  | Pijpops, D. (In press). Het voorzetselobject. In Liesbeth Augustinus, Maaike Beliën, Adrienne Bruyn, D. Pijpops, Mario van de Visser, ... Ton van der Wouden, Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Leiden, Netherlands: Instituut voor Nederlandse Taal.  Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D. (In press). Het direct object. In Liesbeth Augustinus, Maaike Beliën, Adrienne Bruyn, D. Pijpops, Mario van de Visser, ... Ton van der Wouden, Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Leiden, Netherlands: Instituut voor Nederlandse Taal. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D. (In press). Het oorzakelijk object. In Liesbeth Augustinus, Maaike Beliën, Adrienne Bruyn, D. Pijpops, Mario van de Visser, ... Ton van der Wouden, Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Leiden, Netherlands: Instituut voor Nederlandse Taal. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., De Pascale, S., Van de Velde, F., & Zenner, E. (2023). Big Pimpin’. Een big data-benadering van de verspreiding van het leenwoord pimpen in het Nederlands. Taal en Tongval, 75 (1), 73 - 113. doi:10.5117/TET2023.1.005.PIJP Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi |
 | Pijpops, D., & Zehentner, E. (09 December 2022). Is language efficient or redundant? How language users distinguish the agent from the recipient in English and Dutch [Paper presentation]. Cogling Days. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., & Zehentner, E. (25 November 2022). How redundant is language really? Agent-recipient disambiguation across time and space. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 7 (1), 1-41. doi:10.16995/glossa.8763 Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi |
 | Pijpops, D., Marianne Hundt, Freek Van de Velde, & Laetitia Van Driessche. (18 November 2022). De stap van micro- naar macroniveau met computersimulaties [Paper presentation]. Taal & Tongval Colloquium. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., Dirk Speelman, & Antal van de Bosch. (28 October 2022). Generating hypotheses for alternations at low and intermediate levels of schematicity. The use of Memory-Based Learning. Linguistics Vanguard, Printed online, ahead of print. doi:10.1515/lingvan-2021-0081 Peer reviewed |
 | De Pascale, S., & Pijpops, D. (01 July 2022). Modelling meaning differences in syntactic alternations with token-based vectors [Paper presentation]. Grammar and Corpora, Ghent, Belgium. Peer reviewed |
 | Hundt, M., Van Driessche, L., & Pijpops, D. (21 June 2022). Epicentral influence via agent‐based modelling. World Englishes, 41 (3), 377-399. doi:10.1111/weng.12584 Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi |
 | Pijpops, D. (2022). Lectal contamination. Evidence from corpora and from agent-based simulation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. doi:10.1075/ijcl.20040.pij Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi |
 | Pijpops, D. (01 April 2022). The effect of standardization on Dutch psych verb variation [Paper presentation]. Sociolinguistics Circle. Editorial reviewed |
 | De Pascale, S., Pijpops, D., Van de Velde, F., & Zenner, E. (17 March 2022). Reassembling the Pimped Ride: A Quantitative Look at the Integration of a Borrowed Expression. Frontiers in Communication, 7. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2022.777312 Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi |
 | Pijpops, D. (03 March 2022). Lexical constraints in construction grammar: methodological implications of a theoretical account [Paper presentation]. Invited talk at the workshop Lexical Constraints. Editorial reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., & Zehentner, E. (2022). Is redundancy useful in language? Agent-recipient disambiguation in English and Dutch [Poster presentation]. Joint Conference on Language Evolution (JCoLE). Peer reviewed |
 | Zehentner, E., & Pijpops, D. (05 December 2021). Redundancy: do Dutch and English speakers like it? [Paper presentation]. Linguisttweets2. Editorial reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D. (December 2021). Het gebruik van zo’n en zulk. Drie hypotheses over lexicale voorkeuren, functie en register. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde, 136 (4), 151-182. Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi |
 | De Pascale, S., Pijpops, D., Van de Velde, F., & Zenner, E. (26 November 2021). Gepimpte data! From English TV show to Dutch verb in less than three years [Paper presentation]. Taal & Tongval Colloquium. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., Dirk Speelman, & Antal van den Bosch. (26 November 2021). Geheugengebaseerd leren als datagedreven techniek om lexeemspecifieke variatie te onderzoeken [Paper presentation]. Taal & Tongval Colloquium. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D. (16 November 2021). Combining corpus research with agent-based modelling in the study of morphological and syntactic variation [Paper presentation]. Invited talk at the workshop Modelling constructional variation and change: Agents, networks, and vectors. Editorial reviewed |
De Pascale, S., & Pijpops, D. (15 November 2021). Token-based distributional semantics for grammatical alternation research [Paper presentation]. Modelling constructional variation and change: Agents, networks, and vectors. Editorial reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D. (2021). Does standardization affect the type of motivating factors that determine language variation? The case of the Dutch transitive-reflexive alternation. In G. Kristiansen, K. Franco, S. De Pascale, ... W. Zhang (Eds.), Cognitive Sociolinguistics Revisited (pp. 384-397). Mouton de Gruyter. Peer reviewed |
Pijpops, D. (2021). We verlangen niet noodzakelijk naar wat we verlangen. In N. van der Sijs, L. Fonteyn, ... M. van der Meulen (Eds.), Wat gebeurt er in het Nederlands?! Over taal, frequentie en variatie (pp. 72-73). Sterck & De Vreese. Peer reviewed |
Pijpops, D. (2021). Wat zoeken we, en waar zoeken we naar? In N. Van Der Sijs, L. Fonteyn, ... van der Meulen (Eds.), Wat gebeurt er in het Nederlands?! Over taal, frequentie en variatie (pp. 65-66). Sterck & De Vreese. Peer reviewed |
Zehentner, E., & Pijpops, D. (17 September 2021). Is redundancy useful in language? Agent-Recipient disambiguation in English and Dutch [Paper presentation]. Crosslinguistic Perspectives on Processing and Learning (X-PPL). Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., Speelman, D., Van de Velde, F., & Grondelaers, S. (15 September 2021). Incorporating the multi-level nature of the constructicon into hypothesis testing. Cognitive Linguistics, 32 (3), 487-528. doi:10.1515/cog-2020-0039 Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi |
 | Pijpops, D. (11 September 2021). Parsimony in usage-based argument structure [Paper presentation]. Invited talk in the Abralin Ao Vivo series. Editorial reviewed |
 | De Pascale, S., & Pijpops, D. (30 August 2021). Token-based distributional semantics for grammatical alternation research [Paper presentation]. 54th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea (SLE). Peer reviewed |
Pijpops, D., Franco, K., Speelman, D., & Van de Velde, F. (19 August 2021). Introduction to the workshop ‘What counts as an alternation in usage-based construction grammar?’ [Paper presentation]. 11th International Conference of Construction Grammar. Editorial reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., De Smet, I., & Van de Velde, F. (05 July 2021). Attraction through formal resemblance. Five case studies on constructional contamination [Paper presentation]. 5th Usage-based Linguistics Conference. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D. (28 May 2021). At what level of schematicity should we investigate argument structure variation? [Paper presentation]. Combining functional with formal approaches. Editorial reviewed |
 | Van de Velde, F., & Pijpops, D. (2021). Investigating lexical effects in syntax with regularized regression (Lasso). Research Design and Statistics in Linguistics and Communication Science. Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi |
 | Hundt, M., Pijpops, D., & Laetitia Van Driessche. (2021). Approaching Epicentral Influence with Agent-Based Modelling [Paper presentation]. Invited talk at the workshop Modelling constructional variation and change: Agents, networks, and vectors. Editorial reviewed |
 | Van de Velde, F., & Pijpops, D. (2020). Spiegelei of omelet [Sunny-side up or omelet]. Neerlandistiek.nl. |
 | Pijpops, D. (16 October 2020). The use of zo’n versus zulke ‘such’ in Belgian and Netherlandic Dutch. Testing hypotheses relating to lexical biases, function, register and noun type [Paper presentation]. Taaldag Belgische Kring voor Linguistiek (BKL). Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D. (20 August 2020). Lectal contamination: How lexical biases in linguistic variation may originate from lectal differences [Paper presentation]. 53th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea (SLE). Peer reviewed |
Pijpops, D., De Smet, I., & Van de Velde, F. (2020). Constructional contamination in morphological and syntactic variation [Paper presentation]. UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference (UK-CLC-7). Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D. (2020). What is an alternation? Six answers. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 34, 283-294. doi:10.1075/bjl.00053.pij Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi |
 | Pijpops, D. (18 November 2019). Agent-based modelling in linguistics: what, why and how [Paper presentation]. Invited talk at the University of Zurich. Editorial reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., Speelman, D., Grondelaers, S., & Van de Velde, F. (27 June 2019). How can we determine at what level of abstraction lectal predictors operate? A case study of the alternation(s) between the Dutch direct and prepositional object [Poster presentation]. International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE-10). Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D. (2019). Where, how and why does argument structure vary? A usage-based investigation into the Dutch transitive-prepositional alternation [Doctoral thesis, University of Leuven]. ORBi-University of Liège. https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/258552 |
 | Pijpops, D., Speelman, D., Grondelaers, S., & Van de Velde, F. (12 December 2018). Complexe constituenten worden vaak door een functiewoord ingeleid. Maar waarom? [Paper presentation]. De Dag van de Nederlandse Zinsbouw. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., & Van de Velde, F. (14 September 2018). A corpus-based contrastive analysis of the Dutch adjectival -s ending. Deflexion or refunctionalization [Paper presentation]. Using Corpora in Contrastive and Translation Studies. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., Speelman, D., Grondelaers, S., & Van de Velde, F. (30 August 2018). Met of zonder voorzetsel? Zinsdelen in beweging [Paper presentation]. Colloquium Neerlandicum. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., Speelman, D., Grondelaers, S., & Van de Velde, F. (17 July 2018). Why and how we need to incorporate the multi-level nature of the constructicon into corpus research [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Construction Grammar (ICCG-10). Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., Beuls, K., & Van de Velde, F. (19 April 2018). The evolutionary dynamics of language as a function of demography [Poster presentation]. Evolang XII. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., Speelman, D., Grondelaers, S., & Van de Velde, F. (2018). A methodological approach to integrate the vertical stratification of the constructicon in corpus research [Paper presentation]. Cogling Days. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., & Van de Velde, F. (2018). A multivariate analysis of the partitive genitive in Dutch. Bringing quantitative data into a theoretical discussion. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 14 (1), 99-131. doi:10.1515/cllt-2013-0027 Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., & Van de Velde, F. (2018). Lectal contamination. How language-external variation becomes language-internal through language contact [Paper presentation]. Variationist Linguistics meets Contact Linguistics. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., Speelman, D., Grondelaers, S., & Van de Velde, F. (2018). Comparing explanations for the Complexity Principle. Evidence from argument realization. Language and Cognition, 10 (3), 514-543. doi:10.1017/langcog.2018.13 Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi |
 | Van de Velde, F., & Pijpops, D. (2018). Grensoverschrijdend syntactisch gedrag. In T. Colleman, J. De Caluwe, V. De Tier, A.-S. Ghyselen, L. Triest, R. Vandenberghe, ... U. Vogl (Eds.), Woorden om te bewaren. Huldeboek voor Jacques Van Keymeulen (pp. 433-449). UGent, Vakgroep Taalkunde, Afdeling Nederlands. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., De Smet, I., & Van de Velde, F. (2018). Constructional contamination in morphology and syntax. Four case studies. Constructions and Frames, 10 (2), 269-305. doi:10.1075/cf.00021.pij Peer reviewed |
 | Van de Velde, F., & Pijpops, D. (2018). Taalcolumns mogen best wat beter geïnformeerd zijn. De Morgen. |
 | Pijpops, D., De Smet, I., & Van de Velde, F. (24 November 2017). Constructional contamination. An occasional rarity or a pervasive effect? [Paper presentation]. Morphology Days. Peer reviewed |
 | De Smet, I., Beuls, K., Pijpops, D., & Van de Velde, F. (02 August 2017). Language-specific differences in regularization rates of the Germanic preterite [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Historical Linguistics (ICHL). Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., & Van de Velde, F. (08 June 2017). Geographic variation as a window on probabilistic individual grammars [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE-9). Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D. (29 May 2017). Encoding versus decoding.Why do language users make sentence structure explicit? [Paper presentation]. Psycholinguistics in Flanders (PiF). Peer reviewed |
Pijpops, D. (2017). Onze taal verandert: een computersimulatie [Paper presentation]. Koninklijk Atheneum Kamsa. |
 | Van de Velde, F., Beuls, K., De Smet, I., & Pijpops, D. (17 March 2017). The weakening of strong preterites in West-Germanic: an interdisciplinary approach [Paper presentation]. Germanic Sandwich conference. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., & Van de Velde, F. (09 March 2017). Processing shapes grammar. But whose processing are we talking about? [Paper presentation]. 39. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft (DGFS). Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D. (2017). Digging Deeper. The directional alternation in Dutch [Paper presentation]. Taaldag Belgische Kring voor Linguistiek (BKL) [Language Day, Belgian Linguistic Circle]. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., & De Smet, I. (2017). Observing and simulating changes in the Germanic past tense system [Poster presentation]. Pôle de Recherche en Linguistique (PLIN) day. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D. (2017). Leest u hier iets gek? Over Taal, (3), p. 6-8. |
 | Pijpops, D., & Speelman, D. (2017). Alternating argument constructions of Dutch psychological verbs. A theory-driven corpus investigation. Folia Linguistica, 51 (1), 207-251. doi:10.1515/flin-2017-0006 Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D. (2017). Review of Jiyoung Yoon Stefan Gries (eds.). 2016. Corpus-based Approaches to Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames, 9 (2), 329-336. Peer reviewed |
 | Van de Velde, F., Marzo, S., Pijpops, D., Ruette, T., & Zenner, E. (25 November 2016). Grammaticale kenmerken van het Marokkaans-Nederlandse etnolect. Inzichten op basis van het Moroccorp [Grammatical features of the Marrocan-Dutch ethnolect. Insights based on the Moroccorp] [Paper presentation]. Taal & Tongval Colloquium. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., Beuls, K., & Van de Velde, F. (11 November 2016). Weak versus Strong, David versus Goliath? A simulation of language use [Paper presentation]. Grammar & Cognition Colloquium. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., & Van de Velde, F. (28 October 2016). How to measure constructional contamination [Paper presentation]. Moving Humanities conference. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., & Speelman, D. (01 September 2016). Syntactic alternations of Dutch psych verbs [Paper presentation]. 49th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea (SLE). Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., Beuls, K., & Van de Velde, F. (15 June 2016). How could the Germanic weak inflection overthrow a regular and more frequent competitor? A computer simulation of language usage [Paper presentation]. The Usage-based Linguistics Conference (UBL). Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., Beuls, K., & Van de Velde, F. (21 May 2016). Explaining the success of the Germanic weak dental suffix in the face of a transparent strong inflection [Paper presentation]. Germanic Linguistics Annual Conference (GLAC-22). Peer reviewed |
Pijpops, D. (2016). Taalevolutie en computersimulaties. |
 | Van de Velde, F., & Pijpops, D. (22 March 2016). Addressees use Zipf's law as a cue for semantics [Paper presentation]. Evolang XI. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., & Van de Velde, F. (2016). Constructional Contamination. How does it work and how do we measure it? Folia Linguistica, 50 (2), 543-581. doi:10.1515/flin-2016-0020 Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., & Van de Velde, F. (2016). A quantitative measure of constructional contamination through superficial resemblance [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Construction Grammar 9 (ICCG-9). Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., Beuls, K., & Van de Velde, F. (2016). How social changes altered the Germanic past tense system. An agent-based simulation [Poster presentation]. Linking social effects in language processing to social effects in language evolution. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., & Speelman, D. (2016). An alternation study of Dutch psych verbs [Paper presentation]. New Ways of Analyzing Syntactic Variation. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., Beuls, K., & Van de Velde, F. (18 December 2015). The rise of the Germanic weak suffix against all odds. An agent-based simulation [Paper presentation]. Morphology Days. Peer reviewed |
Pijpops, D. (11 September 2015). A case study of constructional contamination. The Dutch partitive genitive [Paper presentation]. PhD-day of the Department of Linguistics, University of Leuven. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., Beuls, K., & Van de Velde, F. (03 September 2015). Fighting in broken formation. The competition between the Germanic strong ablaut classes and weak suffix inflection in an agent-based model [Paper presentation]. 48th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea (SLE). Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., & Beuls, K. (08 June 2015). Generating the Conserving Effect without Language Acquisition. An agent-based model [Poster presentation]. BKL-CLK Thematic Conference Computational Construction Grammar and Constructional Change. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., & Beuls, K. (06 February 2015). Strong ‘islands of resilience’ in the weak flood. Dutch strategies for past tense formation implemented in an agent-based model [Paper presentation]. Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands (CLIN). Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D. (01 February 2015). Second Language speakers and postnominal adjectival inflection in Dutch. A corpus research of the present-day situation in the Netherlands [Paper presentation]. Linguistics in the Netherlands-day. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., & Speelman, D. (2015). Argument alternations of the Dutch psych verbs. A corpus investigation. In J. Wahle, M. Köllner, H. Baayen, G. Jäger, ... T. Baayen-Oudshoorn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Quantitative Investigations in Theoretical Linguistics. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., & Van de Velde, F. (2015). Ethnolect speakers and Dutch partitive adjectival inflection. A corpus analysis. Taal en Tongval, 67 (2), 343-371. doi:10.5117/tet2015.2.pijp Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi |
 | Beuls, K., De Clerck, B., Pijpops, D., & Van de Velde, F. (2015). Introduction to workshop Shifting Classes [Paper presentation]. 48th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea (SLE). Editorial reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., Beuls, K., & Van de Velde, F. (2015). The rise of the verbal weak inflection in Germanic. An agent-based model. Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal, 5, 81-102. Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi |
 | Pijpops, D., & Beuls, K. (2015). Agent-gebaseerde modellering in de historische taalkunde. Een model van regularisatiedruk op de Nederlandse werkwoorden. Handelingen der Koninklijke Zuid-Nederlandse Maatschappij voor Taal- en Letterkunde en Geschiedenis, 69, 5-23. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D. (24 October 2014). Agent-based modelling van Nederlandse werkwoordsverzwakking [agent-based modeling of the Dutch verb weakening] [Paper presentation]. Herfstvergadering Koninklijke Zuid-Nederlandse Maatschappij voor Taal- en Letterkunde en Geschiedenis [Autumn Meeting of the Royal Society for Linguistics, Literary Sciences and History of the Southern Low Countries]. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D. (10 August 2014). The verb-inflection game. Modelling the Dutch strong-weak past tense inflection in an agent-based simulation [Paper presentation]. FCG Summer Meeting. |
 | Pijpops, D., & Van de Velde, F. (22 May 2014). In search of the function of the Dutch partitive genitive: a corpus analysis [Paper presentation]. Germanic Genitives Conference. Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., Beuls, K., Wellens, P., & Van de Velde, F. (14 April 2014). Entrenchment vs. Transparency Modelling the Dutch strong-weak past tense competition in an agent-based simulation (poster presentation) [Poster presentation]. Evolang X Workshop How grammaticalization processes create grammar. Peer reviewed |
 | Van de Velde, F., & Pijpops, D. (2014). Constructional contamination in language (invited talk) [Paper presentation]. Invited talk at the University of Gothenburg. Editorial reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., & Van de Velde, F. (2014). Constructional contamination effects. Evidence from mixed-effects logistic regression modeling of the Dutch partitive genitive [Paper presentation]. 47th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea (SLE). Peer reviewed |
 | Pijpops, D., & Van de Velde, F. (06 December 2013). “Blood is thicker than water” Lectal and structural persistence in Dutch vestigial genitives [Paper presentation]. Taal- & Tongval colloquium. Peer reviewed |
