Albert, R. S. (1975). Toward a behavioral definition of genius. American Psychologist,30, 140–151.
Allison, P. D. (1980). Inequality and scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science,10, 163–179.
Allison, P. D., & Stewart, J. A. (1974). Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage. American Review of Sociology,39, 576–606.
Amir, R., & Knauff, M. (2008). Ranking economics departments worldwide on the basis of PhD placement. Review of Economics and Statistics,90, 185–190.
Aversa, E. S. (1985). Citation patterns of highly cited papers and their relationship to literature aging: A study of the working literature. Scientometrics,7(3–6), 383–389.
Axarloglou, K., & Theoharakis, V. (2003). Diversity in economics: An analysis of journal quality perceptions. Journal of the European Economic Association,1(6), 1402–1423.
Azoulay, P., Stuart, T., & Wang, Y. (2014). Matthew: Effect or fable? Management Science,60(1), 92–109.
Baldi, S. (1998). Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: A network-analytic model. American Sociological Review,63, 829–846.
Bjork. S., Offer, A., & Söderberg, G. (2014). Time series citation data: the Nobel Prize in economics. Scientometrics,98(1), 185–196.
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behaviour. Journal of Documentation,64, 45–80.
Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory,71(1), 14–25.
Chan, H. F., Frey, B. S., Gallus, J., Schaffner, M., Torgler, B., & Whyte, S. (2013). External influence as an indicator of scholarly importance. CREMA Working Paper Series, 2013–2016.
Chan, H. F., Frey, B. S., Gallus, J., Schaffner, M., Torgler, B., & Whyte, S. (2014a). Do the best scholars attract the highest speaking fees? An exploration of internal and external influence. Scientometrics, 101(1), 793–817.
Chan, H. F., Frey, B. S., Gallus, J., & Torgler, B. (2014b). Academic honors and performance. Labour Economics,31, 188–204.
Chubin, D. E., Porter, A. L., & Rossini, F. A. (1984). “Citation classics” analysis: An approach to characterizing interdisciplinary research. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,35, 360–368.
Cole, S. (1970). Professional standing and the reception of scientific discoveries. American Journal of Sociology,76, 286–306.
Cole, J., & Singer, B. (1991). A theory of limited differences: Explaining the productivity puzzle. In J. C. Harriet Zuckerman & J. Bauer (Eds.), The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community (pp. 277–340). New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Ductor, L. (2014). Does co-authorship lead to higher academic productivity? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. doi:10.1111/obes.12070.
Einstein, A., & Infeld, L. (1938). The Evolution of Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engemann, K., & Wall, H. J. (2009). A journal ranking for the ambitious economist. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review,91, 127–139.
Eom, Y.-H., & Fortunato, S. (2011). Characterizing and modeling citation dynamics. PLoS One,6(9), e24926. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024926.
Garfield, E. (1989). More delayed recognition Part 1. Examples from the genetics of color blindness, the entropy of short-term memory, phosphoinositides, and polymer rheology. Current Contents,38, 3–8.
Garfield, E. (1990). More delayed recognition Part 2. From inhibin to scanning electron microscopy. Current Contents,9, 3–9.
Gilbert, G. N. (1977). Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies in Science,7, 113–122.
Glänzel, W., Schlemmer, B., & Thijs, B. (2003). Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon. Scientometrics,58(3), 571–586.
Gupta, H. M., Campanha, J. R., & Pesce, R. A. G. (2005). Power-law distributions for the citation index of scientific publications and scientists. Brazilian Journal of Physics,35(4), 981–986.
Hjørland, B. (2013). Citation analysis: A social and dynamic approach to knowledge organization. Information Processing and Management,49(6), 1313–1325.
Huang, W. (2015). Do abcs get more citations than xyzs? Economic Inquiry,53, 773–789.
Hudson, J. (2007). Be known by the company you keep: Citations—quality or chance? Scientometrics,71, 231–238.
Johnston, D. W., Piatti, M., & Torgler, B. (2013). Citation success over time: Theory or empirics? Scientometrics,95, 1023–1029.
Kalaitzidakis, P., Mamuneas, T. P., & Stengos, T. (2011). An updated ranking of academic journals in economics. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique,44, 1525–1538.
Kalaitzidakis, P., Theofanis, P. M., & Thanasis, S. (2003). Rankings of academic journals and institutions in economics. Journal of the European Economic Association,1, 1346–1366.
Kodrzycki, Y. K., & Yu, P. (2006). New approaches to ranking economics journals. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy,5(1), 1–44.
Landes, W. M. (2003). The test of time: Does 20th century American art survive? In V. A. Ginsburgh (Ed.), Economics of art and culture invited papers at the 12th international conference of the association of cultural economics international (contributions to economic analysis, volume 260) (pp. 143–164). London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. London: Sage.
Lawani, S. M. (1986). Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research. Scientometrics,9(1–2), 13–25.
Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2008). Patterns of annual citation of highly cited articles and the prediction of their citation ranking: A comparison across subjects. Scientometrics,77(1), 41–60.
Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academic of Sciences,16, 317–323.
Mayer, T. (2004). Comment on “Dry holes in economic research”. Kyklos,57, 621–625.
Mazlish, B. (1982). The quality of “the quality of science”: An evaluation. In M. C. La Follette (Ed.), Quality in science (pp. 48–67). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Merton, R. K. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. American Sociological Review,22, 635–659.
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science,159, 56–63.
Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis,79, 606–623.
Mingers, J. (2008). Exploring the dynamics of journal citations: Modelling with s-curves. Journal of the Operational Research Society,59, 1013–1025.
Ohba, N., & Nakao, K. (2012). Sleeping beauties in ophthalmology. Scientometrics,93(2), 253–264.
Ponomarev, I. V., Williams, D. E., Hackett, C. J., Schnell, J. D., & Haak, L. L. (2014). Predicting highly cited papers: A method for early detection of candidate breakthroughs. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 81, 49–55.
Price, D. D. S. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
Price, D. D. S. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,27, 292–306.
Putnam, L. L. (2009). Symbolic capital and academic fields: An alternative discourse on journal rankings. Management Communication Quarterly,23, 127–134.
Redner, S. (1998). How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems,4(2), 131–134.
Redner, S. (2005). Citation statistics from 110 years of physical review. Physics Today,58(6), 49–53.
Roth, C., Wu, J., & Lozano, S. (2012). Assessing impact and quality from local dynamics of citation networks. Journal of Informetrics,6(1), 111–120.
Sangwal, K. (2013). Growth dynamics of citations of cumulative papers of individual authors according to progressive nucleation mechanism: Concept of citation acceleration. Information Processing and Management,49(4), 757–772.
Simmons, L. M, Jr, & West, G. B. (1981). Physics, philosophy, leadership, policy: An interview with Peter Carruthers. Los Alamos Science,2, 133–143.
Stack, S. (2004). Gender, children and research productivity? Research in Higher Education,45, 891–920.
Stigler, G. J., Stigler, S. M., & Friedland, C. (1995). The journals of economics. Journal of Political Economy,103, 331–359.
Torgler, B., & Piatti, M. (2013). A century of American economic review: Insights on critical factors in journal publishing. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave/MacMillan.
Wall, H. (2009). Journal rankings in economics: handle with care. Working paper 2009-014A, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
Wallace, M. L., Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2009). Modeling a century of citation distributions. Journal of Informetrics,3(4), 296–303.
Watts, C., & Gilbert, N. (2011). Does cumulative advantage affect collective learning in science? An agent-based simulation. Scientometrics.89(1), 437–463.
