Article (Scientific journals)
Reproducibility of the wet part of the soil water retention curve: a European interlaboratory comparison
Guillaume, Benjamin; Aroui Boukbida, H.; Bakker, G. et al.
2023In Soil, 9 (1), p. 365–379
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
soil-9-365-2023.pdf
Publisher postprint (7.48 MB) Creative Commons License - Attribution
Download
Annexes
soil-9-365-2023-supplement.pdf
(3.32 MB) Creative Commons License - Attribution
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
soil water retention curve
Abstract :
[en] The soil water retention curve (SWRC) is a key soil property required for predicting basic hydrological processes. The SWRC is often obtained in the laboratory with non-harmonized methods. Moreover, procedures associated with each method are not standardized. This can induce a lack of reproducibility between laboratories using different methods and procedures or using the same methods with different procedures. The goal of this study was to estimate the inter- and intralaboratory variability of the measurement of the wet part (from 10 to 300 hPa) of the SWRC. An interlaboratory comparison was carried out between 14 laboratories, using artificially constructed, porous reference samples that were transferred between laboratories according to a statistical design. The retention measurements were modelled by a series of linear mixed models using a Bayesian approach. This allowed the detection of sample-to-sample variability, interlaboratory variability, intralaboratory variability and the effects of sample changes between measurements. The greatest portion of the differences in the measurement of SWRCs was due to interlaboratory variability. The intralaboratory variability was highly variable depending on the laboratory. Some laboratories successfully reproduced the same SWRC on the same sample, while others did not. The mean intralaboratory variability over all laboratories was smaller than the mean interlaboratory variability. A possible explanation for these results is that all laboratories used slightly different methods and procedures. We believe that this result may be of great importance regarding the quality of SWRC databases built by pooling SWRCs obtained in different laboratories. The quality of pedotransfer functions or maps that might be derived is probably hampered by this inter- and intralaboratory variability. The way forward is that measurement procedures of the SWRC need to be harmonized and standardized.
Disciplines :
Agriculture & agronomy
Author, co-author :
Guillaume, Benjamin ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Echanges Eau - Sol - Plantes
Aroui Boukbida, H.
Bakker, G.
Bieganowski, A.
Brostaux, Yves  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre > Modélisation et développement
Cornelis, W.
Durner, W.
Hartmann, C.
Iversen, B. V.
Javaux, M.
Ingwersen, J.
Lamorski, K.
Lamparter, A.
Makó, A.
Mingot Soriano, A. M.
Messing, I.
Nemes, A.
Pomes-Bordedebat, A.
van der Ploeg, M.
Weber, T. K. D.
Weihermüller, L.
Wellens, Joost  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Sphères
Degré, Aurore  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre > Echanges Eau - Sol - Plantes
More authors (13 more) Less
Language :
English
Title :
Reproducibility of the wet part of the soil water retention curve: a European interlaboratory comparison
Publication date :
30 June 2023
Journal title :
Soil
ISSN :
2199-3971
eISSN :
2199-398X
Volume :
9
Issue :
1
Pages :
365–379
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 16 August 2023

Statistics


Number of views
33 (8 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
21 (3 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
0
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi