[en] Natural history collections are invaluable reference collections. Digitizing these collections is a transformative process that improves the accessibility, preservation, and exploitation of specimens and associated data in the long term. Arthropods make up the majority of zoological collections. However, arthropods are small, have detailed color textures and share small, complex and shiny structures, which poses a challenge to conventional digitization methods. Sphaeroptica is a multi-images viewer that uses a sphere of oriented images. It allows the visualization of insects including their tiniest features, the positioning of landmarks, and the extraction of 3D coordinates for measuring linear distances or for use in geometric morphometrics analysis. The quantitative comparisons show that the measures obtained with Sphaeroptica are similar to the measurements derived from 3D μCT models with an average difference inferior to 1%, while featuring the high resolution of color stacked pictures with all details like setae, chaetae, scales, and other small and/or complex structures. Shaeroptica was developed for the digitization of small arthropods but it can be used with any sphere of aligned images resulting from the digitization of objects or specimens with complex surface and shining, black, or translucent texture which cannot easily be digitized using structured light scanner or Structure-from-Motion (SfM) photogrammetry.
Disciplines :
Entomology & pest control
Author, co-author :
Mathys, Aurore ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Unités de recherche interfacultaires > Art, Archéologie et Patrimoine (AAP) ; Scientific Service of Heritage, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium ; Collections Management, Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium
Pollet, Yann; Scientific Service of Heritage, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium
Gressin, Adrien ; School of Engineering and Management Vaud, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Art Western, Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland
Muth, Xavier; School of Engineering and Management Vaud, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Art Western, Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland
Brecko, Jonathan ; Scientific Service of Heritage, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium ; Collections Management, Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium
Dekoninck, Wouter; Scientific Service of Heritage, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium
Vandenspiegel, Didier; Collections Management, Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium
Jodogne, Sébastien ; Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA > GIGA CRC In vivo Imaging - Neuroimaging, data acquisition and processing ; Institute of Information and Communication, Technologies Electronics and Applied Mathematics (ICTEAM), UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Semal, Patrick; Scientific Service of Heritage, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium
Language :
English
Title :
Sphaeroptica: A tool for pseudo-3D visualization and 3D measurements on arthropods.
Johnson KR, Owens IFP, the Global Collection Group. A global approach for natural history museum collections. Science. 2023; 379(6638):1192–1194. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adf6434 PMID: 36952410
Hedrick BP, Heberling JM, Meineke EK, Turner KG, Grassa CJ, Park DS, et al. Digitization and the Future of Natural History Collections. BioScience. 2020; 70(3):243–251. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/ biz163
Popov D, Roychoudhury P, Hardy H, Livermore L, Norris K. The Value of Digitising Natural History Collections. Research Ideas and Outcomes. 2021; 7:e78844. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.7.e78844
Brecko J, Mathys A. Handbook of best practice and standards for 2D+ and 3D imaging of natural history collections. European Journal of Taxonomy. 2020;(623). https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.623
Nguyen CV, Lovell DR, Adcock M, Salle JL. Capturing Natural-Colour 3D Models of Insects for Species Discovery and Diagnostics. PLOS ONE. 2014; 9(4):e94346. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0094346 PMID: 24759838
Doan TN, Nguyen CV. A low-cost digital 3D insect scanner. Information Processing in Agriculture. 2023; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2023.03.003.
Wagner T, Bachenberg L, Glaser SM, Oikonomou A, Linn M, Grüter C. Large body size variation is associated with low communication success in tandem running ants. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2020; 75(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02941-x
Wonglersak R, Fenberg PB, Langdon PG, Brooks SJ, Price BW. Insect body size changes under future warming projections: a case study of Chironomidae (Insecta: Diptera). Hydrobiologia. 2021; 848 (11):2785–2796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04597-8
Van De Walle R, Logghe G, Haas N, Massol F, Vandegehuchte ML, Bonte D. Arthropod food webs predicted from body size ratios are improved by incorporating prey defensive properties. Journal of Animal Ecology. 2023; 92(4):913–924. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13905 PMID: 36807906
Mráz R, Štěpka K, Pekár M, Matula P, Pekár S. MAPHIS—Measuring arthropod phenotypes using hierarchical image segmentations. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2024; 15(1):36–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.14250
Mullin SK, Taylor PJ. The effects of parallax on geometric morphometric data. Computers in Biology and Medicine. 2002; 32(6):455–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4825(02)00037-9 PMID: 12356495
Ströbel B, Schmelzle S, Blüthgen N, Heethoff M. An automated device for the digitization and 3D model-ling of insects, combining extended-depth-of-field and all-side multi-view imaging. ZooKeys. 2018; 759:1–27. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.759.24584 PMID: 29853774
Plum F, Labonte D. scAnt—an open-source platform for the creation of 3D models of arthropods (and other small objects). PeerJ. 2021; 9:e11155. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11155 PMID: 33954036
Keklikoglou K, Faulwetter S, Chatzinikolaou E, Wils P, Brecko J, Kvaček J, et al. Micro-computed tomography for natural history specimens: a handbook of best practice protocols. European Journal of Taxonomy. 2019;(522). https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2019.522
Kroupa A, Pluta, Schurian B, Glöckler F. ZooSphere—A tool for automated spheric image capturing and interactive 3D visualization of biological collection objects. In: 29th Annual Meeting: Historic Collections: A Resource for the Future; 2014. Available from: https://www.idigbio.org/sites/default/files/workshop-presentations/spnhc2014/10_kroupa%20et%20al%20zoosphere.pdf
Pollet Y. Sphaeroptica: photogrammétrie appliquée à des images d’arthropodes [masterthesis]. École polytechnique de Louvain, Université catholique de Louvain; 2023. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/thesis:40749.
Westoby MJ, Brasington J, Glasser NF, Hambrey MJ, Reynolds JM. #x2018;Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology. 2012; 179:300–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.021
Iglhaut J, Cabo C, Puliti S, Piermattei L, O’Connor J, Rosette J. Structure from Motion Photogrammetry in Forestry: a Review. Current Forestry Reports. 2019; 5(3):155–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-019-00094-3
Javadnejad F, Slocum RK, Gillins DT, Olsen MJ, Parrish CE. Dense Point Cloud Quality Factor as Proxy for Accuracy Assessment of Image-Based 3D Reconstruction. Journal of Surveying Engineering. 2021; 147(1):04020021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000333
Ijiri T, Todo H, Hirabayashi A, Kohiyama K, Dobashi Y. Digitization of natural objects with micro CT and photographs. PLOS ONE. 2018; 13(4):e0195852. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195852 PMID: 29649299
Schubnel T, Mazurier A, Nel A, Grandcolas P, Desutter-Grandcolas L, Legendre F, et al. Flat does not mean 2D: Using X-ray microtomography to study insect wings in 3D as a model for comparative studies. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2023; 14(8):2036–2048. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.14132
Chitsaz N, Marian R, Chahl J. Experimental method for 3D reconstruction of Odonata wings (methodology and dataset). PLOS ONE. 2020; 15(4):e0232193. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232193 PMID: 32348334
Shin Mj, Park W, Kang Sj, Kim J, Yun K, Cheong WS. Understanding the Limitations of SfM-Based Camera Calibration on Multi-View Stereo Reconstruction. In: 2021 36th International Technical Conference on Circuits/Systems, Computers and Communications (ITC-CSCC); 2021. p. 1–3. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9501460.
Hartley RI, Sturm P. Triangulation. Computer Vision and Image Understanding. 1997; 68(2):146–157. https://doi.org/10.1006/cviu.1997.0547
Solà J. Towards visual localization, mapping and moving objects tracking by a mobile robot: a geometric and probabilistic approach [phdthesis]. Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse—INPT; 2007. Available from: https://theses.hal.science/tel-00136307.
Hartley R, Zisserman A. Multiple view geometry in computer vision. Second edition ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
Olkowicz M, Dabrowski M, Pluymakers A. Focus stacking photogrammetry for micro-scale roughness reconstruction: a methodological study. The Photogrammetric Record. 2019; 34(165):11–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/phor.12270
Jodogne S. The Orthanc Ecosystem for Medical Imaging. Journal of Digital Imaging. 2018; 31(3):341–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-018-0082-y PMID: 29725964