digital evidence; cooperation of service providers; US law; Fourth Amendment; ECPA; CLOUD Act; Stored Communications Act; law enforcement; cross-border cooperation
Abstract :
[en] This chapter provides an account of the governing legal framework with respect to the gathering of digital evidence by U.S. LEAs and the rules that bind U.S. service providers – an issue that, given the quantity of data of interest in the hands of U.S.-based providers, increasingly matters to law enforcement authorities all around the world. Parts I and II describe the general statutory and constitutional scheme governing data collection in the United States, with a focus on the federal level. Part III examines specific questions with respect to cross-border cooperation, particularly in light of the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Uses of Data (CLOUD) Act that seeks to better facilitate cross-border access to data, in specified circumstances, and in accordance with baseline procedural and substantive protections. Finally, Part IV draws some concluding thoughts about both the need for more attention to cross-border access to data and some of the lacuna in U.S. law.
Research Center/Unit :
Cité - ULiège
Disciplines :
Criminal law & procedure Metalaw, Roman law, history of law & comparative law
Franssen, Vanessa ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de droit > Droit pénal et procédure pénale ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Cité
Language :
English
Title :
Digital Evidence Gathering by US Authorities and Cross-Border Cooperation with US-Based Service Providers
Publication date :
08 January 2025
Main work title :
The Cambridge Handbook of Digital Evidence in Criminal Investigations
Author, co-author :
Franssen, Vanessa ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de droit > Droit pénal et procédure pénale ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Cité
Tosza, Stanislaw; Unilu - Université du Luxembourg [LU]
Publisher :
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom
ISBN/EAN :
9781009049771
Collection name :
Cambridge Law Handbooks
Pages :
569-586
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Name of the research project :
The cooperation of ICT companies in criminal investigations Cross-border gathering of digital evidence: Mutual legal assistance, its shortcomings and remedies
Funders :
F.R.S.-FNRS - Fund for Scientific Research Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions ULiège - University of Liège
Funding number :
CDR J.0293.17; postdoctoral grant BeIPD-COFUND
Funding text :
This book publication is the outcome of two converging research projects. The first project, entitled “The cooperation of ICT companies in criminal investigations”, was funded by the F.R.S.-FNRS (research grant CDR J.0293.17) and the University of Liège with Vanessa Franssen as the Principle Investigator. The second research project, entitled “Cross-border gathering of digital evidence: Mutual legal assistance, its shortcomings and remedies”, was co-funded by the European Commission (Marie Curie, FP7 people funding) and the University of Liège (postdoctoral grant BeIPD-COFUND) with Stanisław Tosza as the Principle Investigator.
Susan Freiwald, "¿At the Privacy Vanguard: California's Electronic Communications Privacy ¿Act (CalECP¿A)" (2018) 33 Berkeley Technology Law Journal. 131, 150-153.
Orin S. Kerr, "Katz Has Only One Step: The Irrelevance of Subjective Expectations" (2015) 82 University of Chicago Law review. 113
Jed Rubenfeld, "The End of Privacy" (2008) 61 Stanford Law Review. 101
Silas J. Wasserstrom and Louis Michael Seidman, "The Fourth Amendment as Constitutional Theory" (1988) 77 Georgetown Law Journal. 19
Richard A. Posner, "The Uncertain Protection of Privacy by the Supreme Court" (1979) Supreme Court Review. 173.
Paul Ohm, "The Many Revolutions of Carpenter" (2019) 32 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology. 357, 358-361.
Matthew Tokson, "The ¿Aftermath of Carpenter: ¿An Empirical Study of Fourth ¿Amendment Law, 2018-2021" (2022) 135 Harvard Law Review. 1790.
Susan Freiwald and Stephen Wm Smith, "The Carpenter Chronicle: ¿A Near-Perfect Surveillance" (2018) 132 Harvard Law Review. 205, 230
Daniel de Zayas, "Carpenter v. United States and the Emerging Expectation of Privacy in Data Comprehensiveness ¿Applied to Browsing History" (2019) 68 American University Law Review. 2209