Ecological indicators; Economic valuation approaches; Environmental perception; Monetary and non-monetary valuation; Systematic review; Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics; Ecology; Nature and Landscape Conservation
Abstract :
[en] Ecosystem services (ESs) include the benefits people receive from ecosystems that support the socio-economic requirements and human well-being. The Man and Biosphere (MAB) programs are a scientific plan in the African context that is linked to governments and attempts to create a systematic ground to enhance the relationship between individuals and their environments. Using economic valuation methods, the main objective of this study was to perform a systematic review on studies undertaken in African countries in order to expose the role of MAB programs in conserving ESs in these countries. Based on the results, MAB programs offer both the protection of cultural ecosystem services and the improvement of livelihoods. Moreover, the MAB programs enable biosphere reserves to help national governments find solutions to the pressing challenges in Africa. In conclusion, policymakers should be aware of the main goal of ESs valuation approaches. In other words, the main goal should focus on the creation of prevention rather than rehabilitation activities in order to avoid the loss of ecosystem services mainly at the cost of users. Overall, the findings of this study underlined that economic valuation methods should provide evidence to underpin the development of policy instruments for the conservation of ESs in African countries. More importantly, ESs conservation strategies should consider various measures to reduce human impacts while also considering their well-being. In this context, the study's main implication is that human well-being is determined not only by the quantity but also by the quality of ESs.
Disciplines :
Agriculture & agronomy
Author, co-author :
Azadi, Hossein ; Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre > Modélisation et développement ; Department of Geography, Ghent University, Belgium ; Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
Van Passel, Steven; Department of Engineering Management, University of Antwerp, Belgium
Cools, Jan; Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development, University of Antwerp, Belgium
Language :
English
Title :
Rapid economic valuation of ecosystem services in man and biosphere reserves in Africa: A review
AEO, 2013. Africa Environment Outlook 3: Summary for policy makers. A publication of the United Nations Environment Program. 〈http://www.unep.org/pdf/aeo3.pdf〉.
Aerts, R., Honnay, O., Forest restoration, biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. BMC Ecol., 11, 2011, 29.
AfriMAB, 2017. Report of the 2017 AfriMAB Bureau Meeting: Improve Governance of the MAB Programme and Biosphere Reserves in Africa. 〈http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/ecological-sciences/man-and-biosphere-programme/networks/afrimab/〉.
AfriMAB, 2013. AfriMAB: Biosphere Reserves in Sub-Saharan Africa: Showcasing Sustainable Development. (Eds.) R. Pool-Stanvliet and M. Clusener-Godt. Published by Department of Environmental Affairs, Directorate: Protected Areas Planning, Legislation, Compliance and Monitoring, Pretoria, South Africa, and UNESCO, Division of Ecological and Earth Sciences, Paris, France.
Ajavon, G., Proposals for a Reinforcement of the Biosphere Reserves Managers Capabilities in Sub-Saharan Africa. 2017, Toulouse University International Union for Conservation of Nature. Program for African Protected Areas & Conservation.
Alamanos, A., Papaioannou, G., A GIS multi-criteria analysis tool for a low-cost, preliminary evaluation of wetland effectiveness for nutrient buffering at watershed scale: the case study of Grand River, Ontario, Canada. Water, 12, 2020, 3134.
Arowolo, A.O., Deng, X., Olatunji, O.A., Obayelu, A.E., Assessing changes in the value of ecosystem services in response to land-use/land-cover dynamics in Nigeria. Sci. Total Environ. 636 (2018), 597–609.
Asara, V., Otero, L., Demaria, F., Corbera, E., Socially sustainable degrowth as a social–ecological transformation: repoliticizing sustainability. Sustain. Sci. 10:3 (2015), 375–384, 10.1007/s11625-015-0321-9.
Balvanera, P., Uriarte, M., Almeida- Len ˜ero, L., Altesor, A., DeClerck, F., Gardner, T., Hall, J., Lara, A., Laterra, P., Vallejos, M., ES research in Latin America: the state of the art. Ecosyst. Serv. 2 (2012), 56–70.
Bayliss, J., Schaafsma, M., Balmford, A., Burgess, N.D., Green, J.M.H., Madoffe, S., Okayasu, S., Peh, K., Platts, P., Yu, D., The current and future value of nature-based tourism in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania. Ecosyst. Serv. 8 (2014), 75–83.
Beeri, I., Gottlieb, D., Izhaki, I., Eshet, T., Cohen, N., The impact of training on druze entrepreneurs’ attitudes towards and intended behaviors regarding local sustainability governance: a field experiment at the mount carmel biosphere reserve. Sustainability, 12, 2020, 4584.
Boafo, Y.A., Saito, O., Takeuchi, K., Provisioning ecosystem services in rural savanna landscapes of Northern Ghana: an assessment of supply, utilization, drivers change. J. Dis. Res 9 (2014), 501–515.
Boerema, A., Rebelo, A.J., Bodi, M.B., Esler, K.J., Meire, P., Are ecosystem services adequately quantified?. J. Appl. Ecol. 54 (2017), 358–370, 10.1111/1365-2664.12696.
Bogardi, J.J., Leentvaar, J., Sebesvári, Z., Biologia Futura: integrating freshwater ecosystem health in water resources management. Biol. Futur. 71 (2020), 337–358.
Bolzonella, C., Lucchetta, M., Teo, G., Boatto, V., Zanella, A., Is there a way to rate insecticides that is less detrimental to human and environmental health?. Glob. Ecol. Conserv., 20, 2019, e00699.
Bonnin, M., M. Jardin., 2009. Legal interpretation of the biosphere reserve concept in the framework of national legislation. 〈http://www.unesco.org/mab/doc/icc/2009/e_legal.pdf〉.
Bridgewater, P., The Man and Biosphere programme of UNESCO: rambunctious child of the sixties, but was the promise fulfilled?. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 19 (2016), 1–6.
Carson, R. T., Contingent valuation: a practical alternative when prices aren't available. J. Econ. Pers. 26:4 (2012), 27–42, 10.1257/jep.26.4.27.
Cavan, G., Lindley, S., Jalayer, F., Yeshitela, K., Pauleit, S., Renner, F., Gill, S., Capuano, P., Nebebe, A., Woldegerima, T., Kibassa, D., Shemdoe, R., Urban morphological determinants of temperature regulating ES in two African cities. Ecol. Ind. 42 (2014), 43–57.
Chee, Y.E., An ecological perspective on the valuation of ES. Biol. Conserv. 120 (2004), 549–565.
Cools, J., Johnston, R., Hattermann, F., Douven, W., Zsuffa, I., Tools for wetland management: lessons learnt from a comparative assessment. Environ. Sci. Policy 34 (2013), 138–145.
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P., van den Belt, M., The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecol. Econ. 25:1 (1997), 3–15 1997.
Costanza, R., dArge, R., De Groot, R., Faber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Raskin, R.G., The value of the world's ES and natural capital. Nature 387 (1997), 253–260.
Crossman, N., Burkhard, B., Nedkov, S., Willemen, L., Petz, K., Palomo, I., Drakou, E., Martı´n-Lopez, B., McPhearson, T., Boyanova, K., Alkemade, R., Egoh, B., Dunbar, M., Maes, J., A blueprint for mapping and modelling ES. Ecosyst. Serv. 4 (2013), 4–14.
Daily, G., Matson, P., ES: from theory to implementation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105 (2008), 9455–9456.
Daryanto, S., Jacinthe, P.A., Fu, B., Zhao, W., Wang, L., Valuing the ecosystem services of cover crops: barriers and pathways forward. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 270–271 (2019), 76–78.
Davenport, N.A., Shackleton, C.M., Gambiza, J., The direct use value of municipal commonage goods and services to urban house-holds in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Land Use Policy 29:3 (2012), 548–557.
De Groot, R.S., Matthew, A., Wilson, R., Boumans, M.J., A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol. Econ. 41 (2000), 393–408.
DEA Biosphere Reserve Programme, 2010. The South African National Committee for the UNESCO Man and Biosphere Programme (Terms of Reference), 2010. DEA internal National Biosphere Reserve Programme Committee document.
Defra, 2007. An introductory guide to valuing ecosystem services. Published by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Available at: 〈www.defra.gov.uk〉.
Department of Social Development (DSD), Strategic Plan 2015–2020. Strateg. Plan, 2017.
Dickens, Ch., 2015. ES mapping as a framework for integrated resource management. A Proposed Framework for INRM at the District Scale in South Africa. Rep. Water Res. Comm. Proj. Num.
Elbakidze, M., Hahn, T., Mauerhofer, V., Angelstam, P., Axelsson, R., Legal framework for biosphere reserves as learning sites for sustainable development: a comparative analysis of Ukraine and Sweden. Ambio 42:2 (2013), 174–187.
Elisa, M., Gara, J.I., Wolanski, E., A review of the water crisis in Tanzania's protected areas, with emphasis on the Katuma River-Lake Rukwa ecosystem. Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 10:2 (2011), 153–166.
Feng, Z., Cui, Y., Zhang, H., Gao, Y., Assessment of human consumption of ecosystem services in China from 2000 to 2014 based on an ecosystem service footprint model. Ecol. Indic. 94 (2018), 468–481.
Fisher, B., Turner, R.K., Burgess, N.D., Swetnam, R.D., Green, J., Green, R., Kajembe, G., Kulindwa, K., Lewis, S., Marchant, R., Marshall, A.R., Madoffe, S., Munishi, P.K.T., Morse-Jones, S., Mwakalila, S., Paavola, J., Naidoo, R., Ricketts, T., Rouget, M., Willcock, S., White, S., Balmford, A., Measuring, modelling and mapping ES in the eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 35 (2011), 595–611.
Fisher, J.A., Patenaude, G., Meir, P., Rounsevell, M.D.A., Williams, M., Giri, K., Lewis, K., Pinho, P., Understanding the relationships between ES and poverty alleviation: a conceptual framework. Ecosyst. Serv. 7 (2014), 34–45, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.08.002.
Fisher,B., Bateman I., Turner, R.K., 2011b. Valuing ecosystem services: benefits, values, space and time. Ecosystem Services Economics (ESE) Working Paper Series, Paper N° 3. UNEP.
Fuseini, I., Kemp, J., A review of spatial planning in Ghana's socio-economic development trajectory: a sustainable development perspective. Land Use Policy 47 (2015), 309–320.
Gallai, N., Salles, J.-M., Settele, J., Vaissière, B.E., Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline. Ecol. Econ. 68 (2009), 810–821, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.014.
Gatiso, T.T., Wossen, T., Forest dependence and income inequality in rural Ethiopia: evidence from Chilimo-Gaji community forest users International. Int. J. Sust. Dev. World 22 (2015), 14–24.
GIZ, 2012. Economic Valuation of ES. Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ). 〈https://www.giz.de/expertise/downloads/giz2013-en-biodiv-economic-valuation-ecosystem-services.pdf〉.
Government of South Africa, 2015. The South African Strategy for the Biosphere Programme (2016–2020). Department of Environmental Affairs, Pretoria, South Africa.
Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., 2013. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES), Version 4.3. Report to the European Environment Agency. Available at: 〈www.cices.eu〉.
Handmer, J., Honda, Y., Kundzewicz, Z.W., Arnell, N., Benito, G., Hatfield, J., Mohamed, I.F., Peduzzi, P., Wu, S., Sherstyukov, B., Takahashi, K., Yan, Z., Changes in impacts of climate extremes: human systems and ecosystems. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation, 2012, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York NY. USA, 231–290 A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
Hawkins, S.J., Southward, A.J., Genner, M.J., Detection of environmental change in a marine ecosystem—evidence from the western English Channel. Sci. Total. Environ. 310:1–3 (2003), 245–256.
Hicks, C., Woroniecki, S., Fancourt., M., Bieri, M., Garcia, Robles., H., Trumper, K., Mant, R., 2014. The relationship between biodiversity, carbon storage and the provision of other ecosystem services: Critical Review for the Forestry Component of the International Climate Fund. Cambridge, UK.
Hicks, C.C., Graham, N., Cinner, J.E., Synergies and tradeoffs in how managers, scientists, and fishers value coral reef ES. Glob. Environ. Change 23:6 (2013), 1444–1453.
Hugé, J., Rochette, A.J., Parra Paitan, C., de Béthune, S., Vanderhaegen, K., Vandervelden, T., Van Passel, S., Vanhove, M., Verbis,t M., Waas, T., Janssens, I., Janssens de Bisthoven, L., 2020. Ecosystem services assessment tools for African Biosphere Reserves: a user-informed classification. Eco. Ser.
Inkoom, J.N., Frank, S., Fürst, S., Challenges and opportunities of ecosystem service integration into land use planning in West Africa – an implementation framework. International Journal Of Biodiversity. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 13:2 (2017), 67–81.
Iqbal, M.H., Valuing ecosystem services of Sundarbans Mangrove forest: approach of choice experiment. Glob. Ecol. Conserv., 24, 2020, e01273.
Ishwaran, N., Science in intergovernmental environmental relations: 40 years of UNESCO's Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme and its future. Environ. Dev. 1 (2012), 91–101.
Keeler, B.L., et al. Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2012.
Kermagoret, C., Dupras, J., Coupling spatial analysis and economic valuation of ecosystem services to inform the management of an UNESCO World Biosphere Reserve. PLoS One, 13(11), 2018, 0205935.
Kothari, A., Demaria, F., Acosta, A., Buen Vivir, Degrowth and Ecological Swaraj: alternatives to sustainable development and the Green Economy. Development 57:3–4 (2014), 362–375, 10.1057/dev.2015.24.
La Notte, A., Liquete, C., Grizzetti, B., Maes, J., Egoh, B.N., Paracchini, M.L., An ecological-economic approach to the valuation of ecosystem services to support biodiversity policy. A case study for nitrogen retention by Mediterranean rivers and lakes. Ecol. Indic. 48 (2015), 292–302, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.006.
Liebelt, V., Bartke, S., Schwarz, N., Hedonic pricing analysis of the influence of urban green spaces onto residential prices: the case of Leipzig, Germany. Eur. Plan. Stud. 26 (2018), 133–157, 10.1080/09654313.2017.1376314.
Ma, X., Zhu, J., Zhang, H., Yan, W., Zhao, C., Trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem service values of inland lake wetlands in Central Asia under land use/cover change: a case study on Ebinur Lake, China. Glob. Ecol. Conserv., 24, 2020, e01253.
Mangi, H.O., Estimation of monetary values of the ecosystem services flow at the Tidal Elbe River. Adv. Ecol., 2016, 10.1155/2016/6742786.
MEA, 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis., Washington, DC.
Moore, R., Williams, T., Rodriguez, E., Hepinstall-Cymmerman, J., Quantifying the Value of Non-timber Ecosystem Services from Georgia's Private Forests. 2011, Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Munn, Z., Peters, M.D.J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., Aromataris, E., Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med. Res. Method., 18, 2018, 143.
Muthee, K., Mbow, Ch, Macharia, G., Leal-Filho, W., Ecosystem services in adaptation projects in West Africa. Int. J. Clim. Change Strateg. Manag. 10 (2017), 533–550, 10.1108/IJCCSM-06-2017-0140.
Namaalwa, S., Van dam, A.A., Funk, A., Ajie, G.S., Kaggwa, R.C., A characterization of the drivers, pressures, ecosystem functions and services of Namatala wetland, Uganda. Environ. Sci. Policy 34 (2013), 44–57.
Nelson, E., Bhagabati, N., Ennaanay, D., Lonsdorf, E., Pennington, D., Sharma, M., Modeling terrestrial ES. Levin, S., (eds.) Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, 2nd Volume, 2013, Academic Press, Waltham, MA, 347–361.
Nguyen, T.T., Do, T.L., Bühler, D., Hartje, R., Grote, U., Rural livelihoods and environmental resource dependence in Cambodia. Ecol. Econ. 120 (2015), 282–295.
Nilsson, M., Griggs, D., Visbeck, M., Policy: map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals. Nature 534 (2016), 320–322, 10.1038/534320a.
Otto, I.M., Reckien, D., Reyer, C.P.O., Marcus, R., Le Masson, V., Jones, L., Norton, A., Serdeczny, O., Social vulnerability to climate change: a review of concepts and evidence. Reg. Environ. Change 17 (2017), 1651–1662.
Pandeya, B., Buytaert, W., Zulkafli, Z., Karpouzoglou, T., Mao, F., Hannah, D.M., A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scarce regions. Ecosyst. Serv. 22 (2016), 250–259.
Peh, K.S.H., Balmford, A., Bradbury, R., TESSA: a toolkit for rapid assessment of ES at sites of biodiversity conservation importance. Ecosyst. Serv. 5 (2016), 51–57.
Pittini, M., 2011. Monetary valuation for ecosystem accounting. Issue paper prepared for the UN/World Bank/EEA Expert Meeting on Ecosystem Accounts, London, 5 -7 December 2011.
Pollock, A., Berge, E., How to do a systematic review. Int. J. Stroke 13:2 (2018), 138–156, 10.1177/1747493017743796.
Pool-Stanvliet, R., Coetzer, K., The scientific value of UNESCO biosphere reserves. S. Afr. J. Sci., 116(1–2), 2020, 7432, 10.17159/sajs.2020/7432 Art. #7432, 4 pages.
Pool-Stanvliet, R., Stoll-Kleemann, S., Giliomee, J.H., Criteria for selection and evaluation of biosphere reserves in support of the UNESCO MAB Programme in South Africa. Land Use Policy 76 (2018), 654–663, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.047.
Pool-Stanvliet, R., 2014. The UNESCO MAB Programme in South Africa: Current Challenges and Future Options Relating to the Implementation of Biosphere Reserves Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Greifswald, Germany.
Prentice, M.B., Bowman, J., Murray, D.L., Klütsch, C.F.C., Khidas, K., Wilson, P.J., Evaluating evolutionary history and adaptive differentiation to identify conservation units of Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis). Glob. Ecol. Conserv., 20, 2019, e00708.
Reed, M., The contributions of UNESCO Man and Biosphere Programme and biosphere reserves to the practice of sustainability science. Sustain. Sci. 14 (2019), 809–821, 10.1007/s11625-018-0603-0.
Reyers, B., Cowling, R., Egoh, B., Le Maitre, D., Vlok, J., Ecosystem services, land-cover change, and stakeholders: finding a sustainable foothold for a semiarid biodiversity hotspot. E&S, 14(1), 2009, art38.
Rodríguez-Robayo, K.J., Perevochtchikova, M., Ávila-Foucat, S., De la Mora De la Mora, G., Influence of local context variables on the outcomes of payments for ecosystem services. Evidence from San Antonio del Barrio, Oaxaca, Mexico. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 22 (2020), 2839–2860.
Rosa, I.M.D., Purvis, A., Alkemade, R., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Ferrier, S., Guerra, C.A., Hurtt, G., Kim, H., Leadley, P., Martins, I.S., Popp, A., Schipper, A.M., van Vuuren, D., Pereira, H.M., Challenges in producing policy-relevant global scenarios of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Glob. Ecol. Conserv., 22, 2020, e00886.
Ruckelshaus, M., McKenzie, E., Tallis, H., Guerry, A., Daily, G., Kareiva, P., et al. Notes from the field: lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions. Ecol. Econ., 2013, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.009.
Schultz, L., Duit, A., Folke, C., Participation, adaptive co-management, and management performance in the world network of biosphere reserves. World Dev. 39:4 (2011), 662–671.
Seppelt, R., Dormann, C.F., Eppink, F.V., Lautenbach, S., Schmidt, S., A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J. Appl. Ecol. 48:3 (2011), 630–636.
Siddaway, A.P., Wood, A.M., Hedges, L.V., How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 70 (2019), 747–770, 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803.
Silvestri, S., Zaibet, L., Said, M.Y., Kifugo, S.C., Valuing ES for conservation and development purposes: a case study from Kenya. Environ. Sci. Policy 31 (2013), 23–33.
Tawfik, G.M., Dila, K.A.S., Mohamed, M.Y.F., Tam, D.N.H., Kien, N.D., Ahmed, A.M., Huy, N.T., A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data. Trop. Med. Health, 47, 2019, 46, 10.1186/s41182-019-0165-6.
TEEB., 2010. The Economics of Ecosystem and Biodiversity for Local and Regional Policy Makers.Report, 207. Retrieved from 〈http://www.teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/Study〉 and Reports/Reports/Local and Regional Policy Makers/D2 Repor t/TEEB _Local_ PolicyMak ers_Report.pdf.
Thondhlana, G., Muchapondwa, E., Dependence on environmental resources and implications for household welfare: evidence from the Kalahari drylands, South Africa. Ecol. Econ. 108 (2014), 59–67.
Turner, W.R., Brandon, K., Brooks, T.M., Gascon, C., Gibbs, H.K., Lawrence, K.S., Mittermeier, R.A., Selig, E.R., Global biodiversity conservation and the alleviation of poverty. BioScience 62 (2012), 85–92.
Turpie, J.K., Forsythe, K.J., Knowles, A., Blignaut, J., Letley, G., Mapping and valuation of South Africa's ES: a local perspective. Ecosyst. Serv. 27 (2017), 179–192.
UNESCO, 2015a. MAB Networks. From UNESCO website, cited 22 June 2015: 〈 https://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/ecological-sciences/man-and-biosphere-programme/networks/〉.
UNESCO, 2015b. Man and the Biosphere Programme. From UNESCO website, cited 9 August 2015: 〈 http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/ecological-sciences/man-and-biosphere-programme〉.
UNESCO, 2017. A new Roadmap for the Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme and its World Network of Biosphere Reserves. MAB Strategy (2015–2025), Lima Action Plan (2016–2025), Lima Declaration. Paris: UNESCO.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2016. Man and The Biosphere Programme. 2016–2017. 〈http://www.unesco.org/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/H Q/SC/images /MAB_leaflet_2016_2017_en.pdf〉.
Van Jaarsveld, A.S., Biggs, R., Scholes, R.J., Bohensky, E., Reyers, B., Lynam, T., Musvoto, C., Fabricius, C., Measuring conditions and trends in ES at multiple scales: the Southern African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (SAfMA) experience. Biol. Sci. 360:1454 (2005), 425–441.
Vihervaara, P., Ronka, M., Walls, M., Trends in ecosystem service research: early steps and current drivers. Ambio 39:4 (2010), 314–324.
Vilà, M., Hulme, P.E., Non-native species, ecosystem services, and human well-being. Vilà, M., Hulme, P., (eds.) Impact of Biological Invasions on Ecosystem Services. Invading Nature - Springer Series in Invasion Ecology, vol 12, 2017, Springer, Cham, 10.1007/978-3-319-45121-3_1.
Wangai, P.W., Burkhard, B., Muller, F., A review of studies on ES in Africa. Int. IJSBE 5 (2016), 225–245.
WHO, 2018. Ethical, legal, human rights and social accountability implications of self-care interventions for sexual and reproductive health. 12–14 March 2018, Brocher Foundation, Hermance, Switzerland. 〈https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/273989/WHO-F W C-18.30-eng.pdf〉.
Willemen, L., Drakou, E.G., Dunbar, M.B., Mayaux, P., Egoh, B.N., Safeguarding ES and livelihoods: understanding the impact of conservation strategies on benefit flows to society. Ecosystm. Serv. 4 (2013), 95–103.
