Request a copy

Full Text

• Acharya, A. 2014. The End of American World Order. Cambridge: Polity.
• Acharya, A. 2015. The Meanings of ‘Multiplex’, and the ‘Multiplex World Order’. Multiplexworld, February 8, available at: https://multiplexworld.com/2015/02/08/the-meaning-of-multiplex-and-the-multiplex-world-order/ (accessed 18 October 2023).
• Acharya, A. 2017. After Liberal Hegemony: The Advent of a Multiplex World Order. Ethics and International Affairs 31 (3): 271-285.
• Acharya, A. 2019. Understanding the Emerging Multiplex Order. University College London, July 1, available at: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/global-governance/news/2019/jul/understanding-emerging-multiplex-world-order (accessed 18 October 2023).
• Aggarwal, V.K., and E. Fogarty, eds. 2004. EU Trade Strategies: Regionalism and Globalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Ambrosio, T. 2012. The Rise of the ‘China Model’ and ‘Beijing Consensus’: Evidence of Authoritarian Diffusion? Contemporary Politics 18 (4): 381-399.
• Aydin-Düzgit, S., and G. Noutcheva. 2022. External Contestations of Europe: Russia and Turkey as Normative Challengers? Journal of Common Market Studies 60 (6): 1815-1831.
• Badie, B. 2013. La diplomatie de connivence: Les dérives oligarchiques du système international. Paris: La Découverte.
• Badie, B. 2016. Nous ne sommes plus seuls au monde. Un autre regard sur ‘l’ordre international’ Paris: La Découverte.
• Balmaceda, M. 2021. Russian Energy Chains: The Remaking of Technopolitics from Siberia to Ukraine to the European Union. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Berzins, V. 2022. Hybrid Warfare: Weaponized Migration on the Eastern Border of the EU? The Interdisciplinary Journal of International Studies 12 (1): 119.
• Bialasiewicz, L., ed. 2016. Europe in the World: EU Geopolitics and the Making of European Space. London and New York: Routledge.
• Borzel, T.A. 2016. From EU Governance of Crisis to Crisis of EU Governance: Regulatory Failure, Redistributive Conflict and Eurosceptic Publics. Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (8): 8-31.
• Borzel, T.A., and T. Risse. 2009. The Transformative Power of Europe: The European Union and Diffusion of Ideas. KFG Working Paper, n 1, 1-28.
• Borzel, T.A., and T. Risse. 2018. From the Euro to the Schengen Crises: European Integration Theories, Politicization, and Identity Politics. Journal of European Public Policy 25 (1): 83-108.
• Bretherton, C., and J. Vogler. 2006. The European Union as a Global Actor. London and New York: Routledge.
• Calder, K.E. 1988. Japanese Foreign Economic Policy Formation: Explaining the Reactive State. World Politics 40 (4): 517-541.
• Casier, T. 2022. Russia and the Diffusion of Political Norms: The Perfect Rival? Democratization 2 (3): 433-450.
• Cassani, A., and L. Tomini. 2020. Reversing Regimes and Concepts: From Democratization to Autocratization. European Political Science 19: 272-287.
• Ceccorulli, M., E. Fassi, and S. Lucarelli, eds. 2020. The EU Migration System of Governance: Justice on the Move. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Ceccorulli, M., and S. Lucarelli. 2017. Migration and the EU Global Strategy: Narratives and Dilemmas. The International Spectator 52 (3): 83-102.
• Cerny, P.G., ed. 2022. Heterarchy in World Politics. London: Taylor & Francis.
• Colgan, J.D., and R.O. Keohane. 2017. The Liberal Order Is Rigged: Fix It Now or Watch It Wither. Foreign Affairs 96 (3): 36-44.
• Dandashly, A., and C. Kourtelis. 2020. Classifying the Implementation of the EU’s Normative Power in its Southern Neighbourhood: The Role of Local Actors. Journal of Common Market Studies 58 (6): 1523-1539.
• De Graaff, N., and B. Van Apeldoorn. 2018. US-China Relations and the Liberal World Order: Contending Elites, Colliding Visions? International Affairs 94 (1): 113-131.
• De Wilde, P. 2011. No Polity for Old Politics? A Framework for Analyzing the Politicization of European Integration. Journal of European Integration 33 (5): 559-575.
• De Wilde, P., and M. Zürn. 2012. Can the Politicization of European Integration be Reversed? Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (1): 137-153.
• Dony, M., and L. Serena. 2008. Démocratie, cohérence et transparence: vers une constitutionnalisation de l’Union européenne? Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
• Dopchie, R., and L. Lika. 2024. The EU Enlargement Strategy in the Western Balkans: Assessing the Implications Amidst the War in Ukraine. European Foreign Affairs Review 29 (2): 159-176.
• Duchêne, F. 1972. Europe’s Role in World Peace. In Europe Tomorrow: Sixteen Europeans Look Ahead, ed. R. Mayne, 32-47. London: Fontana/Collins.
• Duncombe, C., and T. Dunne. 2018. After Liberal World Order. International Affairs 94 (1): 25-42.
• Duke, S. 2006. Consistency as an Issue in EU External Activities. Working Paper, European Institue of Public Administration, 1-38.
• Esteves, P., and S. Klingebiel. 2021. Diffusion, Fusion, and Confusion: Development Cooperation in a Multiplex World Order. In The Palgrave Handbook of Development Cooperation for Achieving the 2030 Agenda, ed. S. Chaturvedi, H. Janus, S. Klingebiel, X. Li, A. de Mello e Souza, E. Sidiropoulos, and D. Wehrmann, 185-215. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
• European Commission. 2019a. The von der Leyen Commission: For a Union That Strives for More. Press release, 19/5542.
• European Commission. 2019b. EU-China a Strategic Outlook, available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:520 19JC0005 (accessed 7 November 2023).
• European Commission. 2022. Speech by President von der Leyen at the European Parliament Plenary on the Russian Aggression Against Ukraine. Speech/22/1483.
• EEAS. 2022. Russian Aggression Against Ukraine: Speech by High Represen-tative/Vice-President Josep Borrell at the EP Plenary, March 1, available at: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/russian-aggression-against-ukraine-speech-high-representativevice-president-josep-borrell-ep-plenary-0_en (accessed 26 September 2023).
• Fagerholm, A. 2024. Sympathy or Criticism? The European Far Left and Far Right React to Russia’s 2022 Invasion of Ukraine. Europe-Asia Studies 76 (6): 829-850.
• Fahey, E., ed. 2020. Framing Convergence with the Global Legal Order. The EU and the World. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
• Fahey, E., and I. Mancini, eds. 2022. Understanding the EU as a Good Global Actor: Ambitions, Values and Metrics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Farrell, H., and A.L. Newman. 2019. Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion. International Security 44 (1): 4279.
• Ferguson, N., and F. Zakaria. 2017. The End of the Liberal Order? London: Oneworld Publications.
• Freire, M.R. et al. 2022. EU Global Actorness in a World of Contested Leadership. Policies, Instruments and Perceptions. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Fukuyama, F. 2022. Putin’s War on the Liberal Order, Financial Times, available at: https://www.ft.com/content/d0331b51-5d0e-4132-9f97-c3f41c7d75b3 (accessed 7 November 2023).
• Grabbe, H. 2006. EU’s Transformative Power: Europeanization Through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Haass, R.N. 2008. The Age of Nonpolarity: What Will Follow U.S. Dominance. Foreign Affairs 87 (3): 44-56.
• Haass, R. 2017. A World in Disarray: American Foreign Policy and the Crisis of the Old Order. New York: Penguin.
• Hackenbroich, J., and P. Zerka. 2021. Measured Response: How to Design a European Instrument Against Coercion, ECFR, available at: https://ecfr.eu/publication/measured-response-how-to-design-a-european-instrument-against-economic-coercion/ (accessed 20 November 2023).
• Hansen, B. 2010. Unipolarity and World Politics. A Theory and Its Implications. London: Routledge.
• Hellmeier, S., et al. 2021. State of the World 2020: Autocratization Turns Viral. Democratization 28 (6): 1053-1074.
• Hill, C., and M. Smith. 2005. International Relations and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Hill, C., M. Smith, and S. Vanhoonacker, eds. 2023. International Relations and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Holden, P. 2009. In Search of Structural Power: EU Aid Policy as a Global Political Instrument. Farnham: Ashgate.
• Hopewell, K. 2022. Beyond US-China Rivalry: Rule Breaking, Economic Coercion, and the Weaponization of Trade. CUP. Available at: https://S2398772322000034jra58..63 (accessed 20 November 2023).
• Ikenberry, G.J. 2018. The End of Liberal International Order? International Affairs 94 (1): 7-23.
• Johansson-Nogués, E. 2007. The (Non-)Normative Power EU and the European Neighbourhood Policy: An Exceptional Policy for an Exceptional Actor? European Political Economic Review 7: 181-194.
• Jupille, J., and J. Caporaso. 1998. States, Agency and Rules: The European Union in Global Environmental Politics. In The European Union in the World Community, ed. C. Rhodes, 213-229. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
• Kavalski, E. 2013. The Struggle for Recognition of Normative Powers: Normative Power Europe and Normative Power China in Context. Cooperation and Conflict 48 (2): 247-267.
• Klose, S. 2018. Theorizing EU Actorness: Towards an Interactionist Role Theory Framework. Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (5): 1144-1160.
• Krauthammer, C. 1990/1991. The Unipolar Moment. Foreign Affairs 70 (1): 23-33.
• Leonard, M. 2021. The Power Atlas. Seven Battlegrounds of a Networked World, ECFR, available at: https://ecfr.eu/special/power-atlas/ (accessed 20 November 2023).
• Lieber, R.J. 2022. Polarity, Non-polarity, and the Risks of A-Polarity. In Polarity in International Relations. Past, Present, Future, ed. N. Graeger et al., 171189. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Lika, L., and A. Weerts. 2021. Jeux et enjeux de l’Union Européenne: quels enseignements peut-on tirer? Cahiers de Science Politique de l’Université de Liège, 103-108.
• Lührmann, A., and S.I. Lindberg. 2019. A Third Wave of Autocratization Is Here: What Is New About It? Democratization 26 (7): 1095-1113.
• Lütz, S., T. Leeg, and D. Otto. 2021. The European Union as a Global Actor: Trade, Finance and Climate Policy. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• Manners, I. 2002. Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2): 235-258.
• Manners, I. 2010. As You Like It: European Union Normative Power in the European Neighbourhood Policy. In The European Neighbourhood Policy in Perspective: Context, Implementation and Impact, ed. R. Whitman and S. Wolff, 29-50. Houndmills Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Marangoni, A.-C. 2014. Towards Consistency of EU External Policies? A Case Study on the European Commission, Doctoral Thesis, University of Maastricht.
• Marangoni, A.-C., and S. Vanhoonacker. 2015. The Consistency of EU External Action Post-Lisbon: Renewing Appropriate Measures Against Zimbabwe in 2012. In Dynamics of institutional cooperation in the European Union: Dimensions and Effects, European Integration online Papers (EIoP), Special issue, 19 (1): 1-22.
• Maull, H.W. 1990. Germany and Japan: The New Civilian Powers, Foreign Affairs, available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/1990-12-01/germany-and-japan-new-civilian-powers (accessed 18 October 2023).
• Mearsheimer, J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. London and New York: Norton.
• Meissner, K.L., and M.G. Schoeller. 2020. Rising Despite the Polycrisis? The European Parliament’s Strategies of Self-empowerment After Lisbon. In The European Union Beyond the Polycrisis? Integration and Politicization in an Age of Shifting Cleavages, ed. J. Zeitlin and F. Nicoli, 113-131. London: Routledge.
• Menendez, A.J. 2016. The Refugee Crisis: Between Human Tragedy and Symptom of the Structural Crisis of European Integration. European Law Journal 22 (4): 388-416.
• Merle, M. 1988. Sociologie des relations internationales. Paris: Dalloz.
• Meunier, S., and K. Nicolaidis. 2019. The Geopoliticization of European Trade and Investment Policy. Journal of Common Market Studies 57 (1): 103-113.
• Niemann, A., and C. Bretherton. 2013. EU External Policy at the Crossroads: The Challenge of Actorness and Effectiveness. International Relations 27 (3): 261-275.
• Onea, T. 2021. The Grand Strategies of Great Powers. New York: Routledge.
• Petiteville, F. 2002. L’Union européenne, acteur international ‘global’? Un Agenda De Recherche. Revue Internationale Et Stratégique 47 (3): 145-157.
• Puetter, U. 2012. Europe’s Deliberative Intergovernmentalism: The Role of the Council and European Council in EU Economic Governance. Journal of European Public Policy 19 (2): 161-178.
• Riga, D. 2024. Navigating Regionalism in a Heterarchical Global Order: A Comprehensive Analysis of the EU’s Empowerment in Global Investment Governance. In Postinternationalism and the Rise of Heterarchy, ed. D.M. Ramjit, 165-188. Hershey PA: IGI Global.
• Santander, S., and A. Vlassis. 2020. EU in Global Affairs: Constrained Ambition in an Unpredictable World? European Foreign Affairs Review 25 (1): 5-22.
• Scott, D.A. 2017. Multipolarity, Multilateralism and Beyond…? EU-China Understandings of the International System. International Relations 27 (1): 30-51.
• Shekhovtsov, A. 2017. Russia and the Western Far Right. Tango Noir. London: Routledge.
• Simao, L. 2022. Unpacking EU’s International Actorness: Debates, Theories and Concepts. In EU Global Actorness in a World of Contested Leadership. Policies, Instruments and Perceptions, ed. M.R. Freire et al., 13-32. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Slaughter, A.M. 2004. Disaggregated Sovereignty: Towards the Public Accountability of Global Government Networks. Government and Opposition 39 (2): 159-190.
• Smith, M.A. 2013. Russia and Multipolarity Since the End of the Cold War. East European Politics 29 (1): 36-51.
• Soderbaum, F., and L. Van Langenhove. 2006. The EU as a Global Player: The Politics of Interregionalism. New York: Routledge.
• Stiglitz, J.E. 2014. Crises: Principles and Policies with an Application to the Euro Zone Crisis. In Life After Debt: The Origins and Resolutions of Debt Crisis, ed. J.E. Stiglitz and D. Heymann, 43-79. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Stiglitz, J.E. 2016. The Fundamental Flaws in the Euro Zone Framework. In The Euro and the Crisis: Perspectives for the Eurozone as a Monetary and Budgetary Union, ed. N. de Costa Cabral et al., 11-16. New York: Springer.
• Taeuber, S. 2020. Reconstructing the Silk Road: Norm Contestation in Sino-European Relations in Times of the Belt and Road Initiative. Journal of Rising Powers and Global Governance 1 (1): 31-65.
• Telò, M. 2006. Europe: A Civilian Power? European Union, Global Governance, World Order. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Telò, M., ed. 2014. Globalisation, Multilateralism, Europe. Towards a Better Global Governance? New York: Routledge.
• Tocci, N. 2017. Framing the EU Global Strategy. A Stronger Europe in a Fragile World. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• Van der Pijl, K., ed. 2021. The Militarization of the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
• Vanhoonacker, S. 2018. The Bush Administration (1989-1993) and the Development of a European Security Identity. London and New York: Routledge.
• Veebel, V. 2019. Why It Would Be Strategically Rational for Russia to Escalate in Kaliningrad and the Suwalki corridor. Comparative Strategy 38 (3): 182-197.
• Vuskane, L. 2019. The Role of European Union in World Politics. München: GRIN Verlag.
• Wu, Z. 2018. Classical Geopolitics, Realism and the Balance of Power Theory. Journal of Strategic Studies 41 (6): 786-823.
• Yakemtchouk, R. 2005. La politique étrangère de l’Union européenne. Paris: L’Harmattan.
• Zeitlin, J., and F. Nicoli, eds. 2020. The European Union Beyond the Polycrisis? Integration and Politicization in an Age of Shifting Cleavages. London: Routledge.