Between entrepreneurs and workers: Cleavages and compromises in rationales and policy solutions regarding ‘dependent contractors’

Florin, Louis; Pichault, François

doi:10.1177/0143831X211030345

Article (Scientific journals)

Between entrepreneurs and workers: Cleavages and compromises in rationales and policy solutions regarding ‘dependent contractors’

Florin, Louis; Pichault, François

2021 • In Economic and Industrial Democracy

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/262380

DOI
10.1177/0143831X211030345

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

Between_entrepreneurs_and_workers-final-17-06_with_names.pdf

Author preprint (425.93 kB)

Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

dependent contractors; employment; european union

Abstract :

[en] The emergence of dependent contractors challenges the existing institutions regarding social protection and labour regulation. This article aims at identifying the political narratives that explain the emergence of New Forms of Employment (NFE) and dependent contracting along with the policy solutions proposed by the social partners at the EU and international level. By analysing policy documents from the social partners through the lens of a qualitative version of the Narrative Policy Framework (NPF), the authors indentify two distinct narratives – ‘devaluation of work’ and ‘entrepreneurship and flexibility’. The authors show how these rationales lead to various policy solutions and identify oppositions and possible compromise.

Research center :

LENTIC - Laboratoire d'Études sur les Nouvelles Formes de Travail, l'Innovation et le Changement - ULiège

Disciplines :

Sociology & social sciences

Author, co-author :

Florin, Louis ; Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC Recherche

Pichault, François ; Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC Liège : UER > UER Management : Gestion des ressources humaines

Language :

English

Title :

Between entrepreneurs and workers: Cleavages and compromises in rationales and policy solutions regarding ‘dependent contractors’

Publication date :

28 July 2021

Journal title :

Economic and Industrial Democracy

ISSN :

0143-831X

eISSN :

1461-7099

Publisher :

SAGE, Thousand Oaks, United States - California

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Additional URL :

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X211030345

Available on ORBi :

since 03 August 2021

Statistics

Number of views

69 (6 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

2 (2 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Abdelnour S, (2013) L’entrepreneuriat au service des politiques sociales: La fabrication du consensus politique sur le dispositif de l’auto-entrepreneur. Sociétés contemporaines 89(1): 131–154.
ACCA (2020) Changing Environment of Self-Employed – event report. January. Brussels. Available at: www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/ACCA_Global/professional-insights/PUBLIC_AFFAIRS/Changing%20environmet%20of%20Self-Employed-%2028%20January%202020%20event%20REPORT%20FINAL.pdf (accessed 28 April 2020).
Akrich M, Callon M, Latour B, (eds) (2013) Sociologie de la traduction: Textes fondateurs. Sciences sociales. Paris: Presses des Mines.
Bergvall-Kåreborn B, Howcroft D, (2013) ‘The future’s bright, the future’s mobile’: A study of Apple and Google mobile application developers. Work, Employment and Society 27(6): 964–981.
Beuker L, Pichault F, (2020) Quelles formes de dialogue social pour les travailleurs autonomes ? Revue RH et M: Ressources Humaines et Management 78(Juillet). Paris. Available at: https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/247175 (accessed 24 February 2021).
Blum S, Kuhlmann J, (2019) Stories of how to give or take – towards a typology of social policy reform narratives. Policy and Society 38(3): 339–355.
Business Europe (2018a) Business Europe response on consultation on second phase consultation of social partners on the European Pillar of Social Rights. Brussels.
Business Europe (2018b) Position Paper on the Council Recommendation on access to social protection. Brussels.
Business Europe (2019) The Future of the Social Dimension in Europe. Available at: www.businesseurope.eu/sites/buseur/files/media/reports_and_studies/final_social_affairs_brochure_2019_0.pdf (accessed 5 February 2020).
Cantillon B, (2019) The European Pillar of Social Rights: Ten arguments for prioritising principle 14 on minimum incomes. Working Paper No. 19 / 02, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
Cappelli P, Keller J, (2013) Classifying work in the new economy. Academy of Management Review 38(4): 575–596.
Carver L, Doellgast V, (2020) Dualism or solidarity? Conditions for union success in regulating precarious work. European Journal of Industrial Relations. Epub ahead of print 18 December 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0959680120978916.
Cascio WF, Boudreau JW, (2017) Talent management of nonstandard employees. In: Collings DG, Mellahi K, Cascio WF, (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Talent Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Castel R, (2014) Les Métamorphoses de la question sociale: Une chronique du salariat. Paris: Fayard.
Cox RH, (2001) The social construction of an imperative: Why welfare reform happened in Denmark and the Netherlands but not in Germany. World Politics 53(3): 463–498.
DARES (2003) Les Politiques de l’emploi et du marché du travail. Repères. Paris: La Découverte. Available at: www.cairn.info/les-politiques-de-l-emploi-et-du-marche-du-travail–9782707141316.htm
Esping-Andersen G, (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
ETUC (2018) ETUC Position on a Second stage consultation of the social partners on possible action addressing the challenges of access to social protection for people in all forms of employment. Brussels.
ETUC (2019) ETUC Action Programme 2019–2023. Brussels.
Eurofound (2002) ‘Economically Dependent Workers’, Employment Law and Industrial Relations. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2002/economically-dependent-workers-employment-law-and-industrial-relations (accessed 3 June 2021).
Eurofound (2017) Exploring Self-Employment in the European Union. EF 1718EN. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Eurofound (2019) Labour Market Segmentation: Piloting New Empirical and Policy Analyses. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Florin L, Pichault F, (2020) Emerging forms of precariousness related to autonomy at work: Toward an empirical typology. Frontiers in Sociology 5: 34.
Giddens A, (1999) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Oxford: Wiley.
Gray G, Jones MD, (2016) A qualitative narrative policy framework? Examining the policy narratives of US campaign finance regulatory reform. Public Policy and Administration 31(3): 193–220.
Hemerijck A, (2013) Changing Welfare States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hemerijck A, (2018) Social investment as a policy paradigm. Journal of European Public Policy 25(6): 810–827.
ILO (2017a) Dependent self-employment: Trends, challenges and policy responses in the EU. ILO Employment Working Paper No. 228.
ILO (2017b) Inception Report for the Global Commission on the Future of Work. Geneva: International Labour Office. Available at: www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—dgreports/—cabinet/documents/publication/wcms_591502.pdf (accessed 9 February 2021).
IOE (2017) Understanding the Future of Work. IOE Brief. Geneva.
IOE (2019) IOE Policy Paper on Industrial Relations and Independent Contractors. Geneva.
ITUC (2017) The Future of Work. Available at: www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/the_future_of_work_web.pdf (accessed 5 February 2020).
ITUC (2019) ITUC Frontline Campaigns and Four Pillars for Action 2020. Available at: www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/2019-10_ituc_frontlinesandpillars_2020_report-en.pdf (accessed 5 February 2020).
Jones MD, Radaelli CM, (2015) The Narrative Policy Framework: Child or monster? Critical Policy Studies 9(3): 339–355.
Koene BAS, Pichault F, (2021) Embedded fixers, pragmatic experimenters, dedicated activists: Evaluating third-party labour market actors’ initiatives for skilled project-based workers in the gig economy. British Journal of Industrial Relations 59(2): 444–473.
Leighton P, Brown D, (2014) Future working: The rise of Europe’s independent professionals. Available at: http://crse.co.uk/research/future-working-rise-europe%E2%80%99s-independent-professionals (accessed 20 October 2020).
McKeown JT, (2015) What’s in a name? The value of ‘entrepreneurs’ compared to ‘self- employed’.. But what about ‘freelancing’ or ‘IPro’? In: Burke A, (ed.) The Handbook of Research on Freelancing and Self-Employment. Dublin: Senate Hall Academic Publishing, pp. 121–134.
McKeown T, Pichault F, (2021) Independent professionals as talent: Evidence from individual views of working as a contractor. Human Resource Management 60(2): 313–328.
Marsden D, (2004) The ‘network economy’ and models of the employment contract. British Journal of Industrial Relations 42(4): 659–684.
Méda D, (2015) Le Travail. Paris: PUF.
Mena S, Suddaby R, (2016) Theorization as institutional work: The dynamics of roles and practices. Human Relations 69(8): 1669–1708.
Menegatti E, (2019) The evolving concept of ‘worker’ in EU law. Italian Labour Law e-Journal 12(1): 71–83.
Newlands G, Lutz C, Fieseler C, (2018) Collective action and provider classification in the sharing economy. New Technology, Work and Employment 33(3): 250–267.
Oliver RJ, Morelock AL, (2021) Insider and outsider support for unions across advanced industrial democracies: Paradoxes of solidarity. European Journal of Industrial Relations 27(2): 167–183.
Osnowitz D, (2010) Freelancing Expertise: Contract Professionals in the New Economy, 1st edn. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Oswalt MM, (2016) Improvisational unionism. California Law Review 104(3).
Pernicka S, (2006) Organizing the self-employed: Theoretical considerations and empirical findings. European Journal of Industrial Relations 12(2): 125–142.
Pernicka S, Reichel A, (2014) An institutional logics approach to the heterogeneous world of highly skilled work. Employee Relations 36(3): 235–253.
Rubery J, Grimshaw D, Keizer A, et al. (2018) Challenges and contradictions in the ‘normalising’ of precarious work. Work, Employment and Society 32(3): 509–527.
Schoukens P, Barrio A, Montebovi S, (2018) The EU social pillar: An answer to the challenge of the social protection of platform workers? European Journal of Social Security 20(3): 219–241.
Semenza R, Pichault F, (2019) The Challenges of Self-Employment in Europe: Status, Social Protection and Collective Representation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Shanahan EA, Jones MD, McBeth MK, (2011) Policy narratives and policy processes. Policy Studies Journal 39(3): 535–561.
Shanahan EA, Jones MD, McBeth MK, (2018) How to conduct a Narrative Policy Framework study. The Social Science Journal 55(3): 332–345.
Silverman D, (2015) Interpreting Qualitative Data. London: Sage.
SME United (2019) Strengthening Crafts and SMEs for the Future of the European Union. Available at: https://smeunited.eu/admin/storage/smeunited/190701-sme2024.pdf (accessed 11 February 2020).
Standing G, (2014) The precariat. Contexts 13(4): 10–12.
Stanford J, (2017) The resurgence of gig work: Historical and theoretical perspectives. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 28(3): 382–401.
Stewart A, Stanford J, (2017) Regulating work in the gig economy: What are the options? The Economic and Labour Relations Review 28(3): 420–437.
Stone D, (2012) Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making, 3rd edn. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Supiot A, (2017) A labour code for the 21st century. Le Monde Diplomatique, October. Available at: www.greeneuropeanjournal.eu/a-labour-code-for-the-21st-century/ (accessed 20 February 2020).
Supiot A, Casas ME, and European Commission (2001) Beyond Employment: Changes in Work and the Future of Labour Law in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thompson P, Jones M, Warhurst C, (2007) From conception to consumption: Creativity and the missing managerial link. Journal of Organizational Behavior 28(5): 625–640.
UEAPME (2018) UEAPME Position: Commission proposal for a Council Recommendation on access to social protection for workers and the self-employed. Available at: https://smeunited.eu/admin/storage/smeunited/180607-ueapme-position-on-access-to-social-protection.pdf (accessed 5 February 2020).
Veneziani B, (2009) The employment relationship. In: Hepple B, Veneziani B, (eds) The Transformation of Labour Law in Europe. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.
WEC (2016) The Future of Work: White Paper from the Employment Industry. Brussels.
Weible CM, Sabatier PA, (eds) (2018) Theories of the Policy Process, 4th edn. New York: Routledge.
Wilthagen T, Tros F, (2004) The concept of ‘flexicurity’: A new approach to regulating employment and labour markets. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 10(2): 166–186.
Wynn M, (2015) Organising freelancers: A hard case or a new opportunity? International Review of Entrepreneurship 13(2): 93–102.
Wynn MT, (2016) Chameleons at large: Entrepreneurs, employees and firms – the changing context of employment relationships. Journal of Management & Organization 22(6): 826–842.