aménagement intérieur; co-design; comme chez-soi; Ehpad; homelike; interior design; nursing home; olders; personnes âgées; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Education; Female; France; Homes for the Aged; Humans; Male; Nursing Homes; Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology; Geriatrics and Gerontology; Neurology (clinical); Biological Psychiatry
Abstract :
[en] While it is necessary to provide « homelike» in nursing homes, the risk is to reduce it to decoration. As the aim is to reconcile care and home, we propose co-design, an approach involving users in the design of living spaces, as a solution. We propose tools and a protocol, then provide feedback from a workshop on co-designing a collective space with three residents in a nursing home in Île-de-France. We thoroughly analyse the contributions of the residents during the workshop, and then compare their proposals with the opinions of the nurses. We found that the workshop enabled participants to express concret needs that tended towards « homelike» proposals. The convergence of day-to-day expertise, through co-design, encourages design solutions that are suitable for everyone, while its role in mediation supports organisational change in the nursing home.
Disciplines :
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Author, co-author :
Pègues, Clémentine; DER Design, ENS Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Labarchède, Manon; Passages UMR CNRS, Pessac, France
Cérèse, Fany; Pôle Recherche Atelier AA, Montpellier, France
Safin, Stéphane ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Ergonomie et intervention au travail ; I3 UMR CNRS 9217, Télécom Paris, Palaiseau, France
Adam, Stéphane ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Psychologie de la sénescence et du vieillissement
Language :
French
Title :
Vers un « comme chez-soi» en Ehpad: retour d'expérience d'un atelier de co-design avec des habitants
Publication date :
June 2024
Journal title :
Gériatrie et Psychologie Neuropsychiatrie du Vieillissement
Insee. 4 millions de seniors seraient en perte d'autonomie en 2050. Insee, 2019 (1767).
Duthé G, Samuel O, Solaz A. Avant-propos. Population 2021; 76: 2234.
Villez A. Ehpad: La crise des modèles. Gérontol Soc 2007; 30: 169-84.
Brami G. Les paradoxes de l'évolution des Ehpad. Empan 2013; 91: 56-61.
Adam S, Marquet M, Missotten P. Maison de repos, maison de vie ? Liège: Altura, 2022.
Cérèse F. Architecture et liberté d'aller et venir dans les lieux de vie institutionnels. Gérontol Soc 2023; 45: 15766.
Anderson D, Grey T, Kennelly S, O'Neill D. Nursing Home Design and Covid-19: Balancing Infection Control,Quality of Life, and Resilience. J Am Med Direct Assoc 2020; 21: 1519-24.
Szczerbińska K. Could we have done better with Covid-19 in nursing homes? Eur Geriatr Med 2020; 11: 639-43.
Marquet M, Boutaayamou M, Schwartz C, et al. Does negative information about aging influence older adults' physical performance and subjective age? Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2018; 78: 181-9.
Coudin G, Alexopoulos T. “Help me! I'm old!” How negative aging stereotypes create dependency among older adults. Aging Mental Health 2010; 14: 516-23.
den Ouden M, Kuk NO, Zwakhalen SM, Bleijlevens MH, Meijers JM, Hamers JP. The role of nursing staff in the activities of daily living of nursing homeresidents. Geriatric Nursing 2017; 38: 225-30.
Bazin M, Muller M. Le personnel et les difficultés de recrutement dans les Ehpad. Études & Résultats 2018 (1067).
Muller A, Missotten P, Adam S. Transforming nursing home culture: Opinions of older people. A cross-sectional study in Belgium. J Aging Studies 2022; 61: 101020.
Nedelec P, Somme D, Charras K. L'architecture des Ehpad et son influence sur le bien-être des résidents. Gérontol Soc 2023; 45: 105-24.
Eijkelenboom A, Verbeek H, Felix E, van Hoof J. Architectural factors influencing the sense of home in nursing homes: An operationalization for practice. Frontiers Architectural Res 2017; 6: 111-22.
Charras K, Cérèse F. Être « chez-soi» en Ehpad: domestiquer l'institution. Gérontol Soc 2017; 39: 169-83.
Cérèse F. Environnement architectural, santé et domesticité: étude des effets d'un aménagement architectural domestique sur la qualité de vie, l'usage et la perception de l'espace dans les lieux de vie institutionnels pour personnes âgées. [Thèse de doctorat]. Université Montpellier 3, 2015.
Orban AC, Dayez JB. Le « chez-soi» en maison de repos: une question de chambre ou d'établissement ? Analyses Énéo 2014 (13).
Rield M, Mantovan F, Them C. Being a nursing home resident: A challenge to one's identity. Nursing Res Pract 2013: 932381.
Drees. L'aide et l'action sociales en France. Paris: Drees, 2020, pp. 109-115.
Eynard C. La chambre comme espace d'intimité. Gérontol Soc 2007; 30: 85-9.
Fleury-Perkins C, Fenoglio A. Le design peut-il aider à mieux soigner ? Le concept de proof of care. Soins 2019:64: 58-61.
Sanders E, Stappers PJ. Co-creation and the New Landscapes of Design. CoDesign 2008; 4.
Dorta T, Safin S, Boudhraâ S, Marchand EB. Co-Designing in Social VR. Process awareness and suitable representations to empower user participation. ArXiv 2019.
Hanington BM. Generative research in design education. Proceedings of the International Association of Societies of Design Research 2007.
Sumner J, Chong L, Bundele A, Wei Lim Y. Co-designing technology for aging in place: A systematic review. Gerontologist 2020; 61: e395-e409.
Bailleul M, Marie-Bailleul G. Éthique de la sollicitude dans une unité cognitivo comportementale: Des « proofs of care» aux « outils pour le care». NPG Neurologie - Psychiatrie - Gériatrie 2021; 21: 11825.
Hiltus S, Hart R. Participatory planning and design of recreational spaces with children. Architecture Comportement 1994; 10: 361-70.
Jay I. Faire de la co-conception avec les personnes âgées: promesses, difficultés et enjeux. Gestion et Management 2021. dumas-03545099
Rosson MB, Carroll J. Scenario-Based Design. In: Jacko J, Sears A (eds.). The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002, pp. 1032-1050.
Pirinen A. The barriers and enablers of co-design for services. IJ Design 2016; 10: 27-42.
Duque E, Fonseca G, Vieira H, Gontijo G, Ishitani L. A systematic literature review on user centered design and participatory design with older people. Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2019.
Anesm. Normes de sécurité incendie dans les Ehpad (structures J et U): entre normes et personnalisation des espaces, 2018.
Muller A, Missotten P, Adam S. Transforming nursing home culture: Opinions of older people. A cross-sectional study in Belgium. J Aging Studies 2022; 61: 101020.
Crutzen C, Adam S. “What if It's not Just an Item of Clothing?” - A Narrative Review and Synthesis of the White Coat in the Context of Aged Care. Psychologica Belgica 2022; 62: 62-74.
Olivier M, Rey S, Voilmy D, Ganascia JG, Lan Hing Ting K. Combiner cultural probes et entretiens avec des soignants pour co-concevoir une solution robotique mobile sociale. JETSAN 2021.
Künemund H, Hahmann J. Social inequalities and falls: Correlations and consequences for gerontechnology. Gerontechnology 2016; 15: 42S.
Fougères AJ, Ospina VE. Médiation et connaissances coopératives dans un EIAH. EGC'05, 2005.
Prévot J, Weber A. Participation et choix des personnes âgées vivant en institution. Retraite et société 2009; 59: 181-93.
Cérèse F. Repenser l'Ehpad pour qu'il devienne un habitat adapté et désirable. Les apports de l'architecture en gériatrie. Revue de Gériatrie 2019; 44: 35560.
Zeisel J, Silverstein NM, Hyde J, Levkoff S, Lawton MP, Holmes W. Environmental correlates to behavioral health outcomes in Alzheimer's special care units. Gerontologist 2003; 43: 697-711.
