Crotti Junior. A., C. Debruyne, and D. O'Sullivan. 2017. Using a Block Metaphor for Representing R2RML Mappings. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Visualization and Interaction for Ontologies and Linked Data colocated with the 16th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2017), Vienna, Austria, October 22, 2017. 1-12. http: //ceur-ws. org/Vol-1947/paper01. pdf
Crotti Junior. A., C. Debruyne, and D. O'Sullivan. 2018. Juma Uplift: Using a Block Metaphor for Representing Uplift Mappings. In 2018 IEEE 12th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC). 211-218. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/ICSC. 2018. 00037
K. Alexander, R. Cyganiak, M. Hausenblas, and J. Zhao. 2011. Describing Linked Datasets with the VoID Vocabulary. Retrieved November 2018 from https: //www. w3. org/TR/void/.
Christopher Andrews, Debra Burleson, Kristi Dunks, Kimberly Elmore, Carie S. Lambert, Brett Oppegaard, Elizabeth E. Pohland, Danielle Saad, Jon S. Scharer, Ronda L. Wery, Monica Wesley, and Gregory Zobel. 2012. A New Method in User-Centered Design: Collaborative Prototype Design Process (CPDP). Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 42, 2 (2012), 123-142. https: //doi. org/ 10. 2190/TW. 42. 2. c arXiv: https: //doi. org/10. 2190/TW. 42. 2. c
Danielle A Becker and Lauren Yannotta. 2013. Modeling a library web site redesign process: Developing a user-centered web site through usability testing. Information Technology and Libraries 32, 1 (2013), 6-22.
T. Berners-Lee. 2006. Linked Data. Retrieved November 2018 from https: //www. w3. org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.
T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila. 2001. The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284, 5 (2001), 1-5.
C. Bizer, T. Heath, and T. Berners-Lee. 2009. Linked Data-The Story So Far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 5, 3 (2009), 1-22.
D. Brickley and L. Miller. 2014. FOAF Vocabulary Specification 0. 99. Retrieved November 2018 from http: //xmlns. com/foaf/spec/.
J. J. Carroll, C. Bizer, P. Hayes, and P. Stickler. 2005. Named graphs. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 3, 4 (2005), 247-267.
P. Ciccarese, S. Soiland-Reyes, K. Belhajjame, A. J. Gray, C. Goble, and T. Clark. 2013. PAV ontology: provenance, authoring and versioning. Journal of Biomedical Semantics 4, 1 (2013), 37.
Panel 2] Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems [CCSDS. 2002. CCSDS 650. 0-B-1: Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS). Blue Book. Issue 1, 1-1. http: //ssdoo. gsfc. nasa. gov/nost/wwwclassic/documents/ pdf/CCSDS-650. 0-B-1. pdf.
J. Daniel. 2011. Sampling Essentials: Practical Guidelines for making Sampling Choices (1st ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd., CA, Chapter Choosing Between Non-Probability Sampling and Probability Sampling, 66-80.
S. Das, S. Sundara, and R. Cyganiak. 2012. R2RML: RDB to RDF Mapping Language. W3C Recommendation 27 September 2012. Retrieved January 2019 from https: //www. w3. org/TR/r2rml/.
L. Ding, J. Shinavier, T. Finin, and D. L. McGuinness. 2010. owl: sameAs and Linked Data: An empirical study. In Proceedings of the Second Web Science Conference.
L. Faulkner. 2003. Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 35, 3 (01 Aug 2003), 379-383. https: //doi. org/10. 3758/BF03195514
Alfio Ferrara, Andriy Nikolov, and François Scharffe. 2011. Data linking for the semantic web. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS) 7, 3 (2011), 46-76.
T. Gibson, K. Schuchardt, and E. Stephan. 2009. Application of named graphs towards custom provenance views. In Paper presented at the First workshop on on Theory and practice of provenance, San Francisco, CA.
B. M. Gonzales. 2014. Linking Libraries to the Web: Linked Data and the Future of the Bibliographic Record. Information Technology and Libraries 33, 4 (2014), 10-22.
P. Groth, Y. Gil, J. Cheney, and S. Miles. 2012. Requirements for provenance on the web. International Journal of Digital Curation. nternational Journal of Digital Curation 7, 1 (2012), 39-56.
H. Halpin, P. J. Hayes, J. P. McCusker, D. L. McGuinness, and H. S. Thompson. 2010. When owl: sameAs Isn-t the Same: An Analysis of Identity in Linked Data. In Proceedings of the 9th International Semantic Web Conference.
H. Halpin, I Herman, and P. J. Hayes. 2010. When owl: sameAs Isn-t the Same: An Analysis of Identity Links on the Semantic Web. Retrieved January 2019 from http: //www. w3. org/2009/12/rdf-ws/papers/ws21.
O. Hartig and J. Zhao. 2010. Publishing and Consuming Provenance Metadata on the Web of Linked Data. In Paper presented at the IPAW 2010, Berlin, Heidelberg.
R. Hastings. 2015. Linked Data in Libraries: Status and Future Direction. Computers in Libraries 35, 9 (2015), 12-16.
A. Hevner and S. Chatterjee. 2010. Design research in Information Systems: Theory and Practice. Springer Publishing, New York.
W. Hwang and G. Salvendy. 2010. Number of People Required for Usability Evaluation: The 10&Plusmn;2 Rule. Commun. ACM 53, 5 (May 2010), 130-133. https: //doi. org/10. 1145/1735223. 1735255
J. G. Kim and M. Hausenblas. 2015. 5 Star Open Data. Retrieved January 2019 from https: //5stardata. info/en/.
S. Kumar, M. Ujjal, and B. Utpal. 2013. Exposing MARC 21 Format for Bibliographic Data As Linked Data With Provenance. Journal of Library Metadata 13, 2-3 (2013), 212-229.
T. Lebo, S. Sahoo, D. McGuinness, K. Belhajjame, and D. et al Corsar. 2013. Provo: The prov ontology. W3C Recommendation. World Wide Web Consortium. Retrieved November 2018 from https: //www. w3. org/TR/prov-o/.
R. J. Lewis. 2002. Psychometric Evaluation of the PSSUQ Using Data from Five Years of Usability Studies. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 14, 3-4 (2002), 463-488.
C. Li and S. Sugimoto. 2014. Provenance Description of Metadata using PROV with PREMIS for Long-term Use of Metadata. In Proceedings of the IInternational Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
R. Macefield. 2009. How to Specify the Participant Group Size for Usability Studies: A Practitioner's Guide. J. Usability Studies 5, 1 (Nov. 2009), 34-45. http: //dl. Acm. org/citation. cfm?id=2835425. 2835429
L. McKenna, C. Debruyne, and D. O'Sullivan. 2018. Understanding the Position of Information Professionals with regards to Linked Data: A Survey of Libraries, Archives and Museums. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE on Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. 7-16.
E. T. Mitchell. 2016. Library Linked Data: Early Activity and Development. Library Technology Reports 52, 1 (2016), 5-33.
L. Moreau, B. Clifford, J. Freire, J. Futrelle, and Y. et al Gil. 2011. The Open Provenance Model core specification (v1. 1). Future Generation Computer Systems 27, 6 (2011), 743-756.
L. Moreau, P. Groth, J. Cheney, T. Lebo, and S. Miles. 2015. The rationale of PROV. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 35 (2015), 235-257.
P. Neish. 2015. Linked data: what is it and why should you care The Australian Library Journal 64, 1 (2015), 3-10.
Georg Neubauer. 2017. Visualization of typed links in Linked Data. Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Asterreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare 70 (09 2017), 179. https: //doi. org/10. 31263/voebm. v70i2. 1748
J. Nielsen. 2000. Why You Only Need to Test with 5 Users. Retrieved January 2019 from https: //www. nngroup. com/articles/ why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/.
J. Nielsen. 2012. Thinking Aloud: The No. 1 Usability Tool. Retrieved January 2019 from https: //www. nngroup. com/articles/thinking-aloud-the-1-usability-tool/.
Library of Congress. 2018. PREMIS: Preservation Metadata Maintenance Activity. Retrieved January 2019 from http: //www. loc. gov/standards/premis/.
L. Papaleo, N. Pernelle, F. Saïs, and C. Dumont. 2014. Logical Detection of Invalid SameAs Statements in RDF Data. In Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, K. Janowicz, S. Schlobach, P. Lambrix, and E. Hyvönen (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 373-384.
S. S. Sahoo and A. P. Sheth. 2009. Provenir ontology: Towards a Framework for eScience Provenance Management. In Microsoft eScience Workshop, Pittsburgh, PA Oct 15-17.
K. Smith-Yoshimura. 2018. Analysis of 2018 international linked data survey for implementers. Code4Lib 42 (2018).
D. Travis. 2011. ISO 13407 is dead. Long live ISO 9241-210! Retrieved from January 2019 https: //www. userfocus. co. uk/articles/iso-13407-is-dead. html.
M. van den Haak, M. De Jong, and P. J. Schellens. 2003. Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud protocols: Testing the usability of an online library catalogue. Behaviour & Information Technology 22, 5 (2003), 339-351. https: //doi. org/10. 1080/0044929031000 arXiv: https: //doi. org/10. 1080/0044929031000
