clustering; PE fit; person-centred; temporal profiles; value congruence; Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Abstract :
[en] Value congruence is generally studied as a stable experience instead of a dynamic phenomenon. This static approach largely ignores the emerging evidence that the fit experiences of individuals vary over time, and that different individuals may develop distinct experience profiles as time unfolds. We hypothesize that these temporal profiles of value congruence provide relevant insights into the relationship between perceived value congruence and employee functioning. We conducted a repeated weekly measures study with 125 white-collar Belgian employees to assess perceptions of value congruence and work role behaviours during 12 consecutive weeks. Through cluster analysis we were able to group employees with similar experience profiles based on average, variance, and frequency of changes into five distinct fit and misfit types. These were differentially related to two types of work role behaviours, i.e., work role proficiency (task performance and organizational citizenship behaviour) and work role proactivity (change-oriented behaviour and innovative work behaviour). Overall, our findings challenge the idea that fit–misfit is a dichotomous category, and underscore the need for more temporal research on perceptions of organizational fit in order to get a better understanding of how different types of fit and misfit behave in work settings.
Research center :
LENTIC - Laboratoire d'Études sur les Nouvelles Formes de Travail, l'Innovation et le Changement - ULiège
Disciplines :
Human resources management
Author, co-author :
Vleugels, Wouter ; Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC Liège : UER > UER Management : Strategic and Sustainable Human Resource Management ; Department of Work and Organisation Studies, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Tierens, Hans ; Department of Work and Organisation Studies, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Billsberry, Jon ; Department of Management, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
Verbruggen, Marijke ; Department of Work and Organisation Studies, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
De Cooman, Rein ; Department of Work and Organisation Studies, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Language :
English
Title :
Profiles of fit and misfit: a repeated weekly measures study of perceived value congruence
Publication date :
2019
Journal title :
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J., (2013). Problematization as a methodology for generating research questions. In M., Alvesson & J., Sandberg (Eds.), Constructing research questions: Doing interesting research (pp. 47–70). London, UK: Sage Publications.
Bakker, A., & Bal, M., (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 189–206.
Becker, H., (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York, NY: Free Press.
Becker, H., (1982). Art worlds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Blau, P., (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: Wiley.
Blustein, D., (2011). A relational theory of working. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79, 1–17.
Boon, C., & Biron, M., (2016). Temporal issues in person-organization fit, person-job fit and turnover: The role of leader-member exchange. Human Relations, 69, 2177–2200.
Bretz, F., Hothorn, T., & Westfall, P. H., (2011). Multiple comparisons using R. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Buss, D., (1987). Selection, evocation, and manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1214–1221.
Cable, D., & DeRue, S., (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 875–884.
Cable, D., & Parsons, C., (2001). Socialization tactics and person-organization fit. Personnel Psychology, 54, 1–23.
Carver, C., & Scheier, M., (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Chang, C.-H., Johnson, R., & Lord, R., (2010). Moving beyond discrepancies: The importance of velocity as a predictor of satisfaction and motivation. Human Performance, 23, 58–80.
Chatman, J., (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person– Organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14, 333–349.
Chatman, J., (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 459–484.
Chatman, J., Caldwell, D., O’Reilly, C., & Doerr, B. (2014). Parsing oranizational culture: How the norm for adaptability influences the relationship between culture consensus and financial performance in high-technology firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 785–808.
Chatman, J., & O’Reilly, C., (2016). Paradigm lost: Reinvigorating the study of organizational culture. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 199–224.
Cheverton, R., Vincent, L., & Wilson, B., (2001). The maverick way: Profiting from the power of the corporate misfit. La Palma, California: Maverick Way Publishing.
Choi, J. N., (2007). Change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: Effects of work environment characteristics and intervening psychological processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 467–484.
Cooper-Thomas, H., Van Vianen, A., & Anderson, N., (2004). Changes in person-organization fit: The impact of socialization tactics on perceived and actual P-O fit. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13, 52–78.
Cooper-Thomas, H., & Wright, S., (2013). Person-environment misfit: The neglected role of social context. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28, 21–37.
Dalal, R., & Hulin, C., (2008). Motivation for what? A multivariate dynamic perspective of the criterion. In R., Kanfer, G., Chen, & R., Pritchard (Eds.), Work motivation: Past, present, and future (pp. 63–100). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
Dalal, R., Lam, H., Weiss, H., Welch, E., & Hulin, C., (2009). A within-person approach to work behavior and performance: Concurrent and lagged citizenship-counterproductivity associations, and dynamic relationships with affect and overall job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 1051–1066.
Dawis, R., & Lofquist, L., (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
De Cooman, R., De Gieter, S., Pepermans, R., Hermans, S., Du Bois, C., Caers, R., & Jegers, M., (2009). Person-organization fit: Testing socialization and attraction-selection-attrition hypotheses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 102–107.
Debusscher, J., Hofmans, J., & De Fruyt, F., (2015). The effect of state core self-evaluations on task performance, organizational citizenship behaviour, and counterproductive work behaviour. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25, 301–315.
Deng, H., Wu, C.-H., Leung, K., & Guan, J., (2016). Depletion from self-regulation: A resource-based account of the effect of value incongruence. Personnel Psychology, 69, 431–465.
Edwards, J., & Cable, D., (2009). The value of value congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 654–677.
Edwards, J., Cable, D., Williamson, I., Lambert, L., & Shipp, A., (2006). The phenomenology of fit: Linking the person and environment to the subjective experience of person-environment fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 802–827.
Festinger, L., (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Follmer, E., Talbot, D., Kristof-Brown, A., Astrove, S., & Billsberry, J., (2018). Resolution, relief, and resignation: A qualitative study of responses to misfit at work. Academy of Management Journal, 61, 440–465.
Fraley, C., & Raftery, A., (2002). Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis and density estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 611–631.
Fraley, C., & Raftery, A., (2007). Model-based methods of classification: Using the mclust software in chemometrics. Journal of Statistical Software, 18, 1–13.
Fraley, C., Raftery, A., Murphy, T., & Scrucca, L., (2012). mclust version 4 for R: Normal mixture modeling for model-based clustering, classification, and density estimation (Technical Report No. 597). Seattle, WA: Department of Statistics, University of Washington.
French, J., Caplan, R., & Harrison, R., (1982). The mechanisms of job stress and strain. London, UK: Wiley.
Frese, M., & Fay, D., (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133–187.
Gabriel, A., Diefendorff, J., Chandler, M., Moran, C., & Greguras, G., (2014). The dynamic relationships of work affect and job satisfaction with perceptions of fit. Personnel Psychology, 67, 389–420.
Gardiner, E., & Jackson, C., (2012). Workplace mavericks: How personality and risk-taking propensity predicts maverickism. British Journal of Psychology, 103, 497–519.
Gardiner, E., & Jackson, C. J., (2015). Personality and learning processes underlying maverickism. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30, 726–740.
George, J., & Jones, G., (2000). The role of time in theory and theory building. Journal of Management, 26, 657–684.
Greguras, G., & Diefendorff, J., (2009). Different fits satisfy different needs: Linking person-environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self-determination theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 465–477.
Griffin, M., Neal, A., & Parker, S., (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 327–347.
Hausknecht, J., Sturman, M., & Roberson, Q., (2011). Justice as a dynamic construct: Effects of individual trajectories on distal work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 872–880.
Hewlin, P., (2003). And the award of best actor goes to…: Facades of conformity in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 28, 633–642.
Hoever, I., van Knippenberg, D., van Ginkel, W., & Barkema, H., (2012). Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity’s potential. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 982–996.
Hoffman, B., Bynum, B., Piccolo, R., & Sutton, A., (2011). Person-organization value congruence: How transformational leaders influence work group effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 779–796.
Hoffman, B., & Woehr, D., (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between person-organization fit and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 389–399.
Hox, J., (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Jansen, K., & Shipp, A., (2013). A review and agenda for incorporating time in fit research. In A., Kristof-Brown & J., Billsberry (Eds.), Organizational fit: Key issues and new directions (pp. 195–221). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Janssen, O., (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287–302.
Jehn, K., Northcraft, G., & Neal, M., (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741–763.
Johnson, R., Howe, M., & Chang, C., (2012). The importance of velocity, or why speed may matter more than distance. Organizational Psychology Review, 3, 62–85.
Johnson, R., Taing, M., Chang, C., & Kawamoto, C., (2013). A self-regulation approach to person-environment fit. In A., Kristof-Brown & J., Billsberry (Eds.), Organizational fit: Key issues and new directions (pp. 74–98). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Jones, C., Svejenova, S., Strandgaard Pedersen, J., & Townley, B., (2016). Misfits, mavericks and mainstreams: Drivers of innovation in the creative industries. Organization Studies, 37, 751–768.
Judge, T., Simon, L., Hurst, C., & Kelley, K., (2014). What I experienced yesterday is who I am today: Relationship of work motivations and behaviors to within-individual variation in the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 199–221.
Kouzes, J., & Posner, B., (1987). The leadership challenge: How to get extraordinary things done in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kristof, A., (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49.
Kristof-Brown, A., Zimmerman, R., & Johnson, E., (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342.
Kuppens, P., Oravecz, Z., & Tuerlinckx, F., (2010). Feelings change: Accounting for individual differences in the temporal dynamics of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 1042–1060.
Lauver, K., & Kristof-Brown, A., (2001). Distinguishing between employees’ perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 454–470.
Liedtka, J., (1989). Value congruence: The interplay of individual and organizational value systems. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 805–815.
McMurry, R., (1974). The maverick executive. New York, NY: American Management Association.
Meglino, B., & Ravlin, E., (1998). Individual values in organizations: Concepts, controversies, and research. Journal of Management, 24, 351–389.
Meglino, B., Ravlin, E., & Adkins, C., (1989). A work values approach to corporate culture: A field test of the value congruence process and its relationship to individual outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 424–432.
Meglino, B., Ravlin, E., & Adkins, C., (1991). Value congruence and satisfaction with a leader: An examination of the role of interaction. Human Relations, 44, 481–495.
Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., & Zapf, D., (2010). Diary studies in organizational research: An introduction and some practical recommendations. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9, 79–93.
Ostroff, C., & Fulmer, C., (2014). Variance as a construct: Understanding variability beyond the mean. In J., Ford, J., Hollenbeck, & A., Ryan (Eds.), The nature of work: Advances in psychological theory, methods, and practice (pp. 185–210). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Ostroff, C., & Schulte, M., (2014). A configural approach to the study of organizational culture and climate. In B., Schneider & K., Barbera (Eds.), Oxford handbook of organizational culture and climate (pp. 532–552). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Parkinson, B., Briner, R., Reynolds, S., & Totterdell, P., (1995). Time frames for mood: Relations between momentary and generalized ratings of affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 331–339.
Ray, G., Ugbah, S., Brammer, C., & DeWine, S., (1996). Communication behaviors, innovation, and the maverick leader. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 3, 20–30.
Roe, R., (2008). Time in applied psychology. The study of “what happens” rather than “what is”. European Psychologist, 13, 37–52.
Rokeach, M., (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: Free Press.
Schneider, B., (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437–453.
Schneider, B., Goldstein, H., & Smith, B., (1995). The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psychology, 48, 747–773.
Schwartz, S., & Bilsky, W., (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 550–562.
Shipp, A., & Jansen, K., (2011). Reinterpreting time in fit theory: Crafting and recrafting narratives of fit in medias res. Academy of Management Review, 36, 76–101.
Solinger, O., van Olffen, W., Roe, R., & Hofmans, J., (2013). On becoming (un)committed: A taxonomy of and test of newcomer onboarding scenarios. Organization Science, 24, 1640–1661.
Spreitzer, G., & Sonenshein, S., (2003). Positive deviance and extraordinary organizing. In K., Cameron, J., Dutton, & R., Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 207–224). San Francisco: Berrett-Kohler.
Swider, B., Zimmerman, R., & Barrick, M., (2015). Searching for the right fit: Development of applicant person-organization fit perceptions during the recruitment process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 880–893.
Van Vianen, A., Stoelhorst, J., & De Goede, M., (2013). The construal of person-organization fit during the ASA stages: Content, source and focus of comparison. In A., Kristof-Brown & J., Billsberry (Eds.), Organizational fit: Key issues and new directions (pp. 145–169). Oxford, UK: Wiley–Blackwell.
Verquer, M., Beehr, T., & Wagner, S., (2003). A meta-analysis of the relations between person-organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 473–489.
Vleugels, W., De Cooman, R., Verbruggen, M., & Solinger, O., (2018). Understanding dynamic change in perceptions of person-environment fit: An exploration of competing theoretical perspectives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39, 1066–1080.
Vogel, R., & Feldman, D., (2009). Integrating the levels of person-environment fit: The roles of vocational fit and group fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75, 68–81.
Vogel, R., Rodell, J., & Lynch, J., (2016). Engaged and productive misfits: How job crafting and leisure activity mitigate the negative effects of value incongruence. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1561–1584.
Wheeler, A., Gallagher, V., Brouer, R., & Sablynski, C., (2007). When person-organization (mis)fit and (dis)satisfaction lead to turnover: The moderating role of perceived job mobility. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 203–219.
Williams, L., & Anderson, S., (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617.
Yu, K., (2013). A motivational model of person-environment fit: Psychological motives as drivers of change. In A., Kristof-Brown & J., Billsberry (Eds.), Organizational fit: Key issues and new directions (pp. 21–49). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
