de-humanization; flexwork; mixed method; office design; Human Factors and Ergonomics; Strategy and Management; Management of Technology and Innovation
Abstract :
[en] Recent research on flexible office designs have shown that open-plan and/or flex offices may not have the expected effects in terms of employees’ productivity, well-being, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and retention. In this article, we propose to consider that the feeling of de-humanization may explain such dark side of office designs. Adopting a mixed methods approach, we administrated a quantitative survey to 534 employees working in a variety of office designs, and conducted 12 semi-structured interviews among the respondents to the survey in order to investigate how they experienced their office designs, notably in terms of de-humanization. Results showed that the three specific office designs under study (i.e. cell, open-plan, and flex offices) are associated with different levels of de-humanization and that this feeling of de-humanization mediates their impact on employees’ job satisfaction, affective organizational commitment, extra-role performance, psychological strains, and turnover intentions. Interviews’ analysis reveals three main mechanisms in the development of the feeling of de-humanization in such office designs: a triple feeling of dispossession (of space, voice and professional mastery), a feeling of abandon and an injunction to adopt a modern behaviour.
Research center :
HEC Recherche. Changing workplace and strategic HRM - ULiège [BE] LENTIC - Laboratoire d'Études sur les Nouvelles Formes de Travail, l'Innovation et le Changement - ULiège
Disciplines :
Human resources management
Author, co-author :
Taskin, Laurent ; Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium
Parmentier, Michaël ; Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC Liège Research > HEC Liège Research: Changing workplace and strategic HRM ; Psychology Department, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Stinglhamber, Florence; Organizational Psychology and Human Resource Management in the Psychology Department, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Language :
English
Title :
The dark side of office designs: towards de-humanization
The authors wish to thank Professor Miguel Martinez Lucio and the two anonymous reviewers for the many thoughtful suggestions they made and which helped us to improve our manuscript, as well as the colleagues from ETHOS at Cass Business School who commented earlier versions of this work. They also thank all the parties involved in the LaboRH Chair in “Management Humain et Transformations du Travail” at the Université catholique de Louvain for having promoted this research and allowed data collection, as well as for the stimulating environment it offers for conducting research.
Alvesson, M. and H. Willmott (1992), ‘On the Idea of Emancipation in Management and Organization Studies’, Academy of Management Review 17, 432–464.
Andrighetto, L., C. Baldissarri and C. Volpato (2016), ‘(Still) Modern Times: Evidence of Objectification Within Working Domain’, European Journal of Social Psychology 47, 25–35.
Baldissarri, C., L. Andrighetto and C. Volpato (2014), ‘When Work Does Not Ennoble Man: Psychological Consequences of Working Objectification’, TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology 21, 3, 1–13.
Baldry, C. and A. Barnes (2012), ‘The Open-Plan Academy: Space, Control and the Undermining of Professional Identity’, Work, Employment and Society 26, 228–245.
Becker, T. (2005), ‘Potential Problems in the Statistical Control of Variables in Organizational Research: A Qualitative Analysis With Recommendations’, Organizational Research Methods 8, 274–289.
Becker, T., G. Atinc, J. Breaugh, K. Carlson, J. Edwards and P. Spector (2016), ‘Statistical Control in Correlational Studies: 10 Essential Recommendations for Organizational Researchers’, Journal of Organizational Behavior 37, 157–167.
Bell, C. and C. Khoury (2011), ‘De-Humanization, Deindividuation, Anomie and Organizational Justice’, in S. Gilliland, D. Steiner and D. Skarlicki (eds), Emerging Perspectives on Organizational Justice and Ethics, Research in Social Issues in Management, Vol. 7 (Greenwich: Information Age Publishing), pp. 169–200.
Bell, C. and C. Khoury (2016), ‘Organizational Powerlessness, De-Humanization, and Gendered Effects of Procedural Justice’, Journal of Managerial Psychology 31, 570–585.
Beyes, T. and C. Steyaert (2011), ‘Spacing Organization: Non-Representational Theory and Performing Organizational Space’, Organization 19, 45–61.
Bodin Danielsson, C., H. Singh Chungkham, C. Wulff and H. Westerlund (2014), ‘Office Design's Impact on Sick Leave Rates’, Ergonomics 57, 139–147.
Brennan, A., J. Chugh and T. Kline (2002), ‘Traditional Versus Open Office Design: A Longitudinal Field Study’, Environment and Behavior 34, 279–299.
Brewer, M. (1991), ‘The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17, 475–482.
Caesens, G., F. Stinglhamber, S. Demoulin and M. De Wilde (2017), ‘Perceived Organizational Support and Employees’ Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Organizational De-Humanization’, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 26, 527–540.
Caesens, G., N. Nguyen and F. Stinglhamber (2019), ‘Abusive Supervision and Organizational Dehumanization’, Journal of Business and Psychology 34, 5, 709–728.
Christoff, K. (2014), ‘De-Humanization in Organizational Settings: Some Scientific and Ethical Considerations’, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8, 1–5.
Collins, A., D. Hislop and S. Cartwright (2016), ‘Social Support in the Workplace Between Teleworkers, Office-Based Colleagues and Supervisors’, New Technology, Work and Employment 31, 161–175.
Costas, J. (2013), ‘Problematizing Mobility: A Metaphor of Stickiness, Non-Places and the Kinetic Elite’, Organization Studies 34, 1467–1485.
Courpasson, D., F. Dany and R. Delbridge (2017), ‘Politics of Place: The Meaningfulness of Resisting Places’, Human Relations 70, 237–259.
Dale, K. and G. Burrell (2008), The Spaces of Organisation and the Organisation of Space: Power, Identity and Materiality at Work (New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan).
Desombre, T., C. Kelliher, F. Macfarlane and M. Ozbilgin (2006), ‘Re-Organizing Work Roles in Health Care: Evidence From the Implementation of Functional Flexibility’, British Journal of Management 17, 139–151.
Eisenberger, R., J. Cummings, S. Armeli and P. Lynch (1997), ‘Perceived Organizational Support, Discretionary Treatment, and Job Satisfaction’, Journal of Applied Psychology 82, 5, 812.
Eisenberger, R., G. Karagonlar, F. Stinglhamber, P. Neves, T. Becker, M. Gonzalez-Morales and M. Steiger-Mueller (2010), ‘Leader-Member Exchange and Affective Organizational Commitment: The Contribution of Supervisor's Organizational Embodiment’, The Journal of Applied Psychology 95, 1085–1103.
Felstead, A. and G. Henseke (2017), ‘Assessing the Growth of Remote Working and its Consequences for Efforts, Well-Being and Work-Life Balance’, New Technology, Work and Employment 32, 195–212.
Felstead, A., N. Jewson and S. Walters (2003), ‘Managerial Control of Employees Working at Home’, British Journal of Industrial Relations 41, 241–264.
Gajendran, R. and D. Harrison (2007), ‘The Good, the bad, and the Unknown About Telecommuting: Meta-Analysis of Psychological Mediators and Individual Consequences’, Journal of Applied Psychology 92, 1524–1541.
Gold, M. and M. Mustafa (2013), ‘“Work Always Wins”: Client Colonization, Time Management and the Anxieties of Connected Freelancers’, New Technology, Work and Employment 28, 197–211.
Golden, T. and J. Veiga (2005), ‘The Impact of Extent of Telecommuting on Job Satisfaction: Resolving Inconsistent Findings’, Journal of Management 31, 301–318.
Haslam, N. (2006), ‘De-Humanization: An Integrative Review’, Personality and Social Psychology Review 10, 252–264.
Hayes, A. (2013), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (New York, NY: The Guilford Press).
Hirst, A. (2011), ‘Settlers, Vagrants and Mutual Indifference: Unintended Consequences of hot-Desking’, Journal of Organizational Change Management 24, 767–788.
Hislop, D. and C. Axtell (2007), ‘The Neglect of Spatial Mobility in Contemporary Studies of Work: The Case of Telework’, New Technology, Work and Employment 22, 34–51.
Jancey, J., S. McGann, R. Creagh, K. Blackford, P. Howat and M. Tye (2016), ‘Workplace Building Design and Office-Based Workers'activity: A Study of a Natural Experiment’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 40, 78–82.
Jaros, S. (1997), ‘An Assessment of Meyer and Allen's (1991) Three-Component Model of Organizational Commitment and Turnover Intentions’, Journal of Vocational Behavior 51, 319–337.
Johnson, R., A. Onwuegbuzie and L. Turner (2007), ‘Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research’, Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1, 112–133.
Judd, C. and G. McClelland (1989), Data Analysis: A Model Comparison Approach (New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich).
Kelliher, C. and J. Richardson (2012), New Ways of Organizing Work (London: Routledge).
Kingma, S. (2018), ‘New Ways of Working: Work Space and Cultural Change in Virtualizing Organizations’, Culture and Organization 1–24.
Kline, R.B. (2011), Principles and Practices of Structural Equation Modelling, 3rd edn (New York, NY: The Guilford Press).
Knight, C. and A. Haslam (2010), ‘Your Place or Mine? Organizational Identification and Comfort as Mediators of Relationships Between the Managerial Control of Workspace and Employees’ Satisfaction and Well-being’, British Journal of Management 21, 717–735.
Kueffer, C., G. Hadorn, G. Bammer, L. van Kerkhoff and C. Polh (2007), ‘Towards a Publication Culture in Transdisciplinary Research’, GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 16, 22–26.
Marx, K. (1844), Les Manuscrits Économico-Philosophiques de 1844 (Paris: Vrin).
Meyer, J., N. Allen and C. Smith (1993), ‘Commitment to Organizations and Occupations: Extension and Test of a Three-Component Conceptualization’, Journal of Applied Psychology 78, 538–551.
Nguyen, N. and F. Stinglhamber (2019), ‘Emotional Labor and Core Self-Evaluations as Mediators Between Organizational Dehumanization and job Satisfaction’, Current Psychology, in press.
Ornstein, S. (1989), ‘The Hidden Influences of Office Design’, Academy of Management Executive 3, 144–147.
Paillé, P. and A. Mucchielli (2012), L'analyse Qualitative en Sciences Humaines et Sociales (Paris: Armand Colin).
Peters, P., E. Poutsma, B. Van der Heijden, A. Bakker and T. de Bruijn (2014), ‘Enjoying new Ways to Work: An HRM- Process Approach to Study Flow’, Human Resource Management 53, 271–290.
Podsakoff, P., S. MacKenzie, J. Lee and N. Podsakoff (2003), ‘Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies’, Journal of Applied Psychology 88, 879–903.
Putnam, L., K. Myers and B. Gailliard (2014), ‘Examining the Tensions in Workplace Flexibility and Exploring Options for new Directions’, Human Relations 67, 413–440.
Richardson, J. and S. McKenna (2014), ‘Reordering Spatial and Social Relations: A Case Study of Professional Managerial Flexworkers’, British Journal of Management 25, 724–736.
Ryan, G. and H. Bernard (2003), ‘Techniques to Identify Themes’, Field Methods 15, 85–109.
Sanchez, A., M. Pérez, P. De Luis Carnicer and M. Vela Jiménez (2007), ‘Teleworking and Workplace Flexibility: A Study of Impact on Firm Performance’, Personnel Review 36, 42–64.
Sewell, G. and L. Taskin (2015), ‘Out of Sight, Out of Mind in a New World of Work? Autonomy, Control, and Spatiotemporal Scaling in Telework’, Organisation Studies 36, 1507–1529.
Siebert, S., S. Bushfield, G. Martin and B. Howieson (2018), ‘Eroding ‘Respectability’: Deprofessionalization Through Organizational Spaces’, Work, Employment and Society 32, 330–347.
Spector, P. and M. Brannick (2011), ‘Methodological Urban Legends: The Misuse of Statistical Control Variables’, Organizational Research Methods 14, 287–305.
Stang-Våland, M. and S. Georg (2018), ‘Spacing Identity: Unfolding Social and Spatial-Material Entanglements of Identity Performance’, Scandinavian Journal of Management 34, 193–204.
Stich, J.-F., M. Tarafdar, C. Cooper and P. Stacey (2017), ‘Workplace Stress From Actual and Desired Computer-Mediated Communication use: A Multi-Method Study’, New Technology, Work and Employment 32, 84–100.
Tashakkori, A. and C. Teddlie (2010), Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, 2nd edn (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
Taskin, L. and P.K. Edwards (2007), ‘The Possibilities and Limits of Telework in a Bureaucratic Environment: Lessons From the Public Sector’, New Technology, Work and Employment 22, 195–207.
Taylor, S. and A. Spicer (2007), ‘Time for Space: A Narrative Review of Research on Organizational Spaces’, International Journal of Management Reviews 9, 325–346.
Van Katwyk, P., S. Fox, E. Spector and E. Kelloway (2000), ‘Using the Job-Related Affective Well-Being Scale (JAWS) to Investigate Affective Responses to Work Stressors’, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 5, 219–230.
Van Maanen, J. (ed) (1979), Qualitative Methodology (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).
Weber, M. (1905), L’Éthique Protestante et L'esprit du Capitalisme (Paris: Librairie Plon).
Williams, L. and S. Anderson (1991), ‘Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-Role Behaviours’, Journal of Management 17, 601–617.
Zalesny, M. and R. Farace (1987), ‘Traditional Versus Open Offices: A Comparison of Sociotechnical, Social Relations, and Symbolic Meaning Perspectives’, Academy of Management Journal 30, 240–259.
