Article (Scientific journals)
A systematic review of prediction models to diagnose COVID-19 in adults admitted to healthcare centers
Locquet, M.; Diep, Anh Nguyet; Beaudart, Charlotte et al.
2021In Archives of Public Health, 79 (1), p. 105
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
A systematic review of prediction models....pdf
Publisher postprint (1.06 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
COVID-19; Hospitalisation; Prediction model
Abstract :
[en] Background: The COVID-19 pandemic is putting significant pressure on the hospital system. To help clinicians in the rapid triage of patients at high risk of COVID-19 while waiting for RT-PCR results, different diagnostic prediction models have been developed. Our objective is to identify, compare, and evaluate performances of prediction models for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in adult patients in a health care setting. Methods: A search for relevant references has been conducted on the MEDLINE and Scopus databases. Rigorous eligibility criteria have been established (e.g., adult participants, suspicion of COVID-19, medical setting) and applied by two independent investigators to identify suitable studies at 2 different stages: (1) titles and abstracts screening and (2) full-texts screening. Risk of bias (RoB) has been assessed using the Prediction model study Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). Data synthesis has been presented according to a narrative report of findings. Results: Out of the 2334 references identified by the literature search, 13 articles have been included in our systematic review. The studies, carried out all over the world, were performed in 2020. The included articles proposed a model developed using different methods, namely, logistic regression, score, machine learning, XGBoost. All the included models performed well to discriminate adults at high risks of presenting COVID-19 (all area under the ROC curve (AUROC) > 0.500). The best AUROC was observed for the model of Kurstjens et al (AUROC = 0.940 (0.910–0.960), which was also the model that achieved the highest sensitivity (98%). RoB was evaluated as low in general. Conclusion: Thirteen models have been developed since the start of the pandemic in order to diagnose COVID-19 in suspected patients from health care centers. All these models are effective, to varying degrees, in identifying whether patients were at high risk of having COVID-19. © 2021, The Author(s).
Disciplines :
Public health, health care sciences & services
Author, co-author :
Locquet, M.;  WHO Collaborating Centre for Public Health, Aspects of Musculo-Skeletal Health and Ageing, Research Unit in Public Health, Epidemiology and Health, Economics, University of Liège, Quartier Hôpital, Av. Hippocrate 13, CHU B23, Liège, 4000, Belgium
Diep, Anh Nguyet  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Plateforme Diagnostic Covid-19
Beaudart, Charlotte ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Dardenne, Nadia  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Biostatistique
Brabant, Christian ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Epidémiologie clinique
Bruyère, Olivier  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Donneau, Anne-Françoise ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Biostatistique
Language :
English
Title :
A systematic review of prediction models to diagnose COVID-19 in adults admitted to healthcare centers
Publication date :
2021
Journal title :
Archives of Public Health
ISSN :
0778-7367
eISSN :
2049-3258
Publisher :
BioMed Central Ltd
Volume :
79
Issue :
1
Pages :
105
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 17 February 2022

Statistics


Number of views
73 (11 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
23 (6 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
14
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
13
OpenCitations
 
7

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi