Temperature-dependent hysteresis model for soft magnetic materials

Magnetic hysteresis; Material modeling; Soft magnetic materials; Thermal analysis; Ferromagnetic materials; Hysteresis; Hysteresis loops; Magnetization; Parameter estimation; Temperature; Thermoanalysis; Arbitrary excitations; Design/methodology/approach; Hysteresis modeling; Identification method; Magnetization curves; Temperature dependent; Wide temperature ranges

Abstract :

[en] Purpose: To understand the behavior of the magnetization processes in ferromagnetic materials in function of temperature, a temperature-dependent hysteresis model is necessary. This study aims to investigate how temperature can be accounted for in the energy-based hysteresis model, via an appropriate parameter identification and interpolation procedure. Design/methodology/approach: The hysteresis model used for simulating the material response is energy-consistent and relies on thermodynamic principles. The material parameters have been identified by unidirectional alternating measurements, and the model has been tested for both simple and complex excitation waveforms. Measurements and simulations have been performed on a soft ferrite toroidal sample characterized in a wide temperature range. Findings: The analysis shows that the model is able to represent accurately arbitrary excitation waveforms in function of temperature. The identification method used to determine the model parameters has proven its robustness: starting from simple excitation waveforms, the complex ones can be simulated precisely. Research limitations/implications: As parameters vary depending on temperature, a new parameter variation law in function of temperature has been proposed. Practical implications: A complete static hysteresis model able to take the temperature into account is now available. The identification is quite simple and requires very few measurements at different temperatures. Originality/value: The results suggest that it is possible to predict magnetization curves within the measured range, starting from a reduced set of measured data. © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited.

Disciplines :

Electrical & electronics engineering

Author, co-author :

Longhitano, Maria Roberta; Laboratoire Ampère, École Centrale de Lyon, Lyon, France

Sixdenier, Fabien; Laboratoire Ampère, École Centrale de Lyon, Lyon, France, CNRS, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France

Scorretti, Riccardo; Laboratoire Ampère, École Centrale de Lyon, Lyon, France, CNRS, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France

Krähenbühl, Laurent; Laboratoire Ampère, École Centrale de Lyon, Lyon, France, CNRS, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France

Geuzaine, Christophe ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Dép. d'électric., électron. et informat. (Inst.Montefiore) > Applied and Computational Electromagnetics (ACE)

Language :

English

Title :

Temperature-dependent hysteresis model for soft magnetic materials

Publication date :

2019

Journal title :

COMPEL - The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering

ISSN :

0332-1649

Publisher :

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.

Volume :

Issue :

Pages :

1595-1613

Peer reviewed :

Peer reviewed

Funders :

PIT 7706 Traction 2020

Available on ORBi :

since 22 April 2021

Statistics

Number of views

51 (3 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

154 (3 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Adler, E. and Pfeiffer, H. (1974), “The influence of grain size and impurities on the magnetic properties of the soft magnetic alloy 47.5% NiFe”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 172-174.
Benabou, A., Leite, J., Clénet, S., Simão, C. and Sadowski, N. (2008), “Minor loops modelling with a modified Jiles–Atherton model and comparison with the Preisach model”, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Vol. 320 No. 20, pp. e1034-e1038.
Bergqvist, A. (1997), “Magnetic vector hysteresis model with dry friction-like pinning”, Physica B, Vol. 233 No. 4, pp. 342-347.
Bergqvist, A., Lin, D. and Zhou, P. (2014), “Temperature-dependent vector hysteresis model for permanent magnets”, Vol. 50 No. 2, pp. 345-348.
Bergqvist, A., Lundgren, A. and Engdahl, G. (1997), “Experimental testing of an anisotropic vector hysteresis model”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 33 No. 5, pp. 4152-4154.
Cass, C., Wang, Y., Burgos, R., Chow, T.P., Wang, F. and Boroyevich, D. (2007), “Evaluation of SiC JFETs for a three-phase current-source rectifier with high switching frequency”, Twenty Second Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC).
Ferroxcube (2013), “Soft ferrites and Accessories - Data handbook”, available at: https://elnamagnetics.com/wp-content/uploads/catalogs/Ferroxcube/catalog.pdf
François-Lavet, V., Henrotte, F., Stainier, L., Noels, L. and Geuzaine, C. (2011), “Vectorial incremental nonconservative consistent hysteresis model”, ACOMEN.
Henrotte, F., Nicolet, A. and Hameyer, K. (2006), “An energy-based vector hysteresis model for ferromagnetic materials”, COMPEL – The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 71-80.
Henrotte, F., Steentjes, S., Hameyer, K. and Geuzaine, C. (2014), “Iron loss calculation in steel laminations at high frequencies”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 50 No. 2, pp. 333-336.
Jacques, K., Steentjes, S., Henrotte, F., Geuzaine, C. and Hameyer, K. (2018), “Representation of microstructural features and magnetic anisotropy of electrical steels in an energy-based vector hysteresis model”, AIP Advances, Vol. 8 No. 4, p. 047602.
Jiles, D.C. and Atherton, D.L. (1986), “Theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis”, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Vol. 61 Nos 1/2, pp. 48-60.
Landgraf, F.J.G., da Silveira, J.R.F. and Rodrigues, D. Jr, (2011), “Determining the effect of grain size and maximum induction upon coercive field of electrical steels”, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Vol. 323 Nos 18/19, pp. 2335-2339.
Mager, A. (1952), “About the influence of grain size on the coercivity”, Annalen Der Physik, Vol. 446 No. 1, pp. 15-16.
Petrun, M., Steentjes, S., Hameyer, K. and Dolinar, D. (2017), “Comparison of static hysteresis models subject to arbitrary magnetization waveforms”, COMPEL - The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 774-790.
Preisach, F. (1935), “Über die magnetische Nachwirkung”, Zeitschrift für Physik, Vol. 94 Nos 5/6, pp. 277-302.
Preisach, F. (2017), “On the magnetic aftereffect”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 53 No. 3, pp. 1-11.
Raghavender, A., Zadro, K., Pajic, D., Skoko, Z. and Biliškov, N. (2010), “Effect of grain size on the néel temperature of nanocrystalline nickel ferrite”, Materials Letters, Vol. 64 No. 10, pp. 1144-1146.
Raghunathan, A., Melikhov, Y., Snyder, J.E. and Jiles, D.C. (2010), “Theoretical model of temperature dependence of hysteresis based on mean field theory”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 46 No. 6, pp. 1507-1510.
Rayleigh, L. (1887), “XXV. Notes on electricity and magnetism. iii. On the behaviour of iron and steel under the operation of feeble magnetic forces”, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, Vol. 23 No. 142, pp. 225-245.
Sixdenier, F. and Scorretti, R. (2018), “Numerical model of static hysteresis taking into account temperature”, International Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields, Vol. 31 No. 2, p. e2221.
Song, T. and Roshko, R. (2000), “Preisach model for systems of interacting superparamagnetic particles”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 223-230.
Stancu, A. and Spinu, L. (1998), “Temperature- and time-dependent Preisach model for a stoner–wohlfarth particle system”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 34 No. 6, pp. 3867-3875.
Zirka, S.E., Moroz, Y.I., Harrison, R.G. and Chwastek, K. (2012), “On physical aspects of the Jiles-Atherton hysteresis models”, Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 112 No. 4.