R Script, cite as Boisville M, Chatar N, Lambert O, Dewaele L. 2022. Sexual dimorphism in the walrus mandible: comparative description and geometric morphometrics. PeerJ 10:e13940 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13940
Geometric morphometrics; Mandibles; Odobenus rosmarus; Sexual dimorphism
Abstract :
[en] The modern walrus Odobenus rosmarus is characterized by marked sexual dimorphism, related to its polygynous behavior and the aggressive competition between males during the breeding season. Previous studies treated skeletal sexual dimorphism in walruses either qualitatively or with basic quantitative measurements. The present study combines a detailed qualitative comparison of male and female walrus mandibles with quantitative two-dimensional geometric morphometrics analysis (principal component analysis, Procrustes ANOVA and a linear discriminant analysis). In addition to identifying previously recognized sexually dimorphic features (e.g., convexity of the anterior margin of the mandible in adult males), our study finds new morphological differences between males and females, such as a relative dorsal expansion of the anterior part of the mandible and an accentuated concavity between the dorsal margin and the coronoid process in adult males. Both our qualitative comparisons and quantitative analyses demonstrate that sexual dimorphism as expressed in the mandible of extant walruses is statistically significant and that (variation in) mandibular morphology can be used as tool to attribute sex with a good degree of accuracy to isolated mandibles or skeletons lacking the cranium. Sexual dimorphism in walruses is directly related to their sexual behavior, characterized as aggressive in males and linked to a polygynous reproduction system. Indeed, the difference in size of the tusks between males and females but also the use of these during intraspecific fights, can reasonably account for this great mandibular morphological disparity between adult males and females, but also among different ontogenetic stages. Finally, the results obtained in the present study may serve as a starting point for assessing sexual dimorphism more in-depth and studying inter- and intraspecific variation in the mandibles of fossil walruses by identifying quantified size and shape mandibular features.
Disciplines :
Zoology
Author, co-author :
Boisville, Mathieu
Chatar, Narimane ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Geology ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de géologie > Evolution and diversity dynamics lab
Lambert, Olivier ; Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences [BE] > Operational Directorate Earth and History of Life
Dewaele, Leonard ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de géologie > Evolution and diversity dynamics lab ; Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences [BE] > Operational Directorate Earth and History of Life
Language :
English
Title :
Sexual dimorphism in the walrus mandible: comparative description and geometric morphometrics
Adams D, Collyer M, Kaliontzopoulou A. 2020. Geomorph: software for geometric morphometric analyses. R Package Version 3.2.1. Available at https://cran.r-project. org/package=geomorph.
Arnason U, Gullberg A, Janke A, Kullberg M, Lehman N, Petrov EA, Vainola R. 2006. Pinniped phylogeny and a new hypothesis for their origin and dispersal. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 41(2):345-354 DOI 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.05.022.
Baken EK, Collyer ML, Kaliontzopoulou A, Adams DC. 2021. geomorph v4.0 and gmShiny: enhanced analytics and a new graphical interface for a comprehensive morphometric experience. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 12(12): 2355-2363 DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.13723.
Bartholomew GA. 1970. A model for the evolution of pinniped polygyny. Evolution 24(3):546-559 DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1970.tb01790.x.
Berta A, Churchill M, Boessenecker RW. 2018. The origin and evolutionary biology of pinnipeds: seals, sea lions, walruses. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 46(1):203-228 DOI 10.1146/annurev-earth-082517-010009.
Boessenecker RW, Churchill M. 2013. A reevaluation of the morphology, paleoecology, phylogenetic relationships of the enigmatic walrus pelagiarctos. PLOS ONE 8(1):e54311 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0054311.
Boessenecker RW, Churchill M. 2021. Chapter 2: The surprising evolutionary heritage of the Atlantic walrus as chronicled by the fossil record. In: Keighley X, Olsen MT, Jordan P, Desjardins SPA, eds. Atlantic Walrus: multidisciplinary insights into humananimal interactions. 1st edition. Cambridge: Academic Press, 9-37.
Bookstein FL. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Box GEP. 1949. A general distribution theory for a class of likelihood criteria. Biometrika 36:317-346 DOI 10.1093/biomet/36.3-4.317.
Cullen TM, Fraser D, Rybczynski N, Schroder-Adams C. 2014. Early evolution of sexual dimorphism and polygyny in Pinnipedia. Evolution 68(5):1469-1484 DOI 10.1111/evo.12360.
Deméré TA. 1994a. Two new species of fossil walruses (Pinnipedia: Odobenidae) from the Upper Pliocene San Diego Formation. California. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History 29:77-98.
Deméré TA. 1994b. The family Odobenidae: a phylogenetic analysis of fossil and living taxa. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History 29:99-123.
Evans HE, deLahunta A. 2013. Miller’s anatomy of the dog. 4th edn. St. Louis: Elsevier, Saunders.
Fay FH. 1982. Ecology and Biology of the Pacific Walrus, Odobenus rosmarus divergens Illiger. United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, North American Fauna 74:1-279.
Garlich-Miller JL, Stewart REA. 1998. Growth and sexual dimorphism of Atlantic walrus (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) in Foxe Basin, Northwest Territories, Canada. Marine Mammal Science 14(4):803-818 DOI 10.1111/j.1748-7692.1998.tb00764.x.
Gunz P, Mitteroecker P. 2013. Semilandmarks: a method for quantifying curves and surfaces. Hystrix 24:103-109.
Jones KE, Goswami A. 2010. Chapter 12: morphometric analysis of cranial morphology in pinnipeds (Mammalia, Carnivora): convergence, ecology, ontogeny, dimorphism. In: Goswani A, Friscia A, eds. Carnivoran evolution: new views on phylogeny, form and function. 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, 342-373.
Jones KE, Ruff CB, Goswami A. 2013. Morphology and biomechanics of the pinniped jaw: mandibular evolution without mastication. The Anatomical Record 296(7): 1049-1063 DOI 10.1002/ar.22710.
Jones KE, Smaers JB, Goswami A. 2015. Impact of the terrestrial-aquatic transition on disparity and rates of evolution in the carnivoran skull. BioMed Central Evolutionary Biology 15(1):1-19.
Kienle SS, Berta A. 2016. The better to eat you with: the comparative feeding morphology of phocid seals (Pinnipedia, Phocidae). Journal of Anatomy 228(3): 396-413 DOI 10.1111/joa.12410.
Kienle SS, Hermann-Sorensen H, Costa DP, Reichmuth C, Mehta RS. 2018. Comparative feeding strategies and kinematics in phocid seals: suction without specialized skull morphology. The Journal of Experimental Biology 221(15): jeb179424.
Kohno N, Ray CE. 2008. Pliocene walruses from the Yorktown Formation of Virginia and North Carolina, a systematic revision of the North Atlantic Pliocene walruses. Virginia Museum of Natural History Special Publication 14:39-80.
Kovacs KM, Lavigne DM. 1992. Maternal investment in Otariid seals and walruses. Canadian Journal of Zoology 70(10):1953-1964 DOI 10.1139/z92-265.
Kryukova NV. 2012. Dentition in Pacific walrus (Odobenus rosmarus divergens) calves of the year. Biology Bulletin 39(7):618-626 DOI 10.1134/S1062359012070072.
Lindenfors P, Tullberg B, Biuw M. 2002. Phylogenetic analyses of sexual selection and sexual size dimorphism in pinnipeds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 52(3):188-193 DOI 10.1007/s00265-002-0507-x.
Meloro C, Tamagnini D. 2021. Macroevolutionary ecomorphology of the Carnivora skull: adaptations and constraints in the extant species. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society zlab075 DOI 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab075.
Mesnick S, Ralls K. 2018. Sexual dimorphism. In: Encyclopedia of marine mammals. 3rd edn. London: Academic Press, 848-853.
Miller EH. 1975. Walrus ethology. I. The social role of tusks and applications of multidimensional scaling. Canadian Journal of Zoology 53(5): 590-613 DOI 10.1139/z75-073.
Miller EH, Kochnev AA. 2021. Chapter 22: ethology and behavioral ecology of the Walrus (Odobenus rosmarus) with emphasis on communication and social behavior. In: Campagna C, Harcourt R, eds. Ethology and behavioral ecology ofotariids and the odobenid of ethology and behavioral ecology of marine mammals series. 1st edn. Switzerland: Springer Nature, 437-488.
Mitteroecker P, Gunz P. 2009. Advances in geometric morphometrics. Evolutionary Biology 36:235-247 DOI 10.1007/s11692-009-9055-x.
MohrE. 1942. Geschlechtsunterschiede am WalroszSchàdel. Zoologischer Anzeiger 137(5/6):71-76. Paterson RS, Rybczynski N, Kohno N, Maddin HC. 2020. A total evidence phylogenetic analysis of pinniped phylogeny and the possibility of parallel evolution within a monophyletic framework. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7:457 DOI 10.3389/fevo.2019.00457.
Polly PD. 2008. Adaptive zones and the pinniped ankle: a 3D quantitative analysis of carnivoran tarsal evolution. In: Sargis E, Dagosto M, eds. Mammalian evolutionary morphology: a tribute to Frederick S. Szalay. Dordrecht Netherlands: Springer, 167-196.
Ralls K, Mesnick S. 2009. Sexual dimorphism. In: Wursig B, Perrin W, Thewissen JGM, eds. Encyclopedia of marine mammals. 2nd edn. London: Acamedic Press, 1005-1011.
Randau M, Sanfelice A, Goswami D. 2019. Shifts in cranial integration associated with ecological specialization in pinnipeds (Mammalia, Carnivora). Royal Society Open Science 6(3):190-201.
R Development Core Team. 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 3.5.3. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at https://www.r-project.org/.
Reitz EJ, Wing ES. 2008. Size and age in animals with determinate growth. In: Reitz EJ, Wing ES, eds. Zooarcheology. Cambridge manuals in archaeology. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 70-73.
Rickert SS, Kass PH, Verstraete FJM. 2021. Temporomandibular joint pathology of wild carnivores in the Western USA. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 8:657381 DOI 10.3389/fvets.2021.657381.
Rohlf FJ. 2006. tpsDig, digitize landmarks and outlines. Stony Brook: Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York. New York, USA Version 2.32.
Rohlf FJ. 2010. tpsRelw: relative warps analysis. Stony Brook: Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Rohlf FJ. 2018. tpsUtil32 version 1.70. Available at http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/.
Schlager S. 2017. Morpho and Rvcg -Shape Analysis in R: R-package for geometric morphometrics, shape analyses and surface manipulation. In: Zheng G, Li S, Székely G, eds. Statistical shape and deformation analysis: methods, implementation and applications. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press, 217-256.
Sherratt E. 2016. Quick guide to geomorph 3.0.2. Available at http://www.emmasherratt. com/uploads/2/1/6/0/21606686/quick_guide_to_geomorph-_introduction.html.
Sjare B, Stirling 1.1996. The breeding behavior of Atlantic walruses, Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in the Canadian High Arctic. Canadian Journal of Zoology 74(5):897-911 DOI 10.1139/z96-103.
Storâ J. 2000. Skeletal development in the Grey seal Halichoerus grypus, the Ringed seal Phoca hispida botnica, the Harbour seal Phoca vitulina vitulina, the Harp seal Phoca groenlandica, Epiphyseal fusion and life history. Archaeozoologia 11:199-222.
Taylor N, Clark CT, Misarti N, Horstmann L, Hohn A. 2020. Determining sex of adult Pacific walruses from mandible measurements. Journal of Mammalogy 101(4):941-950 DOI 10.1093/jmammal/gyaa051.
Velez-Juarbe J. 2017. Eotaria citrica, sp. nov. a new stem otariid from the Topanga formation of Southern California. PeerJ 5:e3022 DOI 10.7717/peerj.3022.
Viscosi V, Cardini A. 2011. Leaf morphology, taxonomy and geometric morphometries: a simplified protocol for beginners. PLOS ONE 6(10):e2563O DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0025630.
Weckerly FW. 1998. Sexual-size dimorphism: influence of mass and mating systems in the most dimorphic mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 79(1): 33-52 DOI 10.2307/1382840.
Wiig 0, Born I, Gjertz C, Lydersen REA, Stewart EW. 2007. Historical sex-specific distribution of Atlantic walrus (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) in Svalbard assessed by mandible measurements. Polar Biology 31(1):69-75 DOI 10.1007/s00300-007-0334-7.
Winer JN, Arzi B, Leale DM, Kass PH, Verstraete FJM. 2016. Dental and temporomandibular joint pathology of the walrus (Odobenus rosmarus). Journal of Comparative Pathology 155(2-3):242-253 DOI 10.1016/j.jcpa.2016.07.005.
