[en] As the issue of PhD graduates (PhDs) pursuing careers beyond academia gains attention, the existing literature remains disparate and fragmented. In this scoping review, we examine how this phenomenon has been studied over the last two decades. Drawing on 71 publications, we used science mapping and content analyses to synthesise findings and identify research gaps. Eight dominant research foci emerged: outcomes of doctoral education, industryoriented PhD programmes, career development initiatives, PhDs’ career choices/intentions, PhDs’ employment, transitions to nonacademic sectors, labour-market demand, and employer perceptions of PhDs. This literature primarily reflects Western perspectives, emphasises STEM fields, and highlights broad trends concerning PhDs’ career preferences and destinations. Most publications draw on descriptive methods, suggesting an exploratory and undertheorised field. Gaps remain in understanding PhDs’ subjective experiences (particularly from social sciences and underrepresented groups), non-academic stakeholders’ perspectives, and the effectiveness of institutional career-support mechanisms. Future research should prioritise these areas to identify best practices in preparing PhDs for diverse careers. However, our findings show that a cultural shift within academia is needed to normalise diverse career paths, alongside formal institutional support and stronger collaborations with non-academic sectors. This paper advances the discussion on equipping PhDs for an increasingly complex and competitive career landscape.
Research Center/Unit :
LENTIC - Laboratoire d'Études sur les Nouvelles Formes de Travail, l'Innovation et le Changement - ULiège HEC Recherche. Changing workplace and strategic HRM - ULiège
Disciplines :
Business & economic sciences: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Author, co-author :
Skakni, Isabelle; University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland > Research and Innovation Division
American Association of University Professors (AAUP). (2022). The academic workforce. https://data.aaup.org/academic-workforce/
Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L., (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Armat, M. R., Assarroudi, A., & Rad, M., (2018). Inductive and deductive: Ambiguous labels in qualitative content analysis. The Qualitative Report, 23(1), 219–221. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.2872
Associazione Dottorandi e Dottori di Ricerca in Italia (ADI). (2019). Dottorato di ricerca: Niente di nuovo sul fronte occidentale. https://dottorato.it/sites/default/files/survey/indagine-adi-2019.pdf
Austin, A., & McDaniels, M., (2006). Preparing the professoriate of the future: Graduate student socialization for faculty roles. In J., Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 397–456). Agathon Press.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2016). Census of population and housing, 2016. https://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/censushome.nsf/home/2016
Council of Canadian Academies (CCA). (2021). Degrees of success: The transition from postsecondary education to the labour market. https://www.cca-reports.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Degrees-of-Success_FullReport_EN.pdf
Crumb, L., Haskins, N., Dean, L., & Avent Harris, J., (2020). Illuminating social-class identity: The persistence of working-class African American women doctoral students. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 13(3), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000109
Gardner, S. K., (2008). "What’s too much and what’s too little?”: The process of becoming an independent researcher in doctoral education. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 326–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772101
Gardner, S. K., & Doore, S. A., (2020). Doctoral student socialization and professional pathways. In J. C., Weidman, & L., DeAngelo (Eds.), Socialization in higher education and the early career. Knowledge studies in higher education (pp. 113–127). Springer.
Guerin, C., Jayatilaka, A., & Ranasinghe, D., (2015). Why start a higher degree by research? An exploratory factor analysis of motivations to undertake doctoral studies. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934663
Horta, H., Li, H., & Chan, S. J., (2024). Why do students pursue a doctorate in the era of the ‘PhD crisis’? Evidence from Taiwan. Higher Education Quarterly, 78(2), 505–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12467
Jackson, D., & Michelson, G., (2015). Factors influencing the employment of Australian PhD graduates. Studies in Higher Education, 40(9), 1660–1678. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.899344
Kereselidze, N., & Skakni, I., (2023). PhD graduates’ preparedness for careers beyond academia: The role of support communities. 20th EARLI Biennial Conference. Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O'Brien, K. K., (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
Li, H., & Horta, H., (2022). Factors influencing PhD students’ intentions to pursue careers in the government and nonprofit sectors: Evidence from a global survey. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(6), 1946–1961. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1948975
Locke, M. L., Trudgett, M., & Page, S., (2023). Building and strengthening indigenous early career researcher trajectories. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(1), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2048637
McAlpine, L., Skakni, I., & Inouye, K., (2021). PhD careers beyond the traditional: Integrating individual and structural factors for a richer account. European Journal of Higher Education, 11(4), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2020.1870242
Muurlink, O., Chen, L. A., Boorman, R., Pearson, D., & Cohen, G., (2024). Stakeholder perceptions of what industry wants from doctoral students: A systematic literature review. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(4), 952–965. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2269871
Nerad, M., (2020). Governmental innovation policies, globalisation, and change in doctoral education worldwide: Are doctoral programmes converging? Trends and tensions. In S., Cardoso, O., Tavares, C., Sin, & T., Carvalho (Eds.), Structural and institutional transformations in doctoral education. Issues in higher education (pp. 43–84). Palgrave Macmillan.
OECD. (2021). Reducing the precarity of academic research careers. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/0f8bd468-en
OECD. (2023). Promoting diverse career pathways for doctoral and postdoctoral researchers. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/dc21227a-en
OECD. (2024). The state of academic careers in OECD countries: An evidence review. OECD Education Policy Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1787/ea9d3108-en
Peters, M. D., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., … Khalil, H., (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(10), 2119–2126. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., & Britten, N., (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in sytematic reviews. Institute for Health Research.
Rosa, R., (2021). The trouble with ‘work–life balance’ in neoliberal academia: A systematic and critical review. Journal of Gender Studies, 31(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2021.1933926
Sinche, M. V., (2016). Next gen PhD: A guide to career paths in science. Harvard University Press.
Skakni, I., (2018). Reasons, motives and motivations for completing a PhD: A typology of doctoral studies as a quest. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 9(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-D-18-00004
Skakni, I., & Inouye, K., (2023). Preparing for the world outside academia: Avoiding organisational culture shock. In D., Eliott, K., Guccione, & S., Bengtsen (Eds.), The hidden curriculum in doctoral education, and the development of researcher independence (pp. 241–249). Palgrave.
Statistics Netherlands (CBS). (2020). Gepromoveerden op de arbeidsmarkt. https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/longread/statistische-trends/2020/gepromoveerden-op-de-arbeidsmarkt
Turk-Bicakci, L., Berger, A., & Haxton, C., (2014). The nonacademic careers of STEM PhD holders. American Institute for Research (AIR). https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/202106/STEM%20nonacademic%20careers%20April14.pdf
van der Boon, J., Kahmen, S., Maes, K., & Waaijer, C., (2018). Delivering talent: Careers of researchers inside and outside academia. League of European Research Universities. https://www.leru.org/publications/delivering-talent-careers-of-researchers-inside-and-outside-academia#
van Eck, N. J., (2011). Methodological advances in bibliometric mapping of science. Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Vitae. (2016). What research staff do next. (Report). https://www.vitae.ac.uk/vitae–publications/reports/vitae–what–do–research–staffdo–next–2016.pdf
Waltman, L., Van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. M., (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
Weber, C. T., Borit, M., Canolle, F., Hnatkova, E., & Pacitti, D., (2018). Identifying and documenting transferable skills and competences to enhance early career researchers’ employability and competitiveness. European Council of Doctoral Candidates and Junior Researchers.
Weidman, J. C., Twale, D. J., & Stein, E. L., (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report). Jossey-Bass. https://eric.ed.gov/?id = ED457710
Zupic, I., & Čater, T., (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
