Patients’ self-triage for unscheduled urgent care: a preliminary study on the accuracy and factors affecting the performance of a Belgian self-triage platform
Gilbert, Allison; Diep, Anh Nguyet; Boufraioua, Maryameet al.
[en] Abstract: Background
Management of unscheduled urgent care is a complex concern for many healthcare providers. Facing the challenge of appropriately dispatching unscheduled care, primary and emergency physicians have collaboratively implemented innovative strategies such as telephone triage. Currently, new original solutions tend to emerge with the development of new technologies. We created an interactive patient self-triage platform, ODISSEE, and aimed to explore its accuracy and potential factors affecting its performance using clinical case scenarios.
Methods
The ODISSEE platform was developed based on previously validated triage protocols for out-of-hours primary care. ODISSEE is composed of 18 icons leading to algorithmic questions that finally provide an advised orientation (emergency or primary care services). To investigate ODISSEE performance, we used 100 clinical case scenarios, each associated with a preestablished orientation determined by a group of experts. Fifteen volunteers were asked to self-triage with 50 randomly selected scenarios using ODISSEE on a digital tablet. Their triage results were compared with the experts’ references.
Results
The 15 participants performed a total of 750 self-triages, which matched the experts references regarding the level of care in 85.6% of the cases. The orientation was incorrect in 14.4%, with an undertriage rate of 1.9% and an overtriage rate of 12.5%. The tool’s specificity and sensitivity to advise participants on the appropriate level of care were 69% (95% CI: 64—74) and 97% (95% CI: 95—98) respectively. When combined with advice on the level of urgency, the tool only found the correct orientation in 68.4% with 9.2% of undertriages and 22.4% of overtriages. Some participant characteristics and the types of medical conditions demonstrated a significant association with the tool performance.
Conclusion
Self-triage apps, such as the ODISSEE platform, could represent an innovative method to allow patients to self-triage to the most appropriate level of care. This study based on clinical vignettes highlights some positive arguments regarding ODISSEE safety, but further research is needed to assess the generalizability of such tools to the population without equity issues.
Disciplines :
Public health, health care sciences & services
Author, co-author :
Gilbert, Allison ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service des urgences
Diep, Anh Nguyet ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Santé publique : de la Biostatistique à la Promotion de la Santé
Boufraioua, Maryame
Pétré, Benoît ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Education thérapeutique du patient au service des soins intégrés
Donneau, Anne-Françoise ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique
Ghuysen, Alexandre ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Médecine d'urgence
Language :
English
Title :
Patients’ self-triage for unscheduled urgent care: a preliminary study on the accuracy and factors affecting the performance of a Belgian self-triage platform
Hollander JE, Sharma R. The availablists: emergency care without the emergency department. NEJM Catalyst. 2021. Available at https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.21.0310. Consulted Feb 6 2022.
Kallberg A, Goransson KE, Florin J, Ostergren J, Brixey JJ, Ehrenberg A. Contributing factors to errors in Swedish emergency departments. Int Emerg Nurs. 2015;23(2):156–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2014.10.002
Zhang Q, Mu M, He Y, Cai Z, Li Z. Burn out in emergency medicine physicians: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Medicine. 2020;99:32.
Roivainen P, Hoikka MJ, Raatiniemi L, Silfvast T, Ala-Kokko T, Kaariainen M. Telephone triage performed by nurses reduces non-urgent ambulance missions: a prospective observational pilot study in Finland. Acta Anaesthesiol Scan. 2020;64(4):556–63. DOI: 10.1111/aas.13542
Brasseur E, Gilbert A, Donneau AF, Servotte JC, Ghuysen A, D'Orio V. SALOMON, a collaboration model between primary and secondary care for nocturnal emergency calls. Rev Med Liège. 2020;75(2):83-8.
North F, Ward WJ, Varkey P, Tulledge-Scheitel SM. Should you search the internet for information about your acute symptom? Telemed J E Health. 2012;18(3):213–8. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0127
Daraz L, Morrow AS, Ponce OJ, Beuschel B, Farah MH, Katabi A, Alsawas M, Majzoub AM, Benkhadra R, Seisa MO, Ding JF, Prokop L, Murad MH. Can patients trust online health information? A meta-narrative systematic review addressing the quality of health information on the internet. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(9):1884–91. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05109-0
Levine D, Mehrotra A. Assessment of diagnosis and triage in validated case vignettes among nonphysicians before and after internet search. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(3):e213287. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3287
Alfano M, Kellet J, Lenzitti B, Helfert M. Proposed use of a conversational agent for patient empowerment. Proceedings of the 14th International Joint conference on biomedical engineering systems and technologies. BIOSTEC. 2021;5:817–24.
Kujala S, Horhammer I, Hanninen-Ervasti R, Heponiemi T. Health professionals’ experiences of the benefits and challenges of online symptom checkers. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020;270:966–70.
Ceney A, Tolond S, Glowinski A, Marks B, Swift S, Palser T. Accuracy of online symptom checkers and the potential impact on service utlisation. PLoS One. 2021;16(7):e0254088. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254088
Fraser H, Coiera E. Safety of patient-facing digital symptom checkers. Lancet. 2018;392:2263–4. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32819-8
Aboueid S, Meyer SB, Wallace J, Chaurasia A. Latent classes associated with the intention to use a symptom checker for self-triage. PLoS One. 2021;16(11):e0259547. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259547
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9241–11: Guidance on Usability. International Organization for Standardiza- tion, 1988. Available at http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueListPage. Last consulted 2 August 2022.
Riihiaho S. Experiences with usability evaluation methods. Helsinky University of Technology-Laboratory of Information Processing Science. Licentiate’s thesis. 2000.
Brasseur E, Servotte JC, Donneau AF, Stipulante S, D’Orio V, Ghuysen A. Triage for out-of-hours primary care calls: a reliability study of a new French-language algorithm the SALOMON rule. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019;37(2):227–32. DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1608057
Brasseur E. Contribution à l’étude de la problématique des soins non programmés: apport d’un Système Algorithmique Liéggeois d’Orientation pour la Médecine Omnipraticienne Nocturne (SALOMON) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Belgique: Université de Liège; 2022.
Brasseur E, Gilbert A, Donneau AF, Monseur J, Ghuysen A, D’Orio V. Reliability and validity of an original nurse telephone triage tool for out-of-hours primary care calls: the salomon algorithm. Acta Clin Belg. 2022;77(3):640–6. DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2021.1936353
Suziedelyte A. How does searching for health information on the Internet affect individuals’ demand for health care services? Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(10):1828–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.022
Ventola CL. Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices. PT. 2014;39(7):491–520.
Nijland N, van Germert-Pijnen J, Boer H, Steehouder MF, Seydel ER. Evaluation of internet-based technology for supporting self-care: problems encountered by patients and caregivers when using self-care applications. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(2):e13. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.957
Granja C, Janssen W, Johansen MA. Factors determining the success and failure of ehealth interventions: systematic review of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(5):e10235. DOI: 10.2196/10235
Winn AN, Somai M, Fergestrom N, Crotty BH. Association of use of online symptom checkers with patients’ plans for seeking care. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(12):e1918561. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18561
Vuokko R, Saranto K, Palojoki S. Typology-based analysis of covid-19 mobile applications: implications for patient empowerment. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020;275:212–6.
Laukka E, Kujala S, Gluschkoff K, Kanste O, Horhammer I, Heponiemi T. Leaders’ support for using inline symptom checkers in Finnish primary care: survey study. Health Informatics J. 2021;27(4):1–13. DOI: 10.1177/14604582211052259
Gilbert S, Mehl A, Baluch A, et al. How accurate are digital symptom assessment apps for suggesting conditions and urgency advice? A clinical vignettes comparison to GPs. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e040269. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040269
Gilbert A, Brasseur E, Ghuysen A, D’Orio V. New method to regulate unscheduled urgent care: the ODISSEE interactive self-triage platform. Rev Med Liège. 2020;75(3):159–63.
Verzantvoort NCM, Teunis T, Verheij TJM, van der Velden AW. Self-triage for acute primary care via a smartphone application: practical, safe and efficient? PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0199284. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199284
Wyatt JC. Fifty million people use computerized self triage. BMJ. 2015;351:h3727. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h3727
Available at https://statbel.fgov.be/fr/nouvelles/isolement-numerique-pres-dun-quart-des-personnes-seules-nont-pas-acces-internet-la-maison. Consulted on Feb 7 2022.
Available at https://www.statista.com/statistics/377636/household-internet-access-in-belgium/. Consulted on August 8 2022.
Available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Digital_economy_and_society_statistics_-_households_and_individuals/fr. Consulted on Feb 7 2022.
Morreel S, Philips H, Colliers A, Verhoeven V. Performance of a new guideline for telephone triage in out-of-hours services in Belgium: a pilot study using simulated patients. Health Serv Manage Res. 2020;33(4):166–71. DOI: 10.1177/0951484820921809
Delshad S, Dontaraju VS, Chengat V. Artificial intelligence-based application provides accurate medical triage advice when compared to consensus decisions of healthcare providers. Cureus. 2021;13(8):e16956.