[en] Sustainable forest management requires accurate fine-scale description of wood resources. Stem size distribution (SSD) by species is used by foresters worldwide as a representative overview of forest structure and species composition suitable for informing management decisions at shorter and longer terms. In mixed uneven-aged deciduous forests, tree data required for SSD estimation are most often collected in the field through traditional forest management inventories (FMIs), but these are time-consuming and costly with respect to the sampled area. Combining FMIs with remote sensing methods such as airborne laser scanning (ALS), which has high potential for predicting forest structure and composition, and is becoming increasingly accessible and affordable, could provide cheaper and faster SSD data across large areas. In this study, we developed a method for estimating species-specific SSDs by combining FMIs and dual-wavelength ALS data using neural networks (NNs). The proposed method was tested and validated using 178 FMI plots within 22,000 ha of a mixed uneven-aged deciduous forest in Belgium. The forest canopy was segmented, and metrics were derived from the ALS point cloud. A NN with a custom architecture was set up to simultaneously predict the three components required to compute species-specific SSDs (species, circumference, and number of stems) at segment level. Species-specific SSDs were thereafter estimated at stand level by aggregating the estimates for the segments. A robustness test was set up using fully independent plots to thoroughly assess the method precision at stand-level on a larger area. The global Reynolds index for the species-specific SSDs was 21.2 for the training dataset and 54.0 for the independent dataset. The proposed method does not require allometric models, prior knowledge of the structure, or the predefinition of variables; it is versatile and thus potentially adaptable to other forest types having different structures and compositions.
Disciplines :
Environmental sciences & ecology
Author, co-author :
Leclere, Louise ; Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre
Lejeune, Philippe ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Gestion des ressources forestières et des milieux naturels
Bolyn, Corentin ; Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre
Latte, Nicolas ; Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre > Gestion des ressources forestières et des milieux naturels
Language :
English
Title :
Estimating Species-Specific Stem Size Distributions of Uneven-Aged Mixed Deciduous Forests Using ALS Data and Neural Networks
Publication date :
11 March 2022
Journal title :
Remote Sensing
eISSN :
2072-4292
Publisher :
MDPI AG
Special issue title :
Advances in LiDAR Remote Sensing for Forestry and Ecology
O’Hara, K.L.; Gersonde, R.F. Stocking control concepts in uneven-aged silviculture. Forestry 2004, 77, 131–143. [CrossRef]
Boncina, A.; Diaci, J.; Cencic, L. Comparison of the two main types of selection forests in Slovenia: Distribution, site conditions, stand structure, regeneration and management. Forestry 2002, 75, 365–373. [CrossRef]
Duchateau, E.; Schneider, R.; Tremblay, S.; Dupont-Leduc, L. Density and diameter distributions of saplings in naturally regenerated and planted coniferous stands in Québec after various approaches of commercial thinning. Ann. For. Sci. 2020, 77, 38. [CrossRef]
Rubin, B.D.; Manion, P.D.; Faber-Langendoen, D. Diameter distributions and structural sustainability in forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 222, 427–438. [CrossRef]
Cameron, A.; Prentice, L. Determining the sustainable irregular condition: An analysis of an irregular mixed-species selection stand in Scotland based on recurrent inventories at 6-year intervals over 24 years. Forestry 2016, 89, 208–214. [CrossRef]
Næsset, E. Area-Based inventory in norway—From innovation to an operational reality. In Forestry Applications of Airborne Laser Scanning; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 215–240. [CrossRef]
Kangas, A.; Astrup, R.; Breidenbch, J.; Fridman, J.; Gobakken, T.; Korhonen, K.T.; Maltamo, M.; Nilsson, M.; Nord-Larsen, T.; Naesset, E.; et al. Remote sensing and forest inventories in Nordic countries—Roadmap for the future. Scand. J. For. Res. 2018, 33, 397–412. [CrossRef]
Maltamo, M.; Packalen, P.; Kangas, A. From comprehensive field inventories to remotely sensed wall-to-wall stand attribute data—A brief history of management inventories in the nordic countries. Can. J. For. Res. 2020, 51, 257–266. [CrossRef]
Rondeux, J. La Mesure des Arbres et des Peuplements Forestiers, 3nd ed.; Les Presses Agronomiques de Gembloux: Gembloux, Belgium, 2021.
Lei, X.D.; Tang, M.P.; Lu, Y.C.; Hong, L.X.; Tian, D.L. Forest inventory in China: Status and challenges. Int. For. Rev. 2009, 11, 52–63. [CrossRef]
Rahlf, J.; Hauglin, M.; Astrup, R.; Breidenbach, J. Timber volume estimation based on airborne laser scanning—Comparing the use of national forest inventory and forest management inventory data. Ann. For. Sci. 2021, 78, 49. [CrossRef]
Hoover, C.M.; Bush, R.; Palmer, M.; Treasure, E. Using forest inventory and analysis data to support national forest management: Regional case studies. J. For. 2020, 118, 313–323. [CrossRef]
Vega, C.; Renaud, J.-P.; Sagar, A.; Bouriaud, O. A new small area estimation algorithm to balance between statistical precision and scale. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2021, 97, 102303. [CrossRef]
Packalén, P.; Maltamo, M. Estimation of species-specific diameter distributions using airborne laser scanning and aerial pho-tographs. Can. J. For. Res. 2008, 38, 1750–1760. [CrossRef]
Maltamo, M.; Næsset, E.; Bollandsås, O.M.; Gobakken, T.; Packalén, P. Non-parametric prediction of diameter distributions using airborne laser scanner data. Scand. J. For. Res. 2009, 24, 541–553. [CrossRef]
Peuhkurinen, J.; Maltamo, M.; Malinen, J. Estimating species-specific diameter distributions and saw log recoveries of boreal forests from airborne laser scanning data and aerial photographs: A distribution-based approach. Silva Fenn. 2008, 42, 625–641. [CrossRef]
Peuhkurinen, J.; Tokola, T.; Plevak, K.; Sirparanta, S.; Kedrov, A.; Pyankov, S. Predicting tree diameter distributions from airborne laser scanning, SPOT 5 satellite, and field sample data in the Perm Region, Russia. Forests 2018, 9, 639. [CrossRef]
Strunk, J.L.; Gould, P.J.; Packalen, P.; Poudel, K.P.; Andersen, H.E.; Temesgen, H. An examination of diameter density prediction with k-NN and airborne lidar. Forests 2017, 8, 444. [CrossRef]
Räty, J.; Packalen, P.; Maltamo, M. Comparing nearest neighbor configurations in the prediction of species-specific diameter distributions. Ann. For. Sci. 2018, 75, 1–16. [CrossRef]
Mauro, F.; Frank, B.; Monleon, V.J.; Temesgen, H.; Ford, K.R. Prediction of diameter distributions and tree-lists in southwestern oregon using lidar and stand-level auxiliary information. Can. J. For. Res. 2019, 49, 775–787. [CrossRef]
Maltamo, M.; Mehtätalo, L.; Valbuena, R.; Vauhkonen, J.; Packalen, P. Airborne laser scanning for tree diameter distribution modelling: A comparison of different modelling alternatives in a tropical single-species plantation. Forestry 2017, 91, 121–131. [CrossRef]
Arias-Rodil, M.; Diéguez-Aranda, U.; Álvarez-González, J.G.; Pérez-Cruzado, C.; Castedo-Dorado, F.; González-Ferreiro, E. Modeling diameter distributions in radiata pine plantations in Spain with existing countrywide LiDAR data. Ann. For. Sci. 2018, 75, 36. [CrossRef]
Cosenza, D.N.; Soares, P.; Guerra-Hernandez, J.; Pereira, L.; Gonzalez-Ferreiro, E.; Castedo-Dorado, F.; Tomé, M. Comparing Johnson’s SB and weibull functions to model the diameter distribution of forest plantations through ALS data. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 2792. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Z.; Cao, L.; Mulverhill, C.; Liu, H.; Pang, Y.; Li, Z. Prediction of diameter distributions with multimodal models using LiDAR data in subtropical planted forests. Forests 2019, 10, 125. [CrossRef]
Gobakken, T.; Næsset, E. Estimation of diameter and basal area distributions in coniferous forest by means of airborne laser scanner data. Scand. J. For. Res. 2004, 19, 529–542. [CrossRef]
Gorgoso, J.J.; Alvarez Gonzalez, J.G.; Rojo, A.; Grandas-Arias, J.A. Modelling diameter distributions of Betula alba L. stands in northwest Spain with the two-parameter Weibull function. Investig. Agrar. Sist. Recur. For. 2007, 16, 113–123. [CrossRef]
Maltamo, M.; Suvanto, A.; Packalén, P. Comparison of basal area and stem frequency diameter distribution modelling using airborne laser scanner data and calibration estimation. For. Ecol. Manag. 2007, 247, 26–34. [CrossRef]
Breidenbach, J.; Gläser, C.; Schmidt, M. Estimation of diameter distributions by means of airborne laser scanner data. Can. J. For. Res. 2008, 38, 1611–1620. [CrossRef]
Thomas, V.; Oliver, R.D.; Lim, K.; Woods, M. LiDAR and Weibull modeling of diameter and basal area. For. Chron. 2008, 84, 866–875. [CrossRef]
Mulverhill, C.; Coops, N.C.; White, J.C.; Tompalski, P.; Marshall, P.L.; Bailey, T. Enhancing the estimation of stem-size distributions for unimodal and bimodal stands in a boreal mixedwood forest with airborne laser scanning data. Forests 2018, 9, 95. [CrossRef]
Paris, C.; Bruzzone, L. A growth-model-driven technique for tree stem diameter estimation by using airborne LiDAR data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2018, 57, 76–92. [CrossRef]
Malek, S.; Miglietta, F.; Gobakken, T.; Næsset, E.; Gianelle, D.; Dalponte, M. Prediction of stem diameter and biomass at individual tree crown level with advanced machine learning techniques. iForest-Biogeosciences For. 2019, 12, 323–329. [CrossRef]
Räty, J.; Packalen, P.; Kotivuori, E.; Maltamo, M. Fusing diameter distributions predicted by an area-based approach and individual-tree detection in coniferous-dominated forests. Can. J. For. Res. 2020, 50, 113–125. [CrossRef]
Vauhkonen, J.; Mehtätalo, L. Matching remotely sensed and field-measured tree size distributions. Can. J. For. Res. 2015, 45, 353–363. [CrossRef]
Xu, Q.; Hou, Z.; Maltamo, M.; Tokola, T. Calibration of area based diameter distribution with individual tree based diameter estimates using airborne laser scanning. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2014, 93, 65–75. [CrossRef]
Kansanen, K.; Vauhkonen, J.; Lähivaara, T.; Seppänen, A.; Maltamo, M.; Mehtätalo, L. Estimating forest stand density and structure using Bayesian individual tree detection, stochastic geometry, and distribution matching. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2019, 152, 66–78. [CrossRef]
Spriggs, R.A.; Coomes, D.A.; Jones, T.A.; Caspersen, J.P.; Vanderwel, M.C. An alternative approach to using LiDAR remote sensing data to predict stem diameter distributions across a temperate forest landscape. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 944. [CrossRef]
Magnussen, S.; Renaud, J.P. Multidimensional scaling of first-return airborne laser echoes for prediction and model-assisted estimation of a distribution of tree stem diameters. Ann. For. Sci. 2016, 73, 1089–1098. [CrossRef]
Shang, C.; Treitz, P.; Caspersen, J.; Jones, T. Estimating stem diameter distributions in a management context for a tolerant hardwood forest using ALS height and intensity data. Can. J. Remote Sens. 2017, 43, 79–94. [CrossRef]
Ferraz, A.; Saatchi, S.S.; Longo, M.; Clark, D.B. Tropical tree size–frequency distributions from airborne lidar. Ecol. Appl. 2020, 30, 2154. [CrossRef]
Budei, B.C.; St-Onge, B.; Hopkinson, C.; Audet, F.A. Identifying the genus or species of individual trees using a three-wavelength airborne lidar system. Remote Sens. Environ. 2018, 204, 632–647. [CrossRef]
Dalponte, M.; Ene, L.T.; Gobakken, T.; Næsset, E.; Gianelle, D. Predicting selected forest stand characteristics with multispectral ALS data. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 586. [CrossRef]
Hastings, J.H.; Ollinger, S.V.; Ouimette, A.P.; Sanders-DeMott, R.; Palace, M.W.; Ducey, M.J.; Sullivan, F.B.; Basler, D.; Orwig, D.A. Tree species traits determine the success of LiDAR-based crown mapping in a mixed temperate forest. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 309. [CrossRef]
Yu, X.; Hyyppä, J.; Litkey, P.; Kaartinen, H.; Vastaranta, M.; Holopainen, M. Single-sensor solution to tree species classification using multispectral airborne laser scanning. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 108. [CrossRef]
Wang, X.H.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Xu, M.M. A multi-threshold segmentation for tree-level parameter extraction in a deciduous forest using small-footprint airborne LiDAR data. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 2109. [CrossRef]
Korpela, I.; Tuomola, T.; Välimäki, E. Mapping forest plots: An efficient method combining photogrammetry and field triangula-tion. Silva Fenn. 2007, 41, 457–469. [CrossRef]
Mas, J.F.; Flores, J.J. The application of artificial neural networks to the analysis of remotely sensed data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2008, 29, 617–663. [CrossRef]
Grossi, E.; Buscema, M. Introduction to artificial neural networks. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2007, 19, 1046–1054. [CrossRef]
Alderweireld, M.; Burnay, F.; Pitchugin, M.; Lecomte, H. Inventaire Forestier Wallon-Résultats 1994–2012; SPW: Jambes, Belgium, 2015.
Claessens, H.; Perin, J.; Latte, N.; Lecomte, H.; Brostaux, Y. Une chênaie n’est pas l’autre: Analyse des contextes sylvicoles du chêne en forêt wallonne. Forêt Wallonne 2010, 108, 3–18.
PDAL Contributors. PDAL Point Data Abstraction Library. Available online: https://pdal.io/(accessed on 8 February 2022).
Roussel, J.R.; Auty, D.; Coops, N.C.; Tompalski, P.; Goodbody, T.R.H.; Meador, A.S.; Bourdon, J.F.; de Boissieu, F.; Achim, A. Lidr: An R package for analysis of Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2020, 251, 112061. [CrossRef]
Korpela, I.; Ole Ørka, H.; Maltamo, M.; Tokola, T.; Hyyppä, J. Tree species classification using airborne LiDAR—Effects of stand and tree parameters, downsizing of training set, intensity normalization, and sensor type. Silva Fenn. 2010, 44, 319–339. [CrossRef]
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, R Core Team: Vienna, Austria, 2020. Available online: https://www.R-project.org/(accessed on 8 February 2022).
Pebesma, E. Simple features for R: Standardized support for spatial vector data. R J. 2018, 10, 439–446. [CrossRef]
Hijmans, R. Raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modelling, R Package Version 3.3–13. Available online: https://rspatial.org/raster (accessed on 8 February 2022).
Perin, J.; Pitchugin, M.; Hébert, J.; Brostaux, Y.; Lejeune, P.; Ligot, G. SIMREG, a tree-level distance-independent model to simulate forest dynamics and management from national forest inventory (NFI) data. Ecol. Model. 2021, 440, 109382. [CrossRef]
Michez, A.; Huylenbroeck, L.; Bolyn, C.; Latte, N.; Bauwens, S.; Lejeune, P. Can regional aerial images from orthophoto surveys produce high quality photogrammetric Canopy Height Model ? A single tree approach in Western Europe. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2020, 92, 102190. [CrossRef]
Hamraz, H.; Contreras, M.A.; Zhang, J. A robust approach for tree segmentation in deciduous forests using small-footprint airborne LiDAR data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2016, 52, 532–541. [CrossRef]
Grizonnet, M.; Michel, J.; Poughon, V.; Inglada, J.; Savinaud, M.; Cresson, R. Orfeo ToolBox: Open source processing of remote sensing images. Open Geospat. Data Softw. Stand. 2017, 2, 15. [CrossRef]
Packalen, P.; Strunk, J.L.; Pitkänen, J.A.; Temesgen, H.; Maltamo, M. Edge-tree correction for predicting forest inventory attributes using area-based approach with airborne laser scanning. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2015, 8, 1274–1280. [CrossRef]
Allaire, J.J.; Chollet, F. Keras: RInterface to Keras. R Package Version 2.3.0.0. 2020. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=keras (accessed on 8 February 2022).
Agresti, A. Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd ed.; Wiley: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2002; Volume 35, pp. 583–584. [CrossRef]
Garavaglia, S.; Sharma, A.; Hill, M. A smart guide to dummy variables: Four applications and macro. In Proceedings of the northeast SAS Users Group Conference, Nashville, TN, USA, 22–25 March 1998; Volume 43.
Potdar, K.; Pardawala, T.S.; Pai, C.D. A comparative study of categorical variable encoding techniques for neural network classifiers. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 2017, 175, 7–9. [CrossRef]
Sharma, S.; Sharma, S.; Athaiya, A. Activation functions in neural networks. Int. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2020, 4, 310–316. [CrossRef]
Srivastava, N.; Hinton, G.; Krizhevsky, A.; Sutskever, I.; Salakhutdinov, R. Droupout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2014, 15, 1929–1958.
Yoshida, Y.; Okada, M. Data-dependence of plateau phenomenon in learning with neural network—Statistical mechanical analysis. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems; NeurIPS: Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2019; pp. 1722–1730.
Reynolds, M.R.; Burk, T.E.; Huang, W.-C. Goodness-of-fit tests and model selection procedures for diameter distribution models. For. Sci. 1988, 34, 373–399.
Li, W.; Guo, Q.; Jakubowski, M.K.; Kelly, M. A new method for segmenting individual trees from the lidar point cloud. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2012, 78, 75–84. [CrossRef]
Dalponte, M.; Coomes, D.A. Tree-centric mapping of forest carbon density from airborne laser scanning and hyperspectral data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2016, 7, 1236–1245. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Silva, C.A.; Hudak, A.T.; Vierling, L.A.; Loudermilk, E.L.; O’Brien, J.J.; Hiers, J.K.; Jack, S.B.; Gonzalez-Benecke, C.; Lee, H.; Falkowski, M.J.; et al. Imputation of individual longleaf pine (Pinus palustris mill.) tree attributes from field and LiDAR data. Can. J. Remote Sens. 2016, 42, 554–573. [CrossRef]
Axelsson, A.; Lindberg, E.; Olsson, H. Exploring multispectral ALS data for tree species classification. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 183. [CrossRef]
Hamraz, H.; Contreras, M.A.; Zhang, J. Forest understory trees can be segmented accurately within sufficiently dense airborne laser scanning point clouds. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6770. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Qi, C.R.; Su, H.; Mo, K.; Guibas, L. PointNet: Deep learning on point sets for 3D classification and segmentation. In Proceedings of the 2016 4th International Conference 3D Vision, 3DV 2016, Stanford, CA, USA, 25–28 October 2016; pp. 601–610.
Maturana, D.; Scherer, S. VoxNet: A 3D Convolutional Neural Network for real time Object Recognition. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Hamburg, Germany, 28 September–3 October 2015; pp. 922–928. [CrossRef]
Hamraz, H.; Contreras, M.A.; Zhang, J. Vertical stratification of forest canopy for segmentation of under-story trees within small-footprint airborne LiDAR point clouds. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2017, 130, 385–392. [CrossRef]
Lu, X.; Guo, Q.; Li, W.; Flanagan, J. A bottom-up approach to segment individual deciduous trees using leaf-off lidar point cloud data. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2014, 94, 1–12. [CrossRef]
Leão, F.M.; Nascimento, R.G.M.; Emmert, F.; Santos, G.G.A.; Caldeira, N.A.M.; Miranda, I.S. How many trees are necessary to fit an accurate volume model for the Amazon forest? A site-dependent analysis. For. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 480, 118652.
Rana, P.; Vauhkonen, J.; Junttila, V.; Hou, Z.; Gautam, B.; Cawkwell, F.; Tokola, T. Large tree diameter distribution modelling using sparse airborne laser scanning data in a subtropical forest in Nepal. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2017, 134, 86–95. [CrossRef]
