Introspective acquaintance: An integration account

Giustina, Anna

doi:10.1111/ejop.12690

Download

Article (Scientific journals)

Introspective acquaintance: An integration account

Giustina, Anna

2021 • In European Journal of Philosophy, 31 (2), p. 380-397

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/290449

DOI
10.1111/ejop.12690

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

Introspective acquaintance - an integration account_EJP_revised_final_cleaned up.docx

Author preprint (91.69 kB)

Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

Philosophy

Abstract :

[en] In this paper, I develop a new version of the acquaintance view of the nature of introspection of phenomenal states. On the acquaintance view, when one introspects a current phenomenal state of one's, one bears to it the relation of introspective acquaintance. Extant versions of the acquaintance view neglect what I call the phenomenal modification problem. The problem, articulated by Franz Brentano in his Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, is that drawing introspective attention to one's current conscious experience may modify its phenomenology. Failing to take phenomenal modification into account affects the adequacy of extant versions of the acquaintance view. The purpose of this paper is to develop a better version, the integration account, that meets the phenomenal modification challenge while preserving the merits of other versions.

Disciplines :

Philosophy & ethics

Author, co-author :

Giustina, Anna ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de philosophie > Phénoménologies

Language :

English

Title :

Introspective acquaintance: An integration account

Publication date :

2021

Journal title :

European Journal of Philosophy

ISSN :

0966-8373

Publisher :

John Wiley and Sons Inc

Volume :

Issue :

Pages :

380-397

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Additional URL :

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ejop.12690

Funding text :

This work was supported by the French National Research Agency's grants ANR‐17‐EURE‐0017 FrontCog and ANR‐10‐IDEX‐0001‐02 PSL. For many conversations on this paper's topic and for thorough comments on previous drafts I am infinitely grateful to Uriah Kriegel. I am also grateful to an anonymous referee for EJP for their very helpful comments. The paper was presented in the , in the , in the in Louvain‐la Neuve, in the conference in Paris, in the in Cologne, in the closing Conference of the FWF Project in Salzburg, and in the workshop in Fribourg. I am grateful to the audiences there, in particular to Stacy Kohls, Yaojun Lu, Trenton Merricks, Adam Patterson, Kara Richardson, Jan Swiderski, Louis Gularte, Aaron Henry, Cheryl Misak, Daniel Munro, Melissa Rees, Julia Smith, David Bourget, Géraldine Carranante, David Chalmers, Eli Chudnoff, François Kammerer, Andrew Lee, Geoff Lee, Farid Masrour, Olivier Massin, Angela Mendelovici, Takuya Niikawa, Susanna Schellenberg, Charles Siewert, Alfredo Tomasetta, Jérôme Dokic, Deborah Marber, Michael Murez, Christine Tappolet, Sacha Fink, Luke Roelofs, Tobias Schlicht, Johannes Brandl, Tim Crane, Arnaud Dewalque, Guillaume Fréchette, Denis Seron, Hamid Taieb, Julien Bugnon, Daniel Morgan, Michelle Liu, and Carlota Serrahima. Syracuse University Philosophy Graduate Conference 2018 University of Toronto Graduate Conference 2018 Congrès International triennal 2018 de la SoPhA Acquaintance and Direct Grasp Tenth international conference of the German Society for Analytic Philosophy Franz Brentano's Descriptive Psychology Phenomenal Consciousness and Self‐Awareness

Available on ORBi :

since 08 May 2022

Statistics

Number of views

45 (0 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

15 (0 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Armstrong, D. M. (1968). A materialist theory of the mind. New York, NY: Humanities Press.
Balog, K. (2012). Acquaintance and the mind-body problem. In S. Gozzano & C. S. Hill (Eds.), New perspectives on type identity: The mental and the physical (pp. 16–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bayne, T. (2010). The unity of consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bigelow, J., & Pargetter, R. (1990). Acquaintance with qualia. Theoria, 56(3), 129–147.
Bigelow, J., & Pargetter, R. (2006). Re-acquaintance with qualia. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 84(3), 353–378.
BonJour, L. 2000. Toward a defense of empirical foundationalism. In M. R. De Paul (Ed.), Resurrecting old-fashioned foundationalism. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
BonJour, L. (2003). A version of internalist foundationalism. In L. Bonjour & E. Sosa (Eds.), Epistemic justification: Internalism vs. externalism, foundations vs. virtues. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Brentano, F. (1874). Psychology from an empirical standpoint. London: Routledge. (A. C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell & L. L. McAlister, trans. (1995))
Brewer, B. (2011). Perception and its objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Campbell, J. (2002). Reference and consciousness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Campbell, J. (2019). Acquaintance as grounded in joint attention. In J. Knowles & T. Raleigh (Eds.), Acquaintance: New essays (pp. 215–226). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carruthers, P. (2005). Consciousness: Essays from a higher-order perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cassam, Q. (2015). Self-knowledge for humans. Oxford: Oxford University Pressy.
Chalmers, D. J. (2003). The content and epistemology of phenomenal belief. In Q. Smith & A. Jokic (Eds.), Consciousness: New philosophical perspectives (pp. 220–272). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coleman, S. (2015). Quotational higher-order thought theory. Philosophical Studies, 172(10), 2705–2733.
Comte, A. (1830). In F. Khodoss & P. Hidalgo (Eds.), Cours de philosophie positive (Vol. 3). Grenoble: La Gaya Scienza.
Conee, E. (1994). Phenomenal knowledge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72(2), 136–150.
Dennett, D. C. (1988). Quining Qualia. In A. J. Marcel & E. Bisiach (Eds.), Consciousness in contemporary science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Duncan, M. (2021). Acquaintance. Philosophy Compass, 16(3), e12727.
Fales, E. (1996). A defense of the given. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Fine, K. (1994). Essence and modality: The second philosophical perspectives lecture. Philosophical Perspectives, 8, 1–16.
Frankish, K. (2016). Illusionism as a theory of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 23(11–12), 11–39.
Fumerton, R. (1996). Metaepistemology and skepticism. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Fumerton, R. (2001). Classical foundationalism. In M. R. DePaul (Ed.), Resurrecting old-fashioned foundationalism (pp. 3–20). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Fumerton, R. (2009). Luminous enough for a cognitive home. Philosophical Studies, 142(1), 67–76.
Gertler, B. (2001). Introspecting phenomenal states. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 63(2), 305–328.
Gertler, B. (2011). Self-knowledge. London: Routledge.
Gertler, B. (2012). Renewed acquaintance. In D. Smithies & D. Stoljar (Eds.), Introspection and consciousness (pp. 89–123). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grzankovski, A., & Michael, T. (2019). What acquaintance teaches. In J. Knowles & T. Raleigh (Eds.), Acquaintance: New essays (pp. 75–94). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hasan, A. (2013). Phenomenal conservatism, classical foundationalism, and Internalist justification. Philosophical Studies, 162(2), 119–141.
Hellie, B. (2010). An externalist's guide to inner experience. In B. Nanay (Ed.), Perceiving the world (pp. 97–145). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Horgan, T., & Kriegel, U. (2007). Phenomenal epistemology: What is consciousness that we may know it so well? Philosophical Issues, 17(1), 123–144.
Jackson, F. (1982). Epiphenomenal Qualia. The Philosophical Quarterly, 32(127), 127–136.
James, W. (1980). The principles of psychology. London: Macmillan.
Kammerer, F. (2016). The hardest aspect of the illusion problem and how to solve it. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 23(11–12), 124–139.
Kant, I. (1786). Metaphysical foundations of natural science. In E. B. Bax (Ed.), Kant's prolegomena, and metaphysical foundations of natural science. London: G. Bell.
Kim, J. (1993). Supervenience and mind: Selected philosophical essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kriegel, U. (2009). Subjective consciousness: A self-representational theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kriegel, U. (2012). Personal-level representation. ProtoSociology, 28, 77–114.
Levine, J. (2019). Acquaintance is consciousness and consciousness is acquaintance. In J. Knowles & T. Raleigh (Eds.), Acquaintance: New essays (pp. 33–48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lycan, W. G. (1996). Consciousness and experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mole, C. (2008). Attention and consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 15(4), 86–104.
Mill, J. S. (1882). Auguste Comte and positivism. London: Tröbner.
Moran, R. (2001). Authority and estrangement: An essay on self-knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Nanay, B. (Ed.). (2010). Perceiving the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pitt, D. (2004). The phenomenology of cognition or What is it like to think that P?. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 69(1), 1–36.
Prinz, J. (2011). Is attention necessary and sufficient for consciousness? In C. Mole, D. Smithies, & W. Wu (Eds.), Attention: Philosophical and psychological essays (pp. 174–203). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Raleigh, T. (2019). The recent renaissance of acquaintance. In J. Knowles & T. Raleigh (Eds.), Acquaintance: New essays (pp. 1–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Recanati, F. (2010). Singular thought: In defence of acquaintance. In R. Jeshion (Ed.), New essays on singular thought (pp. 141–190). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rosenthal, D. M. (2005). Consciousness and mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Russell, B. (1910). Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 11, 108–128.
Russell, B. (1912). The problems of philosophy. New York, NY: H. Holt and Company.
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Siewert, C. (1998). The significance of consciousness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Smithies, D. (2011). Attention is rational-access consciousness. In C. Mole, D. Smithies, & W. Wu (Eds.), Attention: Philosophical and psychological essays (pp. 247–273). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Soteriou, M. (2013). The mind's construction: The ontology of mind and mental action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stazicker, J. (2011). Attention, visual consciousness and indeterminacy. Mind & Language, 26(2), 156–184.
Titchener, E. B. (1912a). Prolegomena to a study of introspection. The American Journal of Psychology, 23(3), 427–448.
Titchener, E. B. (1912b). The schema of introspection. The American Journal of Psychology, 23(4), 485–508.
Watzl, S. (2017). Structuring mind: The nature of attention and how it shapes consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williford, K. (2015). Representationalisms, subjective character, and self-acquaintance. In T. Metzinger & J. M. Windt (Eds.), Open MIND (Vol. 39). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: MIND Group.
Wundt, W. M. (1897). Outlines of psychology. Leipzig and New York: W. Engelmann and G. E. Stechert. http://archive.org/details/cu31924014474534