Article (Scientific journals)
Royal Society report: what would a comprehensive evaluation suggest about non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19?
Paul, Elisabeth; Brown, Garrett W.; Bell, David et al.
2024In Critical Public Health, 34 (1), p. 1-10
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
2024_RoyalSociety.pdf
Publisher postprint (740.41 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Health policies; Non-pharmaceutical interventions; COVID-19; evaluation; realism
Abstract :
[en] A recent report by the Royal Society examined the literature on the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) aimed at reducing the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic. It emphatically concluded that they were ‘effective’, which we argue may be misleading to policymakers. This paper performs a critical analysis of the Royal Society report and explains what a proper evaluation of NPIs would mean, arguing that theory-based evaluations are required to approach complex issues and nurture democratic debates on societal choices. We argue that, first, testing the relationship between NPI interventions and their effectiveness in reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission over a bounded period (a single outcome) is irrelevant for policymaking, because several criteria must be balanced to evaluate any intervention, including efficiency, equity, acceptability, long-term impacts, and sustainability. Second, ignoring the disruptive and unintended effects of NPIs leads to wrong conclusions regarding their overall value. Third, we question the mere objective of NPIs, that is, reducing viral transmission. Finally, we question the methodology used by the Royal Society Report regarding the literature selection and quality. To conclude, we argue that the Royal Society report is not only irrelevant and weak from a methodological point of view but also dangerously misleading in terms of policymaking. Four years after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is high time for researchers, journals, and policymakers to stop debating over NPIs’ mere effectiveness against a parameter that requires a PCR test to determine, but engage in public health-based evaluations that weigh all criteria of interest.
Disciplines :
Public health, health care sciences & services
Political science, public administration & international relations
Author, co-author :
Paul, Elisabeth  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de droit > Droit fiscal ; School of Public Health, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
Brown, Garrett W. ;  School of Politics and International Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Bell, David ;  Independent Public Health Consultant, Lake Jackson, TX, USA
von Agris, Jean Merlin ;  School of Politics and International Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Ridde, Valéry ;  Université Paris Cité, IRD, Ceped, Paris, France
Language :
English
Title :
Royal Society report: what would a comprehensive evaluation suggest about non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19?
Publication date :
22 May 2024
Journal title :
Critical Public Health
ISSN :
0958-1596
eISSN :
1469-3682
Publisher :
Informa UK Limited
Volume :
34
Issue :
1
Pages :
1-10
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funding text :
no funding
Available on ORBi :
since 24 May 2024

Statistics


Number of views
1 (0 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
1 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
0
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi