Les corpus arborés avant et après le numérique

Kahane, Sylvain; Mazziotta, Nicolas

Download

Article (Scientific journals)

Les corpus arborés avant et après le numérique

Kahane, Sylvain; Mazziotta, Nicolas

2022 • In Revue TAL : Traitement Automatique des Langues, 63 (3), p. 63-88

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/300310

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

TAL__ATALA____Kahane___Mazziotta___Treebanks_avant_num_rique(5).pdf

Author preprint (4.19 MB)

Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

corpus arboré; treebank; annotation syntaxique; analyse syntaxique; diagramme syntaxique

Abstract :

[fr] Nous montrons comment, du XVIIIe siècle à nos jours, l’annotation syntaxique de cor- pus a évolué de l’analyse exhaustive de phrases isolées à celle de listes d’exemples, puis à celle de textes entiers. Nous étudions l’évolution des visées de ces corpus arborés entre motivations pédagogique, théorique et ressources pour le TAL. Nous présentons quelques ouvrages clés, souvent peu connus de la communauté TAL comme de celle des linguistes : Buffier (1709), Beauzée (1765), Gaultier (1817), Clark (1847), Jespersen (1937) et Tesnière (1959). Nous concluons sur les liens actuels entre corpus arborés et TAL.

Disciplines :

Languages & linguistics

Author, co-author :

Kahane, Sylvain ^✱

Mazziotta, Nicolas ^✱; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de langues et littératures romanes > Linguistique synchronique du français

^✱ These authors have contributed equally to this work.

Language :

French

Title :

Les corpus arborés avant et après le numérique

Alternative titles :

[en] Treebanks before and after the digital technology

Publication date :

2022

Journal title :

Revue TAL : Traitement Automatique des Langues

ISSN :

1248-9433

eISSN :

1965-0906

Publisher :

Association pour le Traitement Automatique des Langues (ATALA), France

Volume :

Issue :

Pages :

63-88

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Additional URL :

https://www.atala.org/content/tal_63_3_3

Available on ORBi :

since 23 February 2023

Statistics

Number of views

61 (16 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

11 (9 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

Bibliography

Aufrant L., Training parsers for low-resourced languages: improving cross-lingual transfer with monolingual knowledge, PhD thesis, Université Paris Saclay, 2018.
Barnard F. A. P., Analytic grammar, with symbolic illustration, French, New York, 1836.
Beauzée N., « Régime», in D. Diderot, J. L. R. D’Alembert (eds), Encyclopédie, vol. 14, p. 5-11, 1765.
Becker K. F., Deutsche Grammatik, J. C. Hermann’sche, Frankfurt, 1829.
Billroth J. G. F., Lateinische Syntax für die obern Klassen gelehrter Schulen, Weidmann, 1832.
Blanche-Benveniste C., Borel B., Deulofeu J., Durand J., Giacomi A., Loufrani C., « Des grilles pour le français parlé», Recherches sur le Français Parlé, no 2, p. 163-206, 1979.
Breiman L., « Bagging predictors», Machine learning, vol. 24, no 2, p. 123-140, 1996.
Brittain R. C., A critical history of systems of sentence diagramming in English, PhD thesis, University of Texas, Austin, 1973.
Buchholz S., Marsi E., « CoNLL-X shared task on multilingual dependency parsing», Proceedings of the tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), p. 149-164, 2006.
Buffier C., Grammaire françoise sur un plan nouveau, Le Clerc-Brunet-Leconte & Montalant, Paris, 1709.
Chevalier J.-C., Histoire de la syntaxe: Naissance de la notion de complément dans la grammaire française (1530–1750), Droz, Paris, 1968.
Chomsky N., Syntactic structures, Mouton, 1957.
Cigana L., « Some aspects of dependency in Otto Jespersen’s structural syntax», in A. Imrényi, N. Mazziotta (eds), Chapters of Dependency Grammar: A historical survey from antiquity to Tesnière, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, p. 215-251, 2020.
Clark S. W., The science of the English grammar: A practical grammar in which words, phrases, and sentences are classified to their offices, and their relation to each other, illustrated by a complete system of diagrams, H. W. Barnes & Company, Cincinnati, 1847.
Clark S. W., The science of English language. A practical grammar [...]. Revised edition, A.S. Barnes & Co., Derby, Bradley & Co., New York, 1855.
Clark S. W., Key to Clark’s grammar: in which the analyses of the sentences of the grammar are indicated by diagrams, A.S. Barnes & Burr, New York, 1863.
de Blignières, Demoyencourt, Ducrot (de Sixt), Le Clerc ainé, Élemens de grammaire française, extraits de la grammaire de l’abbé Gaultier, Jules Renouard, Paris, 1829.
de Lhoneux M., Zhang S., Søgaard A., « Zero-Shot Dependency Parsing with Worst-Case Aware Automated Curriculum Learning», Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), Association for Computational Linguistics, Dublin, Ireland, p. 578-587, 2022.
Devlin J., Chang M.-W., Lee K., Toutanova K., « Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding», 2019.
Dumarsais C. C., « Construction», in D. Diderot, J. L. R. D’Alembert (eds), Encyclopédie, vol. 4, p. 73-92, 1754.
Einarsson J., « Talbankens skriftspråkskonkordans», 1976.
Gaultier L., Atlas de grammaire, ou tables propres à exciter et à soutenir l’attention des enfans dans l’étude de cette science, Jules Renouard, Paris, 1817.
Gerdes K., « Collaborative dependency annotation», Proceedings of the second international conference on dependency linguistics (DepLing), p. 88-97, 2013.
Gerdes K., Guillaume B., Kahane S., Perrier G., « SUD or surface-syntactic universal dependencies: An annotation scheme near-isomorphic to UD», Proceedings of the second Universal Dependencies Workshop (UDW), Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2018.
Girard G., Les vrais principes de la langue françoise ou la parole réduite en méthode, Le Breton, Paris, 1747.
Gleason H. A. J., Linguistics and English grammar, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Toronto and London, 1965.
Guibon G., Courtin M., Gerdes K., Guillaume B., « When collaborative treebank curation meets graph grammars», Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), 2020.
Guillaume B., « Graph Matching and Graph Rewriting: GREW tools for corpus exploration, maintenance and conversion», Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, p. 168-175, 2021.
Guiller K., Analyse syntaxique du pidgin-créole du Nigéria à l’aide d’un transformer (BERT): Méthodes et résultats, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle, 2020. Mémoire de master.
Hajič J., « Building a syntactically annotated corpus: The prague dependency treebank», in E. Hajičová (ed.), Issues of valency and meaning: Studies in honour of Jarmila Panevová, Karolinum, p. 106-132, 1998.
Hajic J., Vidová-Hladká B., Pajas P., « The prague dependency treebank: Annotation structure and support», Proceedings of the IRCS workshop on linguistic databases, p. 105-114, 2001.
Hall J., Nivre J., « A generic architecture for data-driven dependency parsing», Proceedings of the 15th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics (NODALIDA 2005), p. 47-56, 2006.
Heinecke J., « ConlluEditor: A fully graphical editor for Universal Dependencies treebank files», Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Universal Dependencies (UDW, SyntaxFest), p. 87-93, 2019.
Imrényi A., Mazziotta N., Chapters of Dependency Grammar: A historical survey from antiquity to Tesnière, no 212 in Studies in Language Companion Series, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 2020.
Jespersen O., The philosophy of language, Allen & Unwin, Londres, 1924.
Jespersen O., Analytic syntax, Allen & Unwin, Londres, 1937.
Kahane S., « De l’analyse en grille à la modélisation des entassements», in S. Caddeo, M.-N. Roubaud, M. Rouquier, F. Sabio (eds), Penser les langues avec Claire Blanche-Benveniste, Presses Universitaires de Provence, p. 101-116, 2012.
Kahane S., « How dependency syntax found its modern form in the French Encyclopedia: From Buffier (1709) to Beauzée (1765)», in A. Imrényi, N. Mazziotta (eds), Chapters of Dependency Grammar: A historical survey from antiquity to Tesnière, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, p. 85-131, 2020.
Kahane S., Osborne T., « Translators’ introduction», Elements of structural syntax, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, p. xxix-lxxiv, 2015.
Kemp J. A., John Wallis’s grammar of the English language, Longman, London, 1972.
Kübler S., McDonald R., Nivre J., « Dependency parsing», Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, vol. 1, no 1, p. 1-127, 2009.
Luotolahti J., Kanerva J., Pyysalo S., Ginter F., « SETS: Scalable and efficient tree search in dependency graphs», Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL): Demonstrations, p. 51-55, 2015.
Marcus M., Santorini B., Marcinkiewicz M. A., « Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. 1993», Computational linguistics, 1993.
Mazziotta N., « Drawing sentences before syntactic trees: Stephen Watkins Clark’s sentence diagrams (1847)», Historiographia linguistica, vol. 43, no 3, p. 301-342, 2016.
Mazziotta N., Kahane S., « To what extent is immediate constituency analysis dependency-based ? A survey of foundational texts», Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling), ACL, p. 116-126, 2017.
Murray L., A key to the exercises: adapted to L. Murray’s English grammar, Longman & Rees, Darton & Harvey et Wilson, Spence & Mawman, London, 1799.
Murray L., English exercises, adapted to Murray’s English grammar: [...], 16 edn, Collins & Co., New York, 1812.
Nida E., A synopsys of English syntax, Mouton and Co, London/The Hague, 1966.
Nivre J., De Marneffe M.-C., Ginter F., Goldberg Y., Hajic J., Manning C. D., McDonald R., Petrov S., Pyysalo S., Silveira N. et al., « Universal dependencies v1: A multilingual treebank collection», Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), p. 1659-1666, 2016.
Otto J., Bauer S. W., The diagramming dictionary: A complete reference tool for young writers, aspiring rhetoricians, and anyone else who needs to understand how English works, Well-Trained Mind Press, Charles City, Virginia, 2019. OCLC: 1104510563.
Reed A., Kellogg B., Graded lessons in English. An elementary English grammar [...], Clark and Maynard, New York, 1876.
Reed A., Kellogg B., Higher lessons in English. A work on grammar and composition [...], Clark and Maynard, New York, 1877.
Reed A., Kellogg B., A key containing diagrams of the sentences given for analysis in Reed and Kellogg’s Graded lessons in English and Higher lessons in English, Effingham Maynard & Co., New York, 1889.
Seraji M., Megyesi B., Nivre J., « Bootstrapping a Persian dependency treebank», Linguistic Issues in Language Technology, 2012.
Tesnière L., Éléments de syntaxe structurale, Klincksieck, Paris, 1959.
Tyers F., Sheyanova M., Washington J., « UD Annotatrix: An annotation tool for Universal Dependencies», Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT), p. 10-17, 2017.
Wallis J., Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae, Leon Lichfield, Oxford, 1653. [Grammar of the English Language].
Weil H., De l’ordre des mots dans les langues anciennes comparées aux langues modernes, PhD thesis, Sorbonne, Paris, 1844.