Download

Full Text

• Abubakari, Z., van der Molen, P., Bennett, R.M., Kuusaana, E.D., Land consolidation, customary lands, and Ghana's Northern Savannah Ecological Zone: an evaluation of the possibilities and pitfalls. Land Use Pol. 54 (2016), 386–398.
• Adam, A.A., Shauki, E.R., Socially responsible investment in Malaysia: behavior framework in evaluating investors' decision making process. J. Clean. Prod. 80 (2014), 224–240.
• Adnan, N., Nordin, S.M., bin Abu Bakar, Z., Understanding and facilitating sustainable agricultural practice: a comprehensive analysis of adoption behaviour among Malaysian paddy farmers. Land Use Pol. 68 (2017), 372–382.
• Agidew, A., Singh, K.N., Factors affecting farmers'participation in watershed management programs in the Northeastern highlands of Ethiopia:a case study in the Teleyayen sub-watershed. Ecological Process, 7(1), 2018, 15.
• Ajzen, I., The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50:2 (1991), 179–211.
• Ajzen, I., Madden, T.J., Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavior control. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 22:5 (1986), 453–474.
• Andow, D.A., Resende Filho, M.A., Carneiro, R.G., Lorena, D.R., Sujii, E.R., Alves, R.T., Heterogeneity in intention to adopt organic strawberry production practices among producers in the federal district, Brazil. Ecol. Econ. 140 (2017), 177–189.
• Armitage, C.J., Conner, M., Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Br. J. Soc. Psychol., 40(4), 2001.
• Ashworth, P., Bradbury, J., Wade, S., Ynke Feenstra, C.F.J., Greenberg, S., Hund, G., Mikunda, T., What's in store: lessons from implementing CCS. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 9 (2012), 402–409.
• Atinkut, H.B., Yan, T., Arega, Y., Raza, M.H., Farmers' willingness-to-pay for eco-friendly agricultural waste management in Ethiopia: a contingent valuation. J. Clean. Prod., 261, 2020, 121211.
• A, J.M.P., B, R.I.I., C, A.M., Understanding consumer motivations for buying sustainable agricultural products at Romanian farmers markets. J. Clean. Prod. 184 (2018), 586–597.
• Bagheri, A., Emami, N., Damalas, C.A., Allahyari, M.S., Farmers' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions of Pesticide Use in Apple Farms of Northern Iran: Impact on Safety Behavior. 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
• Bao, H., Deng, S., Xu, S., Peng, Y., Conspicuous consumption behavior of land-lost farmers: a perspective of social identity. Cities 66 (2017), 81–90.
• Basanayak, R.T., Manjunath, L., Yadav, V.S., An Analysis of Farmer's Opinion and Their Adaptation Behavior to Climate Change in Bidar District. 2013, Environment & Ecology, 1300–1302.
• Bondori, A., Bagheri, A., Damalas, C.A., Allahyari, M.S., Retracted: use of personal protective equipment towards pesticide exposure: farmers' attitudes and determinants of behavior. Sci. Total Environ. 639 (2018), 1156–1163.
• Borges, J.A.R., Oude Lansink, A.G.J.M., Ribeiro, C.M., Lutke, V., Understanding farmers' intention to adopt improved natural grassland using the theory of planned behavior. Livest. Sci. 169 (2014), 163–174.
• Burton, R.J.F., The influence of farmer demographic characteristics on environmental behaviour: a review. J. Environ. Manag. 135 (2014), 19–26.
• Cao, Y., Zhang, X., Are they satisfied with land taking? Aspects on procedural fairness, monetary compensation and behavior simulation in China's land expropriation story. Land Use Pol. 74 (2018), 166–178.
• Carrington, M.J., Neville, B.A., Whitwell, G.J., Why ethical consumers don't walk their talk: towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. J. Bus. Ethics 97:1 (2010), 139–158.
• Chen, Y.-h., Wen, X.-w., Wang, B., Nie, P.-y., Agricultural pollution and regulation: how to subsidize agriculture?. J. Clean. Prod. 164 (2017), 258–264.
• Chen, S., Hou, D., Fan, Y., An empirical study on influencing factors of farmers' land transfer willingness in Heilongjiang province. J. Ch. Agric. Resour. Reg. Plann. 41:4 (2020), 68–73.
• Cowie, A.L., Orr, B.J., Castillo Sanchez, V.M., Chasek, P., Crossman, N.D., Erlewein, A., Louwagie, G., Maron, M., Metternicht, G.I., Minelli, S., Tengberg, A.E., Walter, S., Welton, S., Land in balance: the scientific conceptual framework for Land Degradation Neutrality. Environ. Sci. Pol. 79 (2018), 25–35.
• Dai, Z., Zeng, Q., Pan, W., Analysis of the influence of social capital on farmers' willingness to participate in the supply of public goods in villages. Res. Agric. Modernization 41:2 (2020), 303–311.
• Daxini, A., Ryan, M., O'Donoghue, C., Barnes, A.P., Understanding farmers' intentions to follow a nutrient management plan using the theory of planned behaviour. Land Use Pol. 85 (2019), 428–437.
• de Leeuw, A., Valois, P., Ajzen, I., Schmidt, P., Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: implications for educational interventions. J. Environ. Psychol. 42 (2015), 128–138.
• Dubey, R.K., Tripathi, V., Dubey, P.K., Singh, H.B., Abhilash, P.C., Exploring rhizospheric interactions for agricultural sustainability: the need of integrative research on multi-trophic interactions. J. Clean. Prod. 115 (2016), 362–365.
• Emery, S.B., Franks, J.R., The potential for collaborative agri-environment schemes in England: can a well-designed collaborative approach address farmers' concerns with current schemes?. J. Rural Stud. 28:3 (2012), 218–231.
• Fan, X., Thompson, B., Wang, L., Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Struct. Eq. Model. A. Multidisciplin. J. 6:1 (1999), 56–83.
• Fang, L., Yin, C., Fang, Z., Zhang, Y., The path of promoting high-quality agricultural development in the Yellow River Basin. Agric. Resour. Zoning Ch. 42:12 (2021), 16–22.
• Floress, K., de Jalon, S.G., Church, S.P., Babin, N., Ulrich-Schad, J.D., Prokopy, L.S., Toward a theory of farmer conservation attitudes: dual interests and willingness to take action to protect water quality. J. Environ. Psychol. 53 (2017), 73–80.
• Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F., Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18 (1981), 39–50 https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312.
• Fu, H., Peng, Y., Zheng, L., Liu, Q., Zhou, L., Zhang, Y., Kong, R., Turvey, C.G., Heterogeneous choice in WTP and WTA for renting land use rights in rural China: choice experiments from the field. Land Use Pol., 119, 2022.
• Gao, J., Peng, C., Shi, Q.H., The study of high-level fertilizer application and fertilization behavior of the smallholders in China–based on data of China fixed rural observation sites in 1995 - 2016. Manag. World 35:10 (2019), 120–132.
• Gruber, K., Agrobiodiversity: the living library. Nature 544:7651 (2017), S8–S10.
• Grzelak, A., Guth, M., Matuszczak, A., Czyżewski, B., Brelik, A., Approaching the environmental sustainable value in agriculture: how factor endowments foster the eco-efficiency. J. Clean. Prod., 241, 2019, 118304.
• Gu, B., Ju, X., Chang, J., Ge, Y., Vitousek, P.M., Integrated reactive nitrogen budgets and future trends in China. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 112(28), 2015, 8792.
• Guagnano, G.A., Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., Influences on Attitude-Behavior Relationships: A Natural Experiment with Curbside Recycling. 1995, Environment & Behavior.
• Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., Multivarite Data Analysis. seventh ed., 2010.
• Han, H., Zhang, X., Static and dynamic cultivated land use efficiency in China: a minimum distance to strong efficient frontier approach. J. Clean. Prod., 246, 2020, 119002.
• Han, H., Li, H., Zhao, L., Determinants of factor misallocation in agricultural production and implications for agricultural supply-side reform in China. China World Econ., 26(3), 2018, 21.
• Hayduk, L., Cummings, G., Boadu, K., Pazderka-Robinson, H., Boulianne, S., Testing! testing! one, two, three – testing the theory in structural equation models!. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 42:5 (2007), 841–850.
• He, K., Zhang, J., Zeng, Y., Knowledge domain and emerging trends of agricultural waste management in the field of social science: a scientometric review. Sci. Total Environ., 670, 2019, 236e244 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.184.
• Hernandez-Espallardo, M., Arcas-Lario, N., Marcos-Matas, G., Farmers satisfaction and intention to continue membership in agricultural marketing co-operatives: neoclassical versus transaction cost considerations. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 40:2 (2013), 239–260.
• Houessionon, P., Fonta, W.M., Bossa, A.Y., Sanfo, S., Thiombiano, N., Zahonogo, P., Yameogo, T.B., Balana, B., Economic valuation of ecosystem services from small-scale Agricultural management interventions in Burkina Faso: a discrete choice experiment approach. Sustainability, 9(9), 2017.
• Hu, Q., Li, X., Gonçalves, J.M., Shi, H., Tian, T., Chen, N., Effects of residual plastic-film mulch on field corn growth and productivity. Sci. Total Environ., 729, 2020, 138901.
• Huang, W., Chen, F., Tan, Y., The effect of grain production purpose on the disparity of farmers' land transferring willingness price. Resour. Sci. 39:10 (2017), 1844–1857.
• Huang, X., Huang, X., He, Y., Yang, X., Assessment of livelihood vulnerability of land-lost farmers in urban fringes: a case study of Xi'an, China. Habitat Int. 59 (2017), 1–9.
• Hui, L., Siyu, C., An empirical analysis of influencing factors on farmers' willingness to participate in smallscale water conservancy construction–based on a survey of 475 farmers in the main grain-producing areas of Hunan Province. Ch. Rural Surv., 2012, 54–66 02.
• Hung Anh, N., Bokelmann, W., Thi Nga, D., Van Minh, N., Toward sustainability or efficiency: the case of smallholder coffee farmers in Vietnam. Economies, 7(3), 2019.
• Icek, A., Driver, B.L., Application of the theory of planned behavior to leisure choice. J. Leisure Res. 24:3 (1992), 207–224.
• Jd, A., Vr, A., Fc, B., Factors affecting farmers' adoption of integrated pest management in Serbia: an application of the theory of planned behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 228 (2019), 1196–1205.
• Jia, Y., Cheng, S., Shi, R., Decision-making behavior of rural residents' domestic waste classification in Northwestern of China ——analysis based on environmental responsibility and pollution perception. J. Clean. Prod., 326, 2021, 129374.
• Jiang, L., Zhang, J., Wang, H.H., Zhang, L., He, K., The impact of psychological factors on farmers' intentions to reuse agricultural biomass waste for carbon emission abatement. J. Clean. Prod. 189 (2018), 797–804.
• Johnson, K.A., Dalzell, B.J., Donahue, M., Gourevitch, J., Johnson, D.L., Karlovits, G.S., Keeler, B., Smith, J.T., Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) lands provide ecosystem service benefits that exceed land rental payment costs. Ecosyst. Serv. 18 (2016), 175–185.
• Juan, V.O., Royal, G.J., Conflicts, perceptions, and expectations of indigenous communities associated with natural areas in Chile. Nat. Area J. 26:2 (2006), 215–220.
• Kline, R., Kline, R.B., Kline, R., Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 101(12), 2011.
• Li, J., Feng, S., Luo, T., Guan, Z., What drives the adoption of sustainable production technology? Evidence from the large scale farming sector in East China. J. Clean. Prod., 257, 2020, 120611.
• Li, M., Wang, J., Chen, K., Wu, L., Willingness and behaviors of farmers' green disposal of pesticide packaging waste in henan, China: a perceived value formation mechanism perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health, 17(11), 2020, 3753.
• Li, M., Wang, J., Chen, K., Wu, L., Willingness and behaviors of farmers' green disposal of pesticide packaging waste in henan, China: a perceived value formation mechanism perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health, 17(11), 2020.
• Li, M., Wang, J., Zhao, P., Chen, K., Wu, L., Factors affecting the willingness of agricultural green production from the perspective of farmers' perceptions. Sci. Total Environ., 738, 2020, 140289.
• Li, F., Zhang, K., Ren, J., Yin, C., Zhang, Y., Nie, J., Driving mechanism for farmers to adopt improved agricultural systems in China: the case of rice-green manure crops rotation system. Agric. Syst., 192, 2021, 103202.
• Li, W., Ruiz-Menjivar, J., Zhang, L., Zhang, J., Climate change perceptions and the adoption of low-carbon agricultural technologies: evidence from rice production systems in the Yangtze River Basin. Sci. Total Environ., 759, 2021, 143554.
• Lili, H., zonglu, Y., Lixin, Z., Luojuan, Peizhen, Z., Contribution and potential of comprehensive utilization of straw in GHG emission reduction and carbon sequestration. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 53 (2022), 349–359 01.
• Liu, H., Chen, S., An empirical analysis of factors influencing farmers' willingness to participate in farmland small-water conservancy construction–based on a survey of 475 farmers in the main grain-producing areas of Hunan Province. China Rural Observation, 2012, 54–66 02.
• Liu, M., Ji, Y., Determinants of agricultural infrastructure construction in China: based on the “participation of beneficiary groups” perspective. Land, 9(1), 2020.
• Liu, L., Tan, X., Analysis of the willingness of county and township governments and farmers to invest in the construction of farmland small-water conservancy facilities in major grain-producing areas. Ch. Rural Econ.(12), 2006, 32–36+54.
• Liu, C., Zheng, H., How social capital affects willingness of farmers to accept low-carbon agricultural technology (LAT)? A case study of Jiangsu, China. Int. J. Clim. Change Strat. Manag. 13:3 (2021), 286–301.
• Liu, Y., Li, J., Yang, Y., Strategic adjustment of land use policy under the economic transformation. Land Use Pol. 74 (2018), 5–14.
• Liu, B., Xu, Y., Yang, Y., Lu, S., How public cognition influences public acceptance of CCUS in China: based on the ABC (affect, behavior, and cognition) model of attitudes. Energy Pol., 156, 2021, 112390.
• Livote, E.E., Wyka, K.E., Introduction to structural equation modeling using SPSS and AMOS. Struct. Equ. Model. 16:3 (2009), 556–560.
• Lu, H., Xie, H., Impact of changes in labor resources and transfers of land use rights on agricultural non-point source pollution in Jiangsu Province, China. J. Environ. Manag. 207 (2018), 134–140.
• Luu, T.D., Factors influencing Farmers€ adoption of climate-smart agriculture in rice production in Vietnam€s Mekong Delta. Asian J. Agric. Dev., 17, 2020.
• Madden, T.J., Ellen, P.S., Ajzen, I., A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 18:1 (1992), 3–9.
• Malawska, A., Topping, C.J., Nielsen, H.Ø., Why do we need to integrate farmer decision making and wildlife models for policy evaluation?. Land Use Pol. 38 (2014), 732–740.
• Maleksaeidi, H., Keshavarz, M., What influences farmers' intentions to conserve on-farm biodiversity? An application of the theory of planned behavior in fars province, Iran. Glob. Ecol. Conserv., 20, 2019, e00698.
• Maris, S.C., Teira-Esmatges, M.R., Arbonés, A., Rufat, J., Effect of irrigation, nitrogen application, and a nitrification inhibitor on nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide and methane emissions from an olive (Olea europaea L.) orchard. Sci. Total Environ. 538 (2015), 966–978.
• Martinovska Stojcheska, A., Kotevska, A., Bogdanov, N., Nikolić, A., How do farmers respond to rural development policy challenges? Evidence from Macedonia, Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Land Use Pol. 59 (2016), 71–83.
• Mbaga-Semgalawe, Z., Folmer, H., Household adoption behaviour of improved soil conservation: the case of the North Pare and West Usambara Mountains of Tanzania. Land Use Pol. 17:4 (2000), 321–336.
• Mcintosh, C.N., A review of eight software packages for structural equation modeling. Am. Statistician, 66(4), 2012.
• Meijer, S.S., Catacutan, D., Ajayi, O.C., Sileshi, G.W., Nieuwenhuis, M., The role of knowledge, attitudes and perceptions in the uptake of agricultural and agroforestry innovations among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 13:1 (2015), 40–54.
• Meijer, S.S., Catacutan, D., Sileshi, G.W., Nieuwenhuis, M., Tree planting by smallholder farmers in Malawi: using the theory of planned behaviour to examine the relationship between attitudes and behaviour. J. Environ. Psychol. 43 (2015), 1–12.
• Midden, C.J.H., Huijts, N.M.A., The role of trust in the affective evaluation of novel risks: the case of CO2 storage. Risk Anal. 29:5 (2009), 743–751.
• Nuthall, P.L., Old, K.M., Intuition, the farmers' primary decision process. A review and analysis. J. Rural Stud. 58 (2018), 28–38.
• Paulraj, A., Lado, A.A., Chen, I.J., Inter-organizational communication as a relational competency: antecedents and performance outcomes in collaborative buyer–supplier relationships. J. Oper. Manag. 26:1 (2008), 45–64.
• Pousette, A., Hanse, J.J., Job characteristics as predictors of ill-health and sickness absenteeism in different occupational types–a multigroup structural equation modelling approach. Work. Stress 16:3 (2002), 229–250.
• Pratt, O.J., Wingenbach, G., Factors affecting adoption of green manure and cover crop technologies among Paraguayan smallholder farmers. J. Sustain. Agric. 40:10 (2016), 1043–1057.
• Qian, W., Ying, Y., Farmer households' willingness to participate the provision of agricultural infrastructure. Chinese Rural Economy(11), 2014, 39–51.
• Ru, X., Wang, S., Yan, S., Exploring the effects of normative factors and perceived behavior control on individual's energy-saving intention: an empirical study in eastern China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 134 (2018), 91–99.
• Ru, X., Qin, H., Wang, S., Young people's behaviour intentions towards reducing PM2.5 in China: extending the theory of planned behaviour. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 141 (2019), 99–108.
• Savari, M., Gharechaee, H., Application of the extended theory of planned behavior to predict Iranian farmers' intention for safe use of chemical fertilizers. J. Clean. Prod., 263, 2020, 121512.
• Schaak, H., Mußhoff, O., Understanding the adoption of grazing practices in German dairy farming. Agric. Syst. 165 (2018), 230–239.
• Senger, I., Borges, J.A.R., Machado, J.A.D., Using the theory of planned behavior to understand the intention of small farmers in diversifying their agricultural production. J. Rural Stud. 49 (2017), 32–40.
• Seroa da Motta, R., Ortiz, R.A., Costs and perceptions conditioning willingness to accept payments for ecosystem services in a Brazilian case. Ecol. Econ. 147 (2018), 333–342.
• Spash, C.L., Urama, K., Burton, R., Kenyon, W., Shannon, P., Hill, G., Motives behind willingness to pay for improving biodiversity in a water ecosystem: economics, ethics and social psychology. Ecol. Econ. 68:4 (2009), 955–964.
• Stephens, E.C., Jones, A.D., Parsons, D., Agricultural systems research and global food security in the 21st century: an overview and roadmap for future opportunities. Agric. Syst. 163 (2018), 1–6.
• Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S., Using Multivariate Statistics. fifth ed., 2007 Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.
• Tabri, N., Elliott, C.M., Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Can. Graduate J. Sociol. Criminol., 1(1), 2012, 305.
• Tama, R., Ying, L., Yu, M., Hoque, M.M., Sarker, S.A., Assessing farmers' intention towards conservation agriculture by using the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior. J. Environ. Manag., 2020.
• Tama, R.A.Z., Ying, L., Yu, M., Hoque, M.M., Adnan, K.M.M., Sarker, S.A., Assessing farmers' intention towards conservation agriculture by using the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior. J. Environ. Manag., 280, 2021, 111654.
• Tao, Y., Duan, M., Deng, Z., Using an extended theory of planned behaviour to explain willingness towards voluntary carbon offsetting among Chinese consumers. Ecol. Econ., 185, 2021, 107068.
• Thinda, K.T., Ogundeji, A.A., Belle, J.A., Ojo, T.O., Understanding the adoption of climate change adaptation strategies among smallholder farmers: evidence from land reform beneficiaries in South Africa. Land Use Pol., 99, 2020, 104858.
• Vignola, R., Koellner, T., Scholz, R.W., McDaniels, T.L., Decision-making by farmers regarding ecosystem services: factors affecting soil conservation efforts in Costa Rica. Land Use Pol. 27:4 (2010), 1132–1142.
• Vukina, T., Zheng, X., Marra, M., Levy, A., Do farmers value the environment? Evidence from a conservation reserve program auction. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 26:6 (2008), 1323–1332.
• Wang, L., A Preliminary Study on Green Farmland Construction. 2022, China Comprehensive Agricultural Development, 43–47 06.
• Wang, D., Liu, J., Modern agricultural infrastructure investment mechanism and model in rural revitalization. Rural Economy, 2019, 80–87 03.
• Wang, S., Fan, J., Zhao, D., Yang, S., Fu, Y., Predicting consumers' intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model. Transportation 43:1 (2016), 123–143.
• Wang, Y., Liu, J., Chen, M., Du, T., Duan, C., Gao, G., Yang, H., The novel mechanism of rotenone-induced α-synuclein phosphorylation via reduced protein phosphatase 2A activity. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 75 (2016), 34–44.
• Wang, Y., Chen, L., Long, K., Farmers' identity, property rights cognition and perception of rural residential land distributive justice in China: findings from Nanjing, Jiangsu Province - ScienceDirect. Habitat Int. 79 (2018), 99–108.
• Wang, Y., Yang, J., Liang, J., Qiang, Y., Fang, S., Gao, M., Fan, X., Yang, G., Zhang, B., Feng, Y., Analysis of the environmental behavior of farmers for non-point source pollution control and management in a water source protection area in China. Sci. Total Environ. 633 (2018), 1126–1135.
• Wang, Y., Liang, J., Yang, J., Ma, X., Li, X., Wu, J., Yang, G., Ren, G., Feng, Y., Analysis of the environmental behavior of farmers for non-point source pollution control and management: an integration of the theory of planned behavior and the protection motivation theory. J. Environ. Manag. 237 (2019), 15–23.
• Wang, Z., Geng, Y., Liang, T., Optimization of reduced chemical fertilizer use in tea gardens based on the assessment of related environmental and economic benefits. Sci. Total Environ., 713, 2020, 136439.
• Wang, Z., Mao, X., Zeng, W., Xie, Y., Ma, B., Exploring the influencing paths of natives' conservation behavior and policy incentives in protected areas: evidence from China. Sci. Total Environ., 744, 2020, 140728.
• Wang, Y.B., Wang, J.J., Wang, X.Y., Li, Q., Does Policy Cognition Affect Livestock Farmers' Investment in Manure Recycling Facilities? Evidence from China, 795, 2021, Science of The Total Environment.
• Wang, Z., Wang, J., Chen, H., Guan, B., Deng, H., Trends in irrigation investment in northern China since the 8th Five-Year Plan period and factors influencing new irrigation investment in villages. Ch. Rural Econ., 2021, 103–124 08.
• Wanger, T.C., DeClerck, F., Garibaldi, L.A., Ghazoul, J., Kleijn, D., Klein, A.-M., Kremen, C., Mooney, H., Perfecto, I., Powell, L.L., Settele, J., Solé, M., Tscharntke, T., Weisser, W., Integrating agroecological production in a robust post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4:9 (2020), 1150–1152.
• Wauters, E., Mathijs, E., An investigation into the socio-psychological determinants of farmers' conservation decisions: method and implications for policy, extension and research. J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 19:1 (2013), 53–72.
• Wei, C., Ren, S., Yang, P., Wang, Y., He, X., Xu, Z., Wei, R., Wang, S., Chi, Y., Zhang, M., Effects of irrigation methods and salinity on CO2 emissions from farmland soil during growth and fallow periods. Sci. Total Environ., 752, 2021, 141639.
• Wei, X., Khachatryan, H., Zhu, H., Poyang lake wetlands restoration in China: an analysis of farmers' perceptions and willingness to participate. J. Clean. Prod., 284, 2021, 125001.
• Wilson, R.S., Schlea, D.A., Boles, C.M.W., Redder, T.M., Using models of farmer behavior to inform eutrophication policy in the Great Lakes. Water Res. 139 (2018), 38–46.
• Wu, C.H., Yao, G., Analysis of factorial invariance across gender in the Taiwan version of the satisfaction with life scale. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 40:6 (2006), 1259–1268.
• Xie, H., Cheng, L., Lu, H., Farmers' responses to the winter wheat fallow policy in the groundwater funnel area of China. Land Use Pol. 73 (2018), 195–204.
• Xu, W., Zhao, W., Effects of political efficacy and social capital on farmers' participation willingness to rural land consolidation. China Land Science 33:3 (2019), 105–113.
• Xu, H., Paerl, H.W., Zhu, G., Qin, B., Hall, N.S., Zhu, M., Long-term nutrient trends and harmful cyanobacterial bloom potential in hypertrophic Lake Taihu, China. Hydrobiologia 787:1 (2017), 229–242.
• Yazdanpanah, M., Hayati, D., Hochrainer-Stigler, S., Zamani, G.H., Understanding farmers' intention and behavior regarding water conservation in the Middle-East and North Africa: a case study in Iran. J. Environ. Manag. 135 (2014), 63–72.
• Yu, W., Luo, X., Li, R., Xue, l., Huang, L., A study on farmers' willingness to adopt green technologies and behavior deviations from a green cognitive perspective. Resour. Sci. 39 (2017), 1573–1583 08.
• Yu, Z., Wu, C., Tan, Y., Zhang, X., The dilemma of land expansion and governance in rural China: a comparative study based on three townships in Zhejiang Province. Land Use Pol. 71 (2018), 602–611.
• Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Analysis of influencing factors of farmer's willingness in inner Mongolian to participate in land transfer under the "three powers separation. J. Ch. Agric. Resour. Reg. Plann. 42:4 (2021), 204–208.
• Zhang, X., Geng, G., Ping, S., Determinants and implications of citizens' environmental complaint in China: integrating theory of planned behavior and norm activation model. J. Clean. Prod. 166 (2017), 148–156.
• Zhang, J., Zhuang, M., Shan, N., Zhao, Q., Li, H., Wang, L., Substituting organic manure for compound fertilizer increases yield and decreases NH3 and N2O emissions in an intensive vegetable production systems. Sci. Total Environ. 670 (2019), 1184–1189.
• Zhang, Y., Xiao, C., Zhou, G., Willingness to pay a price premium for energy-saving appliances: role of perceived value and energy efficiency labeling. J. Clean. Prod., 242, 2020, 118555.
• Zhang, X., Jin, X., Liang, X., Ren, J., Han, B., Liu, J., Fan, Y., Zhou, Y., Implications of land sparing and sharing for maintaining regional ecosystem services: an empirical study from a suitable area for agricultural production in China. Sci. Total Environ., 820, 2022, 153330.
• Zhao, G., Chen, L., Influence factors and administrative intervention of farmers' willingness to transfer land resources in Hengshui. J. Ch. Agric. Resour. Reg. Plann. 39:10 (2018), 213–218.
• Zhou, J., Cao, X., What is the policy improvement of China's land consolidation? Evidence from completed land consolidation projects in Shaanxi Province. Land Use Pol., 99, 2020, 104847.
• Zhu, H., Weng, Z., Kang, L., Theoretical and empirical analysis of factors influencing farmers' willingness to participate in farmland water conservancy construction–based on micro-survey data of 619 large grain-growing households in Jiangxi Province. J. Nat. Resour. 25 (2010), 539–546 04.