Article (Scientific journals)
Foaming and air-water interfacial properties of camel milk proteins compared to bovine milk proteins
Lajnaf, Roua; Picart-Palmade, Laetitia; Attia, Hamadi et al.
2022In Food Hydrocolloids, 126, p. 107470
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
1-s2.0-S0268005X21008869-main.pdf
Publisher postprint (5.39 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Camel and bovine proteins; Foaming properties; Intrinsic fluorescence; Surface tension; Viscoelastic modulus; Air-water; Air/Water Interfaces; Bovine milk proteins; Camel and bovine protein; Camel milks; Lactoglobulin; Milk protein; Viscoelastic moduli; Food Science
Abstract :
[en] The objective of this research was to explore the foaming properties of camel and bovine milk and their derived proteins fractions including sodium caseinates, sweet whey, β-casein, α-lactalbumin and β-lactoglobulin. First, camel and bovine milk proteins were identified by the reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) and foaming properties (Foam capacity (FC) and stability (FS)) were analyzed. Afterwards, competitive adsorption of proteins to the air-water interface for both milk protein fractions was characterized using pendant-drop tensiometry parameters and was compared to intrinsic fluorescence results of pure proteins. Experimental results indicated that the maximum FC values were found for camel skim milk, sodium caseinates and β-casein with higher FS values for bovine β-casein. Differences in the stability and the highest tensioactive properties of camel β-casein were explained with the different molecular structure and its higher hydrophobicity when compared to its bovine counterpart. Thus, milk proteins adsorbed layers are mainly affected by the presence of β-casein which is the first adsorbed and the most abundant protein at the air-water contrary to whey proteins (α-lactalbumin and β-lactoglobulin). These globular proteins are involved in the composition of protein layers at air-water interface, giving higher viscoelastic modulus values, but could not compact well at the interface because of their rigid molecular structure. For camel milk, foaming properties and interfacial behavior are mainly maintained by camel β-casein due to its higher hydrophobicity compared to bovine β-casein and the greater exposure of tyrosine residues despite the absence of tryptophan in consistence with the intrinsic fluorescence results. Furthermore, the absence of the β-lactoglobulin leads to the dominance of the α-lactalbumin at the air-water interface which is characterized by lower hydrophobicity than its bovine counterpart leading to lower viscoelastic modulus values than those of bovine whey, and hence to weaker rheological properties of camel milk protein layer at the air-water interface.
Disciplines :
Food science
Author, co-author :
Lajnaf, Roua ;  Alimentary Analysis Unit, National Engineering School of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia ; IATE, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France
Picart-Palmade, Laetitia ;  IATE, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France
Attia, Hamadi;  Alimentary Analysis Unit, National Engineering School of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia
Marchesseau, Sylvie ;  IATE, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France
Ayadi, Mohamed ;  Alimentary Analysis Unit, National Engineering School of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia
Language :
English
Title :
Foaming and air-water interfacial properties of camel milk proteins compared to bovine milk proteins
Publication date :
May 2022
Journal title :
Food Hydrocolloids
ISSN :
0268-005X
eISSN :
1873-7137
Publisher :
Elsevier B.V.
Volume :
126
Pages :
107470
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
MHESR - Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique
Funding text :
This work was funded by the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research of Tunisia . We are greatly indebted to UMR-IATE for the drop-tensiometry measurements and to Professor Ammar Ben Ali for editing the manuscript.
Available on ORBi :
since 26 November 2024

Statistics


Number of views
15 (0 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
5 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
22
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
17
OpenCitations
 
10
OpenAlex citations
 
26

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi