Article (Scientific journals)
Methodology required to show clinical differences between benzodiazepines
ANSSEAU, Marc; Doumont, Adrienne; Diricq, Stéphane
1984In Current Medical Research and Opinion, 8 (s4), p. 108-114
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Methodology required to show clinical differences between benzodiazepines.pdf
Publisher postprint (1.3 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Anxiety; Benzodiazepine Tranquillizers; Clinical Trials; Neuroses; Anti-Anxiety Agents, Benzodiazepine; Anxiety Disorders; Comparative Study; Human
Abstract :
[en] Clinical differences exist between the benzodiazepines but demonstration of such differences requires a more specialized methodology than that normally used in comparative trials. It is recommended that double-blind studies should be carried out in hospitalized patients with severe and chronic anxiety, selected according to precise criteria, and that the trials should be designed as crossover rather than as parallel group studies, with randomization of the stages and flexible dosage. A simple graphic method of representing the clinical profile of individual benzodiazepines is described and it is suggested that this could help clinicians adapt their prescribing to each patient's symptoms. © 1984 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted.
Disciplines :
Treatment & clinical psychology
Author, co-author :
ANSSEAU, Marc ;  Université de Liège - ULg
Doumont, Adrienne ;  Unité de Psychopharmacologie, Hôpital Universitaire de Bavière, Liège, Belgium
Diricq, Stéphane ;  Unité de Psychopharmacologie, Hôpital Universitaire de Bavière, Liège, Belgium
Language :
English
Title :
Methodology required to show clinical differences between benzodiazepines
Publication date :
1984
Journal title :
Current Medical Research and Opinion
ISSN :
0300-7995
eISSN :
1473-4877
Publisher :
Taylor & Francis, United Kingdom
Volume :
8
Issue :
s4
Pages :
108-114
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 07 May 2021

Statistics


Number of views
91 (2 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
136 (2 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
12
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
7
OpenCitations
 
9

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi