Estimating canopy density parameters time-series for winter wheat using uas mounted lidar

Drone; Gap fraction; Green area index; Leaf area index; Light detection and ranging; Multispectral; Plant area index; Unmanned aircraft system; Winter wheat; Budget control; Crops; Forestry; Optical sensors; Parameter estimation; Reflection; Remote sensing; Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV); Above ground biomass; Airborne lidar systems; Chlorophyll contents; Destructive measurements; Ground measurements; Spectral reflectances; Optical radar

Abstract :

[en] Monitoring of canopy density with related metrics such as leaf area index (LAI) makes a significant contribution to understanding and predicting processes in the soil–plant–atmosphere system and to indicating crop health and potential yield for farm management. Remote sensing methods using optical sensors that rely on spectral reflectance to calculate LAI have become more mainstream due to easy entry and availability. Methods with vegetation indices (VI) based on mul-tispectral reflectance data essentially measure the green area index (GAI) or response to chlorophyll content of the canopy surface and not the entire aboveground biomass that may be present from non-green elements that are key to fully assessing the carbon budget. Methods with light detection and ranging (LiDAR) have started to emerge using gap fraction (GF) to estimate the plant area index (PAI) based on canopy density. These LiDAR methods have the main advantage of being sensitive to both green and non-green plant elements. They have primarily been applied to forest cover with manned airborne LiDAR systems (ALS) and have yet to be used extensively with crops such as winter wheat using LiDAR on unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). This study contributes to a better understanding of the potential of LiDAR as a tool to estimate canopy structure in precision farming. The LiDAR method proved to have a high to moderate correlation in spatial variation to the multi-spectral method. The LiDAR-derived PAI values closely resemble the SunScan Ceptometer GAI ground measurements taken early in the growing season before major stages of senescence. Later in the growing season, when the canopy density was at its highest, a possible overestimation may have occurred. This was most likely due to the chosen flight parameters not providing the best depictions of canopy density with consideration of the LiDAR’s perspective, as the ground-based destructive measurements provided lower values of PAI. Additionally, a distinction between total LiDAR-derived PAI, multispectral-derived GAI, and brown area index (BAI) is made to show how the active and passive optical sensor methods used in this study can complement each other throughout the growing season. © 2021 by the authors. Li-censee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Disciplines :

Earth sciences & physical geography
Environmental sciences & ecology

Author, co-author :

Bates, J. S.; Institute of Bio-and Geosciences Agrosphere (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, 52428, Germany

Montzka, C.; Institute of Bio-and Geosciences Agrosphere (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, 52428, Germany

Schmidt, M.; Institute of Bio-and Geosciences Agrosphere (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, 52428, Germany

Jonard, François ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de géographie > Systèmes d'information géographiques

Language :

English

Title :

Estimating canopy density parameters time-series for winter wheat using uas mounted lidar

Publication date :

2021

Journal title :

Remote Sensing

eISSN :

2072-4292

Publisher :

MDPI AG

Volume :

Issue :

Pages :

1-23

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Available on ORBi :

since 21 September 2021

Statistics

Number of views

67 (12 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

22 (5 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Yan, G.; Hu, R.; Luo, J.; Weiss, M.; Jiang, H.; Mu, X.; Xie, D.; Zhang, W. Review of indirect optical measurements of leaf area index: Recent advances, challenges, and perspectives. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2019, 265, 390–411, doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.11.033.
Zheng, G.; Moskal, L.M. Retrieving Leaf Area Index (LAI) using remote sensing: Theories, methods and sensors. Sensors 2009, 9, 2719–2745, doi:10.3390/s90402719.
Fang, H.; Baret, F.; Plummer, S.; Schaepman-Strub, G. An overview of global Leaf Area Index (LAI): Methods, products, vali-dation, and applications. Rev. Geophys. 2019, 57, 739–799, doi:10.1029/2018rg000608.
Pasqualotto, N.; Delegido, J.; Van Wittenberghe, S.; Rinaldi, M.; Moreno, J. Multi-crop green LAI estimation with a new simple Sentinel-2 LAI Index (SeLI). Sensors 2019, 19, 904, doi:10.3390/s19040904.
Delegido, J.; Verrelst, J.; Rivera, J.P.; Ruiz-Verdú, A.; Moreno, J. Brown and green LAI mapping through spectral indices. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation 2015, 35 Part B, 350–358, doi:10.1016/j.jag.2014.10.001.
Liu, S.; Baret, F.; Abichou, M.; Boudon, F.; Thomas, S.; Zhao, K.; Fournier, C.; Andrieu, B.; Irfan, K.; Hemmerlé, M.; et al. Estimating wheat green area index from ground-based LiDAR measurement using a 3D canopy structure model. Agric. For. Mete-orol. 2017, 247, 12–20.
Stark, B.; Zhao, T.; Chen, Y. An analysis of the effect of the bidirectional reflectance distribution function on remote sensing imagery accuracy from Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), IEEE, Arlington, VA, USA, 7–10 June 2016; pp. 1342–1350.
Baret, F.; de Solan, B.; Lopez-Lozano, R.; Ma, K.; Weiss, M. GAI Estimates of row crops from downward looking digital photos taken perpendicular to rows at 57.5° zenith angle: Theoretical considerations based on 3D architecture models and application to wheat crops. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2010, 150, 1393–1401.
Kokaly, R.F.; Asner, G.P.; Ollinger, S.V.; Martin, M.E.; Wessman, C.A. Characterizing canopy biochemistry from imaging spec-troscopy and its application to ecosystem studies. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113, S78–S91, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2008.10.018.
Bakuła, K.; Salach, A.; Wziątek, D.Z.; Ostrowski, W.; Górski, K.; Kurczyński, Z. Evaluation of the accuracy of lidar data acquired using a UAS for levee monitoring: Preliminary results. Int. J. Remote. Sens. 2017, 38, 2921–2937, doi:10.1080/01431161.2016.1277044.
Leblanc, S.G.; Chen, J.M.; Fernandes, R.; Deering, D.W.; Conley, A. Methodology comparison for canopy structure parameters extraction from digital hemispherical photography in boreal forests. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2005, 129, 187–207, doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.09.006.
Van Gardingen, P.; Jackson, G.; Hernandez-Daumas, S.; Russell, G.; Sharp, L. Leaf Area Index estimates obtained for clumped canopies using hemispherical photography. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1999, 94, 243–257, doi:10.1016/s0168-1923(99)00018-0.
Ariza-Carricondo, C.; Di Mauro, F.; De Beeck, M.O.; Roland, M.; Gielen, B.; Vitale, D.; Ceulemans, R.; Papale, D. A comparison of different methods for assessing leaf area index in four canopy types. Cent. Eur. For. J. 2019, 65, 67–80, doi:10.2478/forj-2019-0011.
Welles, J.M.; Cohen, S. Canopy structure measurement by gap fraction analysis using commercial instrumentation. J. Exp. Bot. 1996, 47, 1335–1342.
Broadhead, J.; Muxworthy, A.; Ong, C.; Black, C. Comparison of methods for determining leaf area in tree rows. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2003, 115, 151–161, doi:10.1016/s0168-1923(02)00212-5.
Kalacska, M.; Calvo-Alvarado, J.C.; Sanchez-Azofeifa, G.A. Calibration and assessment of seasonal changes in leaf area index of a tropical dry forest in different stages of succession. Tree Physiol. 2005, 25, 733–744, doi:10.1093/treephys/25.6.733.
Olivas, P.C.; Oberbauer, S.F.; Clark, D.B.; Clark, D.A.; Ryan, M.G.; O’Brien, J.J.; Ordoñez, H. Comparison of direct and indirect methods for assessing Leaf Area Index across a tropical rain forest landscape. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2013, 177, 110–116, doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.04.010.
Kobayashi, H.; Ryu, Y.; Baldocchi, D.D.; Welles, J.M.; Norman, J.M. On the correct estimation of gap fraction: How to remove scattered radiation in gap fraction measurements? Agric. For. Meteorol. 2013, 174–175, 170–183.
Weiss, M.; Baret, F.; Smith, G.; Jonckheere, I.; Coppin, P. Review of methods for in situ leaf area index (LAI) determination. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2004, 121, 37–53, doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.08.001.
Fang, H.; Li, W.; Wei, S.; Jiang, C. Seasonal variation of leaf area index (LAI) over paddy rice fields in NE China: Intercomparison of destructive sampling, LAI-2200, digital hemispherical photography (DHP), and AccuPAR methods. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2014, 198–199, 126–141, doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.08.005.
Martinez, B.; García-Haro, F.; Camacho de Coca, F. Derivation of high-resolution leaf area index maps in support of validation activities: Application to the cropland Barrax site. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2009, 149, 130–145, doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.07.014.
Richardson, A.D.; Dail, D.B.; Hollinger, D. Leaf Area Index uncertainty estimates for model–data fusion applications. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2011, 151, 1287–1292, doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.05.009.
Verger, A.; Martínez, B.; Coca, F.C.; García-Haro, F.J. Accuracy assessment of fraction of vegetation cover and leaf area index estimates from pragmatic methods in a cropland area. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2009, 30, 2685–2704.
Woodgate, W.; Jones, S.D.; Suarez, L.; Hill, M.J.; Armston, J.D.; Wilkes, P.; Soto-Berelov, M.; Haywood, A.; Mellor, A. Understanding the variability in ground-based methods for retrieving canopy openness, gap fraction, and leaf area index in diverse forest systems. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2015, 205, 83–95, doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.02.012.
Chiroro, D.; Armston, J.; Makuvaro, V. An investigation on the utility of the Sunscan ceptometer in estimating the leaf area index of a sugarcane canopy. Proc. South Afr. Technol. Assoc. 2006, 80, 143.
Dhami, H.; Yu, K.; Xu, T.; Zhu, Q.; Dhakal, K.; Friel, J.; Li, S.; Tokekar, P. Crop height and plot estimation from unmanned aerial vehicles using 3D LiDAR. arXiv 2020, arXiv:1910.14031.
Neuville, R.; Bates, J.S.; Jonard, F. Estimating forest structure from UAV-mounted LiDAR point cloud using machine learning. Remote. Sens. 2021, 13, 352, doi:10.3390/rs13030352.
Meng, X.; Shang, N.; Zhang, X.; Li, C.; Zhao, K.; Qiu, X.; Weeks, E. Photogrammetric UAV Mapping of Terrain under Dense Coastal Vegetation: An object-oriented classification ensemble algorithm for classification and terrain correction. Remote. Sens. 2017, 9, 1187, doi:10.3390/rs9111187.
Huang, Z.; Zou, Y. Inversion of Forest Leaf Area Index based on Lidar data. TELKOMNIKA Telecommun. Comput. Electron. Con-trol. 2016, 14, 44, doi:10.12928/telkomnika.v14i2A.4379.
Korhonen, L.; Korpela, I.; Heiskanen, J.; Maltamo, M. Airborne discrete-return LIDAR data in the estimation of vertical canopy cover, angular canopy closure and leaf area index. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2011, 115, 1065–1080, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2010.12.011.
Morsdorf, F.; Kötz, B.; Meier, E.; Itten, K.; Allgöwer, B. Estimation of LAI and fractional cover from small footprint airborne laser scanning data based on gap fraction. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2006, 104, 50–61, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.04.019.
Richardson, J.J.; Moskal, L.M.; Kim, S.-H. Modeling approaches to estimate effective leaf area index from aerial discrete-return LIDAR. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2009, 149, 1152–1160, doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.02.007.
Sabol, J.; Patočka, Z.; Mikita, T. Usage of Lidar Data for Leaf Area Index estimation. Geosci. Eng. 2014, 60, 10–18, doi:10.2478/gse-2014-0013.
Sasaki, T.; Imanishi, J.; Ioki, K.; Song, Y.; Morimoto, Y. Estimation of leaf area index and gap fraction in two broad-leaved forests by using small-footprint airborne LiDAR. Landsc. Ecol. Eng. 2013, 12, 117–127, doi:10.1007/s11355-013-0222-y.
Rogers, S.R.; Manning, I.; Livingstone, W. Comparing the spatial accuracy of digital surface models from four unoccupied aerial systems: Photogrammetry versus LiDAR. Remote. Sens. 2020, 12, 2806, doi:10.3390/rs12172806.
Becirevic, D.; Klingbeil, L.; Honecker, A.; Schumann, H.; Rascher, U.; Léon, J.; Kuhlmann, H. On the derivation of crop heights from multitemporal UAV based imagery. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2019, 95–102, doi:10.5194/isprs-annals-iv-2-w5-95-2019.
Cao, L.; Liu, H.; Fu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Shen, X.; Ruan, H. Comparison of UAV LiDAR and digital aerial photogrammetry point clouds for estimating forest structural attributes in subtropical planted forests. Forests 2019, 10, 145, doi:10.3390/f10020145.
Davidson, L.; Mills, J.P.; Haynes, I.; Augarde, C.; Bryan, P.; Douglas, M. Airborne to UAS LiDAR: An analysis of UAS LiDAR ground control targets. ISPRS Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2019, XLII-2/W13, 255–262, doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-w13-255-2019.
Bukowiecki, J.; Rose, T.; Ehlers, R.; Kage, H. High-throughput prediction of whole season green area index in winter wheat with an airborne multispectral sensor. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 10, 10, doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01798.
Deery, D.M.; Rebetzke, G.J.; Jimenez-Berni, J.A.; Condon, A.G.; Smith, D.J.; Bechaz, K.M.; Bovill, W.D. Ground-Based LiDAR improves phenotypic repeatability of above-ground biomass and crop growth rate in wheat. Plant Phenomics 2020, 2020, 1–11, doi:10.34133/2020/8329798.
Wang, D.; Xin, X.; Shao, Q.; Brolly, M.; Zhu, Z.; Chen, J. Modeling aboveground biomass in hulunber grassland ecosystem by using unmanned aerial vehicle discrete lidar. Sensors 2017, 17, 180.
Fu, Z.; Jindi, W.; Jinling, S.; Zhou, H.; Pang, Y.; Chen, B. Estimation of forest canopy leaf area index using MODIS, MISR, and LiDAR observations. J. Appl. Remote. Sens. 2011, 5, 53530, doi:10.1117/1.3594171.
Hilker, T.; Wulder, M.A.; Coops, N.C. Update of forest inventory data with LIDAR and high spatial resolution satellite imagery. Can. J. Remote. Sens. 2008, 34, 5–12, doi:10.5589/m08-004.
Jensen, J.L.; Humes, K.S.; Vierling, L.A.; Hudak, A.T. Discrete return lidar-based prediction of leaf area index in two conifer forests. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2008, 112, 3947–3957, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2008.07.001.
Ma, H.; Song, J.; Wang, J.; Xiao, Z.; Fu, Z. Improvement of spatially continuous forest LAI retrieval by integration of discrete airborne LiDAR and remote sensing multi-angle optical data. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2014, 60–70, doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.01.009.
Bogena, H.; Montzka, C.; Huisman, J.; Graf, A.; Schmidt, M.; Stockinger, M.; Von Hebel, C.; Hendricks-Franssen, H.; Van Der Kruk, J.; Tappe, W.; et al. The TERENO-Rur hydrological observatory: A multiscale multi-compartment research platform for the advancement of hydrological science. Vadose Zone J. 2018, 17, 180055, doi:10.2136/vzj2018.03.0055.
Brogi, C.; Huisman, J.A.; Herbst, M.; Weihermüller, L.; Klosterhalfen, A.; Montzka, C.; Reichenau, T.G.; Vereecken, H. Simulation of spatial variability in crop leaf area index and yield using agroecosystem modeling and geophysics-based quantitative soil information. Vadose Zone J. 2020, 19, e20009.
Hoffmeister, D.; Waldhoff, G.; Korres, W.; Curdt, C.; Bareth, G. Crop height variability detection in a single field by multi-temporal terrestrial laser scanning. Precis. Agric. 2016, 17, 296–312.
Gielen, B.; Acosta, M.; Altimir, N.; Buchmann, N.; Cescatti, A.; Ceschia, E.; Fleck, S.; Hörtnagl, L.; Klumpp, K.; Kolari, P.; et al. Ancillary vegetation measurements at ICOS ecosystem stations. Int. Agrophysics 2018, 32, 645–664, doi:10.1515/intag-2017-0048.
Chen, J.M.; Rich, P.M.; Gower, S.T.; Norman, J.M.; Plummer, S. Leaf area index of boreal forests: Theory, techniques, and meas-urements. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 1997, 102, 29429–29443, doi:10.1029/97jd01107.
Zhang, W.; Qi, J.; Wan, P.; Wang, H.; Xie, D.; Wang, X.; Yan, G. An easy-to-use airborne LiDAR data filtering method based on cloth simulation. Remote. Sens. 2016, 8, 501, doi:10.3390/rs8060501.
Ali, M.; Montzka, C.; Stadler, A.; Menz, G.; Thonfeld, F.; Vereecken, H. Estimation and validation of RapidEye-based time-series of leaf area index for winter wheat in the Rur Catchment (Germany). Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 2808–2831.
Thorp, K.R.; Hunsaker, D.J.; French, A.N. Assimilating leaf area index estimates from remote sensing into the simulations of a cropping systems model. Trans. ASABE 2010, 53, 251–262.
Ryu, J.-H.; Na, S.-I.; Cho, J. Inter-comparison of normalized difference vegetation index measured from different footprint sizes in cropland. Remote. Sens. 2020, 12, 2980, doi:10.3390/rs12182980.
Khaliq, A.; Comba, L.; Biglia, A.; Ricauda Aimonino, D.; Chiaberge, M.; Gay, P. Comparison of satellite and UAV-based multi-spectral imagery for vineyard variability assessment. Remote. Sens. 2019, 11, 436, doi:10.3390/rs11040436.
Tan, C.-W.; Zhang, P.-P.; Zhou, X.-X.; Wang, Z.-X.; Xu, Z.-Q.; Mao, W.; Li, W.-X.; Huo, Z.-Y.; Guo, W.-S.; Yun, F. Quantitative monitoring of leaf area index in wheat of different plant types by integrating NDVI and Beer-Lambert law. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 929, doi:10.1038/s41598-020-57750-z.
Solberg, S.; Næsset, E.; Hanssen, K.H.; Christiansen, E. Mapping defoliation during a severe insect attack on Scots pine using airborne laser scanning. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2006, 102, 364–376, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.03.001.