Attitude to learning; Digital skills; Psychological factors; Smart agriculture; Smart technology; Technology acceptance; Power; Skills development; Smart agricultures; Technology acceptance model; Technology adoption; Business and International Management; Applied Psychology; Management of Technology and Innovation
Abstract :
[en] Working within the theoretical framework set by the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) literature, this paper clarifies how psychological factors (emotions, attitudes, beliefs, and information-seeking) affect skill development in the context of smart farming technologies. Interviews with multiple stakeholders from the agriculture sectors of three European countries (Belgium, Italy, and the United Kingdom) were used to develop a new conceptual model that attempts to generalize the complex interplay existing between skills and psychological factors in the context of smart technology adoption. This conceptualization provides a systematic view of the correlation between skills and psychological factors, complements the TAM by introducing the new concept of attitude to learning, and clarifies how the interplay between cognitive and emotional components influences the decisions to adopt and use smart technologies. In addition to these theoretical contributions, the paper emphasizes the importance of designing policy initiatives that tackle both cognitive and emotional barriers to the adoption of smart technologies, urging decision makers to move away from the simplistic assumption that increasing the digital skills of potential users automatically leads to growth in the adoption and implementation of smart technologies.
Disciplines :
Strategy & innovation
Author, co-author :
Gerli, Paolo ; The Business School, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Esposito, Giovanni ; Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC Liège : UER > UER Management : Sustainable Strategy ; IOB-Institute of Development Policy, University of Antwerp, Belgium
Mora, Luca; The Business School, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom ; Academy of Architecture and Urban Studies, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia
Crutzen, Nathalie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC Recherche > HEC Recherche: Strategy & Performance for the Society
Language :
English
Title :
The hidden power of emotions: How psychological factors influence skill development in smart technology adoption
Adams, D.A., Nelson, R., Todd, P.A., Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication. MIS Quarterly 16 (1992), 227–247, 10.2307/249577.
Adrian, A.M., Norwood, S.H., Mask, P.L., Producers’ perceptions and attitudes toward precision agriculture technologies. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 48:3 (2005), 256–271, 10.1016/j.compag.2005.04.004.
Agostini, L., Nosella, A., The adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies in SMEs: results of an international study. Management Decision 58:4 (2019), 625–643, 10.1108/MD-09-2018-0973.
Ahlgren, L., Tett, L., Work-based learning, identity and organisational culture. Studies in Continuing Education 32:1 (2010), 17–27, 10.1080/01580370903534280.
Albarracín, D., Zanna, M.P., Johnson, B.T., Kumkale, G.T, Attitudes: Introduction and Scope. Albarracín, D., Johnson, B.T., Zanna, M.P., (eds.) The handbook of attitudes, 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 3–19.
Balafoutis, A.T., Beck, B., Fountas, S., Tsiropoulos, Z., Vangeyte, J., van der Wal, T., Soto-Embodas, I., Gómez-Barbero, M., Pedersen, S.M, Smart Farming Technologies – Description, Taxonomy and Economic Impact. Pedersen, S.M., Lind, K.M., (eds.) Precision Agriculture: Technology and Economic Perspectives, 2017, Springer International Publishing, 21–77.
Beckman, S., Barry, M., Design and Innovation through Storytelling. International Journal of Innovation Science, 1(4), 2009, 10.1260/1757-2223.1.4.151.
Bettiga, D., Lamberti, L., Lettieri, E., Individuals’ adoption of smart technologies for preventive health care: a structural equation modeling approach. Health Care Management Science 23:2 (2020), 203–214, 10.1007/s10729-019-09468-2.
Brosnan, M.J., Modeling technophobia: a case for word processing. Computers in Human Behavior 15:2 (1999), 105–121, 10.1016/S0747-5632(98)00020-X.
Capello, R., Lenzi, C., Industry 4.0 and servitisation: Regional patterns of 4.0 technological transformations in Europe. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 2021, 121164, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121164.
Case, D.O., Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior. 2002, Emerald Group Publishing.
Chatterjee, S., Rana, N.P., Dwivedi, Y.K., Baabdullah, A.M., Understanding AI adoption in manufacturing and production firms using an integrated TAM-TOE model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, 2021, 120880, 10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2021.120880.
Choi, M., The effect of information seeking style and news literacy of card news users on recommendation intention: Focused on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Journal of the Korea Convergence Society 10:1 (2019), 141–148, 10.15207/JKCS.2019.10.1.141.
Chuttur, M., Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments and Future Directions. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems 9 (2009), 1–21 Available at https://aisel.aisnet.org/sprouts_all/290.
Ciarli, T., Kenney, M., Massini, S., Piscitello, L., Digital technologies, innovation, and skills: Emerging trajectories and challenges. Research Policy, 50(7), 2021, 104289, 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104289.
Darban, M., Polites, G.L., Do emotions matter in technology training? Exploring their effects on individual perceptions and willingness to learn. Computers in Human Behavior 62 (2016), 644–657, 10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.028.
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R., Warshaw, P., User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science 35:8 (1989), 982–1003 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2632151.
Davis, F.D., A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. 1986, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Davis, F.D., Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13:3 (1989), 319–339, 10.2307/249008.
da Silveira, F., Lermen, F.H., Amaral, F.G., An overview of agriculture 4.0 development: Systematic review of descriptions, technologies, barriers, advantages, and disadvantages. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 189, 2021, 106405, 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106405.
Dengler, K., Matthes, B., The impacts of digital transformation on the labour market: Substitution potentials of occupations in Germany. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 137 (2018), 304–316, 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.024.
Esposito, G., Clement, J., Mora, L., Crutzen, N., One size does not fit all: Framing smart city policy narratives within regional socio-economic contexts in Brussels and Wallonia. Cities, 118, 2021, 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103329.
European Commission. Digital Economy and Society Index. Brussels, Belgium, 2020 Available at https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu.
European Commission. Digital Education Action Plan 2021-2027 Resetting education and training for the digital age, 2020 Available at https://education.ec.europa.eu.
Eurostat. Small and large farms in the EU - statistics from the farm structure survey, 2016, September 28 Available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat.
Eurostat. Farms and farmland in the European Union - statistics, 2018, November Available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat.
Fernández-Rovira, C., Álvarez Valdés, J., Molleví, G., Nicolas-Sans, R., The digital transformation of business. Towards the datafication of the relationship with customers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 2021, 120339, 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120339.
Fiedler, K., Bless, H., The formation of beliefs at the interface of affective and cognitive processes. Frijda, N.H., Manstead, A.S.R., Bem, S.E., (eds.) Emotions and belief: How feelings influence thoughts, 2000, Cambridge University Press, 144–170.
Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. 1975, Addison-Wesley.
Frijda, N.H., Manstead, A.S.R., Bem, S.E., The influence of emotions on beliefs. Frijda, N.H., Manstead, A.S.R., Bem, S.E., (eds.) Emotions and belief: How feelings influence thoughts, 2000, Cambridge University Press, 1–9.
Gastaldi, L., Lessanibahri, S., Tedaldi, G., Miragliotta, G., Companies’ adoption of Smart Technologies to achieve structural ambidexterity: an analysis with SEM. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 2022, 121187, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121187.
Gekara, V., Snell, D., Molla, A., Karanasios, S., International scan of approaches taken by select economies to build the digital skills of the existing workforce in response to the digital transformation of industry. 2020, The Skills Training and Industry Research Network, RMIT University.
Getie, A.S., Factors affecting the attitudes of students towards learning English as a foreign language. Cogent Education, 7(1), 2020, 1738184, 10.1080/2331186X.2020.1738184.
Gibbs, G., The nature of qualitative analysis. Analyzing Qualitative Data, 2007, 1–9.
Gioia, D.A., Corley, K.G., Hamilton, A.L., Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Method 16:1 (2012), 15–31 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1094428112452151.
Groot, A.E., Bolt, J.S., Jat, H.S., Jat, M.L., Kumar, M., Agarwal, T., Blok, V., Business models of SMEs as a mechanism for scaling climate smart technologies: The case of Punjab, India. Journal of Cleaner Production 210 (2019), 1109–1119, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.054.
Grover, V., Goslar, M.D., The Initiation, Adoption, and Implementation of Telecommunications Technologies in U.S. Organizations. Journal of Management Information Systems 10:1 (1993), 141–164, 10.1080/07421222.1993.11517994.
Hailey, J., James, R., Learning leaders: The key to learning organisations. Development in Practice 12:3–4 (2002), 398–408, 10.1080/0961450220149753.
Hamurcu, H., Educational Research and Reviews Examination of attitudes to learning and educational stress in prospective primary school teachers: İzmir-Buca sample. Educational Research and Reviews 13:2 (2018), 92–105 Available at https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1169401.pdf.
Harmon-Jones. A cognitive dissonance theory perspective on the role of emotion in the maintenance and change of beliefs and attitudes. Frijda, N.H., Manstead, A.S.R., Bem, S.E., (eds.) Emotions and belief: How feelings influence thoughts, 2000, Cambridge University Press, 185–211.
Helsper, E., Deursen, A.J.A.M., Digital Skills in Europe: Research and Policy. Andreasson, K., (eds.) Digital Divides: The New Challenges and Opportunities of e-Inclusion, 2015, CRC Press, 125–146.
Higgins, V., Bryant, M., Framing Agri-Digital Governance: Industry Stakeholders, Technological Frames and Smart Farming Implementation. Sociologia Ruralis 60:2 (2020), 438–457, 10.1111/soru.12297.
Hsu, M.H., Chiu, C., Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decision Support Systems 38:3 (2004), 369–381, 10.1016/j.dss.2003.08.001.
Ingram, J., Maye, D., Bailye, C., Barnes, A., Bear, C., Bell, M., Wilson, L., What are the priority research questions for digital agriculture?. Land Use Policy, 114, 2022, 105962, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105962.
Irani, Z., Dwivedi, Y.K., Williams, M.D., Understanding consumer adoption of broadband: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Journal of the Operational Research Society 60:10 (2009), 1322–1334, 10.1057/JORS.2008.100.
Janc, K., Czapiewski, K., Wójcik, M., In the starting blocks for smart agriculture: The internet as a source of knowledge in transitional agriculture. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90–91, 2019, 100309, 10.1016/j.njas.2019.100309.
Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher 33:7 (2004), 14–26, 10.3102/0013189X033007014.
Kay, R.H., Exploring the relationship between emotions and the acquisition of computer knowledge. Computers & Education 50:4 (2008), 1269–1283, 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.12.002.
Kirchherr, J., Charles, K., Enhancing the sample diversity of snowball samples: Recommendations from a research project on anti-dam movements in Southeast Asia. PLoS One, 13(8), 2018, e0201710, 10.1371/journal.pone.0201710.
Klerkx, L., Jakku, E., Labarthe, P., A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: New contributions and a future research agenda. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90–91, 2019, 100315, 10.1016/j.njas.2019.100315.
Knierim, A., Kernecker, M., Erdle, K., Kraus, T., Borges, F., Wurbs, A., Smart farming technology innovations–Insights and reflections from the German Smart-AKIS hub. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90, 2019, 100314, 10.1016/j.njas.2019.100314.
Korukonda, A.R., Personality, individual characteristics, and predisposition to technophobia: some answers, questions, and points to ponder about. Information Sciences 170:2-4 (2005), 309–328, 10.1016/J.INS.2004.03.007.
Krashen, S., Second language acquisition and Second Language Learning. 1981, Pergamon press.
Legris, P., Ingham, J., Collerette, P., Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 40:3 (2003), 191–204, 10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4 North-Holland.
Long, T.B., Blok, V., Coninx, I., Barriers to the adoption and diffusion of technological innovations for climate-smart agriculture in Europe: evidence from the Netherlands, France, Switzerland and Italy. Journal of cleaner production 112 (2016), 9–21, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.044.
Ma, Q., Liu, L., The Technology Acceptance Model: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Findings. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 16:1 (2004), 59–72, 10.4018/9781599049458.ch079.
Marangunić, N., Granić, A., Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society 14 (2014), 81–95, 10.1007/S10209-014-0348-1.
Martin, B.L., Briggs, L.J., The affective and cognitive domains: Integration for instruction and research. 1986, Educational Technology Publications.
Martin-Jones, M., Andrews, J., Martin, D., Reflexive ethnographic research practice in multilingual contexts. Martin-Jones, M., Martin, D., (eds.) Researching Multilingualism, 2016, Routledge, 203–216.
Mesgari, M., Okoli, C., Critical review of organisation-technology sensemaking: towards technology materiality, discovery, and action. European Journal of Information Systems 28:2 (2019), 205–232, 10.1080/0960085X.2018.1524420.
Meyers, E.M., Erickson, I., Small, R.V., Digital literacy and informal learning environments: an introduction. Learning, media and technology 38:4 (2013), 355–367, 10.1080/17439884.2013.783597.
Michels, M., von Hobe, C.-F., Weller von Ahlefeld, P.J., Musshoff, O., The adoption of drones in German agriculture: a structural equation model. Precision Agriculture 22 (2021), 1–21, 10.1007/S11119-021-09809-8.
Mohr, S., Kühl, R., Acceptance of artificial intelligence in German agriculture: an application of the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior. Precision Agriculture 22:6 (2021), 1816–1844, 10.1007/s11119-021-09814-x.
Mora, L., Deakin, M., Untangling Smart Cities: From utopian dreams to innovation systems for a technology-enabled urban sustainability. 2019, Elsevier.
Mora, L., Deakin, M., Zhang, X., Batty, M., De Jong, M., Santi, P., Appio, F.P., Assembling Sustainable Smart City Transitions: An Interdisciplinary Theoretical Perspective. Journal of Urban Technology 28:1-2 (2021), 1–27, 10.1080/10630732.2020.1834831.
Naspetti, S., Mandolesi, S., Buysse, J., Latvala, T., Nicholas, P., Padel, S., Loo, E.J., Zanoli, R., Determinants of the Acceptance of Sustainable Production Strategies among Dairy Farmers: Development and Testing of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model. Sustainability, 9(10), 2017, 1805, 10.3390/su9101805.
Park, E., Baek, S., Ohm, J., Chang, H.J., Determinants of player acceptance of mobile social network games: An application of extended technology acceptance model. Telematics and Informatics 31:1 (2014), 3–15, 10.1016/J.TELE.2013.07.001.
Partala, T., Saari, T., Understanding the most influential user experiences in successful and unsuccessful technology adoptions. Computers in Human Behavior 53 (2015), 381–395 https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.012.
Pierce, R., Stacey, K., Barkatsas, A., A scale for monitoring students’ attitudes to learning mathematics with technology. Computers & Education 48:2 (2007), 285–300, 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.006.
Rainer, R.K., Miller, M.D., An assessment of the psychometric properties of the computer attitude scale. Computers in Human Behavior 12 (1996), 93–105, 10.1016/0747-5632(95)00021-6.
Rayna, T., Striukova, L., Fostering skills for the 21st century: The role of Fab labs and makerspaces. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, 2021, 120391, 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120391.
Rijswijk, K., Klerkx, L., Turner, J.A., Digitalisation in the New Zealand Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System: Initial understandings and emerging organisational responses to digital agriculture. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90–91, 2019, 100313, 10.1016/j.njas.2019.100313.
Roca, J.C., Gagné, M., Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior 24:4 (2008), 1585–1604.
Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of innovations. 1995, Simon and Schuster.
Rosen, L., Weil, M., Adult and Teenage Use of Consumer, Business, and Entertainment Technology: Potholes on the Information Superhighway?. Journal of Consumer Affairs 29:1 (1995), 55–84, 10.1111/J.1745-6606.1995.TB00039.X.
Savolainen, R., Emotions as motivators for information seeking: A conceptual analysis. Library & Information Science Research 36:1 (2014), 59–65, 10.1016/j.lisr.2013.10.004.
Schepers, J., Wetzels, M., A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. In Information & Management 44:1 (2007), 90–103, 10.1016/J.IM.2006.10.007.
Seawright, J., Gerring, J., Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly 61:2 (2008), 294–308.
Shang, L., Heckelei, T., Gerullis, M.K., Börner, J., Rasch, S., Adoption and diffusion of digital farming technologies - integrating farm-level evidence and system interaction. Agricultural Systems, 190, 2021, 103074, 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103074.
Sharifzadeh, M.S., Damalas, C.A., Abdollahzadeh, G., Ahmadi-Gorgi, H., Predicting adoption of biological control among Iranian rice farmers: An application of the extended technology acceptance model (TAM2). Crop Protection 96 (2017), 88–96, 10.1016/J.CROPRO.2017.01.014.
Sharot, T., Sunstein, C., How people decide what they want to know. Nature Human Behaviour 4 (2020), 1–6, 10.1038/s41562-019-0793-1.
Shih, H., Extended technology acceptance model of Internet utilization behavior. Information & Management 41:6 (2004), 719–729, 10.1016/j.im.2003.08.009.
Thaler, T.H., Sunstein, C.H., Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. 2008, Springer.
van Laer, T., de Ruyter, K., Visconti, L.M., Wetzels, M., The Extended Transportation-Imagery Model: A Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers’ Narrative Transportation. Journal of Consumer Research 40:5 (2014), 797–817, 10.1086/673383.
Venkatesh, V., Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research 11:40 (2000), 342–365, 10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872.
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D., A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science 46:2 (2000), 186–204, 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D., A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test. Decision Sciences 27:3 (1996), 451–481, 10.1111/J.1540-5915.1996.TB00860.X.
Vicente, M.R., ICT for healthy and active aging: The elderly as first and last movers. Telecommunications Policy, 2021, 102262, 10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102262.
Vogl, E., Pekrun, R., Murayama, K., Loderer, K., Schubert, S., Surprise, Curiosity, and Confusion Promote Knowledge Exploration: Evidence for Robust Effects of Epistemic Emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(2474), 2019, 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02474.
Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y., Carretero Gomez, S., van den Brande, G., DigComp 2.0: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Update Phase 1: the Conceptual Reference Model. European Commission, 2016 Available at https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/.
Waarts, E., van Everdingen, Y.M., van Hillegersberg, J., The dynamics of factors affecting the adoption of innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management 19:6 (2002), 412–423, 10.1016/S0737-6782(02)00175-3.
