Clinimetric properties of the Nociception Coma Scale (-Revised): A systematic review

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use,distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purp

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

Cinahl; Embase; Nociception Coma Scale; PsycINFO; Review; Web of Science; Awareness; Coma; Consciousness Disorders; Humans; Nociception; Pain Management; Pain Measurement; Reproducibility of Results

Abstract :

[en] The Nociception Coma Scale is a nociception behaviour observation tool, developed specifically for patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) due to (acquired) brain injury. Over the years, the clinimetric properties of the NCS and its revised version (NCS-R) have been assessed, but no formal summary of these properties has been made. Therefore, we performed a systematic review on the clinimetric properties (i.e. reliability, validity, responsiveness and interpretability) of the NCS(-R). We systematically searched CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo and Web of Science until August 2015. Two reviewers independently selected the clinimetric studies and extracted data with a structured form. Included studies were appraised on quality with the COSMIN checklist. Eight studies were found eligible and were appraised with the COSMIN checklist. Although nearly all studies lacked sample size calculation, and were executed by the same group of authors, the methodological quality ranged from fair to excellent. Important aspects of reliability, construct validity and responsiveness have been studied in depth and with sufficient methodological quality. The overview of clinimetric properties in this study shows that the NCS and NCS-R are both valid and useful instruments to assess nociceptive behaviour in DOC patients. The studies provide guidance for the choice in NCS-R cut-off value for possible pain treatment and cautions awareness of interprofessional differences in NCS-R measurements. Significance: This systematic review provides a structured overview of the clinimetric properties of the Nociception Coma Scale (-Revised) and provides insights for a solid evidence-based nociception behaviour assessment and treatment plan. © 2017 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation - EFIC®

Disciplines :

Neurology

Author, co-author :

Vink, P.; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, Netherlands, Omni Cura Nursing Teaching Research, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Lucas, C.; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Medical Faculty (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

Maaskant, J. M.; Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Netherlands, ACHIEVE Centre of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Netherlands

van Erp, Willemijn ; Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA

Lindeboom, R.; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Medical Faculty (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

Vermeulen, H.; Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, Netherlands, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Nijmegen, Netherlands

Language :

English

Title :

Clinimetric properties of the Nociception Coma Scale (-Revised): A systematic review

Publication date :

2017

Journal title :

European Journal of Pain

ISSN :

1090-3801

eISSN :

1532-2149

Publisher :

Wiley-Blackwell, United States

Volume :

Issue :

Pages :

1463-1474

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Available on ORBi :

since 31 December 2021

Statistics

Number of views

38 (1 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

36 (1 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Chatelle, C., Majerus, S., Whyte, J., Laureys, S., Schnakers, C. (2012). A sensitive scale to assess nociceptive pain in patients with disorders of consciousness. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 83, 1233–1237.
Chatelle, C., Thibaut, A., Bruno, M., Boly, M., Beranrd, C., Hustinx, R., Schnakers, C., Laureys, S. (2014). Nocicepton coma scale-revised scores correlate with metabolism in the anterior cingulate cortex. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 28, 149–152.
Chatelle, C., De Val, M., Catano, A., Chaskis, C., Seeldrayers, P., Laureys, S., Biston, P., Schnakers, C. (2015). Is the nociception coma scale-revised a useful clinical tool for managing pain in patients with disorders of consciousness? Clin J Pain 32, 321–326.
van Erp, W., Lavrijsen, J., van de Laar, F., Vos, P., Laureys, S., Koopmans, R. (2014). The vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: A systematic review of prevalence studies. Eur J Neurol 21, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.12483.
Feldt, K.S. (2000). The checklist of nonverbal pain indicators (CNPI). Pain Manag Nurs 1, 13–21.
Herr, K., Coyne, P., McCaffery, M., Manworren, R., Merkel, S. (2011). Pain assessment in the patient unable to self-report: Position statement with clinical practice recommendations. Pain Manag Nurs 12, 230–250.
Kalmar, K., Giacino, J.T. (2005). ‘The JFK coma recovery scale—revised. Neuropsychol Rehabil 15, 454–460.
Landis, J., Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159–174.
Lawrence, J., Alcock, D., McGrath, P., Kay, J., MacMurray, S.B., Dulberg, C. (1993). The development of a tool to assess neonatal pain. Neonatal Netw 12, 59–66.
Maaskant, J., Raymakers-Janssen, P., Veldhoen, E., Ista, E., Lucas, C., Vermeulen, H. (2016). The clinimetric properties of the COMFORT scale: A systematic review. Eur J Pain 20, 1587–1611. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.880.
Merkel, S.I., Voepel-Lewis, T., Shayevitz, J.R., Malviya, S. (1997). The FLACC: A behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs 23, 293–297.
Mokkink, L., Terwee, C., Gibbons, E., Stratford, P., Alonso, J., Patrick, D., De Vet, H. (2010a). Interrater agreement and reliability of the COSMIN (consensus-based standards for the measurement and selection of health status measurement instruments) checklist. BMC Med Res Methodol 10, 1–11.
Mokkink, L., Terwee, C., Knol, D., Alonso, J., Patrick, D., De Vet, H. (2010b). The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol 10, 1–8.
Mokkink, L., Terwee, C., Patrick, D., Stratford, P., Knol, D., De Vet, H. (2010c). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 19, 539–549.
Mokkink, L., Terwee, C., Patrick, D., Alonso, J., Stratford, P., Knol, D., De Vet, H. (2013). The COSMIN checklist manual [Online]. Available at: www.cosmin.nl [November 2015].
Prisma Statement (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis, [Online]. Available at: http://www.prisma-statement.org/ [January 2015].
Riganello, F., Cortese, M., Arcuri, F., Candelieri, A., Guglielmino, F., Dolce, G., Sannita, W., Schnakers, C. (2015). A study of the reliability of the Nociception Coma Scale. Clin Rehabil 29, 388–393.
Sattin, D., Pagani, M., Covelli, V., Giovannetti, A., Leonardi, M. (2013). The Italian version of the Nociception Coma Scale. Int J Rehabil Res 36, 182–186.
Schnakers, C., Chatelle, C., Vanhaudenhuyse, A., Majerus, S., Ledouc, D. et al. (2009). The Nociception Coma Scale: A new tool to assess nociception in disorders of consciousness. Pain 148, 215–219.
Schnakers, C., Chatelle, C., Demertzi, A., Majerus, S., Laureys, S. (2012). What about pain in disorders of consciousness? AAPS J 14, 437–444.
Suraseranivongse, S., Yuvopoositanont, P., Srisakkrapikoop, P., Pommul, R., Phaka, W., Itthimathin, P. (2015). A comparison of pain scales in patients with disorders of consciousness following craniotomy. J Med Assoc Thai 98, 684–692.
Terwee, C., Bot, S., De Boer, M., Van Der Windt, D., Knol, D., Dekker, J., Bouter, L., De Vet, H. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60, 34–42.
Thibaut, A., Chatelle, C., Wannez, S., Deltombe, T., Stender, J., Schnakers, C., Laureys, S., Gosseries, O. (2015). Spasticity in disorders of consciousness: A behavioral study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 51, 389–397.
de Tomasso, M., Navarro, J., Lanzillotti, C., Ricci, K., Buonocunto, F., Livrea, P., Lancioni, G. (2015). Cortical responses to salient nociceptive and not nociceptive stimuli in vegetative and minimal conscious state. Front Hum Neurosci 9, 1–14.
Vink, P., Eskes, A., Lindeboom, R., van den Munckhof, P., Vermeulen, H. (2014). Nurses Assessing pain with the nociception coma scale: Interrater reliability and validity. Pain Manag Nurs 15, 881–887.
Vink, P., Verweij, L., van Erp, W.S., Lucas, C., Vermeulen, H. (2015). A survey on pain assessment in patients with disorders of consciousness in Dutch hospitals and nursing homes. Br J Neurosci Nurs 11, 881–887. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjnn.2015.11.1.34.
Warden, V., Hurley, A.C., Volicer, L. (2003). Development and psychometric evaluation of the pain assessment in advanced dementia (PAINAD) scale. J Am Med Dir Assoc 4, 9–15.