affect; perceived fit; performance; person–environment fit; within-person change; Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Abstract :
[en] The longstanding assumption in person–environment (PE) fit research is that perceived fit embodies the subjectively experienced match between personal and environmental attributes and hence triggers affect and behavior (i.e., normal causation perspective). This argument is however increasingly debated, with some scholars suggesting that the causal flow may also run from affect and behavior to perceived fit (i.e., reverse causation perspective), and others even arguing that perceptions of PE fit are not substantially different from how people feel and think about their environment (i.e., synchronous relationship perspective). In this research, we propose that these three competing perspectives correspond with different assumptions on how PE fit perceptions dynamically change over time (i.e., by means of comparative reasoning, logical deduction, or heuristic thinking). We empirically validate these three competing perspectives by teasing out the causal ordering of the within-person relationships between perceptions of fit and workplace affect and performance. In two separate diary studies, one with weekly (N = 153) and one with daily (N = 77) repeated measures, support was found for the synchronous relationship perspective with heuristic thinking as the plausible underlying process. This research contributes to the PE fit literature by providing new insight into the dynamic nature of perceived fit.
Research Center/Unit :
LENTIC - Laboratoire d'Études sur les Nouvelles Formes de Travail, l'Innovation et le Changement - ULiège
Disciplines :
Human resources management
Author, co-author :
Vleugels, Wouter ; Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC Liège : UER > UER Management : Strategic and Sustainable Human Resource Management ; KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Bakker, A., & Bal, M. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 189–206.
Bargh, J., & Chartrand, T. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.
Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1995). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford, US: University Press.
Baumeister, R., Masicampo, E., & Vohs, K. (2011). Do conscious thoughts cause behavior? Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 331–336.
Beal, D., & Ghandour, L. (2011). Stability, change, and the stability of change in daily workplace affect. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 526–546.
Bem, D. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183–200.
Blustein, D. (2011). A relational theory of working. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79, 1–17.
Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing live as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616.
Boon, C., & Biron, M. (2016). Temporal issues in person–organization fit, person–job fit and turnover: The role of leader–member exchange. Human Relations, 69, 2177–2200.
Brief, A., & Weiss, H. (2002). Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 279–307.
Cable, D., & DeRue, S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 875–884.
Cable, D., & Judge, T. (1996). Person–organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 294–311.
Cable, D., & Parsons, C. (2001). Socialization tactics and person–organization fit. Personnel Psychology, 54, 1–23.
Caplan, R. (1987). Person–environment fit theory and organizations: Commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 248–267.
Carver, C., & Scheier, M. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Chen, F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504.
Cheung, G., & Rensvold, R. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.
Conway, J., & Lance, C. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 325–334.
Cooper-Thomas, H., Van Vianen, A., & Anderson, N. (2004). Changes in person–organization fit: The impact of socialization tactics on perceived and actual P–O fit. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13, 52–78.
Dalal, R., Lam, H., Weiss, H., Welch, E., & Hulin, C. (2009). A within-person approach to work behavior and performance: Concurrent and lagged citizenship–counterproductivity associations, and dynamic relationships with affect and overall job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 1051–1066.
Dawis, R., & Lofquits, L. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment. Minneapolis, MN: Unniversity of Minnesota Press.
Demerouti, E., & Rispens, S. (2014). Improving the image of student-recruited samples: A commentary. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 34–41.
DeRue, S., & Morgeson, F. (2007). Stability and change in person–team and person–role fit over time: The effects of growth satisfaction, performance, and general self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1242–1253.
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168.
Edwards, J. A., & Billsberry, J. (2010). Testing a multidimensional theory of person–environment fit. Journal of Managerial Issues, 22, 476–493.
Edwards, J. R., & Cable, D. (2009). The value of value congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 654–677.
Edwards, J. R., Cable, D., Williamson, I., Lambert, L., & Shipp, A. (2006). The phenomenology of fit: Linking the person and environment to the subjective experience of person–environment fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 802–827.
Enders, C., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multi-level models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138.
Fisher, C., & To, M. (2012). Using experience sampling methodology in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 865–877.
Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. (1984). Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Follmer, E., Talbot, D., Kristof-Brown, A., Astrove, S., & Billsberry, J. (2017). Resolution, relief, and resignation: A qualitative study of responses to misfit at work. Academy of Management Journal, 61, 440–465.
Forgas, J., & George, J. (2001). Affective influences on judgements and behavior in organizations: An information processing perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 3–34.
French, J., Caplan, R., & Harrison, R. (1982). The mechanisms of job stress and strain. London: Wiley.
French, J., Rodgers, W., & Cobb, S. (1974). Adjustment as person–environment fit. In G. Coelho, D. Hamburg, & J. Adams (Eds.), Coping and adaptation (pp. 316–333). New York: Basic Books.
Frijda, N. (1988). The laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43, 349–358.
Gabriel, A., Diefendorff, J., Chandler, M., Moran, C., & Greguras, G. (2014). The dynamic relationships of work affect and job satisfaction with perceptions of fit. Personnel Psychology, 67, 389–420.
Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482.
Grant, A. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32, 393–417.
Greguras, G., & Diefendorff, J. (2009). Different fits satisfy different needs: Linking person–environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self-determination theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 465–477.
Harrison, R. (1978). Person–environment fit and job stress. In C. Cooper, & R. Payne (Eds.), Stress at work (pp. 175–205). New York: Wiley.
Hoffman, B., & Woehr, D. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between person–organization fit and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 389–399.
Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Humphrey, S., Nahrgang, J., & Morgeson, F. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytical summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1332–1356.
Ilies, R., Johnson, M., Judge, T., & Keeney, J. (2011). A within-individual study of interpersonal conflict as a work stressor: Dispositional and situational moderators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 44–64.
Jansen, K., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2006). Toward a multidimensional theory of person environment fit. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18, 193–212.
Johnson, R., Taing, M., Chang, C., & Kawamoto, C. (2013). A self-regulation approach to person–environment fit. In A. Kristof-Brown, & J. Billsberry (Eds.), Organizational fit: Key issues and new direction (pp. 74–98). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. London, UK: Penguin books.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgement of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454.
Kammeyer-Mueller, J., Wanberg, C., Rubenstein, A., & Song, Z. (2013). Support, undermining, and newcomer socialization: Fitting in during the first 90 days. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1104–1124.
Klag, M., Jansen, K., & Lee, M. (2015). Contemplating workplace change: Evolving individual thought processes and emergent story lines. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 51, 36–70.
Kline, R. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Kristof, A. (1996). Person–organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49.
Kristof-Brown, A., & Billsberry, J. (2013). Fit for the future. In A. Kristof-Brown, & J. Billsberry (Eds.), Organizational fit: Key issues and new direction (pp. 1–18). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Kristof-Brown, A., & Jansen, K. (2007). Issues of person–organization fit. In C. Ostroff, & T. Judge (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational fit (pp. 123–153). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
Kristof-Brown, A., Li, C., & Schneider, B. (2016). Fitting in and doing good: A review of person-environment fit and organizational citizenship behavior research. In P. Podsakoff, S. MacKenzie, & N. Podsakoff (Eds.), The oxford handbook of organizational citizenship behavior. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
Kristof-Brown, A., Zimmerman, R., & Johnson, E. (2005). Consequences of individuals' fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342.
Lang, J., Bliese, P., Lang, J., & Adler, A. (2011). Work gets unfair for the depressed: Cross-lagged relations between organizational justice perceptions and depressive symptoms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 602–618.
Lauver, K., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2001). Distinguishing between employees' perceptions of person–job and person–organization fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 454–470.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Louis, M. (1980). Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 226–251.
Mayer, R., Davis, J., & Schoorman, F. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.
Muchinsky, P., & Monahan, C. (1987). What is person–environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary models of fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 268–277.
Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2013). Mplus user's guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., & Zapf, D. (2010). Diary studies in organizational research: An introduction and some practical recommendations. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9(2), 79–93.
Ostroff, C. (2012). Person–environment fit in organizational settings. In S. Kozlowski (Ed.), Handbook of organizational psychology (pp. 373–408). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Parker, S. (2014). Beyond motivation: Job and work design for development, health, ambidexterity, and more. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 661–669.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
Roe, R. (2008). Time in applied psychology. The study of “what happens” rather than “what is”. European Psychologist, 13, 37–52.
Schneider, B. (2001). Fits about fit. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50, 141–152.
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523.
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. (2003). Mood as information: 20 years later. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 296–303.
Shipp, A., & Jansen, K. (2011). Reinterpreting time in fit theory: Crafting and recrafting narratives of fit in medias res. Academy of Management Review, 36, 76–101.
Smith, E., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108–131.
Smyth, M., Collins, A., Morris, P., & Levy, P. (1994). Cognition in action (2nd ed.). Erlbaum, UK: Psychology Press.
Sonnentag, S., Mojza, E., Binnewies, C., & Scholl, A. (2008). Being engaged at work and detached at home: A week-level study on work engagement, psychological detachment, and affect. Work and Stress, 22, 257–276.
Spector, P. (1994). Using self-report questionnaires in OB research: A comment on the use of a controversial method. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 385–392.
Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S., & Grant, A. (2005). A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization Science, 16, 537–549.
Tims, M., Derks, D., & Bakker, A. (2016). Job crafting and its relationships with person–job fit and meaningfulness: A three-wave study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 44–53.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 207–342.
Van Katwyk, P., Fox, S., Spector, P., & Kelloway, E. (2000). Using the Job-Related Affective Well-Being Scale (JAWS) to investigate affective responses to work stressors. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 219–230.
Verquer, M., Beehr, T., & Wagner, S. (2003). A meta-analysis of the relations between person organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 473–489.
Williams, L., & Anderson, S. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617.
Yu, K. (2009). Affective influences in person–environment fit theory: Exploring the role of affect as both cause and outcome of P-E fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1210–1226.
Yu, K. (2013). A motivational model of person–environment fit: Psychological motives as drivers of change. In A. Kristof-Brown, & J. Billsberry (Eds.), Organizational fit: Key issues and new direction (pp. 21–49). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
