[en] Human remains detection dogs (HRDD) are commonly used by law enforcement agencies to search for cadavers. Biological material is typically used as a training stimulus, also called aids, to train dogs to recognize the smell of cadavers. While HRDD training approaches have received extensive attention, information remains limited on the olfactory cues used to train them. Here, we aimed to decipher the chemical basis of detection dog olfaction. Five specific objectives were explored to precise whether the composition or the concentration of the training aids drives the HRDDs responses. We recorded the behavioral responses of four HRDDs exposed to different cadaveric-like smells. We found that HRDDs recognized a simplified synthetic aid composed of cadaveric compounds. The lowest concentration at which HRDDs continued to perceive the cadaveric smell was determined. HRDDs were not impacted by slight modifications to the chemical composition of a blend of odors that they have been trained with. HRDDs associated sulfur and nitrogen compounds as human cadaver. Our findings highlight a lack of specificity of HRDDs to cadaveric compounds, which could lead to error of detection. Moreover, all dogs did not positively respond to the same blends, despite being trained with the same aids and procedure. However, we confirmed that dogs could be trained with a simplified blend of molecules. The chemical composition of a training aid has therefore high consequences on the performance of the trained animal, and this conclusion opens additional questions regarding olfaction-based detection animals.
Disciplines :
Zoologie
Auteur, co-auteur :
Martin, Clément ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Gestion durable des bio-agresseurs
Süskind P. Perfume: the story of a murderer. Zürich, Switzerland: Diogenes; 1985.
Komar D. The use of cadaver dogs in locating scattered, scavenged human remains: preliminary field test results. J Forensic Sci. 1999;44(2):405–8. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS14474J
Nizio KD, Ueland M, Stuart BH, Forbes SL. The analysis of textiles associated with decomposing remains as a natural training aid for cadaver-detection dogs. Forensic Chem. 2017;5:33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forc.2017.06.002
Lorenzo N, Wan T, Harper RJ, Hsu YL, Chow M, Rose S, et al. Laboratory and field experiments used to identify Canis lupus var. familiaris active odor signature chemicals from drugs, explosives, and humans. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2003;376(8):1212–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-2018-7
Martin C, Diederich C, Verheggen F. Cadaver dogs and the deathly hallows — a survey and literature review on selection and training procedure. Animals (Basel). 2020;10(7):1219. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10071219
Webb EK, Saccardo CC, Poling A, Cox C, Fast CD. Rapidly training African giant pouched rats (Cricetomys ansorgei) with multiple targets for scent detection. Behav Processes. 2020;174:104085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104085
Deldalle S, Gaunet F. Effects of 2 training methods on stress-related behaviors of the dog (Canis familiaris) and on the dog-owner relationship. J Vet Behav Clin Appl Res. 2014;9(2):58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2013.11.004
Stadler S, Focant J-F, Forbes SL. Forensic analysis of volatile organic compounds from decomposed remains in a soil environment. In: Kars H, van den Eijkel L, editors. Soil in criminal and environmental forensics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Cham; 2016. p. 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33115-7
Cablk ME, Szelagowski EE, Sagebiel JC. Characterization of the volatile organic compounds present in the headspace of decomposing animal remains, and compared with human remains. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;220(1–3):118–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.02.007
Eckenrode BA, Ramsey SA, Stockham RA, Van Berkel GJ, Asano KG, Wolf DA. Performance evaluation of the scent transfer unit™ (STU-100) for organic compound collection and release. J Forensic Sci. 2006;51(4):780–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00178.x
Stadler S, Stefanuto P-H, Byer JD, Brokl M, Forbes SL, Focant J-F. Analysis of synthetic canine training aids by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-time of flight mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2012;1255:202–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.04.001
Oesterhelweg L, Kröber S, Rottmann K, Willhöft J, Braun C, Thies N, et al. Cadaver dogs – a study on detection of contaminated carpet squares. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;174(1):35–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.02.031
Rust BL. Odour profiling of blood training aids for blood-detection dogs using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) [PhD thesis]. Sydney, NSW: University of Technology Sydney; 2018.
Martin C, Willem N, Desablens S, Menard V, Tajri S, Blanchard S, et al. What a good boy! Deciphering the efficiency of detection dogs. Front Anal Sci. 2022;2:932857. https://doi.org/10.3389/frans.2022.932857
Lazarowski L, Dorman DC. Explosives detection by military working dogs: olfactory generalization from components to mixtures. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2014;151:84–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2013.11.010
Martin C, Verheggen F. Odour profile of human corpses: a review. Forensic Chem. 2018;10:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forc.2018.07.002
Rosier E, Loix S, Develter W, Van De Voorde W, Tytgat J, Cuypers E. The search for a volatile human specific marker in the decomposition process. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0137341. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137341
Rosier E, Loix S, Develter W, Van de Voorde W, Tytgat J, Cuypers E. Time-dependent VOC-profile of decomposed human and animal remains in laboratory environment. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;266:164–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.05.035
Dekeirsschieter J, Verheggen FJ, Haubruge E, Brostaux Y. Carrion beetles visiting pig carcasses during early spring in urban, forest and agricultural biotopes of Western Europe. J Insect Sci. 2011;11:73. https://doi.org/10.1673/031.011.7301
Vass AA, Smith RR, Thompson CV, Burnett MN, Wolf DA, Synstelien JA, et al. Decompositional odor analysis database. J Forensic Sci. 2004;49(4):760–9. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS2003434
Statheropoulos M, Spiliopoulou C, Agapiou A. A study of volatile organic compounds evolved from the decaying human body. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;153(2–3):147–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.08.015
Dent BB, Forbes SL, Stuart BH. Review of human decomposition processes in soil. Environ Geol. 2004;45(4):576–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0913-z
Vass AA, Smith RR, Thompson CV, Burnett MN, Dulgerian N, Eckenrode BA. Odor analysis of decomposing buried human remains. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53(2):384–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00680.x
Irish L, Rennie SR, Parkes GMB, Williams A. Identification of decomposition volatile organic compounds from surface-deposited and submerged porcine remains. Sci Justice. 2019;59(5):503–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2019.03.007
Sebeok TA, Rosenthal R, editors. The clever Hans phenomenon: communication with horses, whales, apes, and people. New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences; 1981.
Alexander MB, Hodges TK, Wescott DJ, Aitkenhead-Peterson JA. The effects of soil texture on the ability of human remains detection dogs to detect buried human remains. J Forensic Sci. 2016;61(3):649–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13084
Migala AF, Brown SE. Use of human remains detection dogs for wide area search after wildfire: a new experience for Texas task force 1 search and rescue resources. Wilderness Environ Med. 2012;23(4):337–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wem.2012.05.005
Frederickx C, Verheggen FJ, Haubruge E. Biosensors in forensic sciences. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ. 2011;15(4):449–58.
Riezzo I, Neri M, Rendine M, Bellifemina A, Cantatore S, Fiore C, et al. Cadaver dogs: unscientific myth or reliable biological devices? Forensic Sci Int. 2014;244:213–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.08.026
Lit L, Crawford CA. Effects of training paradigms on search dog performance. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2006;98(3–4):277–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.08.022
Williams M, Johnston JM. Training and maintaining the performance of dogs (Canis familiaris) on an increasing number of odor discriminations in a controlled setting. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2002;78(1):55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00081-3
Forbes SL, Rust LT, Trebilcock K, Perrault KA, McGrath LT. Effect of age and storage conditions on the volatile organic compound profile of blood. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2014;10(4):570–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-014-9610-3
Van Denhouwe B, Schotsmans EMJ. DVI Belgium: victim identification and necrosearch. In: Groen MJM, Márquez-Grant N, Janaway RC, editors. Forensic archaeology: a global perspective. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2015. p. 9–17.
Gazit I, Goldblatt A, Grinstein D, Terkel J. Dogs can detect the individual odors in a mixture of explosives. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2021;235:105212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105212
Angle C, Passler T, Waggoner PL, Fischer TD, Rogers B, Galik PK, et al. Real-time detection of a virus using detection dogs. Front Vet Sci. 2016;2:79. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2015.00079
Rust LT, Nizio KD, Wand MP, Forbes SL. Investigating the detection limits of scent-detection dogs to residual blood odour on clothing. Forensic Chem. 2018;9:62–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forc.2018.05.002
Hag-Ali M, AlShamsi AS, Boeijen L, Mahmmod Y, Manzoor R, Rutten H, et al. The detection dogs test is more sensitive than real-time PCR in screening for SARS-CoV-2. Commun Biol. 2021;4(1):686. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02232-9
Dekeirsschieter J, Verheggen FJ, Gohy M, Hubrecht F, Bourguignon L, Lognay G, et al. Cadaveric volatile organic compounds released by decaying pig carcasses (Sus domesticus L.) in different biotopes. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;189(1–3):46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.03.034
Dubois LM, Stefanuto PH, Perrault KA, Delporte G, Delvenne P, Focant J-F. Comprehensive approach for monitoring human tissue degradation. Chromatographia. 2019;82:857–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-019-03710-3
Verheggen FJ, Perrault KA, Caparros Megido R, Dubois LM, Francis F, Haubruge E, et al. The odor of death: an overview of current knowledge on characterization and applications. Bioscience. 2017;67(7):600–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix046
Forbes SL, Perrault KA, Stefanuto PH, Nizio KD, Focant J-F. Comparison of the decomposition VOC profile during winter and summer in a moist, mid-latitude (Cfb) climate. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):3113681. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113681
Forbes SL, Troobnikoff AN, Ueland M, Nizio KD, Perrault KA. Profiling the decomposition odour at the grave surface before and after probing. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;259:193–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.12.038
Forbes SL, Perrault KA. Decomposition odour profiling in the air and soil surrounding vertebrate carrion. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):395107. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095107
Hoffman EM, Curran AM, Dulgerian N, Stockham RA, Eckenrode BA. Characterization of the volatile organic compounds present in the headspace of decomposing human remains. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;186(1–3):6–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.12.022
Statheropoulos M, Agapiou A, Zorba E, Mikedi K, Karma S, Pallis GC, et al. Combined chemical and optical methods for monitoring the early decay stages of surrogate human models. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;210(1–3):154–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.02.023
Dekeirsschieter J, Stefanuto PH, Brasseur C, Haubruge E, Focant J-F. Enhanced characterization of the smell of death by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GCxGC-TOFMS). PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39005. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039005
Kasper J, Mumm R, Ruther J. The composition of carcass volatile profiles in relation to storage time and climate conditions. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;223(1–3):64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.08.001
Vass AA. Beyond the grave – understanding human decomposition. Microbiol Today. 2001;28(28):190–2.
Oldenburg C, Schoon A, Heitkönig IMA. Wildlife detection dog training: a case study on achieving generalization between target odor variations while retaining specificity. J Vet Behav Clin Appl Res. 2016;13:34–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2016.03.008
