barriers to PSS adoption; consumer perception; habitual practices; practice change; PSS; Environmental Science (all); General Environmental Science
Abstract :
[en] The viability of PSS models has been shown to be frequently jeopardized by low levels of consumer appeal and retention. Using Social Practice Theory (SPT) and the habitual practice approach, this paper posits that barriers to consumer adoption and retention of PSS offers are twofold: 1) generic to the PSS offers—that is, common to all sectors but playing differently from one sector to another and 2) sector-specific. The purpose of the paper is to study how routinization of habitual practices differently affects consumers’ propensity to change their consumption practices and to move towards PSS offers across sectors. To gain in-depth understanding of generic and sector-specific barriers and to distinguish between them, three sectors of PSS are analysed and compared: mobility, clothing and tooling. A quantitative and qualitative mixed methodology was used with consumers in the Brussels Region (Belgium). Two results emerge from the study. First, we confirm the existence of generic barriers to the adoption of PSS offers (e.g., not feeling like a target customer, flawed price representation, fear of unavailability of the product, not wanting to share the use of the product, dislike for subscription, or preference for ownership). Second, just as the relative weight of the barriers differs according to the sectors and there are specific obstacles to certain sectors (e.g., morphology in the clothing industry), we demonstrate that determinants of pleasure and determinants of consumption type (purchase or PSS) differ across cases. In addition, we discuss the fact that the type of payment (pay-per-use or subscription) and the related consumer engagement (requiring a change in established practice or not) have an impact on the perception and adoption of PSS offers by consumers.
Disciplines :
Business & economic sciences: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Author, co-author :
Muylaert, Coralie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC Liège Research ; Department of Economics and Social Sciences, ICHEC Research Lab (IRL), ICHEC Brussels Management School, Brussels, Belgium
Thiry, Géraldine; Department of Economics and Social Sciences, ICHEC Research Lab (IRL), ICHEC Brussels Management School, Brussels, Belgium
Roman, Philippe; Department of Economics and Social Sciences, ICHEC Research Lab (IRL), ICHEC Brussels Management School, Brussels, Belgium
Ruwet, Coline; Department of Economics and Social Sciences, ICHEC Research Lab (IRL), ICHEC Brussels Management School, Brussels, Belgium
De Hoe, Roxane; Department of Economics and Social Sciences, ICHEC Research Lab (IRL), ICHEC Brussels Management School, Brussels, Belgium
Maréchal, Kevin ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Modélisation et développement
Language :
English
Title :
Consumer perception of product-service systems: Depicting sector-specific barriers in the mobility, clothing and tooling sectors
This research was funded by grants from Innoviris.brussels, public organization that finances and supports research and innovation in the Brussels-Capital Region (2019-PRB-112 : Brufonctionnel).
Akbar P. Mai R. Hoffmann S. (2018). Under which circumstances do consumers choose a product service system (PSS)? Consumer benefits and costs of sharing in PSS. J. Clean. Prod. 201, 416–427. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.010
Annarelli A. Battistella C. Nonino F. (2016). Product service system: A conceptual framework from a systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 139, 1011–1032. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.061
Armstrong C. Lang C. (2013). Sustainable product service systems: The new frontier in apparel retailing? Res. J. Text. Appar. 17, n°1–12. 10.1108/rjta-17-01-2013-b001
Armstrong C. M. Niinimäki K. Kujala S. Karell E. Lang C. (2015). Sustainable product-service systems for clothing: Exploring consumer perceptions of consumption alternatives in Finland. J. Clean. Prod. 97, 30–39. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.046
Armstrong C. M. Niinimäki K. Lang C. Kujala S. (2016). A use‐oriented clothing economy? Preliminary affirmation for sustainable clothing consumption alternatives. Sust. Dev. 24 (1), 18–31. 10.1002/sd.1602
Bacchetti E. (2017). A design approach with method and tools to support SMEs in designing and implementing Distributed Renewable Energy (DRE) solutions based on Sustainable Product-Service System (S.PSS), 64. Procedia CIRP, 229–234. 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.064
Bacchetti E. Vezzoli C. Landoni P. (2016). Sustainable product-service system (S. PSS) applied to distributed renewable energy (DRE) in low and middle-income contexts: A case studies analysis. Procedia CIRP 47, 442–447. 10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.085
Bardhi F. Eckhardt G. M. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing: Table 1. J. Consum. Res. 39 (4), 881–898. 10.1086/666376
Baumeister C. Wangenheim F. V. (2014). Access vs. ownership: Understanding consumers’ consumption mode preference. Social Science Research Network. 10.2139/ssrn.2463076
Baxter W. Childs P. (2017). Oxfordshire, UK “Designing circular possessions,” in Routledge handbook of sustainable product design (Routledge), 391–404.
Bourdieu P. Nice R. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu P. (1990). “Structures, habitus, practices,” in The logic of practice (Cambridge, UK: Polity), 52–65.
Briceno T. Stagl S. (2006). The role of social processes for sustainable consumption. J. Clean. Prod. 14 (17), 1541–1551. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.027
Browne A. (2016). Can people talk together about their practices? Focus groups, humour and the sensitive dynamics of everyday life. Area 48 (2), 198–205. 10.1111/area.12250
Camacho-Otero J. Pettersen I. N. Boks C. (2017). “Consumer and user acceptance in the circular economy: What are researchers missing?,” in Proceedings product lifetimes and the environment (Amsterdam, Netherlands.IOS Press
Catulli M. Cook M. Potter S. (2017). Consuming use orientated product service systems: A consumer culture theory perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 141, 1186–1193. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.187
Catulli M. (2012). What uncertainty? Further insight into why consumers might be distrustful of product service systems. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 23 (6), 780–793. 10.1108/17410381211253335
Ceschin F. (2012). Critical factors for implementing and diffusing sustainable product-service systems: Insights from innovation studies and companies' experiences. J. Clean. Prod. 45, 74–88. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.034
Cherry C. Pidgeon N. (2018). Why is ownership an issue? Exploring factors that determine public acceptance of product-service systems. Sustainability 10 (7), 2289. 10.3390/su10072289
Creswell J. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson Education.
Dyllick T. Rost Z. (2017). Towards true product sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 162, 346–360. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.189
Geels F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms, 1. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 24–40.
Giddens A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity; self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Giddens A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press.
Grin J. Rotmans J. Schot J. (2010). Transitions to sustainable development: New directions in the study of long term transformative change. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
Haber N. Fargnoli M. (2021). Sustainable product-service systems customization: A case study research in the medical equipment sector. Sustainability 13 (12), 6624. 10.3390/su13126624
Halme M. Anttonen M. Hrauda G. Kortman J. (2006). Sustainability evaluation of european household services. J. Clean. Prod. 14 (17), 1529–1540. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.021
Hannon M. J. Foxon T. J. Gale W. F. (2015). ‘Demand pull’government policies to support product- service system activity: The case of energy service companies (ESCos) in the UK. J. Clean. Prod. 108, 900–915. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.082
Hazée S. Delcourt C. Van Vaerenbergh Y. (2017). Burdens of access: Understanding customer barriers and barrier-attenuating practices in access-based services. J. Serv. Res. 20 (4), 441–456. 10.1177/1094670517712877
Héran F. (2021). Une analyse structurale des systèmes modaux. Revue d’Economie. Regionale Urbaine 1, 5–25. 10.3917/reru.pr1.0028
Héran F. (2017). Vers des politiques de déplacements urbains plus cohérentes. norois 245, 89–100. 10.4000/norois.6242
Intlekofer K. Bras B. Ferguson M. (2010). Energy implications of product leasing. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44 (12), 4409–4415. 10.1021/es9036836
Joshi Y. et Rahman Z. (2017). Investigating the determinants of consumers’ sustainable purchase behaviour. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 10, 110–120. 10.1016/j.spc.2017.02.002
Kjaer L. L. Pigosso D. C. A. McAloone T. C. Birkved M. (2018). Guidelines for evaluating the environmental performance of Product/Service-Systems through life cycle assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 190, 666–678. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.108
Kjaer L. L. Pigosso D. C. Niero M. Bech N. M. McAloone T. C. (2019). Product/service-systems for a circular economy: The route to decoupling economic growth from resource consumption? J. Industrial Ecol. 23 (1), 22–35. 10.1111/jiec.12747
Lamberton C. P. Rose R. L. (2012). When is ours better than mine? A framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems. J. Mark. 76 (4), 109–125. 10.1509/jm.10.0368
Lang C. (2018). Perceived risks and enjoyment of access-based consumption: Identifying barriers and motivations to fashion renting. Fash. Text. 5 (1), 23. 10.1186/s40691-018-0139-z
Lawson S. J. Gleim M. R. Perren R. Hwang J. (2016). Freedom from ownership: An exploration of access-based consumption. J. Bus. Res. 69 (8), 2615–2623. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.021
Lidenhammar R. (2015). Hopping on the service bandwagon towards a cir-cular economy-consumer acceptance of product-service systems for home furniture. IIIEE Master Thesis.
Maréchal K. Holzemer L. (2015). Getting a (sustainable) grip on energy consumption: the importance of household dynamics and ‘habitual practices. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 10, 228–239. 10.1016/j.erss.2015.06.013
Maréchal K. Holzemer L. (2018). Unravelling the 'ingredients' of energy consumption: Exploring home-related practices in Belgium. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 39, 19–28. 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.025
Mashhadi A. R. Vedantam A. Behdad S. (2019). Investigation of consumer’s acceptance of product-service-systems: A case study of cell phone leasing. Resour. Conservation Recycl. 143, 36–44. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.006
Moeller S. Wittkowski K. (2010). The burdens of ownership: Reasons for preferring renting. Manag. Serv. Qual. Int. J. 20 (2), 176–191. 10.1108/09604521011027598
Mont O. K. (2002). Clarifying the concept of product–service system. J. Clean. Prod. 10 (3), 237–245. 10.1016/s0959-6526(01)00039-7
Moody J. Farr E. Papagelis M. Keith D. R. (2021). The value of car ownership and use in the United States. Nat. Sustain. 4, 769–774. 10.1038/s41893-021-00731-5
Möhlmann M. (2015). Collaborative consumption: Determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. J. Consum. Behav. 14 (3), 193–207. 10.1002/cb.1512
Muylaert C. Maréchal K. (2022). Understanding consumer lock-in mechanisms towards clothing libraries: A practice-based analysis coupled with the multi-level perspective. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 34, 342–352. 10.1016/j.spc.2022.09.011
Mylan J. (2015). Understanding the diffusion of Sustainable Product-Service Systems: Insights from the sociology of consumption and practice theory. J. Clean. Prod. 97, 13–20. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.065
Nairn A. Spotswood F. (2015). Obviously in the cool group they wear designer things”: A social practice theory perspective on children’s consumption. Eur. J. Mark. 49 (10), 1460–1483. 10.1108/ejm-10-2013-0557
Park H. Armstrong C. M. J. (2019). Will “no-ownership” work for apparel?: Implications for apparel retailers. J. Retail. Consumer Serv. 47, 66–73. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.10.012
Poppelaars F. Bakker C. Van Engelen J. (2018). Does access trump ownership? Exploring consumer acceptance of access-based consump- tion in the case of smartphones. Sustainability 10 (7), 2133. 10.3390/su10072133
Princen T. Maniates M. Conca K. (2002). Confronting consumption. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.,
Rao V. R. (2014).New York, NY, USA Applied conjoint analysis. Springer.
Reckwitz A. (2002). Towards a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. Eur. J. Soc. Theory 5/2, 243–263. 10.1177/13684310222225432
Retamal M. (2019). Collaborative consumption practices in Southeast Asian cities: Prospects for growth and sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 222, 143–152. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.267
Retamal M. Schandl H. (2017). Dirty laundry in manila: Comparing resource consumption practices for individual and shared laundering. J. Ind. Ecol. 22 (6), 1389–1401. 10.1111/jiec.12696
Rexfelt O. Hiort af Ornäs V. (2009). Consumer acceptance of product-service systems: Designing for relative advantages and uncertainty reductions. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 20 (5), 674–699. 10.1108/17410380910961055
Roman P. Muylaert C. Ruwet C. Thiry G. Maréchal K. (2020). Intégrer la territorialité pour une économie de la fonctionnalité plus soutenable. developpementdurable. 11, n°1. 10.4000/developpementdurable.17046
Røpke I. (2009). Theories of practice: New inspiration for ecological economic studies on consumption. Ecol. Econ. 68 (10), 2490–2497. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.015
Schaefers T. Lawson S. J. Kukar-Kinney M. (2016). How the burdens of ownership promote consumer usage of access-based services. Mark. Lett. 27 (3), 569–577. 10.1007/s11002-015-9366-x
Schatzki T. (2002). Pennsylvania, PA, USA, The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. Pennsylvania University Press.
Schatzki T. (1996). Social practices: A wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Shove E. (2003). Converging conventions of comfort, cleanliness and convenience. J. Consum. Policy (Dordr). 26, 395–418. 10.1023/a:1026362829781
Shove E. Pantzar M. Watson M. (2012). Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, The dynamics of social practices -everyday life and how it changes. Sage Publications.
Sousa-Zomer T. T. Cauchick Miguel P. C. (2016). Exploring the consumption side of sustainable product-service systems (PSS): An empirical study and insights for PSS sustainable design. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 15, 74–81. 10.1016/j.cirpj.2016.04.004
Southerton D. Dıaz-Mendez C. Warde A. (2012). Behavioural change and the temporal ordering of eating practices: A UK –Spain comparison. Int. J. Sociol. Agric. Food 19 (1), 19–36.
Spurling N. McMeekin A. (2015). “Interventions in practices: Sustainable mobility policies in england,” in Social practices, intervention and sustainability: Beyond behaviour change. Editors Strengers Y. Maller C. (Oxfordshire, Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge), 78–94.
Tanner C. et Wölfing Kast S. (2003). Promoting sustainable consumption: Determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumers. Psychol. Mark. 20, 883–902. 10.1002/mar.10101
Taylor C. (1985)., 1. Cambridge, UK: CUP, 15–44.What is human agency?Hum. Agency Lang. Philosophical Pap.
Tukker A. (2004). Eight types of product-service system: Eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from suspronet. Bus. Strat. Env. 13, 246–260. 10.1002/bse.414
Tukker A. (2015). Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy–a review. J. Clean. Prod. 97, 76–91. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.049
Tukker A. Tischner U. (2006). Product-services as a research field: Past, present and future. Reflections from a decade of research. J. Clean. Prod. 14 (17), 1552–1556. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.022
Tunn V. S. C. Bocken N. M. P. Van den Hende E. A. Schoormans J. P. L. (2019). Business models for sustainable consumption in the circular economy: An expert study. J. Clean. Prod. 212, 324–333. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.290
Tunn V. S. C. Bocken N. M. P. Van den Hende E. A. Schoormans J. P. L. (2021). “Diffusion of access-based product-service systems: Adoption barriers and how they are addressed in practice,” in Proceedings product lifetimes and the environment 2019 (Berlin, Germany.
Tunn V. S. C. Van den Hende E. A. Bocken N. M. P. Schoormans J. P. L. (2020). Digitalised product-service systems: Effects on consumers' attitudes and experiences. Resour. Conservation Recycl. 162, 105045. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105045
Van Niel J. (2014). L’économie de fonctionnalité: Principes, éléments de terminologie et proposition de typologie. developpementdurable. 5 (1). 10.4000/developpementdurable.10160
Veblen T. (1970). New York, NY, USA, The theory of the leisure class, in Théorie de la classe de loisir (The MacMillan Company).
Warde A. (2005). Consumption and theories of practice. J. Consumer Cult. 5, 131–153. 10.1177/1469540505053090
Yang M. Evans S. (2019). Product-service system business model archetypes and sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 220, 1156–1166. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.067
Yin J. Qian L. Singhapakdi A. (2018). Sharing sustainability: How values and ethics matter in consumers’ adoption of public bicycle-sharing scheme. J. Bus. Ethics 149, 313–332. 10.1007/s10551-016-3043-8
