil Engineering)
Teller, Jacques  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département ArGEnCo > LEMA (Local environment management and analysis)
Language :
English
Title :
A comparative assessment of flood mapping methods for urban risk management in data-poor environments
Alternative titles :
[fr] Évaluation comparative des méthodes de cartographie des inondations pour la gestion des risques urbains dans les environnements pauvres en données
Publication date :
20 August 2025
Journal title :
Natural Hazards
ISSN :
0921-030X
eISSN :
1573-0840
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Development Goals :
11. Sustainable cities and communities
Name of the research project :
Flood resilience of populations in deprived urban areas
Funders :
F.R.S.-FNRS - Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique
Funding text :
ESA Network of Resources Initiative
Available on ORBi :
since 02 September 2025

Statistics


Number of views
72 (3 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
56 (1 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
0
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
0
OpenAlex citations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi