Unpublished conference/Abstract (Scientific congresses and symposiums)
Effect of two distinct running retraining interventions on running-related injuries in recreational endurance runners: a three-arm randomised controlled trial with a one-year follow-up.
Abran, Guillaume
20242nd National Congress of Sports Physiotherapy
Peer reviewed
 

Files


Full Text
Poster_BFSP2.pdf
Author postprint (540.74 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] Introduction: Many experts and athletics coaches support running with a forefoot striking pattern, greater cadence, and minimalist footwear to reduce the risk of running-related injuries (RRIs) [1][2]. The objective of this study was to explore the effect of a running retraining intervention or transition to minimalist footwear on RRIs. Methods: One-hundred forty rearfoot runners were randomised into three groups: minimalist (N = 47), verbal feedback (N = 46), and control (N = 47). The minimalist group (MG) received either trail or road minimalist footwear. The verbal feedback group (VFG) received six sessions of running retraining aimed at running softer, avoiding rearfoot strike, and increasing cadence by 7.5%. The control group (CG) received a stretching program without additional instructions. Running habits, cadence, and footstrike pattern were measured on a treadmill at baseline, two, six and 12 months. Every two weeks, all runners received an e-mail to report whether they had sustained a RRIs [3]. Results: At 12 month follow-up, 57 runners (40%) sustained a RRIs. RRIs were mainly located in the foot (45,6%), tibia (17,5%), knee (15, 7%), and hip (15,7%). Intention-to-treat analysis showed that 18 runners (39%) in the CG, 13 runners (38%) in the MG, and 21 runners (44%) in the VFG sustained a RRIs. Similarly, as-treated analysis showed that 17 runners (47%) in the CG, 18 runners (38%) in the MG, and 17 runners (44%) in the VFG sustained a RRIs. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates showed no difference between-groups in the log-rank test at 12 months for intention-to-treat analysis (p = 0.229) or for as-treated analysis (p = 0.521). Conclusions: Unlike popular beliefs, neither transitioning to minimalist footwear nor adopting a softer running technique led to a decrease in RRIs. However, an individualised analysis is needed to detect the runner profile that could benefit from these interventions. [1] Abran G, Delvaux F, Schwartz C, et al. Current perception and practice of athletics coaches about the modification of footstrike pattern in endurance runners: a survey. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2022;17(6):1345-1353. doi:10.1177/17479541221108089 [2] Davis, I. S., Chen, T. L., & Wearing, S. C. (2022). Reversing the Mismatch With Forefoot Striking to Reduce Running Injuries. Frontiers in sports and active living, 4, 794005. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.794005 [3] Yamato, T. P., Saragiotto, B. T., & Lopes, A. D. (2015). A consensus definition of running-related injury in recreational runners: a modified Delphi approach. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 45(5), 375–380. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2015.5741
Disciplines :
Human health sciences: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Author, co-author :
Abran, Guillaume  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Unités de recherche interfacultaires > Motion analysis research unit (MARU)
Language :
English
Title :
Effect of two distinct running retraining interventions on running-related injuries in recreational endurance runners: a three-arm randomised controlled trial with a one-year follow-up.
Publication date :
16 November 2024
Event name :
2nd National Congress of Sports Physiotherapy
Event date :
16/11/2024
Audience :
International
Peer review/Selection committee :
Peer reviewed
Available on ORBi :
since 16 January 2025

Statistics


Number of views
64 (3 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
2 (2 by ULiège)

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi