Article (Scientific journals)
Co-constructing participatory ethics to address hierarchy and inequality: Social work ethics in research practice
De Backer, Mattias
2022In Qualitative Research, p. 146879412210989
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
14687941221098931.pdf
Publisher postprint (552.96 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
collaborative research; ethics; Particatory research; radicalisation; social work; young people; Social Sciences (miscellaneous); History and Philosophy of Science
Abstract :
[en] Research on a sensitive and potentially stigmatising topic such as ‘radicalisation’ begs for a robust ethical framework. Ethical procedures, issuing from an institutional ethics commission, are not sufficient to manage these risks. Arguably, collaborative and participatory research is best suited to overcome the risks of doing research on such a sensitive topic as well as the hierarchy and inequality in the relationship between researchers, gatekeepers and participants. To co-construct a participatory ethical framework in this context, 22 social workers were asked about the core ethical values of their own professional context. In this paper, these social work ethics are brought in tension with the practice of doing research. The paper concludes with the insight that social work ethics are not transferrable to the research context in a straightforward manner. Hierarchy and inequality (as well as much frustration) will persist if only this strategy is adopted.
Disciplines :
Social work & social policy
Author, co-author :
De Backer, Mattias  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences sociales > Centre d'études de l'ethnicité et des migrations (CEDEM)
Language :
English
Title :
Co-constructing participatory ethics to address hierarchy and inequality: Social work ethics in research practice
Publication date :
2022
Journal title :
Qualitative Research
ISSN :
1468-7941
Publisher :
SAGE Publications Ltd
Pages :
146879412210989
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
BELSPO - Belgian Science Policy Office [BE]
Funding text :
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This paper derives from work undertaken in a project funded by Belspo, the Belgian fund for scientific research (grant number: BR/165/A4/CONRAD).
Available on ORBi :
since 11 September 2022

Statistics


Number of views
30 (4 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
1 (1 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
0
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi