Lectal contamination. Evidence from corpora and from agent-based simulation

Pijpops, Dirk

doi:10.1075/ijcl.20040.pij

Download

Article (Scientific journals)

Lectal contamination. Evidence from corpora and from agent-based simulation

Pijpops, Dirk

2022 • In International Journal of Corpus Linguistics

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/292226

DOI
10.1075/ijcl.20040.pij

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

Pijpops_2022.pdf

Author postprint (788.86 kB)

Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

corpus; lectal contamination; agent-based modelling; simulation; mixed regression modelling

Abstract :

[en] This paper presents evidence from both corpora and agent-based simulation for the effect of lectal contamination. By doing so, it shows how agent-based simulation can be used as a complementary technique to corpus research in the study of language variation. Lectal contamination is an effect whereby the words that are typical of a language variety more often appear in a morphosyntactic variant typical of that same variety, even among language use from a different variety. This study looks at the Dutch partitive genitive construction, which exhibits variation between a “Netherlandic” variant with -s ending and a “Belgian” variant without -s ending. It is shown that the probability of the Belgian variant without -s increases among more “Belgian” words, in the language use of both Belgians and people from the Netherlands. Meanwhile, an agent-based simulation reveals the crucial theoretical preconditions that lead to this effect.

Research center :

Lilith - Liège, Literature, Linguistics - ULiège

Disciplines :

Languages & linguistics

Author, co-author :

Pijpops, Dirk ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de langues modernes : linguistique, littérature et traduction

Language :

English

Title :

Lectal contamination. Evidence from corpora and from agent-based simulation

Publication date :

13 June 2022

Journal title :

International Journal of Corpus Linguistics

ISSN :

1384-6655

eISSN :

1569-9811

Publisher :

John Benjamins Publishing Company

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Additional URL :

http://www.jbe-platform.com/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/ijcl.20040.pij/ijcl.20040.pij.pdf

Available on ORBi :

since 14 June 2022

Statistics

Number of views

28 (5 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

199 (7 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Algeo, J. (2006). British or American English?: A Handbook of Word and Grammar Patterns. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607240
Arnon, I., & Snider, N. (2010). More than words: frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2013). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 (Version 1.4) [Computer software]. http://cran.r-project.org/package=lme4
Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M., Croft, W., Ellis, N., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00533.x
Bentivoglio, P., & Sedano, M. (2011). Morphosyntactic variation in Spanish–speaking Latin America. In M. Díaz-Campos (Ed.), The Handbook of Hispanic Sociolinguistics (pp. 123–147). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444393446.ch8
Beuls, K., & Steels, L. (2013). Agent-based models of strategies for the emergence and evolution of grammatical agreement. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e58960. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058960
Bloem, J., Versloot, A., & Weerman, F. (2015). An agent-based model of a historical word order change. In R. Berwick, A. Korhonen, A. Lenci, T. Poibeau, & A. Villavicencio (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Learning (pp. 22–27). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W15-2404
Blythe, R., & Croft, W. (2012). S-curves and the mechanisms of propagation in language change. Language, 88(2), 269–304. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0027
Broekhuis, H. (2013). Syntax of Dutch: Adjectives and Adjective Phrases. Amsterdam University Press.
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526
Bybee, J. (2013). Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 49–69). Oxford University Press.
Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. (n.d.). Retrieved March 13, 2020, from https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/#/CBS/nl/dataset/83926NED/barv?dl=17256&ts=1584114358740
Claes, J. (2015). Competing constructions: The pluralization of presentational haber in Dominican Spanish. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0006
Colleman, T. (2009). Verb disposition in argument structure alternations: A corpus study of the dative alternation in Dutch. Language Sciences, 31(5), 593–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2008.01.001
Dąbrowska, E. (2014). Recycling utterances: A speaker’s guide to sentence processing. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(4), 617–653. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0057
Daems, J., Heylen, K., & Geeraerts, D. (2015). Wat dragen we vandaag: een hemd met blazer of een shirt met jasje? [What do we wear today: A ‘hemd’ with a ‘blazer’ or a ‘shirt’ with a ‘jasje’?] Taal En Tongval, 67(2), 307–342. https://doi.org/10.5117/TET2015.2.DAEM
Davies, M. (2004). British National Corpus (from Oxford University Press). Retrieved January, 2020, from https://www.english-corpora.org/bnc/
Davies, M. (2008–). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Retrieved January, 2020, from https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/
De Vylder, B. (2007). The Evolution of Conventions in Multi-agent Systems [Doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Brussel]. https://langev.com/pdf/deVylder07evoltionOfConventionsPHD.pdf
Diessel, H. (2015). Usage-based construction grammar. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 296–322). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110292022-015
Diessel, H. (2019). The Grammar Network: How Linguistic Structure Is Shaped by Language Use. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108671040
Dürscheid, C., Elspaß, S. & Ziegler, A. (Eds.). (2018). Variantengrammatik des Standarddeutschen. Ein Online-Nachschlagewerk [Variant grammar of Standard German. An online reference work]. http://mediawiki.ids-mannheim.de/VarGra/index.php/Substantive_auf_-ation_/_-ung
Fagyal, Z., Swarup, S., Escobar, A.M., Gasser, L., & Lakkaraju, K. (2010). Centers and peripheries: Network roles in language change. Lingua, 120(8), 2061–2079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.02.001
Fox, J., Weisberg, S., Friendly, M., Hong, J., Andersen, R., Firth, D., & Taylor, S. (2016). Effect Displays for Linear, Generalized Linear, and Other Models (Version 3.2) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/effects/
Geeraerts, D., Grondelaers, S., & Speelman, D. (1999). Convergentie en divergentie in de Nederlandse woordenschat: een onderzoek naar kleding- en voetbaltermen [Convergence and divergence in Dutch vocabulary: A study into clothing and football terminology]. P. J. Meertens-Instituut.
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press.
Gilbert, N. (2008). Agent-based Models. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983259
Haeseryn, W. (2013). Belgian Dutch. In F. Hinskens & J. Taeldeman (Eds.), Language and Space: Dutch (pp. 700–720). De Gruyter Mouton.
Haeseryn, W., Romijn, K., Geerts, G., de Rooij, J., & van den Toorn, M. (1997). Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst [General Dutch Grammer]. Nijhoff.
Harrell, F. J. (2017). Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous (Version 4.0-3) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/package=Hmisc
Hay, J. (2018). Sociophonetics: The role of words, the role of context, and the role of words in context. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(4), 696–706. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12326
Hay, J., Walker, A., Sanchez, K., & Thompson, K. (2019). Abstract social categories facilitate access to socially skewed words. PLoS ONE, 14(2), e0210793. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210793
Hilpert, M., & Flach, S. (forthcoming). A case of constructional contamination in English: Modified noun phrases influence adverb placement in the passive. In M. Grygiel (Ed.), Contrast and Analogy in Language: Perspectives from Cognitive Linguistics. John Benjamins.
Höder, S. (2014). Constructing diasystems: Grammatical organisation in bilingual groups. In T. Åfarli & B. Mæhlum (Eds.), The Sociolinguistics of Grammar (pp. 137–152). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.154.07hod
Höder, S. (2018). Grammar is community-specific: Background and basic concepts of Diasystematic Construction Grammar. In H. Boas & S. Höder (Eds.), Constructions in Contact Constructional Perspectives on Contact Phenomena in Germanic languages (pp. 37–70). Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.24.02hod
Jaeger, H., Steels, L., Baronchelli, A., Briscoe, T., Christiansen, M., Griffiths, T., Jäger, G., Kirby, S., Komarova, N., Peter, R., & Jochen, T. (2009). What can mathematical, computational, and robotic models tell us about the origins of syntax? In Biological Foundations and Origin of Syntax. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262013567.003.0018
Karjus, A., & Ehala, M. (2018). Testing an agent-based model of language choice on sociolinguistic survey data. Language Dynamics and Change, 8(2), 219–252. https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-00802004
Landsbergen, F. (2009). Cultural Evolutionary Modeling of Patterns in Language Change: Exercises in Evolutionary Linguistics. LOT.
Landsbergen, F., Lachlan, R., ten Cate, C., & Verhagen, A. (2010). A cultural evolutionary model of patterns in semantic change. Linguistics, 48(2), 363. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2010.012
Levshina, N. (2015). How to Do Linguistics with R: Data Exploration and Statistical Analysis. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.195
Meyer, D., Zeileis, A., & Hornik, K. (2020). vcd: Visualizing Categorical Data (Version 1.4-6) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vcd/index.html
Oostdijk, N., Goedertier, W., Van Eynde, F., Boves, L., Martens, J.-P., Moortgat, M., & Baayen, H. (2002). Experiences from the Spoken Dutch corpus project. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), 340–347.
Oostdijk, N., Reynaert, M., Hoste, V., & Schuurman, I. (2013a). SoNaR User Documentation (version 1.0.4). https://ticclops.uvt.nl/SoNaR_end-user_documentation_v.1.0.4.pdf
Oostdijk, N., Reynaert, M., Hoste, V., & Schuurman, I. (2013b). The construction of a 500-million-word reference corpus of contemporary written Dutch. In P. Spyns & J. Odijk (Eds.), Essential Speech and Language Technology for Dutch, Theory and Applications of Natural Language Processing (pp. 219–247). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30910-6_13
Perek, F., & Goldberg, A. E. (2015). Generalizing beyond the input: The functions of the constructions matter. Journal of Memory and Language, 84, 108–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.04.006
Pérez-Martín, A. M. (2007). Pluralización de había en el habla de El Hierro: Datos cuantitativos [Pluralization of había in the speech of El Hierro: Quantitative data]. Revista de Filología de La Universidad de La Laguna, 25, 505–513.
Phan, D., & Varenne, F. (2010). Agent-based models and simulations in economics and social sciences. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 13(4), 1532. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.1532
Pijpops, D. (2019). How, Why and Where Does Argument Structure Vary? A Usage-Based Investigation into the Dutch Transitive-Prepositional Alternation [Doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven]. LIRIAS @ KU Leuven. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/2815151
Pijpops, D., & Beuls, K. (2015). Agent-gebaseerde modellering in de historische taalkunde. Een model van regularisatiedruk op de Nederlandse werkwoorden [Agent-based modelling in historical linguistics: A model of the regularization pressure on Dutch verbs]. Handelingen Der Koninklijke Zuid-Nederlandse Maatschappij Voor Taal- En Letterkunde En Geschiedenis, 69, 5–23.
Pijpops, D., Beuls, K., & Van de Velde, F. (2015). The rise of the verbal weak inflection in Germanic: An agent-based model. Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal, 5, 81–102.
Pijpops, D., De Smet, I., & Van de Velde, F. (2018). Constructional contamination in morphology and syntax: Four case studies. Constructions and Frames, 10(2), 269–305. https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00021.pij
Pijpops, D., & Van de Velde, F. (2015). Ethnolect speakers and Dutch partitive adjectival inflection: A corpus analysis. Taal En Tongval, 67(2), 343–371. https://doi.org/10.5117/TET2015.2.PIJP
Pijpops, D., & Van de Velde, F. (2016). Constructional contamination: How does it work and how do we measure it? Folia Linguistica, 50(2), 543–581. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2016-0020
Pijpops, D., & Van de Velde, F. (2018). A multivariate analysis of the partitive genitive in Dutch: Bringing quantitative data into a theoretical discussion. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 14(1), 99–131. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2013-0027
Plevoets, K. (2008). Tussen spreek- en standaardtaal. Een corpusgebaseerd onderzoek naar de situationele, regionale en sociale verspreiding van enkele morfosyntactische verschijnselen uit het gesproken Belgisch-Nederlands [Between language for speaking and standard language. A corpus-based study to the situational, regional and social diffusion of a number of morphosyntactic features of spoken Belgian Dutch] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven]. LIRIAS @ KU Leuven. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/1821028
Ruette, T. (2012). Aggregating Lexical Variation: Towards Large-scale Lexical Lectometry [Doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven]. LIRIAS @ KU Leuven. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/1821265
Ruette, T., Ehret, K., & Szmrecsanyi, B. (2016). A lectometric analysis of aggregated lexical variation in written Standard English with Semantic Vector Space models. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 21(1), 48–79. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21.1.03rue
Sonderegger, M., Wagner, M., & Torreira, F. (2018). Quantitative Methods for Linguistic Data. http://people.linguistics.mcgill.ca/~morgan/book/
Speelman, Dirk. (2014). Logistic regression: A confirmatory technique for comparisons in corpus linguistics. In D. Glynn & J. A. Robinson (Eds.), Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy (pp. 487–533). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.43.18spe
Speelman, D., Heylen, K., & Geeraerts, D. (2018). Mixed-Effects Regression Models in Linguistics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69830-4
Steels, L. (2011). Modeling the cultural evolution of language. Physics of Life Reviews, 8(4), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2011.10.014
Steels, L. (2000). Language as a complex adaptive system. In M. Schoenauer, K. Deb, G. Rudolph, X. Yao, E. Lutton, J.J. Merelo, & H.-P. Schwefel (Eds.), Proceedings of PPSN VI: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 17–26). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45356-3_2
Tremblay, A., & Baayen, R.H. (2010). Holistic processing of regular four-word sequences: A behavioral and ERP study of the effects of structure, frequency, and probability on immediate free recall. In D. Wood (Ed.), Perspectives on Formulaic Language: Acquisition and Communication (pp. 151–173). Continuum.
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C. (2011). Processing advantages of lexical bundles: evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning, 61(2), 569–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00622.x
van Agtmaal-Wobma, E., Harmsen, C., Dal, L., & Poulain, M. (2007). Belgen in Nederland en Nederlanders in België [Belgians in the Netherlands and Dutchmen in Belgium]. Centraal Bureau voor Statistiek (CBS). https://www.cbs.nl/-/media/imported/documents/2008/02/2007-k4-b15-p47-art.pdf
van den Toorn, M.C. (1977). Nederlandse Grammatica [Dutch Grammar] (5th ed.). Wolters-Noordhoff.
van der Horst, J. (2008). Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse syntaxis [History of Dutch syntax]. Universitaire Pers Leuven.
van Eerten, L. (2007). Over het Corpus Gesproken Nederlands [About the Corpus of Spoken Dutch]. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 12(3), 194–215.
Van Rossum, G., & Drake, F. L. (2009). Python 3 Reference Manual. CreateSpace.
van Trijp, R., & Steels, L. (2012). Multilevel alignment maintains language systematicity. Advances in Complex Systems, 15(3–4). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525912500397
Wellens, P. (2012). Adaptive Strategies in the Emergence of Lexical Systems. Dissertation Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
Wieling, M., & Nerbonne, J. (2015). Advances in dialectometry. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1, 243–264. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-124930