Economic growth and under-investment: A nonparametric approach

[en] This paper expounds a ratio to measure countries’ under-investment which combines the advantages of being simple, intuitive, easy to compute, and nonparametric. Applying this to a panel of 81 countries over the period extending between 1965 and 2014 evidences a case of under-investment in all countries. Over this time period, OECD countries and Asian Tigers show less and less constrained by their available resources, while the contrary is true of Latin American and African countries. The distribution of our under-investment ratio also appears to become bi-modal over time, which implies that under-investment plays a role in economic divergence between countries. Our findings are supported by several statistical tests and a sensitivity analysis. © 2019 Elsevier B.V.

Disciplines :

Economic systems & public economics

Author, co-author :

Perelman, Sergio ; Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC Liège > HEC Liège

Walheer, Barnabé ; Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC Liège : UER > UER Economie : Microéconométrie et économétrie appliquée

Language :

English

Title :

Economic growth and under-investment: A nonparametric approach

Publication date :

2020

Journal title :

Economics Letters

ISSN :

0165-1765

eISSN :

1873-7374

Publisher :

Elsevier B.V.

Volume :

186

Peer reviewed :

Peer reviewed

Available on ORBi :

since 10 March 2022

Statistics

Number of views

101 (4 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

85 (4 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Barro, R., Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Q. J. Econ. 106 (1991), 407–443.
Barro, R., Lee, J.W., A new data set of educational attainment in the world. J. Dev. Econ. 104 (2013), 184–198.
Baumol, W., Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: what the long-run data show. Amer. Econ. Rev. 76:5 (1986), 1072–1085.
Castello, A., Domenech, R., Human capital inequality and economic growth: some new evidence. Econ. J. 112 (2002), C187–C200.
Cherchye, L., De Witte, K., Perelman, S., A unified productivity-performance approach applied to secondary schools. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 70 (2019), 1522–1537.
Daraio, C., Simar, L., Advanced Robust and Nonparametric Methods in Efficiency Analysis: Methodology and Applications. 2007, Springer, New York, NY.
Diewert, W., Capital and the theory of productivity measurement. Amer. Econ. Rev. 70:2 (1980), 260–267.
Farrell, M., The measurement of productive efficiency. J. Royal Stat. Soc. Ser. 1, 1957, 253–281 General, 120, Part 3.
Feenstra, R.C., Inklaar, R., Timmer, M.P., The next generation of the penn world table. Amer. Econ. Rev. 105:10 (2015), 3150–3182.
Galor, O., Tsiddon, D., The distribution of human capital and economic growth. J. Econ. Growth 2 (1997), 93–124.
Hall, P., York, M., On the calibration of Silverman's test for multimodality. Statist. Sinica 11 (2001), 515–536.
Henderson, D.J., Russell, R.R., Human capital and convergence: a production-frontier approach. Internat. Econom. Rev. 46:4 (2005), 1167–1205.
Jones, C.I., On the evolution of the world income distribution. J. Econ. Perspect. 11 (1997), 19–36.
Kumar, S., Russell, R.R., Technological change, technological catch-up, and capital deepening: relative contributions to growth and convergence. Amer. Econ. Rev. 92:3 (2002), 527–548.
Quah, D., Twin peaks: growth and convergence in models of distribution dynamics. Econom. J. 106:437 (1996), 1045–1055.
Quah, D., Empirics for growth and distribution: stratification, polarization, and convergence clubs. J. Econ. Growth 2:1 (1997), 27–59.
Simar, L., Detecting outliers in frontier models: a simple approach. J. Product. Anal. 20 (2003), 391–424.
Solow, R., A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q. J. Econ. 70:1 (1956), 65–94.
Temple, J., The new growth evidence. J. Econ. Lit. 37:1 (1999), 112–156.