Hartmann, Franz Stefan Fabian; Microbial Processes and Interactions (MiPI), Terra Research and Teaching Centre ; University of Liège, Gembloux, Belgium
Grégoire, Mélanie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Microbial technologies ; Microbial Processes and Interactions (MiPI), Terra Research and Teaching Centre ; Research Unit in Biology of Microorganisms (URBM), Biology Department, University of Namur, Narilis, Namur, Belgium
Renzi, Francesco; Research Unit in Biology of Microorganisms (URBM), Biology Department, University of Namur, Narilis, Namur, Belgium
Delvigne, Frank ; Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre > Microbial technologies ; Microbial Processes and Interactions (MiPI), Terra Research and Teaching Centre
Language :
English
Title :
Single cell technologies for monitoring protein secretion heterogeneity
Gurbatri, C.R., et al. Engineering bacteria as interactive cancer therapies. Science 378 (2022), 858–864.
An, B., et al. Programming living glue systems to perform autonomous mechanical repairs. Matter 3 (2020), 2080–2092.
Filloux, A., Bacterial protein secretion systems: game of types. Microbiology, 168, 2022, 1193.
Cavalli, G., Cenci, S., Autophagy and protein secretion. J. Mol. Biol. 432 (2020), 2525–2545.
Cohen, M.J., et al. Through the back door: unconventional protein secretion. Cell Surf., 6, 2020, 100045.
Green, E.R., Mecsas, J., Bacterial secretion systems: an overview. Microbiol. Spectr., 4, 2016 Published online February 26, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.vmbf-0012-2015.
Nicholson, K.R., Champion, P.A., Bacterial secretion systems: networks of pathogenic regulation and adaptation in mycobacteria and beyond. PLoS Pathog., 18, 2022, e1010610.
Uhlén, M., et al. The human secretome. Sci. Signal., 1, 2019, eaaz0274.
Yang, H., et al. An overview and future prospects of recombinant protein production in Bacillus subtilis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 105 (2021), 6607–6626.
Henrion, L., et al. Fitness cost associated with cell phenotypic switching drives population diversification dynamics and controllability. Nat. Commun., 14, 2023, 6128.
Ploss, T.N., et al. Homogeneity and heterogeneity in amylase production by Bacillus subtilis under different growth conditions. Microb. Cell Factories, 15, 2016, 57.
Promchai, R., et al. A novel salt-inducible vector for efficient expression and secretion of heterologous proteins in Bacillus subtilis. J. Biotechnol. 222 (2016), 86–93.
Fritz, G., et al. Single cell kinetics of phenotypic switching in the arabinose utilization system of E. coli. PLoS ONE, 9, 2014, e89532.
Binder, D., et al. Comparative single-cell analysis of different E. coli expression systems during microfluidic cultivation. PLoS ONE, 11, 2016, e0160711.
Guiziou, S., et al. A part toolbox to tune genetic expression in Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic Acids Res. 44 (2016), 7495–7508.
Silander, O.K., et al. A genome-wide analysis of promoter-mediated phenotypic noise in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet., 8, 2012, e1002443.
Eling, N., et al. Challenges in measuring and understanding biological noise. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20 (2019), 536–548.
Binder, D., et al. Homogenizing bacterial cell factories: analysis and engineering of phenotypic heterogeneity. Metab. Eng. 42 (2017), 145–156.
Ceroni, F., et al. Burden-driven feedback control of gene expression. Nat. Methods 15 (2018), 387–393.
Bertaux, F., et al. Enhancing bioreactor arrays for automated measurements and reactive control with ReacSight. Nat. Commun., 13, 2022, 3363.
Nguyen, T.M., et al. Reducing phenotypic instabilities of a microbial population during continuous cultivation based on cell switching dynamics. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 118 (2021), 3847–3859.
Delvigne, F., Martinez, J.A., Advances in automated and reactive flow cytometry for synthetic biotechnology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 83, 2023, 102974.
Briat, C., Khammash, M., Perfect adaptation and optimal equilibrium productivity in a simple microbial biofuel metabolic pathway using dynamic integral control. ACS Synth. Biol. 7 (2018), 419–431.
Frain, K.M., et al. Transport of folded proteins by the Tat System. Protein J. 38 (2019), 377–388.
Hemmerich, J., et al. Use of a Sec signal peptide library from Bacillus subtilis for the optimization of cutinase secretion in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb. Cell Factories, 15, 2016, 208.
Grasso, S., et al. Signal peptide efficiency: from high-throughput data to prediction and explanation. ACS Synth. Biol. 12 (2023), 390–404.
Pechsrichuang, P., et al. OmpA signal peptide leads to heterogenous secretion of B. subtilis chitosanase enzyme from E. coli expression system. Springerplus, 5, 2016, 1200.
Jiang, Z., et al. The rational modification of the secretion pathway: the bidirectional grinding strategy on signal peptide and SecA in Bacillus subtilis. Biochem. Eng. J., 191, 2023, 108769.
Geissler, A.S., et al. The impact of PrsA over-expression on the Bacillus subtilis transcriptome during fed-batch fermentation of alpha-amylase production. Front. Microbiol., 13, 2022, 909493.
Lenz, P., et al. Analysis of protein secretion in Bacillus subtilis by combining a secretion stress biosensor strain with an in vivo split GFP assay. Microb. Cell Factories, 22, 2023, 203.
Sosa-Carrillo, S., et al. Maximizing protein production by keeping cells at optimal secretory stress levels using real-time control approaches. Nat. Commun., 14, 2023, 3028.
Trip, H., et al. A novel screening system for secretion of heterologous proteins in Bacillus subtilis. Microb. Biotechnol. 4 (2011), 673–682.
Pasquina-Lemonche, L., et al. The architecture of the Gram-positive bacterial cell wall. Nature 582 (2020), 294–297.
Demchick, P., Koch, A.L., The permeability of the wall fabric of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 178 (1996), 768–773.
Strach, M., et al. Protein secretion zones during overexpression of amylase within the Gram-positive cell wall. BMC Biol., 21, 2023, 206.
Vandereyken, K., et al. Methods and applications for single-cell and spatial multi-omics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 24 (2023), 494–515.
Cao, J., et al. Microfluidics-based single cell analysis: from transcriptomics to spatiotemporal multi-omics. Trends Anal. Chem., 158, 2023, 116868.
Hartmann, F.S.F., et al. Digital models in biotechnology: towards multi-scale integration and implementation. Biotechnol. Adv., 60, 2022, 108015.
Heins, A.L., Weuster-Botz, D., Population heterogeneity in microbial bioprocesses: origin, analysis, mechanisms, and future perspectives. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 41 (2018), 889–916.
Heins, A.L., et al. Development and characterization of Escherichia coli triple reporter strains for investigation of population heterogeneity in bioprocesses. Microb. Cell Factories, 19, 2020, 14.
Sassi, H., et al. Segregostat: a novel concept to control phenotypic diversification dynamics on the example of Gram-negative bacteria. Microb. Biotechnol. 12 (2019), 1064–1075.
Jurischka, S., et al. A secretion biosensor for monitoring Sec-dependent protein export in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb. Cell Factories, 19, 2020, 11.
Haidas, D., et al. Microfluidic platform for multimodal analysis of enzyme secretion in nanoliter droplet arrays. Anal. Chem. 91 (2019), 2066–2073.
Liu, P., et al. Enhancing the secretion of a feruloyl esterase in Bacillus subtilis by signal peptide screening and rational design. Protein Expr. Purif., 200, 2022, 106165.
Ortseifen, V., et al. Microfluidics for biotechnology: bridging gaps to foster microfluidic applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 8, 2020, 589074.
Dusny, C., Grünberger, A., Microfluidic single-cell analysis in biotechnology: from monitoring towards understanding. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 63 (2020), 26–33.
Zhou, Y., et al. Evaluation of single-cell cytokine secretion and cell-cell interactions with a hierarchical loading microwell chip. Cell Rep., 31, 2020, 107574.
Wood, D.K., et al. Single cell trapping and DNA damage analysis using microwell arrays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107 (2023), 10008–10013.
Wink, K., et al. Quantification of biocatalytic transformations by single microbial cells enabled by tailored integration of droplet microfluidics and mass spectrometry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 61, 2022, e202204098.
Kimmerling, R.J., et al. A microfluidic platform enabling single-cell RNA-seq of multigenerational lineages. Nat. Commun., 7, 2016, 10220.
Beneyton, T., et al. High-throughput screening of filamentous fungi using nanoliter-range droplet-based microfluidics. Sci. Rep., 6, 2016, 27223.
Eyer, K., et al. Single-cell deep phenotyping of IgG-secreting cells for high-resolution immune monitoring. Nat. Biotechnol. 35 (2017), 977–982.
Gielen, F., et al. Ultrahigh-throughput-directed enzyme evolution by absorbance-activated droplet sorting (AADS). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113 (2016), E7383–E7389.
Liu, Y.C., et al. Real-time monitoring of single-cell secretion with a high-throughput nanoplasmonic microarray. Biosens. Bioelectron., 202, 2022, 113955.
Haidas, D., et al. Parallel sampling of nanoliter droplet arrays for noninvasive protein analysis in discrete yeast cultivations by MALDI-MS. Anal. Chem. 92 (2020), 3810–3818.
Schirmer, M., et al. Conversion efficiencies of a few living microbial cells detected at a high throughput by droplet-based ESI-MS. Anal. Chem. 92 (2020), 10700–10708.
Mahler, L., et al. Detection of antibiotics synthetized in microfluidic picolitre-droplets by various actinobacteria. Sci. Rep., 8, 2018, 13087.
Sampaio, N.M.V., et al. Dynamic gene expression and growth underlie cell-to-cell heterogeneity in Escherichia coli stress response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 119, 2022, e2115032119.
Patange, O., et al. Escherichia coli can survive stress by noisy growth modulation. Nat. Commun., 9, 2018, 5333.
Sampaio, N.M.V., Dunlop, M.J., Functional roles of microbial cell-to-cell heterogeneity and emerging technologies for analysis and control. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 57 (2020), 87–94.
Nikolados, E.M., et al. Growth defects and loss-of-function in synthetic gene circuits. ACS Synth. Biol. 8 (2019), 1231–1240.
Benisch, M., et al. Optogenetic closed-loop feedback control of the unfolded protein response optimizes protein production. Metab. Eng. 77 (2023), 32–40.
Spinnler, H.E., Production of enzymes: fermentation and genetic engineering. Kermasha, S., Eskin, M.N.A., (eds.) Enzymes: Novel Biotechnological Approaches for the Food Industry, 2020, Elsevier, 45–58.
Evans, D.C.S., et al. GFP fusions of Sec-routed extracellular proteins in Staphylococcus aureus reveal surface-associated coagulase in biofilms. Microbial. Cell 10 (2023), 145–156.
Song, M., et al. Control of type III protein secretion using a minimal genetic system. Nat. Commun., 8, 2017, 14737.
Din, M.O., et al. Synchronized cycles of bacterial lysis for in vivo delivery. Nature 536 (2016), 81–85.
Oña, L., et al. Obligate cross-feeding expands the metabolic niche of bacteria. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5 (2021), 1224–1232.
Jiang, Y., et al. Construction of stable microbial consortia for effective biochemical synthesis. Trends Biotechnol. 41 (2023), 1430–1441.
Fedorec, A.J.H., et al. Single strain control of microbial consortia. Nat. Commun., 12, 2021, 1977.
Ghaisani Komarudin, A., Driessen, A.J.M., SecA-mediated protein translocation through the SecYEG channel. Microbiol. Spectr., 7, 2019 Published online August 2, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.psib-0028-2019.
Tsirigotaki, A., et al. Protein export through the bacterial Sec pathway. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15 (2017), 21–36.
McNutt, Z.A., et al. Ribosomes lacking bS21 gain function to regulate protein synthesis in Flavobacterium johnsoniae. Nucleic Acids Res. 51 (2023), 1927–1942.
Oswald, J., et al. The dynamic SecYEG translocon. Front. Mol. Biosci., 8, 2021, 664241.
Kaushik, S., et al. Bacterial signal peptides- navigating the journey of proteins. Front. Physiol., 13, 2022, 664241.
Fishov, I., Norris, V., Membrane heterogeneity created by transertion is a global regulator in bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 15 (2012), 724–730.
Seinen, A.B., et al. Cellular dynamics of the SecA ATPase at the single molecule level. Sci. Rep., 11, 2021, 1433.
Hyyryläinen, H.L., et al. A novel two-component regulatory system in Bacillus subtilis for the survival of severe secretion stress. Mol. Microbiol. 41 (2001), 1159–1172.
Darmon, E., et al. A novel class of heat and secretion stress-responsive genes is controlled by the autoregulated CssRS two-component system of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 184 (2002), 5661–5671.
Vitikainen, M., et al. Secretion of heterologous proteins in Bacillus subtilis can be improved by engineering cell components affecting post-translocational protein folding and degradation. J. Appl. Microbiol. 99 (2005), 363–375.
Lulko, A.T., et al. Production and secretion stress caused by overexpression of heterologous α-amylase leads to inhibition of sporulation and a prolonged motile phase in Bacillus subtilis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73 (2007), 5354–5362.
Antelmann, H., et al. The extracellular proteome of Bacillus subtilis under secretion stress conditions. Mol. Microbiol. 49 (2003), 143–156.
Harwood, C.R., Kikuchi, Y., The ins and outs of Bacillus proteases: activities, functions and commercial significance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 46, 2022, fuab046.
Ansaryan, S., et al. High-throughput spatiotemporal monitoring of single-cell secretions via plasmonic microwell arrays. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 7 (2023), 943–958.
Samlali, K., et al. Droplet digital microfluidic system for screening filamentous fungi based on enzymatic activity. Microsyst. Nanoeng., 8, 2022, 123.
Yuan, H., et al. Ultrahigh-throughput screening of industrial enzyme-producing strains by droplet-based microfluidic system. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 49, 2022, kuac007.
