Article (Scientific journals)
Genomic prediction and genetic correlations estimated for milk production and fatty acid traits in Walloon Holstein cattle using random regression models.
Paiva, José Teodoro; Mota, Rodrigo Reis; Lopes, Paulo Sávio et al.
2022In Journal of Dairy Research, 89 (3), p. 1 - 9
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Genomic-prediction-and-genetic-correlations-estimated-for-milk-production-and-fatty-acid-traits-in-Walloon-Holstein-cattle-using-random-regression-modelsJournal-of-Dairy-Research.pdf
Author postprint (377.3 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Genetic correlation; MIR; genomic prediction; single-step GBLUP; test-day model; Food Science; Animal Science and Zoology; General Medicine
Abstract :
[en] The aims of this study were to: (1) estimate genetic correlation for milk production traits (milk, fat and protein yields and fat and protein contents) and fatty acids (FA: C16:0, C18:1 cis-9, LCFA, SFA, and UFA) over days in milk, (2) investigate the performance of genomic predictions using single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) based on random regression models (RRM), and (3) identify the optimal scaling and weighting factors to be used in the construction of the H matrix. A total of 302 684 test-day records of 63.875 first lactation Walloon Holstein cows were used. Positive genetic correlations were found between milk yield and fat and protein yield (rg from 0.46 to 0.85) and between fat yield and milk FA (rg from 0.17 to 0.47). On the other hand, negative correlations were estimated between fat and protein contents (rg from -0.22 to -0.59), between milk yield and milk FA (rg from -0.22 to -0.62), and between protein yield and milk FA (rg from -0.11 to -0.19). The selection for high fat content increases milk FA throughout lactation (rg from 0.61 to 0.98). The test-day ssGBLUP approach showed considerably higher prediction reliability than the parent average for all milk production and FA traits, even when no scaling and weighting factors were used in the H matrix. The highest validation reliabilities (r2 from 0.09 to 0.38) and less biased predictions (b1 from 0.76 to 0.92) were obtained using the optimal parameters (i.e., ω = 0.7 and α = 0.6) for the genomic evaluation of milk production traits. For milk FA, the optimal parameters were ω = 0.6 and α = 0.6. However, biased predictions were still observed (b1 from 0.32 to 0.81). The findings suggest that using ssGBLUP based on RRM is feasible for the genomic prediction of daily milk production and FA traits in Walloon Holstein dairy cattle.
Disciplines :
Animal production & animal husbandry
Genetics & genetic processes
Author, co-author :
Paiva, José Teodoro;  Department of Animal Sciences, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil
Mota, Rodrigo Reis;  Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, TERRA Teaching and Research Centre, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium
Lopes, Paulo Sávio;  Department of Animal Sciences, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil
Hammami, Hedi ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre > Animal Sciences (AS)
Vanderick, Sylvie  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre > Animal Sciences (AS)
Oliveira, Hinayah Rojas;  Department of Animal Biosciences, Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Veroneze, Renata;  Department of Animal Sciences, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil
Silva, Fabyano Fonseca E;  Department of Animal Sciences, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil
Gengler, Nicolas  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre > Animal Sciences (AS)
Language :
English
Title :
Genomic prediction and genetic correlations estimated for milk production and fatty acid traits in Walloon Holstein cattle using random regression models.
Publication date :
05 September 2022
Journal title :
Journal of Dairy Research
ISSN :
0022-0299
eISSN :
1469-7629
Publisher :
Cambridge University Press, England
Volume :
89
Issue :
3
Pages :
1 - 9
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
F.R.S.-FNRS - Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique
Funding text :
The authors acknowledge the support of the Walloon Government (Service Public de Wallonie – Direction Générale Opérationnelle Agriculture, Ressources Naturelles et Environnement; SPW-DGARNE) and the use of the computation resources of the University of Liège – Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech provided by the technical platform Calcul et Modélisation Informatique (CAMI) of the TERRA Teaching and Research Centre, partly supported by the National Fund for Scientific Research (Brussels, Belgium) under Grants T.0095.19 (PDR ‘DEEPSELECT’) and J.0174.18 (CDR ‘PREDICT-2’) and the Consortium des Equipements de Calcul Intensif (CECI) of the Federation Wallonia-Brussels (Brussels, Belgium), funded by the National Fund for Scientific Research (Brussels, Belgium) funded under Grant 2.5020.11. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the financial and technical support provided by the Walloon Breeders Association (AWE, Ciney, Belgium). The authors also acknowledge the support of the CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico), the CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) and the Wallonia-Brussels-International (Brussels, Belgium).
Available on ORBi :
since 11 June 2023

Statistics


Number of views
40 (4 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
49 (3 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
0
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
0
OpenAlex citations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi