Integration of Parametric Modeling Tools in Small Architectural Offices – Between Constraints and Organizational Strategies

Stals, Adeline; Elsen, Catherine; Jancart, Sylvie

doi:10.1080/17452007.2022.2050347

Article (Scientific journals)

Integration of Parametric Modeling Tools in Small Architectural Offices – Between Constraints and Organizational Strategies

Stals, Adeline; Elsen, Catherine; Jancart, Sylvie

2022 • In Architectural Engineering and Design Management

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/267716

DOI
10.1080/17452007.2022.2050347

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

AEDM_FINAL_orib.pdf

Author preprint (431.73 kB)

Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

Parametric modeling; design process; SME; emerging practice; organization; adoption

Abstract :

[en] In order to succeed in today's disruptive world, architects have to constantly reevaluate their strategies and innovate. Consequently, some architectural offices have started to implement parametric modeling tools to support their ideation work. Architectural studies consider how such technologies impact the design process, cognitive processes or generation of representations. This paper looks at the impact of this approach from another angle, which relates to the organization; it focuses on parametric modeling adoption, and on how parametric modeling tools and organizational aspects of small offices impact each other. While parametric modeling is announced to be widely adapted, we give an overview of parametric practices in small and medium Belgian architectural offices, which represent the largest part of the market but are generally left aside in studies. This paper divides into four categories the main barriers and enablers architectural SME’s are confronted with, when adopting parametric modeling. These lead to a system of constraints in which the architectural practice evolves. The research observes the management of parametric workflows in SME’s and situates the parametric modeling tool within the theoretical framework of organizations. This study will help understand some of the factors limiting the adoption of those tools in SME’s and will help architects when developing their strategy of adoption.

Disciplines :

Architecture

Author, co-author :

Stals, Adeline ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Architecture > LNA

Elsen, Catherine ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département ArGEnCo > Composition architecturale

Jancart, Sylvie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'Architecture > LNA

Language :

English

Title :

Integration of Parametric Modeling Tools in Small Architectural Offices – Between Constraints and Organizational Strategies

Publication date :

2022

Journal title :

Architectural Engineering and Design Management

ISSN :

1745-2007

eISSN :

1752-7589

Publisher :

Taylor & Francis, United Kingdom

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Funders :

F.R.S.-FNRS - Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique [BE]

Available on ORBi :

since 01 February 2022

Statistics

Number of views

148 (10 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

90 (1 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Aish, R., & Bredella, N. (2017). The evolution of architectural computing: From building modelling to design computation. Architectural Research Quarterly, 21 (1), 65–73.
Aish, R., & Woodbury, R. (2005). Multi-level interaction in parametric design. Computer Science, 3638, 151–162. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-02115-2
Amphoux, P. (2002). Ambiance et conception : De l’analyse des ambiances à la conception architecturale et urbaine. In Conférence Internationale Herbert Simon, Sciences de l’ingénierie, Sciences de La Conception (pp. 19–32).
Anton, I., & Tanase, D. (2016). Informed geometries. Parametric modelling and energy analysis in early stages of design. Energy Procedia, 85, 9–16.
Architects’ Council of Europe. (2019). La profession d’architecte en Europe 2018: Une étude du secteur. Study by Mirza & Nacey Research.
Azzouz, A., & Papadonikolaki, E. (2020). Boundary-spanning for managing digital innovation in the AEC sector. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 1–18. doi: 10.1080/17452007.2020.1735293
Bhooshan, S. (2017). Parametric design thinking: A case-study of practice-embedded architectural research. Design Studies, 52, 115–143. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2017.05.003
Borillo, M., & Goulette, J. P. (2002). Cognition et création. Explorations cognitives des processus de conception. Sprimont: Mardaga.
Bourbonnais, S. (2014). Sensibilités technologiques: expérimentations et explorations en architecture numérique 1987–2010 [Thesis]. Université de Laval-Québec et Université de Paris-est.
Boyd, R., & Holton, R. J. (2017). Technology, innovation, employment and power: Does robotics and artificial intelligence really mean social transformation? Journal of Sociology, 1, 15. doi: 10.1177/1440783317726591
Bruni, A., Miele, F., Pittino, D., & Tirabeni, L. (2021). The intricacies of power relations and digital technologies in organizational processes. Studi Organizzativi, 1, 7–24.
Bukhari, F. A. (2011). A hierarchical evolutionary algorithmic design (HEAD) system for generating and evolving buildings design models. Queensland University of Technology.
Burry, M. (2013). Scripting cultures: Architectural design and programming. John Wiley.
Carpo, M. (2017). The second digital turn–Design beyond intelligence. Writing Architecture, MIT Press.
Chandler, D. (2002). Technological or media determinism: Introduction. The media and communications studies site.
Chien, S.-F., & Yeh, Y.-T. (2012). On creativity and parametric design. In Proceedings of 30th ECAADe conference: Digital aids to design creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 245–254).
Cichocka, J. M., Browne, W. N., & Rodriguez, E. (2017). Optimization in the architectural practice–An international survey. Protocols, flows and glitches. In Proceedings of the 22nd international CAADRIA (Vols. 5–8, pp. 387–397).
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
De la Cruz Paragas, F., & Lin, T. T. (2016). Organizing and reframing technological determinism. New Media & Society, 18 (8), 1528–1546.
Deutsch, R. (2019). Superusers–Design technology specialists and the future of practice. Routledge–Taylor & Francis Group.
Fok, W. W., & Picon, A. (2016). The ownership revolution. Architectural Design, 86 (5), 6–15.
Foster, & Partners. (2006). Instrumental geometry. Architectural Design, 76 (2), 42–53.
Haidar, A., Underwood, J., & Coates, P. (2019). Smart processes for smart buildings: ‘Sustainable processes’, ‘recyclable processes’ and ‘building seeds’ in parametric design. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 15 (5), 402–429. doi: 10.1080/17452007.2018.1564645
Harding, J. E., Joyce, S., Shepherd, P., & Williams, C. (2012). Thinking topologically at early stage parametric design. Advances in Architectural Geometry, 2012, 67–76. http://opus.bath.ac.uk/31469/
Harding, J. E., & Shepherd, P. (2017). Meta-parametric design. Design Studies, 52, 73–95. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.005
Hesselgren, L., & Medjdoub, B. (2011). Interview with Lars Hesselgren, director PLP research. In T. Kocaturk & B. Medjdoub (Eds.), Distributed intelligence in design (pp. 247–251). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Holz, E. B. (2021). Sociomateriality and organizational analysis: From rhetoric to relevance. Organizações & Sociedade, 28, 241–264.
Imbert, F., Frost, K. S., Fisher, A., Witt, A., Tourre, V., & Koren, B. (2012). Concurrent geometric, structural and environmental design. Louvre Abu Dhabi.
Jabi, W., Soe, S., Theobald, P., Aish, R., & Lannon, S. (2017). Enhancing parametric design through non-manifold topology. Design Studies, 52, 96–114.
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1 (2), 112–133.
Kocaturk, T. (2019). An investigation of the emerging knowledge in digital design from a multidisciplinary perspective. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 3 (2), 93–105. doi: 10.7250/csimq.2016-6.03
Leach, N. (2009). Digital morphogenesis. Architectural Design, 1 (79), 32–37.
Léglise, M. (2016). Informatique et architecture: la grande illusion. SCAN-16. Retrieved from http://Scan16.Toulouse.Archi.Fr
Leitão, A. (2013). Teaching computer science for architecture: A proposal. In Future traditions: 1st ECAADe regional international workshop (pp. 95–104).
Marshall, P. D., & Burnett, R. (2003). Web theory: An introduction. Routledge.
Nizet, J., & Pichault, F. (1995). Comprendre les organisations: Mintzberg à l'épreuve des faits. Paris: Gaëtan Morin Éditeur Europe.
Ordre des Architectes. (2016). Consulted on Ordredesarchitectes.Be. Annual report.
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3 (3), 398–427.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11 (4), 404–428. doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28, 1435–1448. doi: 10.1177/0170840607081138
Oxman, R. (2017). Thinking difference: Theories and models of parametric design thinking. Design Studies, 52, 4–39.
Pichault, F. (2013). Change management: Toward a polyphonic management. In De Boeck Superieur (Eds).
Recker, J. (2012). Scientific research in information systems: A beginner’s guide. Springer Science & Business Media.
Riccobono, A., & Pellitteri, G. (2014). The digital change. Reasons and meanings of a new architectural expressivity. In D. Rockwood, & M. Sarvimäki (Eds.), ARCC/EAAE 2014|beyond architecture: New intersections & connections (pp. 408–417). University of Hawaii.
Robertson, B. F., & Radcliffe, D. F. (2009). Impact of CAD tools on creative problem solving in engineering design. Computer-Aided Design, 41 (3), 136–146.
Salim, F. D., & Burry, J. (2010). Software openness: Evaluating parameters of parametric modeling tools to support creativity and multidisciplinary design integration. In D. Taniar et al.: ICCSA (Vol. 3, pp. 483–497).
Scheffers, P., Seijkens, N., Rondeaux, G., Beuker, L., Lisein, O., & Pichault, F. (2017). Rapport d’étude sur la nature, l’évolution et la quantification des prestations des architectes. Rapport pour l’Ordre des Architectes Francophones et Germanophones.
Sennett, R. (2010). Ce que sait la main: La culture de l’artisanat. Albin Michel.
Shelden, D. R. (2002). Digital surface representation and the constructability of Gehry’s architecture. Masachusetts Institute of Technology.
Sprecher, A., & Ahrens, C. (2016). Adaptive knowledge in architecture: A few notes on the nature of transdisciplinarity. Architectural Design, 86 (5), 26–35.
Stals, A. (2019). Pratiques numériques émergentes en conception architecturale dans les bureaux de petite taille, Perceptions et usages de la modélisation paramétrique [Thesis]. Université de Liège.
Stals, A., Elsen, C., & Jancart, S. (2017). Practical trajectories of parametric tools in small and medium architectural firms. In Future trajectories in computation in design, CAAD futures, Istanbul.
Stals, A., Jancart, S., & Elsen, C. (2016). How do small and medium architectural firms deal with architectural complexity? A look into digital practices. In 34th ECAADe conference proceedings: Complexity and simplicity (No. 2, pp. 159–168).
Stals, A., Jancart, S., & Elsen, C. (2018). Influence of parametric tools on the complexity of architectural design in everyday work of SMEs. ArchNet-IJAR, 12 (3), 206. doi: 10.26687/archnet-ijar.v12i3.1665
Stals, A., Jancart, S., & Elsen, C. (2021). Parametric modeling tools in small architectural offices: Towards an adapted design process model. Design Studies, 72. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2020.100978
Tamke, M., & Thomsen, M. R. (2018). Complex modelling. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 16 (2), 87–90.
Tedeschi, A., & Andreani, S. (2014). AAD, algorithms-aided design: Parametric strategies using grasshopper. In Le Penseur (Eds). Brienza, Italy.
Terzidis, K. (2004). Algorithmic design: A paradigm shift in architecture? In Architecture in the network society–22ndECAADe conference proceedings (pp. 201–207).
Tribout, S., & Margier, A. (2018). L’essor des outils numériques dans le champ de la conception urbaine: vecteur de recomposition des postures et pratiques (inter)professionnelles ? 01.DESIGN11, pp. 1–22.
Wortmann, T., & Tuncer, B. (2017). Differentiating parametric design: Digital workflows in contemporary architecture and construction. Design Studies, 52, 173–197.
Yu, R., Gero, J., & Gu, N. (2015). Architects’ cognitive behaviour in parametric design. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 13 (1), 83–101.
Yu, R., Ostwald, M. J., & Gu, N. (2015). Empirical evidence of designers’ cognitive behavior in a parametric design environment and a geometric modeling environment. In IASDR2015 congress.