Matt Novak, ‘Artist Reveals His Award-Winning “Photo” Was Creating Using AI’, Forbes, 17 April 2023, www.forbes.com/sites/mattnovak/2023/04/17/artist-reveals-his-award-winning-photo-was-created-using-ai/?sh = 3aa5e812f0fb.
Jane C. Ginsburg and Luke Ali Budiardjo, ‘Authors and Machines’ (2020) 34(1) Berkeley Technology Law Journal 343-448
George Akerlof, ‘The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism’ (1970) 84(3) Quarterly Journal of Economics 488-500.
Jerome De Cooman, ‘When Art Becomes a Lemon: The Economics of Machine-Enabled Artworks and the Need for a Rule of Origin’ (2023) 5(1) Law, Technology and Humans 24-39.
Justine Pila and Paul Torremans, European Intellectual Property Law (2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).
Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (London: John Murray, 1859) 402
Harry S. Gerla, ‘Competition on the Merits-A Sound Industrial Policy for Antitrust Law’ (1984) 36(4) University of Florida Law Review 553-590
Nicolas Petit, ‘The Judgement of the EU Court of Justice in Intel and the Rule of Reason in Abuse of Dominance Cases’ (2018) 43(5) European Law Review 728-750.
Jonathan Levin, ‘Information and the Market for Lemons’ (2001) 32(4) The RAND Journal of Economics 657-666.
Jack Hirschleifer, ‘Where Are We in the Theory of Information’ (1973) 63(2) American Economic Review 31-39
Malcolm Budd, ‘Artistic Value’ in Peter Lamarque and Stein Haugom Olsen (eds.), Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art: The Analytic Tradition, An Anthology (2nd ed., Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2018) 236-246
Fabian Bocart and Kim Oosterlinck, ‘Discoveries of Fakes: Their Impact on the Art Market’ (2011) 113(2) Economics Letters 124-126
Jonathon Keats, Forged: Why Fakes Are the Great Art of Our Age (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013) 8-11.
Jack W. Meiland, ‘Originals, Copies, and Aesthetic Values’ in Peter Lamarque and Stein Haugom Olsen (eds.), Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art: The Analytic Tradition, An Anthology (2nd ed., Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2018) 229-235
Peter Martin Jaworski, ‘In Defense of Fakes and Artistic Treason: Why Visually-Indistinguishable Duplicates of Paintings Are Just as Good as the Originals’ (2013) 47(4) Journal of Value Inquiry 391-405
Leila Amineddoleh, ‘Purchasing Art in a Market Full of Forgeries: Risks and Legal Remedies for Buyers’ (2015) 22(2-3) International Journal of Cultural Property 419-435
Justine M. Bonner, ‘Let Them Authenticate: Deterring Art Fraud’ (2017) 24(1) UCLA Entertainment Law Review 19-50
David Crystal-Kirk, ‘Forgery Reforged: Art-Faking and Commercial Passing-Off since 1981' (1986) 49(5) Modern Law Review 608-616
Ralph D. Clifford, ‘Intellectual Property in the Era of the Creative Computer Program: Will the True Creator Please Stand Up?' (1997) 71(6) Tulane Law Review 1675-1703.
Luciano Floridi and Massimo Chiriatti, ‘GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences’ (2020) 30(4) Minds and Machines 681-694
Lance Eliot, ‘AI Ethics Left Hanging When AI Wins Art Contest and Human Artists Are Fuming’, Forbes, 7 September 2022, www.forbes.com/sites/lanceeliot/2022/09/07/ai-ethics-left-hanging-when-ai-wins-art-contest-andhuman-artists-are-fuming/?sh = 214570314b1b.
Jerome De Cooman, ‘Humpty Dumpty and High-Risk AI Systems: The Ratione Materiae Dimension of the Proposal for an EU Artificial Intelligence Act’ (2022) 6(1) Market & Competition Law Review 49-88.
Jean Tirole, ‘Overcoming Adverse Selection: How Public Intervention Can Restore Market Functioning’ (2012) 102(1) American Economic Review 29-59.
Stefanio Inama, Rules of Origin in International Trade (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).
Jane C. Ginsburg, ‘The Concept of Authorship in Comparative Copyright Law’ (2003) 52 DePaul Law Review 1092.
Agnieszka Kurant, ‘Phantom Capital, Hybrid Authorship and Collective Intelligence’ (2016) 39(3) Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts 371-376.
Alan R. Durham, ‘The Random Muse: Authorship and Indeterminacy’ (2002) 44(2) William & Mary Law Review 569-642
Michael Spence, Market Signalling (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974).
Joseph E. Stiglitz, ‘The Theory of “Screening”, Education, and the Distribution of Income’ (1975) 65(3) American Economic Review 283-300.
Michael Spence, ‘Informational Aspects of Market Structure: An Introduction’ (1976) 90(4) Quarterly Journal of Economics 591-597
Michael Spence, ‘Signaling in Retrospect and the Informational Structure of Markets’ (2002) 92(3) American Economic Review 434-459
Karl-Gustaf Löfgren, Torsten Persson and Jörgen W. Weibull, ‘Markets with Asymmetric Information: The Contributions of George Akerlof, Michael Spence and Joseph Stiglitz’ (2002) 104(2) Scandinavian Journal of Economics 195-211.
Robert Mamada, ‘The Market for Lemons and Information Theory’ (2022) 120 Mathematical Social Sciences 107-112.
John G. Riley, ‘Testing the Educational Screening Hypothesis’ (1979) 87(5) Journal of Political Economy S227-S252.
Amna Kirmani and Akshay R. Rao, ‘No Pain, No Gain: A Critical Review of the Literature on Signalling Unobservable Product Quality’ (2000) 64(2) Journal of Marketing 66-79.
Phillip Nelson, ‘Advertising as Information’ (1974) 82(4) Journal of Political Economy 729-754.
Joseph Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1942)
Roger Wagner and Andrew Briggs, The Penultimate Curiosity: How Science Swims in the Slipstream of Ultimate Questions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016) 304-310.
