Using linked data to create provenance-rich metadata interlinks: the design and evaluation of the NAISC-L interlinking framework for libraries, archives and museums
Using linked data to create provenance-rich metadata interlinks: the design and evaluation of the NAISC-L interlinking framework for libraries, archives and museums
Alemu G, Stevens B, Ross P, Chandler J (2012) Linked Data for libraries: benefits of a conceptual shift from library-specific record structures to RDF-based data models. New Library World 113(11/12):549–570. 10.1108/03074801211282920 DOI: 10.1108/03074801211282920
Becker DA, Yannotta L (2013) Modeling a library web site redesign process: developing a user-centered web site through usability testing. Inf Technol Libr 32(1):6–22. 10.6017/ital.v32i1.2311 DOI: 10.6017/ital.v32i1.2311
Bensman F, Prongu N, Hellstern M, Kuntschik P (2016) Swissbib goes linked data. Paper presented at Semantic Web in Libraries (SWIB) 2016.
Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O (2001) The semantic web. Sci Am 284(5):34–43 DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0501-34
Berners-Lee T (2006) Linked data. www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
Bizer C, Volz J, Kobilarov G, Gaedke M (2009b) Silk—a link discovery framework for the web of data. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 538:1–6
Bizer C, Heath T, Berners-Lee T (2009) Linked data: the story so far. Int J Semant Web Inf Syst (IJSWIS) 5(3):1–22. https://doi.org/10.4018/jswis.2009081901
Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carroll JJ, Bizer C, Hayes P, Stickler P (2005) Named graphs. J Web Semant 3(4):247–267. 10.1016/j.websem.2005.09.001 DOI: 10.1016/j.websem.2005.09.001
Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) (2019) Reference model for an open archival information system (OAIS). http://www.oais.info/
Cooley M (1987) Human centred systems: an urgent problem for systems designers. AI Soc 1:37–46. 10.1007/BF01905888 DOI: 10.1007/BF01905888
Coyle K (2013) Library linked data: an evolution. Ital J Libr Inf Sci 4(1):53. 10.4403/jlis.it-5443 DOI: 10.4403/jlis.it-5443
Crotti Junior A, Debruyne C, O’Sullivan D (2018) An editor that uses a block metaphor for representing semantic mappings in linked data. In: European semantic web conference (ESWC). Springer, Cham, pp 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98192-5_6
Cruz IF, Antonelli FP, Stroe C (2009) AgreementMaker: efficient matching for large real-world schemas and ontologies. In: Proceedings of the VLDB endowment, vol 2, no 2, pp 1586–1589. 10.14778/1687553.1687598
Cruz IF, Stroe C, Caimi F, Fabiani A, Pesquita C, Couto FM, Palmonari M (2011) Using AgreementMaker to align ontologies for OAEI 2011. In: ISWC international workshop on ontology matching (OM), vol 814, pp 114–121
Das S, Sundara S, Cyganiak R (2012) R2RML: RDB to RDF mapping langauge. https://www.w3.org/TR/r2rml/
De Melo G (2013) Not quite the same: identity constraints for the web of linked data. In: Proceedings of the 27th AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol 27, no 1. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/8468
Debattista J, McKenna L, Brennan R (2018) Understanding information professionals: a survey on the quality of linked data sources for digital libraries. In: 2018 conference on ontologies, databases, and applications of semantics (ODBASE). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02671-4_32
Deliot C (2014) Publishing the British National Bibliography as linked open data. Catal Index 174:13–18
Deliot C, Wilson N, Costabello L, Vandenbussche PY (2017) The British National Bibliography: who uses our linked data?. In: International conference on Dublin core and metadata applications, pp 24–33
Dezani-Ciancaglini M, Horne R, Sassone V (2012) Tracing where and who provenance in linked data: a calculus. Theoret Comput Sci 464:113–129. 10.1016/j.tcs.2012.06.020 DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2012.06.020
Farrell S (2016) Field Studies. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/field-studies/
Ferrara A, Nikolov A, Scharffe F (2011) Data linking for the semantic web. Int J Semant Web Inf Syst (IJSWIS) 7(3):46–76. 10.4018/jswis.2011070103 DOI: 10.4018/jswis.2011070103
Fisher R (1919) XV—the correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans R Soc Edinb 52(2):399–433. 10.1017/S0080456800012163 DOI: 10.1017/S0080456800012163
Guerrini M, Possemato T (2016) From record management to data management: RDA and new application models BIBFRAME, RIMMF, and OliSuite/WeCat. Catalog Classif Q 54(3):179–199. 10.1080/01639374.2016.1144667 DOI: 10.1080/01639374.2016.1144667
Halpin H, Hayes PJ, McCusker JP, McGuinness DL, Thompson HS (2010) When owl: sameas isn’t the same: an analysis of identity in linked data. In: International semantic web conference. Springer, Berlin, pp 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17746-0_20.
Hannemann J, Kett J (2010) Linked data for libraries. In: Proceedings of the world library and information congress, 76th IFLA general conference and assembly. Gothenburg, pp 1–11
Harris S, Seaborne A, Prud’hommeaux E (2013) SPARQL 1.1 Query Language. W3C Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/
Haslhofer B, Isaac A (2011) data.europeana.eu: the Europeana linked open data pilot. In: International conference on dublin core and metadata applications, pp 94–104
Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 10.2307/25148625 DOI: 10.2307/25148625
Hevner A, Chatterjee S (2010) Design science research in information systems. In: Design research in information systems. Springer, Boston, pp 9–22
Hoekstra R, Groth P (2013) Linkitup: link discovery for research data. In: 2013 AAAI fall symposium series, pp 28–35
Jaffri A, Glaser H, Millard IC (2008) URI disambiguation in the context of linked data. In: 1st workshop on linked data on the web (LDOW). http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/265181
Jiménez-Ruiz E, Grau BC (2011) LogMap: logic-based and scalable ontology matching. In: International semantic web conference. Springer, Berlin, pp 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25073-6_18
Jiménez-Ruiz E, Grau BC, Horrocks I (2012) LogMap and LogMapLt results for OAEI 2012. Ontol Matching. 10.5555/2887596.2887609 DOI: 10.5555/2887596.2887609
Krug S (2014) Don't make me think, revisited: a common sense approach to web usability, 3rd edn. New Riders, Peachpit, Pearson Education, San Francisco. https://doi.org/10.5555/2663393
Kruskal WH, Wallis WA (1952) Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 47:583–621. 10.2307/2280779 DOI: 10.2307/2280779
Lee YW, Strong DM, Kahn BK, Wang RY (2002) AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment. Inf Manag 40(2):133–146. 10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00043-5 DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00043-5
Lewis JR (1995) IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. Int J Hum Comput Interact 7(1):57–78. 10.1080/10447319509526110 DOI: 10.1080/10447319509526110
Lewis JR (2002) Psychometric evaluation of the PSSUQ using data from five years of usability studies. Int J Hum Comput Interact 14(3–4):463–488. 10.1080/10447318.2002.9669130 DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2002.9669130
Lewis JR (1992) Psychometric evaluation of the post-study system usability questionnaire: the PSSUQ. In: Proceedings of the human factors society annual meeting, vol 36, no 16. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles, pp 1259–1260. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129203601617.
Lowdermilk T (2013) User-centered design: a developer’s guide to building user-friendly applications. O’Reilly Media Inc, Sebastopol
Malmsten M (2008) Making a library catalogue part of the semantic web. Paper presented at the international conference on dublin core and metadata applications-metadata for semantic and social applications 22–26 September 2008, Berlin (DC-2008)
Malmsten M (2009) Exposing library data as linked data. Paper presented at the IFLA satellite preconference sponsored by the information technology section emerging trends in technology: libraries between Web 2.0, Semantic Web and Search Technology, Florence
Mann HB, Whitney DR (1947) On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Math Stat. 10.1214/aoms/1177730491 DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177730491
Manola F, Miller E (2004) RDF primer. https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/
McGuinness DL, van Harmelen (2004). OWL web ontology language. https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
McKenna L, Debruyne C, O'Sullivan D (2018) Understanding the position of information professionals with regards to linked data: a survey of libraries, archives and museums. In: 2018 ACM/IEEE on joint conference on digital libraries. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197026.3197041
McKenna L, Debruyne C, O'Sullivan D (2019a) Modelling the provenance of linked data interlinks for the library domain. In: Companion proceedings of the 2019 world wide web conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308560.3316518
McKenna L, Debruyne C, O'Sullivan D (2019b) NAISC: an authoritative linked data interlinking approach for the library domain. In: 2019 ACM/IEEE joint conference on digital libraries. https://doi.org/10.1109/JCDL.2019.00012
Moreau L, Hartig O, Simmhan Y, Myers J, Lebo T, Belhajjame K, Miles S, Soiland-Reyes S (2013) PROV-AQ: provenance access and query. http://w3.org/TR/prov-aq/
Nentwig M, Hartung M, NgongaNgomo AC, Rahm E (2017) A survey of current link discovery frameworks. Semantic Web 8(3):419–436. 10.3233/SW-150210 DOI: 10.3233/SW-150210
Neubauer G (2017) Visualization of typed links in Linked Data. Mitteilungen Der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen & Bibliothekare 70(2):179–199 DOI: 10.31263/voebm.v70i2.1748
Ngomo ACN, Auer S (2011) Limes—a time-efficient approach for large-scale link discovery on the web of data. In: Proceedings of IJCAI. / https://doi.org/10.5555/2283696.2283783
Nielsen J, Landauer T (1993) A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. Hum Factors Comput Syst (CHI). 10.1145/169059.169166 DOI: 10.1145/169059.169166
Papaleo L, Pernelle N, Saïs F, Dumont C (2014) Logical detection of invalid sameas statements in RDF data. In: International conference on knowledge engineering and knowledge management. Springer, Cham, pp 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13704-9_29
Paris PH, Hamdi F, Cherfi SSS (2019) Interlinking RDF-based datasets: a structure-based approach. Proc Comput Sci 159:162–171. 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.171 DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.171
Paris PH (2018) Assessing the Quality of owl: sameAs links. In: European semantic web conference. Springer, Cham, pp 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98192-5_49
Pearson K (1895) Notes on the history of correlation. Proc R Soc Lond 58:240–242. 10.2307/2331722 DOI: 10.2307/2331722
Pesch O, Miller E (2016) Using BIBFRAME and library linked data to solve real problems: an interview with Eric Miller of Zepheira. Ser Libr 71(1):1–8. 10.1080/0361526X.2016.1183159 DOI: 10.1080/0361526X.2016.1183159
PREMIS Editorial Committee (2015) PREMIS data dictionary for preservation metadata. https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v3/premis-3-0-final.pdf
Raad J, Beek W, Van Harmelen F, Pernelle N, Saïs F (2018) Detecting erroneous identity links on the web using network metrics. In: International semantic web conference. Springer, Cham, pp 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00671-6_23
Riva P, Le Boeuf P, Žumer M (2016) FRBR—library reference model. http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr-lrm/frbr-lrm_20160225.pdf
Rosala, M. (2019). How to analyze qualitative data from UX Research: thematic analysis. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/thematic-analysis/
Schilling V (2012) Transforming library metadata into linked library data. Association for Library Collections & Technical Services (ALCTS). American Library Association. http://www.ala.org/alcts/resources/org/cat/research/linked-data
Seeman D, Goddard L (2015) Preparing the way: creating future compatible cataloging data in a transitional environment. Catalog Classif Q 53(3–4):331–340. 10.1080/01639374.2014.946573 DOI: 10.1080/01639374.2014.946573
Simon A, Wenz R, Michel V, Di Mascio A (2013) Publishing bibliographic records on the web of data: opportunities for the BnF (French National Library). In: Extended semantic web conference (ESWC). Springer, Berlin, pp 563–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38288-8_38
Spearman C (1904) The proof and measurement of association between two things. Am J Psychol 15:72–101. 10.2307/1422689 DOI: 10.2307/1422689
Student (Gosset, W.S) (1908) The probable error of a mean. Biometrika 6(1):1–25. 10.2307/2331554 DOI: 10.2307/2331554
Summers E, Isaac A, Redding C, Krech D (2008) LCSH, SKOS and linked data. In: The international conference on Dublin core and metadata applications-metadata for semantic and social applications, 22–26 September, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.5555/1503418.1503422
Tukey J (1949) Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 5(2):99–114. 10.2307/3001913 DOI: 10.2307/3001913
Usability First (2015) Introduction to User-Centered Design. http://usabilityfirst.com/about-usability/introduction-to-user-centered-design/
Van Den Haak M, De Jong M, Schellens P (2003) Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud protocols: testing the usability of an online library catalogue. Behav Inf Technol 22(5):339–351. 10.1080/0044929031000 DOI: 10.1080/0044929031000
Vila-Suero D, Gómez-Pérez A (2013) datos.bne.es and MARiMbA: an insight into library linked data. Library Hi Tech 31(4):575–601. 10.1108/LHT-03-2013-0031 DOI: 10.1108/LHT-03-2013-0031
Vila-Suero D, Villazón-Terrazas B, Gómez-Pérez A (2013) datos.bne.es: a library linked dataset. Semantic Web 4(3):307–313. 10.5555/2786071.2786083 DOI: 10.5555/2786071.2786083
Virzi RA (1992) Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: how many subjects is enough? Hum Factors 34(4):457–468 DOI: 10.1177/001872089203400407
W3C (2015) Linked data. from http://w3.org/standards/semanticweb/data
Wiederhold RA, Reeve GF (2021) Authority control today: principles, practices, and trends. Catalog Classif Q 59(2–3):129–158. 10.1080/01639374.2021.1881009 DOI: 10.1080/01639374.2021.1881009
Wieringa RJ (2014) Design science methodology for information systems and software engineering. Springer, Berlin. 10.1177/001872089203400407 DOI: 10.1177/001872089203400407
Zaveri A, Rula A, Maurino A, Pietrobon R, Lehmann J, Auer S (2016) Quality assessment for linked data: a survey. Semantic Web 7(1):63–93. 10.3233/SW-150175 DOI: 10.3233/SW-150175