Paper published in a journal (Scientific congresses and symposiums)
Current practice for safe return-to-play after lateral ankle sprain: a survey among french speaking physicians
Aguilaniu, Aude; Croisier, Jean-Louis; Schwartz, Cédric et al.
2021In British Journal of Sports Medicine, 55 (S1), p. 42
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
2021_11_15_poster_monaco.pdf
Author preprint (475.82 kB) Creative Commons License - Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] Background : The incidence of lateral ankle sprain (LAS) in sports and risk of LAS re-injury is high. Objective : The purpose of this study was to see how physicians use existing recommendations in the literature to decide a safe return-to-play (RTP) after a LAS. We hypothesize that physicians are using the published recommendations to make this RTP decision. Design : An online survey was designed to identify clinical practice patterns to decide a RTP decision after a LAS. Setting : The physicians were contacted by e-mail containing an electronic link for survey access between January and February 2019. They were instructed to answer all questions that related to their clinical practice of patients after a LAS. Patients (or Participants) : 109 physicians answered the entire survey. Among the 109 physicians, 59 had a sport education and 50 had no specific sport education. Interventions (or Assessment of Risk Factors) Physicians selected the criteria and details on the assessment they used in daily practice for RTP decision after a LAS. Main Outcome : Measurements Physicians should select a maximum of 5 items among the 9 suggested: ‘pain, swelling, ankle range of motion, ankle muscle strength, feeling of instability, proprioception, ability to do functional tasks and other criteria’. Results : Pain, functional and instability criteria are the most selected by overall physicians. Sport physicians (94%) selected significantly more the functional criterion than physicians without sport specialty (71%) p=0.0064, OR=0.095 [0,017; 0,515]. Sport physicians (64%) selected significantly more a quantitative value to assess the pain (visual scale) than physicians without sport education (41%) p=0.03. Few physicians use a questionnaire to assess the instability (less than 5%). Conclusions : In daily practice, physicians with sport education are more aware of functional test guidelines to assess a LAS in RTP context. Few physicians use quantitative tools and measures to decide a safe RTP after a LAS.
Disciplines :
Orthopedics, rehabilitation & sports medicine
Author, co-author :
Aguilaniu, Aude  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la motricité > Kinésithérapie générale et réadaptation
Croisier, Jean-Louis ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la motricité > Kinésithérapie générale et réadaptation
Schwartz, Cédric  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la motricité > Kinésithérapie générale et réadaptation
Dardenne, Nadia  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Biostatistique
D'Hooghe, Pieter
Zahraoui, Yanis
COLLIN, Romain ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Autres Services Médicaux > Service de médecine de l'appareil locomoteur
Kaux, Jean-François  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la motricité > Médecine physique, réadaptation et traumatologie du sport
Martens, Géraldine  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la motricité > Kinésithérapie générale et réadaptation
Language :
English
Title :
Current practice for safe return-to-play after lateral ankle sprain: a survey among french speaking physicians
Publication date :
November 2021
Event name :
IOC WORLD CONFERENCE ON PREVENTION OF INJURY & ILLNESS IN SPORT
Event organizer :
IOC
Event place :
Monaco, Monaco
Event date :
25 - 27 NOVEMBER 2021
Audience :
International
Journal title :
British Journal of Sports Medicine
ISSN :
0306-3674
eISSN :
1473-0480
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group, United Kingdom
Volume :
55
Issue :
S1
Pages :
A42
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 30 November 2021

Statistics


Number of views
92 (29 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
75 (15 by ULiège)

OpenCitations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi